[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"child-maltreatment\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:child-maltreatment":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,18,0,[8,65,91,116,154,178,201,223,248,272,299,325,346,367,390,417,451,475],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":53,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":54,"startDateStruct":57,"completionDateStruct":59,"leadSponsor":61,"locationsCount":64},"100614348","reducing-parental-substance-use-and-enhancing-family-resilience-among-rural-families-through-ohio-start-100614348",false,"NCT07278427","Reducing Parental Substance Use and Enhancing Family Resilience Among Rural Families Through Ohio START","Reducing Parental Substance Use, Improving Child Health Outcomes, and Enhancing Family Resilience Among Rural Families Through Ohio START (Sobriety, Treatment, and Reducing Trauma)","Ohio START","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* age 18 or older;\n* currently enrolled in Ohio START;\n* are unemployed or have family income at or below the federal poverty level,\n* designated as the primary parent in the Ohio START case plan.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},400,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to learn about the roles played by parental activity spaces and social networks in reducing parental substance use and promoting child and family health outcomes in the context of Ohio START (Sobriety, Treatment, and Reducing Trauma) for families in rural areas. This study will investigate if substance use treatment service referrals and family peer mentoring services provided by Ohio START lead to positive changes in parental activity spaces and social networks, and if these positive changes lead to better child and family outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does having behavioral health services (referred by Ohio START workers) close to where parents spend their time help with substance use recovery and child health?\n* Does peer mentor support through Ohio START help parents build stronger social connections and family resilience, and does this lead to better long-term family health?\n* Do these associations differ in rural areas compared to urban areas?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Answer survey questions about their substance use, parenting, child health, and family well-being across three waves (Wave 1: when they enroll in the study, Wave 2: 6-month follow-up, and Wave 3: 12-month follow-up)\n* Share information about places they go regularly (such as work, stores, and healthcare visits)\n* Share information about people in their support network",[25,26,27,28,29,30],"Substance Use Disorder (SUD)","Rural Health","Family Resilience","Child Maltreatment","Child Well-beiing","Substance Use Recovery",[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,15,48,49,50,51],"Substance use disorder","Child abuse and neglect","Rural health","Child welfare services","Low socioeconomic status","Rurality","Longitudinal study","Prospective study","Family resilience","Social network","Activity spaces","Child maltreatment","Parental substance use","Family peer mentors","Social networks","Rural families","Child well-being","Substance use treatment services","Family health","The START model","RECRUITING","2026-05-12",{"date":55,"type":56},"2026-05-14","ACTUAL",{"date":58,"type":56},"2026-04-27",{"date":60,"type":21},"2030-08-31",{"name":62,"class":63},"Ohio State University","OTHER",1,{"id":66,"slug":67,"hasResults":11,"nctId":68,"briefTitle":69,"officialTitle":70,"acronym":71,"eligibilityCriteria":72,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":73,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":76,"briefSummary":78,"conditions":79,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":82,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":83,"startDateStruct":85,"completionDateStruct":87,"leadSponsor":89,"locationsCount":64},"100420275","safe-mothers-safe-children-initiative-100420275","NCT04752618","Safe Mothers, Safe Children Initiative","Treating Maternal PTSD to Enhance and Reduce Maltreatment Recidivism: Safe Mothers, Safe Children","SMSC","Inclusion Criteria (mothers):\n\n* Receiving preventive services at the time of the consent session to participate in the study\n* Meeting a severity score of 28 or higher OR probable DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD (PDS-5)\n* Having 1-10-year-old child\n* Being the legal guardian for the child with physical and legal custody\n* Being able to read, write, and speak English or Spanish\n\nExclusion Criteria (mothers):\n\n* Having suicidal ideation present in the past month prior to pre-assessment or reports of a suicide attempt in the past year (SCID-5)\n* Meeting a diagnosis of severe substance or alcohol use disorder (≥ 6 symptoms on SCID) AND not in early remission (≥3 months without meeting any substance or alcohol use disorder criteria (except craving)\n* Having current or active