[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"balance-impairment\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:balance-impairment":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,11,0,[8,45,77,132,163,193,217,249,279,304,336],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100637553","comparative-effects-of-perturbation-based-balance-training-on-firm-surface-and-rolling-board-for-diabetic-neuropathy-patients-100637553",false,"NCT07598513","Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Firm Surface and Rolling Board for Diabetic Neuropathy Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) (Bolen et al., 2016).\n* Participants with a diabetes duration of more than 10 years (Grewal et al., 2015).\n* Participants exhibiting signs and symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (such as numbness, tingling, burning, shooting or electric shock-like pain, and glove-and-stocking distribution), confirmed using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument with scores of 6-8 (patient version) and 2.5-4 (physical assessment) (Haque et al., 2022).\n* Participants aged between 40 and 75 years (Rasool et al., 2024).\n* Both male and female participants will be eligible for inclusion (Haleem et al., 2024).\n* Participants currently using insulin-sensitizing medications (e.g., metformin, Diamicron, insulin).\n* Participants who are able to stand and walk independently (Allin et al., 2020).\n* Participants with a Berg Balance Scale score ranging from 25 to 40 (Phyu et al., 2022).\n* Participants willing to provide informed consent (Lepesis et al., 2023).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) will be excluded (Daud et al., 2021).\n* Those with cognitive deficits (such as dementia or Alzheimer's disease) that may interfere with comprehension or compliance with study procedures will not be included (Hatton et al., 2019).\n* Individuals presenting with foot drop or other neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, myelopathy, or cerebellar ataxia) that could affect the study findings will be excluded (Khurshid et al., 2025).\n* Patients who have recently undergone surgery, sustained trauma to the feet or lower limbs, or have any foot amputation will not be eligible (Collings et al., 2023).\n* Individuals diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis or orthostatic hypotension will be excluded (Khurshid et al., 2025).\n* Patients with active diabetic foot ulcers or notable musculoskeletal deformities (such as scoliosis or degenerative joint disease) will be excluded (Lepesis et al., 2023).\n* Individuals with neuropathy unrelated to diabetes, including cases associated with alcohol use or Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, will not be included.\n* Participants taking medications that may provoke vertigo or disturb balance (for example, aspirin) will be excluded.","ALL","40 Years","75 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},42,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","The present study is designed to compare the effectiveness of perturbation-based balance training performed on two different surfaces, stable (firm surface) and unstable (rolling board), for enhancing static, dynamic, and reactive balance in individuals diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy. This randomized clinical trial will recruit a total of 42 participants, with the sample size calculated using Epi Tool software. A consecutive sampling technique will be implemented. Eligible participants who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into two equal groups (n = 21 each) through an online randomization method. Participants in Group A will undergo perturbation-based balance exercises on a stable surface, whereas participants in Group B will receive similar training on a rolling board to introduce surface instability. In addition to the primary intervention, both groups will receive contrast bath therapy as a standard baseline treatment. Written as well as verbal informed consent will be obtained prior to participation. The intervention protocol will span four weeks, consisting of three sessions per week on alternate days, resulting in a total of twelve treatment sessions. The primary outcomes will focus on balance performance and fall risk. These outcomes will be measured using the Berg Balance Scale, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Screening for diabetic neuropathy will be carried out using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 23.",[26,27],"Balance Impairment","Diabetic Neuropathy",[27,29,30,31,32],"Balance","Perturbation-Based Balance Training","Mini-BESTest","Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-13",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-05-20","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":20},{"date":40,"type":20},"2026-09-20",{"name":42,"class":43},"University