[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"bone-change-diabetic-manifestation\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:bone-change-diabetic-manifestation":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":34,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":41,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":42,"startDateStruct":45,"completionDateStruct":47,"leadSponsor":49,"locationsCount":52},"100593525","phase-2-evaluation-of-marginal-bone-height-changes-and-biting-force-in-screw-retained-implant-prostheses-using-reinforced-resin-vs-monolithic-zirconium-100593525",false,"NCT07007572","Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Height Changes And Biting Force In Screw Retained Implant Prostheses Using Reinforced Resin Vs Monolithic Zirconium","Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Height Changes And Biting Force In Screw Retained Implant Prostheses Using Reinforced Resin Vs Monolithic Zirconium Used In Unilateral Distal Extension Cases","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Mandibular Class II, partially edentulous patients that enables measuring the marginal bone height changes and values of biting forces intra-orally.\n* Fully dentulous edentulous opposing Maxillary arch.\n* Patients with normal class I jaw relationship.\n* Patients that require fixed restorations for functional and esthetic reasons\n* Age range (30-60 years).\n* Cooperative patients those are willing to attend all follow-up periods.\n* Patients with healthy attached mucosa of appropriate thickness free from any inflammation.\n* Patients with healthy bone of appropriate thickness, width and height free from any inflammation.\n* Patients without any medical conditions that contraindicates implant placement.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with Parkinson's disease\n* Patients with xerostomia.\n* Patients with a history of allergy to resins and\u002F or zirconia.\n* Patients with a medical systematic condition that contraindicate implant placement.\n* Patients smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.\n* Patients with pathological changes of residual ridges as recurrent or persistent ulcers, osteomyelitis and infections.\n* Patients with large irregular bony exostosis.\n* Patients with medical or psychological conditions as physical disability or mental retardation that hinder cooperation in the follow up visits and answering the questionnaires.",true,"ALL","30 Years","60 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},14,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"PHASE2","This studies aims to compare the behavior of recently introduced resin reinforces compared to monolithic zirconia",[28,29,30,31,32,33],"Biting Forces","Bone; Change, Diabetic (Manifestation)","Color Stability","Disorder of Soft Tissue","Prosthetic Complications","Bacterial Overgrowth",[35,36,37,38,39],"biting forces","Bacterial Adhesion","color stability","soft tissue response","prosthetic complication","RECRUITING","2025-06-03",{"date":43,"type":44},"2025-06-06","ACTUAL",{"date":46,"type":44},"2024-12-31",{"date":48,"type":22},"2026-03-01",{"name":50,"class":51},"Cairo University","OTHER",2]