symptoms of psychosis in the past month\n* Having a disability affecting communication, such as deafness\n* Having an index child with a developmental condition that impedes cognitive and\u002For physical functioning, e.g. autism\n* Having an index child with current symptoms or diagnosis of psychosis as defined by the DSM-5 in the past 3 months\n* Experiencing current or history of intimate partner violence (IPV) or family violence:\n\nIf there is a history of IPV\u002Ffamily violence and the relationship is no longer active, the relationship must have ended for at least ninety days with no intention of restarting; If there is a history of IPV\u002Ffamily violence, but the relationship is ongoing, there must not have been an IPV\u002Ffamily violence event for at least one year\n\nInclusion criteria (clinicians):\n\n\\- Must be a currently or formerly hired Study Clinician or Clinical Director with Safe Mothers, Safe Children.\n\nExclusion criteria (clinicians):\n\n\\- There are no exclusion criteria for this population. Participants in this population will cease completion of therapist-copy measures upon the conclusion of their role with Safe Mothers, Safe Children, or upon withdrawal from participation in these measures.",{"count":74,"type":21},160,"INTERVENTIONAL",[77],"NA","The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combined interventions, Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) and Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) or P-STAIR, for treating maternal PTSD and reducing maltreatment recidivism.",[80,81,28],"PTSD","Depression","2026-05-01",{"date":84,"type":56},"2026-05-07",{"date":86,"type":56},"2021-05-01",{"date":88,"type":21},"2027-04-30",{"name":90,"class":63},"New York University",{"id":92,"slug":93,"hasResults":11,"nctId":94,"briefTitle":95,"officialTitle":96,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":97,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":99,"maxAge":100,"enrollmentInfo":101,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":103,"briefSummary":104,"conditions":105,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":107,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":108,"startDateStruct":109,"completionDateStruct":111,"leadSponsor":113,"locationsCount":115},"100457173","child-adult-relationship-enhancement-in-primary-care-pricare--criando-nios-con-cario-cario-100457173","NCT05233150","Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care (PriCARE) \u002F Criando Niños Con CARIÑO (CARIÑO)","Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care: Supporting Parents and Children","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Caregiver is age 18 years or older\n* Caregiver is English or Spanish Speaking\n* Caregiver is legal guardian of child subject\n* Caregiver provides informed consent\n* Caregiver is available to attend scheduled times of PriCARE\u002FCARIÑO groups\n* Caregiver has cellular phone with text messaging capacity\n* Caregiver has appropriate technological tools and access to participate in virtual intervention\n* Child is between 18 months and 6 years old\n* Child receives care at participating primary care center\n* Child has Medicaid\u002FChildren's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)\u002Fno insurance\n* Child lives in North Carolina or Philadelphia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Caregiver or another caregiver in the household has previously participated in PriCARE\u002FCARIÑO\n* Child has a cognitive functioning below 2-year-old level, as determined by the screening questions and\u002For the referring clinician\n* Child has a diagnosis of autism\n* Child is receiving individual behavioral health treatment or medication for a behavioral health problem",true,"18 Months","99 Years",{"count":102,"type":21},1932,[77],"The purpose of this study is evaluate the effectiveness of PriCARE\u002FCARIÑO to reduce child maltreatment, improve parent-child interactions, and reduce harsh\u002Fneglectful parenting, parent stress, and child behaviors.",[106,28],"Parent-Child Relations","2026-04-29",{"date":82,"type":56},{"date":110,"type":56},"2022-05-18",{"date":112,"type":21},"2027-07-01",{"name":114,"class":63},"University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill",2,{"id":117,"slug":118,"hasResults":11,"nctId":119,"briefTitle":120,"officialTitle":121,"acronym":122,"eligibilityCriteria":123,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":124,"enrollmentInfo":125,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":127,"briefSummary":128,"conditions":129,"keywords":135,"overallStatus":143,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":144,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":145,"startDateStruct":147,"completionDateStruct":149,"leadSponsor":151,"locationsCount":153},"100625814","misapsy-childhood-maltreatment-food-insecurity-psychological-distress-and-professional-integration-among-socioeconomically-disadvantaged-young-adults-100625814","NCT07427524","MISAPSY: Childhood Maltreatment, Food Insecurity, Psychological Distress and Professional Integration Among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Young Adults","Psychosocial Intervention With Precarious Young People: a Comparative Longitudinal Study on Psychological Distress and Food Insecurity","PRESPA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Be aged 18 to 25 years\n* Be supported by a Mission Locale in Paris as part of a social and\u002For professional integration program\n* Voluntarily participate in the study after receiving clear information and signing an informed consent form\n* Experiencing severe food insecurity (positive response to item 8 of the FIES)\n* Experiencing significant psychological distress, defined by: PHQ-9 score \\> 15; GAD-7 score \\> 10\n* Have been exposed to at least one adverse childhood experience, identified via the CTQ-SF (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short Form).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Being unable to provide informed consent due to impaired comprehension or communication skills\n* Currently receiving psychiatric care for an acute or chronic mental illness requiring regular specialized treatment\n* Experiencing a social or medical emergency incompatible with the study (e.g., unstable emergency housing, acute suicidal crisis, ongoing hospitalization)\n* Being incarcerated, under guardianship or curatorship without specific legal authorization to participate in research\n* Having previously participated in a similar study or currently being engaged in a structured psychological intervention protocol\n* Having insufficient command of the French language, preventing comprehension of instructions, questionnaires, or interviews.","25 Years",{"count":126,"type":21},70,[77],"The MISAPSY study (Childhood Maltreatment, Food Insecurity, Psychological Distress and Professional Integration Among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Young Adults) aims to model the complex interrelations between child maltreatment, trauma exposure, food insecurity, and psychological distress among precarious young adults enrolled in French youth employment and social integration services (Mission Locale).\n\nAdopting a methodology structured around three complementary components, this study consists of: (1) a cross-sectional survey to identify key associations ; (2) a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews exploring psychologists' subjective experiences, and (3) a longitudinal comparative interventional study involving two different support programs to assess and compare the impact of these interventions on participants' food insecurity and psychological well-being.\n\nUsing a multi-phase design, MISAPSY seeks to move beyond linear risk-factor models by adopting a systemic and network-based approach to mental health and social vulnerability. The study integrates quantitative analyses, including network analyses, qualitative exploration of professional practices, and comparative longitudinal intervention to inform more holistic, equitable, and transferable models of care for vulnerable young adults.",[130,131,28,132,133,134],"Trauma and Stress-related Disorders","Food Insecurity","Psychological Distress","Depression Symptoms","Anxiety Symptoms",[131,136,137,138,139,140,141,142],"Mental health","young adults","trauma","adverse childhood experience","psychological distress","precarity","mixed-methods","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-28",{"date":146,"type":56},"2026-05-05",{"date":148,"type":21},"2026-07-01",{"date":150,"type":21},"2027-06",{"name":152,"class":63},"University of Lorraine",6,{"id":155,"slug":156,"hasResults":11,"nctId":157,"briefTitle":158,"officialTitle":159,"acronym":160,"eligibilityCriteria":161,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":162,"enrollmentInfo":163,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":165,"briefSummary":166,"conditions":167,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":169,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":170,"startDateStruct":172,"completionDateStruct":174,"leadSponsor":176,"locationsCount":64},"100439310","smoke-free-safecare-establishing-a-smoke-free-home-in-cps-involved-families-100439310","NCT05000632","Smoke Free SafeCare: Establishing a Smoke Free Home in CPS-involved Families","Establishing Smoke-free Homes With Families Involved in Child Protective Services: Effectiveness-implementation Trial of an Integrated Program","SFSC","Provider Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* SafeCare providers in this study must 1) have completed the SafeCare workshop and passed field Certification (9 sessions of SafeCare delivered with fidelity according to the SafeCare Fidelity Checklist); 2) be employed at an accredited SafeCare agency in a target state based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) adult smoking data or prior SafeCare research documenting high smoking rates.