[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"carious-primary-molars\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:carious-primary-molars":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,41,76,97,118,138,157,174,192],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":40},"100640522","pain-perception-of-novel-chemo-mechanical-caries-remove-versus-atraumatic-restorative-treatment-method-in-primary-molars-100640522",false,"NCT07605689","Pain Perception of Novel Chemo-mechanical Caries Remove Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Method in Primary Molars","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Healthy children aged between 5 and 9 years.\n2. Children presenting with occlusal caries in mandibular and\u002For maxillary primary molars Carious lesions without any pulpal involvement.\n3. Children whose parents or guardians have provided written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1-Children with teeth exhibiting: pulpal exposure, mobility, spontaneous pain, swelling or fistula adjacent to the tooth, furcation involvement, ervical lesions, teeth with sealants, restorations, or enamel defects also exclude .",true,"ALL","5 Years","9 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},28,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to compare pain Perception, patient acceptability, and cavity preparation time between chemo-mechanical caries removal and Atraumatic restorative treatment Method in Primary Molars.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer: \"Does chemo-mechanical caries removal show similar results compared to Atraumatic restorative treatment Method in terms of pain perception in Primary Molars?",[27],"Carious Primary Molars","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-18",{"date":31,"type":32},"2026-05-26","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":21},"2026-09-01",{"date":36,"type":21},"2026-10-01",{"name":38,"class":39},"Cairo University","OTHER",1,{"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":11,"nctId":44,"briefTitle":45,"officialTitle":46,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":47,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":51,"briefSummary":52,"conditions":53,"keywords":57,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":40},"100615666","digital-occlusal-analysis-and-bite-force-evaluation-of-the-hall-technique-vs-stainless-steel-crowns-in-primary-molars-using-t-scan-100615666","NCT07295574","Digital Occlusal Analysis and Bite Force Evaluation of the Hall Technique Vs Stainless Steel Crowns in Primary Molars Using T-scan","Digital Occlusal Analysis and Bite Force Evaluation of Hall Technique Vs Stainless-Steel Crowns as Conventional Restoration of Carious Primary Molars Using T-scan: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Systemically healthy children\n2. Age ranging from 6 to 9 years\n3. Cooperative behavior (positive rating on the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale)\n4. Unrestored carious primary molar\n5. Extent of caries radiographically confined to dentin (≤ or \\> ½ dentin thickness)\n6. Tooth must be vital and symptomless, with no clinical or radiographic signs of pulpal pathology\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Children with special health care needs\n2. Temporomandibular disorders, bruxism or parafunctional habits\n3. pathological facial swelling\n4. periodontal diseases such as gingivitis, drug-induced gingival enlargement, juvenile or aggressive periodontitis\n5. Any child showing mobility, bone loss, or signs of pulpal pathology is also excluded from the study.","6 Years",{"count":50,"type":21},22,[24],"This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare two restorative techniques for managing carious primary molars in children aged 6-9 years: the Hall Technique and conventional stainless-steel crown (SSC) placement. The study evaluates how each technique affects occlusal force distribution, mean bite force, and vertical dimension changes using the T-Scan digital occlusal analysis system. Additional outcomes include temporomandibular joint assessment, child discomfort levels, and parental satisfaction with treatment. Participants are allocated 1:1 to receive either the Hall Technique or conventional SSC restoration, and outcomes are measured at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 2- and 4-week follow-ups. The study aims to determine whether the minimally invasive Hall Technique provides comparable occlusal function and patient-centered outcomes when compared to traditional SSC preparation methods.",[27,54,55,56],"Bite Force","Occlusal Analysis","Stainless-steel Crown",[58,59,27,60,61,54,62,63,64,65,66,67],"Hall Technique","Stainless Steel Crown","Digital Occlusal Analysis","T-Scan","Occlusal Force Distribution","Vertical Dimension","Pediatric Dentistry","Minimal Intervention Dentistry","Conventional Crown Preparation","Randomized Clinical Trial","2025-12-16",{"date":70,"type":32},"2025-12-19",{"date":72,"type":21},"2026-01",{"date":74,"type":21},"2026-03",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":77,"slug":78,"hasResults":11,"nctId":79,"briefTitle":80,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":83,"enrollmentInfo":84,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":86,"briefSummary":87,"conditions":88,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":89,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":90,"startDateStruct":92,"completionDateStruct":94,"leadSponsor":96,"locationsCount":4},"100613321","pulpotomy-with-cem-vs-pulpectomy-with-caoh2iodoform-in-primary-molars-100613321","NCT07265063","Pulpotomy