of Faisalabad","OTHER",1,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":52,"maxAge":53,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":56,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":44},"100629226","robot-assisted-gait-training-vs-visual-feedback-balance-training-in-stroke-100629226","NCT07471919","Robot-Assisted Gait Training vs Visual Feedback Balance Training in Stroke","Comparison of Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Visual Feedback Balance Training on Balance and Gait Outcomes in Patients With Stroke","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 21-85 years\n* Diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by clinical and radiological findings\n* Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) ≥ 3\n* Modified Ashworth Scale ≤ 2 (lower extremity)\n* Ability to understand and follow simple verbal instructions\n* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 23\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unstable cardiopulmonary conditions\n* Severe musculoskeletal disorders affecting standing or walking\n* Severe aphasia preventing participation in assessments\n* Severe visual impairment interfering with balance testing","21 Years","85 Years",{"count":55,"type":20},60,[23],"Stroke frequently leads to balance impairment and gait dysfunction, increasing fall risk and limiting functional independence. Technology-assisted rehabilitation approaches such as robot-assisted gait training and visual feedback balance training have been shown to improve balance and mobility in stroke patients.\n\nThis randomized, assessor-blinded clinical trial aims to compare the effects of robot-assisted gait training and visual feedback balance training on balance and gait outcomes in patients with subacute and chronic stroke. Both interventions are part of routine clinical rehabilitation practice. Participants will be evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention using clinical balance, gait, and functional assessments.",[59,60,26],"Stroke","Gait Impairment",[62,63,64,65,66],"Stroke rehabilitation","Robot-assisted gait training","Visual feedback balance training","Balance impairment","Gait impairment","RECRUITING","2026-03-16",{"date":70,"type":37},"2026-03-18",{"date":72,"type":37},"2026-03-15",{"date":74,"type":20},"2026-08-15",{"name":76,"class":43},"Abant Izzet Baysal University",{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":84,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":87,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":99,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":124,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":125,"startDateStruct":127,"completionDateStruct":129,"leadSponsor":130,"locationsCount":44},"100612195","development-and-efficacy-of-a-novel-cost-effective-gait-training-device-utilized-at-home-for-stroke-survivors-100612195","NCT07250425","Development and Efficacy of a Novel, Cost-Effective Gait Training Device Utilized at Home for Stroke Survivors","Development of a Novel, Cost-Effective Gait Training Device Utilized at Home for the Neurological Patient Population","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years.\n* First-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by medical record.\n* 3 months to 5 years post-stroke at time of enrollment.\n* Presence of lower-extremity motor impairment limiting walking function.\n* Able to stand for at least 30 minutes with no more than minimal assistance (with or without a device).\n* Medically stable and cleared by a physician to participate in moderate-intensity ambulation exercise.\n* Living in a home environment that can safely accommodate device installation (e.g., adequate space, appropriate flooring, and power access) as determined by the study team.\n* Able to understand study procedures and provide informed consent (or have a legally authorized representative), with sufficient cognitive and communication skills to follow simple instructions.\n* If assistance is required for transfers or device set-up, availability of a caregiver or assistant willing to participate in training and device use.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, or other medical conditions that contraindicate moderate- to high-intensity walking exercise (e.g., unstable angina, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmias).\n* Severe musculoskeletal or orthopedic conditions limiting safe participation in supported stepping (e.g., unstable fractures, severe contractures preventing positioning in the device).\n* Severe spasticity or movement disorders that would preclude safe use of the device, based on investigator judgment.\n* Severe cognitive impairment, aphasia, or behavioral disturbance that would prevent informed consent or safe participation.\n* Progressive neurological conditions (e.g., progressive neurodegenerative disease) expected to significantly worsen over the 12-week study period.