[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"balance-performance\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:balance-performance":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,39],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":27,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":28,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":29,"startDateStruct":32,"completionDateStruct":34,"leadSponsor":36,"locationsCount":4},"100637878","immediate-effects-of-visual-and-auditory-feedback-modalities-on-dynamic-balance-100637878",false,"NCT07594405","Immediate Effects of Visual and Auditory Feedback Modalities on Dynamic Balance","Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Different Visual and\u002For Auditory Feedback Modalities on Dynamic Balance: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged between 18 and 25 years\n* Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (glasses or contact lenses allowed)\n* No musculoskeletal disorders of the lower limbs\n* No neurological disorders\n* No history of prior surgery involving the spine or lower limbs\n* No ear infections\n* No vestibular, oculomotor, or balance disorders\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Onset of dizziness or balance disturbances during the experiment\n* Occurrence of a musculoskeletal injury during the experimental protocol preventing continuation of testing or sessions\n* Use of medications affecting postural control during the study period\n* Alcohol consumption within 12 hours prior to an assessment or training session\n* Non-compliance with the protocol or repeated absence from scheduled sessions",true,"ALL",{"count":19,"type":20},80,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the immediate effects of visual, auditory, and combined feedback modalities on dynamic balance in healthy young adults. It also aims to explore whether auditory stimulation (Mozart music) can influence postural control and whether combining visual and auditory feedback provides additional benefits.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does visual feedback (mirror) improve dynamic balance performance measured by the SEBT?\n* Does auditory feedback (Mozart music) improve dynamic balance performance?\n* Does combined visual and auditory feedback lead to greater improvements compared to single modalities?\n\nResearchers will compare three feedback conditions: visual feedback using a mirror, auditory feedback using Mozart music, and a combined visual-auditory condition.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Be 60 healthy young adults aged 18-25 years\n* Be randomly assigned to one of three groups (visual, auditory, combined)\n* Perform the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in 8 directions\n* Perform the test with and without feedback modalities\n* Have their reach distances recorded and normalized according to their height",[26],"Balance Performance","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-16",{"date":30,"type":31},"2026-05-20","ACTUAL",{"date":33,"type":20},"2026-06-01",{"date":35,"type":20},"2026-07",{"name":37,"class":38},"St Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon","OTHER",{"id":40,"slug":41,"hasResults":11,"nctId":42,"briefTitle":43,"officialTitle":44,"acronym":45,"eligibilityCriteria":46,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":47,"maxAge":48,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":51,"briefSummary":52,"conditions":53,"keywords":58,"overallStatus":27,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":67,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":4},"100624021","comparative-effects-of-kinesio-and-dynamic-taping-on-ankle-performance-in-basketball-players-100624021","NCT07404215","Comparative Effects of Kinesio and Dynamic Taping on Ankle Performance in Basketball Players","Comparison of the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Dynamic Taping Applied to the Ankle on Vertical Jump, Balance, and Reaction Time in Basketball Players","KT-DT-BB","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male professional basketball players aged between 18 and 30 years\n* Actively training and competing with a professional basketball team\n* No history of lower extremity surgery within the past 6 months\n* No acute lower extremity injury at the time of assessment\n* Ability to perform single-leg jumping, balance, and reaction time tests\n* Willingness to participate in the study and provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of any acute musculoskeletal injury affecting the lower extremity\n* History of ankle fracture, ligament rupture, or surgery within the past 6 months\n* Neurological, vestibular, or systemic conditions affecting balance or motor performance\n* Known allergy or skin reaction to adhesive taping materials\n* Use of ankle bracing or taping within 48 hours prior to testing\n* Inability to complete the assessment procedures","18 Years","30 Years",{"count":50,"type":20},20,[23],"This study aims to compare the effects of two different ankle taping methods-kinesio taping and dynamic taping-on balance, vertical jump performance, and reaction time in basketball players.\n\nBasketball involves frequent jumping, rapid changes in direction, and single-leg balance tasks that place substantial demands on ankle stability. Reduced ankle stability may negatively affect athletic performance and increase injury risk. Taping methods are commonly used in sports settings to support the ankle joint and enhance functional performance; however, limited comparative evidence exists in basketball players.\n\nIn this non-randomized, fixed-sequence crossover study, healthy male basketball players aged 18 to 30 years will receive both kinesio taping and dynamic taping applications separated by a one-week interval. Kinesio taping will be applied during the first session and dynamic taping during the second session. Each participant will serve as their own control. Performance assessments will be conducted immediately before and after each taping application.\n\nOutcome measures include dynamic balance assessed using the Y-Balance Test, vertical jump performance assessed using a mobile application-based jump test, and lower extremity visuomotor reaction time assessed using a visual stimulus-response task.\n\nAll procedures are non-invasive and associated with minimal risk. The findings are expected to contribute to evidence-based taping strategies aimed at improving athletic performance and supporting ankle function in basketball players.",[54,26,55,56,57],"Ankle Stability","Vertical Jump Performance","Reaction Time","Basketball Players",[59,60,61,62,63],"basketball","postural balance","ankle","reaction time","athletic tape","2026-02-15",{"date":66,"type":31},"2026-02-18",{"date":64,"type":20},{"date":69,"type":20},"2026-03-15",{"name":71,"class":38},"Atlas University"]