With CEM vs Pulpectomy With Ca(OH)2\u002FIodoform in Primary Molars","Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Pulpotomy Using Calcium-Enriched Mixture Versus Pulpectomy Using Calcium Hydroxide\u002FIodoform Paste for the Treatment of Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children:\n\nAged 6-8 years of both sexes. Cooperative and medically free. Diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis based on clinical and radiographic criteria.\n\nParents\u002Flegal guardians provide written informed consent. Parents able to attend follow-up visits.\n\nTeeth:\n\nDeep carious second primary molars with signs of irreversible pulpitis. No clinical signs of necrosis (abscess, fistula, mobility). No radiographic signs of necrosis (periapical lesion or resorption).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children:\n\nWith systemic or mental disorders. Whose parents refuse to give consent. Uncooperative behavior.\n\nTeeth:\n\nSigns of pulpal necrosis (swelling, fistula, pathological mobility). Periapical or furcal radiolucency exceeding half the furcation-apical distance. Non-restorable teeth, root caries, internal\u002Fexternal resorption, or calcified canals.","8 Years",{"count":85,"type":21},50,[24],"Will Calcium-Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement pulpotomy have less postoperative pain and more clinical and radiographic success compared to Calcium Hydroxide\u002FIodoform (Metapex) pulpectomy when managing second primary molars with irreversible pulpitis?",[27],"2025-11-24",{"date":91,"type":32},"2025-12-04",{"date":93,"type":21},"2025-12-01",{"date":95,"type":21},"2026-12-01",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":98,"slug":99,"hasResults":11,"nctId":100,"briefTitle":101,"officialTitle":102,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":103,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":104,"enrollmentInfo":105,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":107,"briefSummary":108,"conditions":109,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":110,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":111,"startDateStruct":113,"completionDateStruct":115,"leadSponsor":117,"locationsCount":40},"100599881","comparison-of-zoe-vs-zon-in-primary-mandibular-molars-pulpectomy-of-5-7-year-olds-100599881","NCT07090252","Comparison of ZOE vs ZON in Primary Mandibular Molars Pulpectomy of 5-7-Year-Olds","Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zinc Oxide-eugenol and Zinc Oxide With Neem as Obturating Materials in Primary Mandibular Molars Pulpectomy for 5-7 Year-Old Children: A Randomized Clinical Trail","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Children aged 5-7 years with infected primary molars.\n2. Deep carious lesion.\n3. History of spontaneous pain\n4. Parent written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Medically compromised children\n2. Children with a history of allergic reaction to the components of the tested material\n3. Children who had non restorable teeth\n4. Teeth with less than two third of root length\n5. Extensive internal or external root resorption\n6. Unable to attend follow-up visits","7 Years",{"count":106,"type":21},24,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluation of Zinc oxide-eugenol compared to Zinc oxide with Neem as obturating materials in primary mandibular molars pulpectomy for 5-7 Year-Old Children.The main question(s)it aim to answer : Could the clinical and radiographic success of a mixture of zinc oxide with Neem oil be comparable with Zinc oxide-eugenol paste in pulpectomy of primary mandibular molars?",[27],"2025-07-29",{"date":112,"type":32},"2025-08-01",{"date":114,"type":21},"2025-09-01",{"date":116,"type":21},"2026-11-01",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":119,"slug":120,"hasResults":11,"nctId":121,"briefTitle":122,"officialTitle":123,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":124,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":125,"maxAge":83,"enrollmentInfo":126,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":127,"briefSummary":128,"conditions":129,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":130,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":131,"startDateStruct":133,"completionDateStruct":135,"leadSponsor":137,"locationsCount":40},"100590542","preparation-time-of-bioflx-crowns-compared-to-zirconia-crowns-on-primary-molars-100590542","NCT06968767","Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars","Evaluation Of Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children aged between 4 and 8 years with a primary molar that needs to be covered by a crown.\n\nMedically healthy children (ASA I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification).\n\nChildren whose parent or guardian is willing to sign an informed consent.\n\nChildren whose parent or guardian are willing to comply with follow-up visits.\n\nFrankl's positive and definitely positive patient.