\n* Current participation in another interventional trial targeting gait or lower-extremity function.\n* Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, would make participation unsafe or interfere with study adherence or outcome interpretation.","18 Years",{"count":86,"type":20},20,[23],"This pilot, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will evaluate the feasibility, safety, usability, and preliminary efficacy of the Rise\\&Walk InHome (RWH), a novel robotic gait training device designed for home use after stroke. Twenty adults with lower-extremity motor impairment following a first-ever stroke (3 months to 5 years post-event) will be randomized 1:1 to either (1) RWH-assisted home walking plus usual care or (2) usual care alone for 12 weeks. Participants in the intervention group will receive an in-home RWH device, complete a structured device training program, and be instructed to perform 30-minute RWH walking sessions four times per week (48 sessions total). All participants will undergo standardized outcome assessments at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12, including the 6-Minute Walk Test (primary outcome), 10-Meter Walk Test, daily step count via wearable activity tracker, and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Additional feasibility and usability outcomes include device use and adherence, patient satisfaction and motivation, ease of use, perceived exertion, and adverse events. Findings will inform the feasibility of in-home deployment of the RWH device and provide preliminary effect-size estimates to guide the design of a larger efficacy trial.",[59,90,91,92,93,94,95,26,96,97,98],"Neurological Diseases or Conditions","Hemiparesis;Poststroke\u002FCVA","Gait Disorders, Neurologic","Post Stroke Fatigue","Motor Recovery","Walking Difficulty","Falls Prevention","Hemiparesis","Mobility Limitation",[100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123],"in-home rehabilitation","Robotic-Assisted Gait Training","gait training device","stroke recovery","functional mobility","rehabilitation technology","remote monitoring","rehabilitation robotics","Fitbit Step Tracking","Self-Directed Gait Training","high-intensity gait training","Neurorehabilitation Research","Lower Limb Rehabilitation","Motor Function Recovery","Physical Therapy","Walking Endurance","task specific walking practice","neurological recovery","stroke rehabilitation","home exercise program","Rise&Walk InHome","daily step count","6-minute walk test","10-meter walk test","2026-03-06",{"date":126,"type":37},"2026-03-09",{"date":128,"type":20},"2026-08",{"date":128,"type":20},{"name":131,"class":43},"Healing Innovations",{"id":133,"slug":134,"hasResults":11,"nctId":135,"briefTitle":136,"officialTitle":137,"acronym":138,"eligibilityCriteria":139,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":140,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":142,"briefSummary":143,"conditions":144,"keywords":147,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":154,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":155,"startDateStruct":157,"completionDateStruct":159,"leadSponsor":161,"locationsCount":44},"100602564","effect-of-task-specific-training-with-and-without-biofeedback-on-balance-and-risk-of-falls-in-chronic-ischemic-stroke-patients-of-central-lahore-pakistan-100602564","NCT07125157","Effect Of Task-Specific Training With And Without Biofeedback On Balance And Risk Of Falls In Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients Of Central Lahore, Pakistan","Effect Of Task-Specific Training With And Without Biofeedback On Balance And Risk Of Falls In Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients Of Central Lahore, Pakistan, A Randomized Controlled Trial","TST-BIO-STROKE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nChronic ischemic stroke patients (more than 3 months after stroke) Both Male and Female Patients Patients of 40 or above years of age Patients with Burnstorm stage 3 or above.) Patients with good cognitive function (score of 20 or more on MMSE) Patients who can ambulate 10 m (with or without the assistive device)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients undergoing concurrent therapy or treatment that could influence the effectiveness of this study will be excluded from participation Patients presenting with contraindications to rehabilitation, such as severe uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, or unstable angina, will be excluded from the study.