[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"badly-decayed-molars\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:badly-decayed-molars":34},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,53],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":20,"enrollmentInfo":21,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":25,"briefSummary":27,"conditions":28,"keywords":36,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":41,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":42,"startDateStruct":45,"completionDateStruct":47,"leadSponsor":49,"locationsCount":52},"100608752","improving-healing-in-children-after-tooth-extraction-using-laser-therapy-or-hyaluronic-acid-100608752",false,"NCT07205640","Improving Healing in Children After Tooth Extraction Using Laser Therapy or Hyaluronic Acid","Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy Versus Hyaluronic Acid on Wound Healing After First Permanent Molar Extraction in Children.","LLLT vs HA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Children aged from six to ten years.\n2. Children of both genders.\n3. Children with badly decayed first permanent molar beyond repair and indicated for extraction.\n4. Parents acceptance to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Medically compromised children.\n2. Uncooperative children.\n3. Children who will not attend the follow up visits",true,"ALL","6 Years","10 Years",{"count":22,"type":23},36,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[26],"NA","Tooth extraction may be an unpleasant and painful experience for children, Post-extraction wound healing. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a widely used adjuvant treatment for wound healing, resulting in both an increase in cell number and an increase in cell metabolism. HA it is an important component of the extracellular matrix and a constituent of the neural, connective, and epithelial tissues.",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"Mesh","Healthy Volunteer","Low Level Laser Therapy","Hyaluronic Acid Gel for Preservation the Extraction Socket","Extraction Socket Healing","Badly Decayed Molars","Tooth Extraction Site Healing",[37,38,39],"hyaluronic acid","low level laser therapy","tooth extraction","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-09-25",{"date":43,"type":44},"2025-10-03","ACTUAL",{"date":46,"type":23},"2025-12-01",{"date":48,"type":23},"2026-12-01",{"name":50,"class":51},"Cairo University","OTHER",1,{"id":54,"slug":55,"hasResults":11,"nctId":56,"briefTitle":57,"officialTitle":58,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":59,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":60,"maxAge":61,"enrollmentInfo":62,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":64,"briefSummary":65,"conditions":66,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":4},"100575613","clinical-evaluation-of-3d-printed-versus-cadcam-milled-onlays-100575613","NCT06774560","Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Versus CAD\u002FCAM Milled Onlays","Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Versus CAD\u002FCAM Milled Onlays Over a Period of One Year: a Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAge: 25-45 years.\n\n* Males or females.\n* Participants with carious vital ower molars indicated for onlay (one or two missing cusps)\n* Patients with at least 20 teeth under occlusion.\n* Good oral hygiene.\n* Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.\n* Have sufficient cognitive ability to understand consent procedures.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participants with parafunctional habits or bruxism.\n* Participants with systemic diseases or disabilities that may affect participation.\n* Heavy smoking.\n* Pregnancy.\n* Lack of compliance.\n* Severe or active periodontal disease.\n* Cognitive impairment.","25 Years","45 Years",{"count":63,"type":23},50,[26],"The digital workflow in dentistry has proven in the past decades to be a time-efficient, multifunctional, effortless, and accessible approach. The inherited shortages milling machines represented by the incapability to produce accurate complex hollow structures may give preference to modern 3D ceramic printing.\n\nComputer-aided-design\u002Fcomputer-aided-manufacturing (CAD\u002FCAM) in dentistry is a digital subtractive approach for manufacturing indirect restorations. Nevertheless, waste materials and milling burs wearing are considered as key disadvantages of CAD\u002FCAM technology, and are the main drive to improve 3D printing technology (additive manufacturing) as the latter has shown considerable efficiency in minimising wasted materials.\n\nAlthough additive manufacturing has been known since the 1980s, its application in dentistry is relatively new and not fully studied with limited research and in vivo studies on their clinical performance.",[34],"2025-01-12",{"date":69,"type":44},"2025-01-14",{"date":71,"type":23},"2025-06-01",{"date":48,"type":23},{"name":50,"class":51}]