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Molars with severe structural loss that may compromise crown retention.\n\nChildren with poor oral hygiene that may contribute to higher plaque levels and affect the clinical outcomes of the crown restorations.\n\nChildren with a history of allergies; known allergies to dental local anesthesia or to the materials used in Biofix crowns.\n\nChildren with any systemic conditions or disabilities that may affect their ability to participate in the study.","4 Years",{"count":50,"type":21},[24],"This study aims to evaluate and compare the preparation time required for Bioflx crowns versus zirconia crowns on primary molars through a randomized clinical trial.\n\n• Primary Objective: To compare the preparation time required for Bioflex crowns and zirconia crowns on primary molars in pediatric patients.\n\n• Secondary Objectives:\n\nTo evaluate the clinical performance of Bioflex crowns compared to zirconia crowns, including:\n\nRetention, Patient Satisfaction, Parental Satisfaction, Occlusal Wear and Gingival Health.\n\nthe main question it aim to answer: Is there a significant difference in the preparation time required for Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the primary molars of pediatric patients?",[27],"2025-05-05",{"date":132,"type":32},"2025-05-13",{"date":134,"type":21},"2025-06-15",{"date":136,"type":21},"2026-06-16",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":139,"slug":140,"hasResults":11,"nctId":141,"briefTitle":142,"officialTitle":143,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":144,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":125,"maxAge":83,"enrollmentInfo":145,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":146,"briefSummary":147,"conditions":148,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":149,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":150,"startDateStruct":152,"completionDateStruct":154,"leadSponsor":156,"locationsCount":40},"100587864","comparative-evaluation-of-gingival-health-and-bacterial-adhesion-in-bioflx-vs-zirconia-crowns-on-primary-molars-100587864","NCT06933927","Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars","Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. patients aged 4-8 years.\n2. decayed in primary molars require full-coverage crowns.\n3. No history of systemic diseases affecting oral health.\n4. Cooperative children.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n-patients with severe medical conditions, badly decayed in primary molars and trauma.",{"count":20,"type":21},[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars. The main question\\[s\\] it aims to answer is there are the differences in bacterial adhesion and gingival health between bioflx and zirconia crowns The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of bacterial adhesion , child and parents satisfaction,as well as preparation time.",[27],"2025-04-17",{"date":151,"type":32},"2025-04-22",{"date":153,"type":21},"2025-06-01",{"date":155,"type":21},"2026-02-26",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":158,"slug":159,"hasResults":11,"nctId":160,"briefTitle":161,"officialTitle":162,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":163,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":125,"maxAge":83,"enrollmentInfo":164,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":165,"briefSummary":166,"conditions":167,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":168,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":169,"startDateStruct":171,"completionDateStruct":172,"leadSponsor":173,"locationsCount":40},"100585027","child-and-parental-satisfaction-of-bioflx-crowns-compared-to-zirconia-crowns-in-primary-molars-100585027","NCT06897020","Child and Parental Satisfaction of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns In Primary Molars","Evaluation Of Child and Parental Satisfaction Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* The Inclusion criteria:\n\n  1. Children aged four to eight years old who are appearing healthy and free of any systemic disease according to parental history.\n  2. Frankl's positive and definitely positive children.\n  3. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to sign an informed consent.\n  4. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to comply with follow-up visits.\n  5. Primary molars indicated for crowns. • Exclusion criteria:\n\n  \u003C!-- -->\n\n  1. Children with\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* The Exclusion criteria:\n\n  1. Children with poor oral hygiene that may contribute to higher plaque levels and affect the clinical outcomes of the crown restorations.\n  2. Children with history of allergies; Known allergies to dental local anesthesia or to the materials used in Bioflx crowns.\n  3. Child with parafunctional habits.\n  4. Molars with severe structural loss that may compromise crown retention.\n  5. Presence of malocclusion such as crossbite or scissor bite.\n  6. Primary molar with root caries.\n  7. Primary molar with root resorption or furcation involvement.",{"count":85,"type":21},[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the child and parents satisfaction of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars. The main question\\[s\\] it aims to answer : Is there a difference in the child and parents satisfaction levels between BioFlx crowns and zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars?\" The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of Retention, occlusal wear, gingival health, as well as preparation time.",[27],"2025-03-25",{"date":170,"type":32},"2025-03-28",{"date":153,"type":21},{"date":155,"type":21},{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":175,"slug":176,"hasResults":11,"nctId":177,"briefTitle":178,"officialTitle":179,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":180,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":125,"maxAge":83,"enrollmentInfo":181,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":182,"briefSummary":183,"conditions":184,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":185,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":186,"startDateStruct":188,"completionDateStruct":189,"leadSponsor":191,"locationsCount":40},"100584561","occlusal-wear-of-bioflx-crowns-compared-to-zirconia-crowns-on-primary-molars-100584561","NCT06890949","Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars","Evaluation Of Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Children aged between 4 and 8 years with primary molar that needs to be covered by crown.\n2. Medically healthy children (ASA I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification).\n3. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to sign an informed consent.\n4. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to comply with follow-up visits. -\n5. Frankl's positive and definitely positive patient\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Molars with severe structural loss that may compromise crown retention.\n2. Children with poor oral hygiene that may contribute to higher plaque levels and affect the clinical outcomes of the crown restorations.\n3. Children with history of allergies; Known allergies to dental local anesthesia or to the materials used in Bioflx crowns.\n4. Children with any systemic conditions or disabilities that may affect their ability to participate in the study.",{"count":85,"type":21},[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the occlusal wear of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars.\n\nThe main question\\[s\\] it aims to answer : \" Is there a difference in the occlusal wear of BioFlx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars?\" The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of retention,gingival health, preparation time, as well as child and parental satisfaction.",[27],"2025-03-20",{"date":187,"type":32},"2025-03-24",{"date":134,"type":21},{"date":190,"type":21},"2026-07-16",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":193,"slug":194,"hasResults":11,"nctId":195,"briefTitle":196,"officialTitle":197,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":198,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":125,"maxAge":83,"enrollmentInfo":199,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":200,"briefSummary":201,"conditions":202,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":203,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":204,"startDateStruct":206,"completionDateStruct":208,"leadSponsor":210,"locationsCount":211},"100581881","retention-of-bioflx-crowns-compared-to-zirconia-crowns-on-primary-molars-100581881","NCT06856070","Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars","Evaluation of Retention and Resistance to Dislodgement of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars","Inclusion Criteria:The inclusion criteria:\n\n1. Children aged between 4 and 8 years with primary molar that needs to be covered by crown.\n2. Children who can cooperate sufficiently for the duration of the procedure, as assessed by behavior management techniques.\n3. Medically healthy children (ASA I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification).\n4. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to sign an informed consent.\n5. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to comply with follow-up visits. -\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* The exclusion criteria\n\n  1. Molars with severe structural loss that may compromise crown retention.\n  2. Children with poor oral hygiene that may contribute to higher plaque levels and affect the clinical outcomes of the crown restorations.\n  3. Children with history of allergies; Known allergies to dental local anesthesia or to the materials used in Bioflx crowns.\n  4. Children with any systemic conditions or disabilities that may affect their ability to participate in the study.",{"count":85,"type":21},[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the retention and resistance to dislodgment of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars. The main question\\[s\\] it aims to answer : Is there a difference in the retention and resistance to dislodgement of BioFlx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars?\" The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of occlusal wear, gingival health, preparation time, as well as child and parental satisfaction.",[27],"2025-03-03",{"date":205,"type":32},"2025-03-04",{"date":207,"type":21},"2025-06-30",{"date":209,"type":21},"2026-02",{"name":38,"class":39},2]