\n\nCaregiver Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Caregivers in this study must meet the following inclusion criteria to participate: 1) Referred to a SafeCare Provider study participant; 2) Reports in-home smoking behavior by herself or another person (person must reside in the home 3 or more nights a week) 3) Caregiver must be aged 18 or older and 4) Mother must be a parent to a child between the ages of 0 and 5 (or 0 - 9 if in the state of Oklahoma).\n\nProvider Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* SafeCare providers will be excluded if they have planned for significant employment leave, resignation, or promotion during the study period.\n\nCaregiver Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* We will exclude those who 1) Report that no one smokes in the home; 2) Demonstrate an inability to understand their responsibilities as outlined in the consent form. This will be determined as the research staff verbally go through the consent form with the mothers. If mothers do not understand the consent form and subsequent procedures, they will be excluded.","89 Years",{"count":164,"type":21},268,[77],"Smoke Free SafeCare (SFSC) is a proposed braided intervention consisting of two evidence-based interventions: Some Things are Better Outside (STBO), aimed at promoting smoke free home rules, and SafeCare, aimed at reducing child maltreatment and improving mother and child outcomes. STBO is effective in creating smoke free homes and reducing second-hand smoke in low-SES (socioeconomic status) households. SafeCare is an effective parent training program that is broadly disseminated in child protective services in the United States. SafeCare is a promising mechanism to effectively increase the reach of STBO to reduce SHS (secondhand smoke) exposure in families with documented high rates of tobacco use and children with cumulative risk for negative health outcomes.",[28,168],"Smoking Behaviors","2026-04-21",{"date":171,"type":56},"2026-04-24",{"date":173,"type":56},"2022-04-19",{"date":175,"type":21},"2026-12",{"name":177,"class":63},"Georgia State University",{"id":179,"slug":180,"hasResults":11,"nctId":181,"briefTitle":182,"officialTitle":183,"acronym":184,"eligibilityCriteria":185,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":186,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":188,"briefSummary":189,"conditions":190,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":192,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":193,"startDateStruct":195,"completionDateStruct":197,"leadSponsor":199,"locationsCount":115},"100521782","father-focused-intervention-for-reducing-family-violence-and-symptoms-in-children-100521782","NCT06074068","Father-Focused Intervention for Reducing Family Violence and Symptoms in Children","Examining Therapeutic Change Mechanisms in an Affect Regulation, Father-Focused Intervention for Reducing Family Violence and Associated Symptoms in Children","F4C","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* have at least one 6 month to 12-year-old biological child with whom they have contact;\n* had an incident of IPV within the last 12 months prior to screening with their child's mother (based on court\u002Fpolice records, coparent or self-report);\n* have a currently open or recently investigated (in the last 6 months) case with CT DCF\n* are able to complete assessments in English or Spanish;\n* agree to have their female coparents (mother of target child) contacted as collateral informants and for consent for participation of their child. If a participant has more than one child in the age range, the youngest will be selected;\n* female coparents (i.e., biological mother who need not be in a relationship with the father) consents to (at minimum) provide parent-report on child; however, may opt out of child participation. If the coparent agrees to participate by providing caregiver-report on child symptoms, but declines participation of their shared child, the father may still participate in the study if he meets eligibility criteria outlined below; thus, preventing any possible retaliation against co-parents for not consenting to child participation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nFathers will be excluded based on the following exclusion criteria:\n\n* an active full\u002Fno contact protective order pertaining to their child because this will preclude participation in the father-child play assessment (many men will have protective orders pertaining to their partners, but it is more common for men to still be allowed contact with their children);\n* physiological addiction to a substance that requires detoxification. Fathers will be evaluated using the Drug Abuse Screening Test and AUDIT. If fathers report significant difficulties with physiological withdrawal (e.g., alcohol tremors or dope sickness) they will be referred for detox services. They can be re-evaluated following a detox program with documentation from the detox center of successful completion and clean urine screen;\n* cognitive impairment that will not allow for understanding of the study interventions (a mini mental state score \\\u003C25);\n* current untreated psychotic disorder;\n* currently suicidal or homicidal ideation based on screening using the BSI; or\n* previously participated in F4C or a BIP.",{"count":187,"type":21},1080,[77],"The goal of this clinical trial is to test the efficacy of Fathers for Change (F4C) compared to standard Batterer Intervention for fathers with a history of Intimate Partner Violence. The main question\\[s\\] it aims to answer are:\n\n1. Is F4C more efficacious than standard BIP in reducing family violence and child mental health impairment?