\n\nIndividuals with prior neurological impairments apart from stroke.",{"count":141,"type":20},66,[23],"This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of task-specific training with and without biofeedback compared to conventional physical therapy on balance and fall risk in chronic ischemic stroke patients in Lahore, Pakistan. Sixty-six participants will be randomly allocated into three groups: Group 1 (task-specific training with biofeedback), Group 2 (task-specific training without biofeedback), and Group 3 (conventional physical therapy). The intervention will span 12 weeks, consisting of 36 sessions. Key outcome measures include the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, and the Barthel Index. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up. The study hypothesizes that the use of biofeedback in task-specific training will produce significantly greater improvements in balance and reduced fall risk compared to conventional rehabilitation strategies. The study is being conducted at Shadman Medical Center in Lahore and is part of a PhD project from Lincoln University College.",[145,26,146],"Chronic Ischemic Stroke","Risk of Fall",[118,148,149,150,151,152,153],"biofeedback","task specific training","balance training","fall prevention","berg balance scale","time up and go","2026-02-17",{"date":156,"type":37},"2026-02-19",{"date":158,"type":20},"2026-02-10",{"date":160,"type":20},"2026-03-12",{"name":162,"class":43},"Syed Ali Behram Subazwari",{"id":164,"slug":165,"hasResults":11,"nctId":166,"briefTitle":167,"officialTitle":168,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":169,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":84,"maxAge":53,"enrollmentInfo":170,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":172,"briefSummary":173,"conditions":174,"keywords":178,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":184,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":185,"startDateStruct":187,"completionDateStruct":189,"leadSponsor":191,"locationsCount":44},"100617770","effects-of-exercise-with-visual-feedback-in-parkinsons-disease-100617770","NCT07322939","Effects of Exercise With Visual Feedback in Parkinson's Disease","Effects of Visual Indicator Exercises for the Trunk and Lower Extremities on Activity and Participation in Parkinson's Disease","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* Individuals diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease\n* Disease severity classified as stage 1 to 3 according to the Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale\n* Patients receiving oral antiparkinsonian treatment only\n\nExclusion Critera\n\n* Presence of musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or vestibular disorders that may interfere with the completion of the assessments or treatment protocol\n* Presence of additional neurological or psychiatric disorders other than Parkinson's disease\n* Presence of visual impairment insufficient to perceive visual feedback",{"count":171,"type":20},32,[23],"Patients with Parkinson's disease who apply to the Hasan Kalyoncu University Application and Research Center and meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the study. The included participants will be randomly assigned into either the intervention group or the control group using a sealed-envelope method. Both groups will undergo a standard exercise program, consisting of posture, strengthening, and balance training, under the supervision of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks, 3 days per week. In addition to this, the intervention group will receive an additional exercise program incorporating visual feedback using a laser pointer, targeting the trunk and lower extremities, also under the supervision of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks, 3 days per week.",[175,26,176,177],"Parkinson Disease","Exercise Training","Postural Control",[179,180,181,182,183],"parkinson disease","balance","postural control","visual feedback","exercise","2026-01-24",{"date":186,"type":37},"2026-01-27",{"date":188,"type":37},"2025-12-01",{"date":190,"type":20},"2026-05-05",{"name":192,"class":43},"Hasan Kalyoncu University",{"id":194,"slug":195,"hasResults":11,"nctId":196,"briefTitle":197,"officialTitle":198,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":199,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":84,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":200,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":202,"briefSummary":203,"conditions":204,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":208,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":209,"startDateStruct":211,"completionDateStruct":213,"leadSponsor":215,"locationsCount":4},"100621035","pelvic-restricted-vs-pelvic-free-robot-assisted-gait-training-in-stroke-patients-100621035","NCT07365384","Pelvic-Restricted vs. Pelvic-Free Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Stroke Patients","Comparison of Pelvic-Free and Pelvic-Restricted Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Walking Pattern, Balance, and Fear of Falling After Stroke","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* History of stroke more than 6 months prior\n* Presence