[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"bifurcation-coronary-disease\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:bifurcation-coronary-disease":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,41],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":40},"100590807","restrospective-analysis-of-mace-in-patients-treated-with-drug-elluting-balloons-100590807",false,"NCT06972225","Restrospective Analysis of MACE in Patients Treated With Drug-elluting Balloons.","Follow-up of MACE in Patients Treated With Drug-eluting Balloons Between 2010 and 2025; a Retrospective Study With Prospective Follow-up From an Institutional Database: EASY-drug-eluting Balloons","EASY-DEB","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults (\\>=18 years of age)\n* Who underwent a coronary angioplasty with drug-eluting balloon between January 2010 and December 2025\n* Identified in the institutional procedure database\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Incomplete or non-available data on the post-procedural clinical follow-up\n* Procedures where other devices were used in combination with drug-eluting balloons.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},1500,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Retrospective analysis of data collected in an institutional database of coronary interventions with use of drug-eluting balloons, with a prospective follow-up for major adverse cardiovascular events and living status.",[25,26,27],"Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)","Restenosis, Coronary","Bifurcation Coronary Disease","RECRUITING","2026-04-15",{"date":31,"type":32},"2026-04-20","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":32},"2025-06-10",{"date":36,"type":21},"2036-03",{"name":38,"class":39},"Olivier F. Bertrand","OTHER",1,{"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":11,"nctId":44,"briefTitle":45,"officialTitle":46,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":47,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":48,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":50,"conditions":51,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":53,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":54,"startDateStruct":56,"completionDateStruct":58,"leadSponsor":60,"locationsCount":5},"100587683","double-kissing-crush-vs-controlled-balloon-crush-techniques-for-complex-coronary-bfurcation-lesions-100587683","NCT06931574","Double Kissing-crush vs Controlled Balloon-crush Techniques For Complex Coronary Bfurcation Lesions","Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes of Double Kissing-crush vs Controlled Balloon-crush Techniques For Complex Coronary Bifurcation Lesions","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged \\>18\n* PCI with either DK-crush or Controlled balloon-crush\n* Complex coronary bifurcation lesion (Medina 0.1.1, Medina 1.1.1)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Non-complex bifurcation anatomy\n* Bail-out 2-stent (reverse modified mini-crush)\n* ST-elevation myocardial infarction\n* Cardiogenic shock status\n* In-stent restenosis\n* A previous of coronary artery bypass grafting\n* Implantation of bare-metal stent\n* End-stage hepatic or renal disease\n* \\\u003C1-year life expectancy",{"count":49,"type":21},300,"The Crush technique for coronary bifurcation lesions has evolved significantly since its introduction to the literature by Colombo et al. in 2003, with several iterations, including double kissing balloon inflation. The main disadvantage of the historical Crush technique is the low success rate of the final kissing balloon inflation. An improvement came with the introduction of double kissing crush stenting aiming for the shorter protrusion and kissing balloon dilation performed before and after main branch stent implantation. The double kissing crush provides a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared to Provisional stenting, Crush, and Culotte techniques. Recently, a novel modified mini-crush technique (controlled balloon-crush) has been introduced to the literature and is one of the most up-to-date crush techniques. The main advantage of this technique over the contemporary mini-crush technique is that the side branch can be easily rewired, and the 1:1 size non-compliant balloon can easily pass through the crushed stent structure in the ostial part of the side branch. The basic rationale of this is that the crushing of the side branch stent is done in a more controlled manner (by slowly deflation of the side branch stent balloon), and this causes less disruption of the stent cells. To date, no data compares the mid-term outcomes of double kissing crush and controlled balloon-crush stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Hence, this study aimed to determine the clinical results of double kissing crush and controlled balloon-crush techniques under mid-term follow-up.",[25,52,27],"Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)","2025-04-15",{"date":55,"type":32},"2025-04-17",{"date":57,"type":32},"2025-04-01",{"date":59,"type":21},"2026-12-30",{"name":61,"class":62},"Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Educational and Training Hospital","OTHER_GOV"]