\n2. What are the trajectories of therapeutic change targets across interventions?\n3. Does father's emotion regulation and reflective functioning mediate the relationship between the two interventions and child-related outcomes? Participants will be randomized to either Fathers for Change on Batterer Intervention.",[191,28],"Intimate Partner Violence","2026-04-10",{"date":194,"type":56},"2026-04-15",{"date":196,"type":56},"2024-01-11",{"date":198,"type":21},"2028-12-31",{"name":200,"class":63},"Yale University",{"id":202,"slug":203,"hasResults":11,"nctId":204,"briefTitle":205,"officialTitle":206,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":207,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":208,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":210,"briefSummary":211,"conditions":212,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":215,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":216,"startDateStruct":218,"completionDateStruct":220,"leadSponsor":221,"locationsCount":64},"100579378","thrive-initiative-parent-education-programming-study-100579378","NCT06823518","Thrive Initiative Parent-Education Programming Study","Thrive Initiative Domestic and Chlid Abuse Prevention Programming Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* United States Air Force service member or dependent\n* Parent\u002Fcaregiver of a child 0-18 years old\n* 18 years of age or older\n* Willing to participate in the research study\n* Has access to technology that will enable them to receive and respond to various technological aspects of the Thrive Initiative programs and research study\n* Able to speak and understand English proficiently\n* Able to understand and give consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Not an United States Air Force service member or dependent\n* Not a parent\u002Fcaregiver of a child 0-18 years old\n* 17 years of age or younger\n* Unwilling to participate in the research study\n* Does not have access to technology that will enable them to receive and respond to various technological aspects of the Thrive Initiative programs and research study\n* Unable to speak and understand English proficiently\n* Unable to understand and give consent",{"count":209,"type":21},480,[77],"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Thrive Initiative's parent-education program delivery methods by comparing hybrid (i.e., a combination of online and group components) program delivery to online-only program delivery. The Thrive Initiative consists of four, universal parent-education programs that correpsond to specific child developmental periods. These programs inlcude: Take Root for parents\u002Fcaregivers of 0-3-year-old children; Sprout for parents\u002Fcaregivers of 3-5-year-old children; Grow for parents\u002Fcaregivres of 5-10-year-old children; and Branch Out for parents\u002Fcaregivers of 10-18-year-old children. The effectiveness of delivery method will be examined for each program. Eligible participants for this study will be United States Air Force service members or dependents who are caregivers of a child 0-18 years old. The study will involve randomization to condition meaning that participants will be assigned to the online-only or hybrid program delivery condition by chance.",[28,213,214],"Parenting","Child Wellbeing","2026-04-02",{"date":217,"type":56},"2026-04-08",{"date":219,"type":56},"2026-03-31",{"date":198,"type":21},{"name":222,"class":63},"Penn State University",{"id":224,"slug":225,"hasResults":11,"nctId":226,"briefTitle":227,"officialTitle":227,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":228,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":229,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":231,"briefSummary":232,"conditions":233,"keywords":235,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":239,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":240,"startDateStruct":242,"completionDateStruct":244,"leadSponsor":246,"locationsCount":64},"100524518","delivering-evidence-based-parenting-services-to-families-in-child-welfare-using-telehealth-100524518","NCT06109766","Delivering Evidence-Based Parenting Services to Families in Child Welfare Using Telehealth","Inclusion Criteria: Birth parents will be eligible if:\n\n1. they are listed in the official DCYF child welfare database as having an open CPS or FAR intake and a child listed in the case file who is between 6-12 months old,\n2. they speak English,\n3. they are not currently experiencing an acute hospitalization or incarceration,\n4. they have the technological capacity to engage in telehealth, and\n5. they have not had PFR in the past.