of hemiplegia-related gait disorder\n* Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score ≥ 2\n* Ability to walk independently prior to stroke\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe cognitive or communication impairment\n* Movement limitations due to joint contracture or deformity\n* Presence of open wounds or pressure ulcers\n* Uncontrolled hypertension or orthostatic hypotension\n* Severe cardiovascular disease, heart failure, cancer, or serious pulmonary disease\n* High risk of fracture due to severe osteoporosis\n* Gait impairment caused by lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders\n* Severe psychosis\u002Fneurosis\n* Modified Ashworth Scale \\> 3 in the lower extremities (severe spasticity)",{"count":201,"type":20},36,[23],"This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of pelvic-free versus pelvic-restricted robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on gait pattern, balance, and fear of falling in stroke patients. Stroke survivors often experience gait impairments, reduced balance, and fear of falling, which limit independence and quality of life. Conventional physiotherapy requires high intensity and repetition but is restricted by therapist capacity. Robotic gait systems provide intensive, repetitive, and safe training; however, most limit pelvic motion, potentially disrupting natural gait patterns and balance strategies.\n\nA total of 36 participants with chronic stroke (≥6 months post-stroke, age ≥18 years, hemiplegic gait disorder, Functional Ambulation Category ≥2) will be randomized into two groups: (1) pelvic-free RAGT plus conventional rehabilitation, or (2) pelvic-restricted RAGT plus conventional rehabilitation. Interventions will consist of 8 RAGT sessions (twice weekly) and 20 conventional rehabilitation sessions (five times weekly) over 4 weeks.\n\nPrimary outcomes include gait analysis parameters (gait speed, step length, cadence, temporal symmetry index) and clinical measures such as the Berg Balance Scale, Functional Ambulation Category, Motricity Index (lower limb), and Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Assessments will be performed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.\n\nThe study hypothesizes that pelvic-free RAGT will improve gait symmetry, balance, and reduce fear of falling more effectively than pelvic-restricted training. Results are expected to provide evidence supporting the integration of pelvic-free robotic gait systems into post-stroke rehabilitation to enhance functional recovery and patient confidence",[59,205,206,26,207],"Hemiplegia","Gait Disorder, Sensorimotor","Fear of Falling","2026-01-23",{"date":210,"type":37},"2026-01-26",{"date":212,"type":20},"2026-01-15",{"date":214,"type":20},"2026-04",{"name":216,"class":43},"Meltem Gunes Akinci",{"id":218,"slug":219,"hasResults":11,"nctId":220,"briefTitle":221,"officialTitle":221,"acronym":222,"eligibilityCriteria":223,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":84,"maxAge":224,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":227,"briefSummary":228,"conditions":229,"keywords":232,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":239,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":240,"startDateStruct":242,"completionDateStruct":244,"leadSponsor":246,"locationsCount":248},"100545420","wearable-technology-to-characterize-and-treat-mtbi-subtypes-biofeedback-based-precision-rehabilitation-100545420","NCT06381674","Wearable Technology to Characterize and Treat mTBI Subtypes: Biofeedback-Based Precision Rehabilitation","SuBTyPE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* For all Aims, participants may be either civilians, active duty military, or Veterans, and must:\n\n  1. have a diagnosis of mTBI based on VA\u002FDoD criteria\n  2. be between 18-60 years old,\n  3. be able to stand unassisted for 10 minutes at a time\n  4. be outside of the acute stage (\\> 2 weeks post-concussion) but within 6 months of their most recent mTBI and still reporting symptoms\n  5. have at least some measurable deficit in Vestibular\u002FOcular categories based on Concussion Profile Screen\n  6. have sufficient vision (corrected or uncorrected) for unassisted reading and performance of everyday personal tasks and independent community ambulation\n  7. have adequate hearing (without amplification) adequate for engaging in close-range personal or telephone conversation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participants must not:\n\n  1. have had or currently have any other injury, medical, or neurological illness that could potentially explain balance or vision deficits (e.g., CNS disease, stroke, epilepsy, greater than mild TBI, Meniere's, bilateral vestibular loss, recent lower extremity or spine orthopedic injury that impairs mobility) this includes unresolved symptoms from previous concussions\n  2. meet criteria for moderate to severe substance-use disorder within the past month, as defined by DSM-V\n  3. display behavior that would significantly interfere with the validity of data collection or safety during the study\n  4. be in significant pain during the evaluation (\\> 7\u002F10 by patient subjective report)\n  5. be a pregnant female (balance considerations)\n  6. been hospitalized for any brain injuries (separate from the emergency department)\n  7. have significant joint pain or recent musculoskeletal injury that limits walking or mobility\n  8. have had any major surgeries in the past year or amputation\n  9. use an assistive device\n  10. unable to stand barefoot\n  11. currently receiving rehabilitation services for their mTBI or injuries related to their concussion (if rehabilitation has been completed more than 1 month ago participants may still be included).","60 Years",{"count":226,"type":20},100,[23],"Current clinical assessment tools are often not sensitive enough to detect and treat some subtle (yet troubling) problems after mTBI. In this study, the investigators will use wearable sensors to both assess and treat people with mTBI. Specifically, the investigators will provide immediate feedback, with visual and\u002For auditory, on movement quality during physical therapy. This immediate feedback on performance may improve outcomes as the investigators will measure multiple body segments including head movements simultaneously with balance and walking exercises. Such complex movements are needed for safe return to high level activity and military duty. The investigators will test this approach against a standard vestibular rehabilitation program. There are few potential risks to this study such as increasing symptoms and a small fall risk. Benefits include physical therapy for balance problems regardless of therapy with or without biofeedback. An indirect benefit is to have data on correct dosage of physical therapy. The investigators will also distinguish which concussion subtype profiles benefit most from physical therapy. This will help healthcare providers and patients by providing more information to help establish clinical guidelines and new tools for physical therapy.",[230,231,26],"Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion","Rehabilitation",[233,234,235,236,180,237,148,238],"mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)","concussion","vestibular","ocular","rehabilitation","wearable sensors","2025-10-10",{"date":241,"type":37},"2025-10-14",{"date":243,"type":37},"2024-06-13",{"date":245,"type":20},"2028-09-30",{"name":247,"class":43},"Oregon Health and Science University",3,{"id":250,"slug":251,"hasResults":11,"nctId":252,"briefTitle":253,"officialTitle":254,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":255,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":84,"maxAge":224,"enrollmentInfo":256,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":258,"phases":4,"briefSummary":259,"conditions":260,"keywords":265,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":270,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":271,"startDateStruct":273,"completionDateStruct":275,"leadSponsor":277,"locationsCount":44},"100595497","vestibular-function-in-obesity-100595497","NCT07033221","Vestibular Function in Obesity","Evaluation of the Effect of Bariatric Surgery on the Vestibular System in Obese Patients.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. The native language must be Turkish\n2. The participant must be between the ages of 18-60\n3. The participant must be suitable for bariatric surgery (BMI ≥40 kg\u002Fm2)\n4. Not have any previous vestibular diagnosis\n5. Not have any problems such as joints, muscles, or walking\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nIndividuals with additional disabilities, neurological problems, vestibulopathy, joint, muscle or walking disorders will not be included in the study.",{"count":257,"type":20},30,"OBSERVATIONAL","Previous studies have demonstrated that obesity negatively affects the human vestibular system. However, whether improvement in vestibular function occurs following the resolution of obesity remains an area requiring further investigation. Therefore, the investigators aimed to assess and analyze vestibular system functions in patients scheduled for bariatric surgery, both before the surgery, after the surgery, and following significant weight loss.\n\nParticipants aged between 18 and 60 years who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Initially, participants will undergo medical history assessment and Body Mass Index (BMI) measurement. The enrolled participants will be evaluated using the following tests at three different time points-preoperatively, at the 1st month postoperatively, and at the 6th month postoperatively: Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), static posturography test, Berg Balance Scale, SF-12 Quality of Life Scale, and the Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale.\n\nAlthough obesity has been shown to be associated with impaired postural balance, studies evaluating the direct effect of BMI on postural sway are limited. The aim of our study is to assess the vestibular system in obese patients before and after bariatric surgery. Through this, the investigators hope to contribute to the literature by providing balance assessments in individuals with obesity",[261,262,263,26,264],"Obesity","Vestibular Function Disorder","Balance Assessment","Sleeve Gastrectomy",[266,267,268,269],"sleeve gastrectomy","balance in obese patients","vestibular function after sleeve gastrectomy","vestibulopathy in and obesity","2025-06-13",{"date":272,"type":37},"2025-06-24",{"date":274,"type":37},"2025-04-05",{"date":276,"type":20},"2026-06-01",{"name":278,"class":43},"Istanbul Aydın University",{"id":280,"slug":281,"hasResults":11,"nctId":282,"briefTitle":283,"officialTitle":284,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":285,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":84,"maxAge":286,"enrollmentInfo":287,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":289,"briefSummary":290,"conditions":291,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":295,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":296,"startDateStruct":298,"completionDateStruct":300,"leadSponsor":302,"locationsCount":44},"100582285","effects-of-short-foot-exercise-on-knee-pain-muscle-tone-balance-and-quality-of-life-in-flexible-flatfoot-patients-100582285","NCT06861322","Effects of Short Foot Exercise on Knee Pain, Muscle Tone, Balance, and Quality of Life in Flexible Flatfoot Patients","The Effects of Short Foot Exercises on Knee Muscle Tone, Knee Pain and Function, Balance, and Quality of Life in Patients with Flexible Flat Foot with Knee Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* BMI (Body Mass Index): If between 18 and 25 kg\u002Fm²\n* Litigation period: If knee pain lasted for more than 6 weeks\n* Navicular drop test: If it was 10 mm or more\n* Numerical assessment scale: If knee pain was 4 or more\n* Health status: If you are a person without health problems and are trying to participate in the experiment\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of knee surgery: If you have had knee surgery\n* Treatment history: If you have received physical therapy for knee pain in the 4 weeks before the start of the study\n* Mental status: If you have a psychological disorder that may interfere with your participation in the study\n* Injury status: If you have a current serious injury affecting the lower extremity joints and foot\n* Lower extremity alignment abnormalities and specific conditions: If you have structural flat foot, scoliosis\n* Diseases and other conditions: If you have diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, or menopause\n* Neurological disorders: If you have experienced a neurological disorder within the past 6 months","65 Years",{"count":288,"type":20},44,[23],"This study was a clinical trial to investigate the effects of Short Foot Exercise (SFE) and standard physical therapy on knee muscle tone, knee pain and function, balance ability, and quality of life in adults with flexible flat feet and knee pain.",[292,293,26,294],"Flexible Flatfoot","Knee Pain","Quality of Life (QOL)","2025-02-28",{"date":297,"type":37},"2025-03-06",{"date":299,"type":20},"2025-03-02",{"date":301,"type":20},"2025-06-30",{"name":303,"class":43},"Sahmyook University",{"id":305,"slug":306,"hasResults":11,"nctId":307,"briefTitle":308,"officialTitle":308,"acronym":309,"eligibilityCriteria":310,"healthyVolunteers":311,"sex":312,"minAge":224,"maxAge":313,"enrollmentInfo":314,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":316,"briefSummary":317,"conditions":318,"keywords":321,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":327,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":328,"startDateStruct":330,"completionDateStruct":332,"leadSponsor":334,"locationsCount":44},"100580572","effects-of-a-multidisciplinary-intervention-on-fall-risk-and-urinary-incontinence-in-older-women-100580572","NCT06839040","Effects of a Multidisciplinary Intervention on Fall Risk and Urinary Incontinence in Older Women","FIRE-WOMEN","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Woman, aged between 60 and 80 years.\n* Not having done physical exercise in the last 3 months.\n* Present UI (SUI, UUI or MUI) after clinical diagnosis.\n* Score greater than 90 on the Barthel Scale.\n* Not present pathologies or functional alterations that limit the practice of physical exercise.\n* Not present severe cognitive alterations or mild cognitive deficit (Global Deterioration Scale less than or equal to 2 or Mini Mental State Examination greater than or equal to 25 points).\n* Maintain walking without support products.\n* Carry out 80% of the total sessions\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Intake of medication that could affect the performance of the exercise or alter the variables studied.\n* Present grade II-IV uterine prolapses.\n* Clinical disease or syndrome (chronic or acute cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory or musculoskeletal disorders) that may interfere with the performance of the intervention and evaluation.\n* Present visual and\u002For auditory alterations that make it difficult to carry out the intervention and evaluation.",true,"FEMALE","80 Years",{"count":315,"type":20},120,[23],"This will be a quantitative, quasi-experimental, and longitudinal study spanning 18 weeks of intervention, followed by a 24-week follow-up, scheduled to begin in January 2025.\n\nThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary intervention comprising physiotherapy, physical exercise, and psychoeducation on fall risk and urinary incontinence in non-institutionalized older adult women aged 60 to 80 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups:\n\n1. A multicomponent exercise group with verbal instructions for pelvic floor exercises.\n2. A multicomponent exercise group with verbal instructions for pelvic floor exercises and psychoeducation.\n3. A multicomponent exercise group without verbal instructions for pelvic floor exercises.\n4. A control group.\n\nMulticomponent exercise sessions will be conducted twice a week, while the psychoeducation group will participate in five group therapy sessions throughout the program. The variables to be analyzed include balance, strength, power, pelvic floor function, quality of life, and self-esteem.",[319,320,26],"Urinary Incontinence","Frailty",[322,323,180,324,325,326],"older women","pelvic floor","multicomponent exercise","urinary incontinence","phsychoeducation","2025-02-16",{"date":329,"type":37},"2025-02-21",{"date":331,"type":37},"2025-02-03",{"date":333,"type":20},"2025-12-28",{"name":335,"class":43},"Fundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir",{"id":337,"slug":338,"hasResults":11,"nctId":339,"briefTitle":340,"officialTitle":341,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":342,"healthyVolunteers":311,"sex":15,"minAge":84,"maxAge":343,"enrollmentInfo":344,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":346,"briefSummary":347,"conditions":348,"keywords":350,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":354,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":355,"startDateStruct":357,"completionDateStruct":359,"leadSponsor":361,"locationsCount":4},"100570504","examining-the-feasibility-of-an-outdoor-therapeutic-horse-carriage-as-a-perturbation--based-balance-training-100570504","NCT06708104","Examining the Feasibility of an Outdoor Therapeutic Horse Carriage As a Perturbation -based Balance Training","Examining the Feasibility of an Outdoor Therapeutic Horse Carriage As a Perturbation -based Balance Training.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Healthy young participants\n* Adults aged 18-45 years\n* Measuring between150-190 cm in stature, with a mass of less than 100 kg\n* No neurological or vestibular or orthopedic mobility impairing conditions, and with no current musculoskeletal injury.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* blindness or serious vestibular impairments (Meniere's disease, dizziness)\n* an inability to ambulate independently\n* symptomatic severe cardiovascular disease\n* neurological disorders such as stroke, Parkinson's, or Multiple sclerosis\n* orthopedic acute disorders requiring total hip or knee replacement\n* severe rheumatoid arthritis; and\u002For (g) cancer (metastatic or under active treatment).","45 Years",{"count":345,"type":20},15,[23],"The proposed study is a prospective experimental single-arm pre-post study aiming to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of an outdoor therapeutic horse carriage, i.e., the Equine Dynamic Balance (EDB), as a form of reactive balance training. First, the investigators will describe the mechanical parameters of perturbations generated by the EDB's standing platform, including displacement, velocity and acceleration. Second, the investigators will assess the effect of EDB training on balance. Independent healthy young adults who do not suffer from balance impairments willing to participate in the study will be tested before and after EDB training, that will be delivered by standing on a dynamic therapeutic horse carriage pulled by a horse, to explore whether there are differences in balance control and balance reactions as a result of a 2-week EDB intervention program.",[26,349],"Accidental Fall",[351,352,353],"Reactive balance","Perturbation training","Animal-assisted therapy","2024-11-24",{"date":356,"type":37},"2024-11-27",{"date":358,"type":20},"2024-12",{"date":360,"type":20},"2025-08",{"name":362,"class":43},"Loewenstein Hospital"]