\n\nExclusion Criteria: Parents will not be eligible if\n\n1. they are experiencing an acute crisis (e.g., hospitalization, incarceration),\n2. they don't have stable enough housing to be able to have home visits,\n3. they don't have reliable access to internet or cell service and\u002For a device with a microphone and camera,\n4. previously received the Promoting First Relationships ® intervention or Child Parent Psychotherapy (CPP).",{"count":230,"type":21},357,[77],"The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare Promoting First Relationships - Home Visit (PFR-HV) to Promoting First Relationships - Telehealth (PFR-T) among parents of 6-12 month olds in the child welfare system. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Is PFR-T effective relative to PFR-HV and Usual Care with respect to observed parent sensitive and responsive care, parent knowledge of child social and emotional development, and child externalizing behavior?\n* Is PFR-T effective relative to PFR-HV and Usual Care with respect to child out-of-home placement in foster care relative to the control group?\n* How does PFR-T compare in a benefit-cost analysis to the cost-effectiveness relative to PFR-HV and Usual Care?\n* Are eligible families impacted by the lack of technology and Wi-Fi\u002Fcellular data to engage in PFR-T?\n* How does provider adherence and fidelity in delivery of PFR-T compare to adherence and fidelity of PFR-HV?\n\nWhat will participants be asked to do?\n\n1. Participants will be asked to agree to randomization, resulting in their placement in one of three groups: PFR-HV, PFR-T, or the control group.\n2. Participants will be asked to participate in three virtual research visits, over the course of approximately 12 months (families could be finished as early as 9 months, however in our experience, intervention sessions and research visits often need to be rescheduled, delaying completion of the study). The research visits take approximately 80 minutes, and families will be paid $75 for each visit they participate in.\n3. During the research visit, the families will be asked to participate in videotaped research activities involving parent-child play and interaction. Parents will be asked to answer questions regarding their background, feelings, parenting opinions, and stress.\n4. Families randomized to the PFR-HV intervention are asked to participate in a 10 week in home parenting program which includes videotaped caregiver-child interactions and feedback.\n5. Families randomized to the PFR-T intervention are asked to participate in a 10-week parenting program that will occur over Zoom, which will include videotaped caregiver-child interactions and feedback.\n6. Families randomized to the control group will be emailed a resource packet with some information about services or programs that might be helpful for them.",[213,106,234,28],"Child Behavior",[236,237,238],"Telehealth","Fidelity","Cost-Benefit Analysis","2026-03-11",{"date":241,"type":56},"2026-03-16",{"date":243,"type":56},"2023-10-12",{"date":245,"type":21},"2028-04-12",{"name":247,"class":63},"University of Washington",{"id":249,"slug":4,"hasResults":11,"nctId":250,"briefTitle":251,"officialTitle":252,"acronym":253,"eligibilityCriteria":254,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":255,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":257,"briefSummary":258,"conditions":259,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":143,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":264,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":265,"startDateStruct":267,"completionDateStruct":269,"leadSponsor":270,"locationsCount":4},"100626757","NCT07439783","Testing the CrOss Systems Technical Assistance for Retaining Staff (COSTARS) Model for Improving Staff Retention Among Child Welfare Workers and Peer Supporters, and Implementation of Evidence Based Interventions.","Staffing and Supports for Implementing Cross-System Interventions With Peer Mentors","COSTARS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults employed as supervisors in child welfare agencies who are leading teams of case workers and family peer mentors as part of Ohio START implementation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Not involved in Ohio START",{"count":256,"type":21},200,[77],"The goal of this study is to test whether the CrOss System Technical Assistance for Retaining Staff (COSTARS) supervision leadership institute can promote workforce stability and improved implementation outcomes within the Ohio START child welfare program. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Among supervisors, caseworkers, and family peer mentors, what is the effect of COSTARS on staff retention and perceptions of the work environment?\n* What is the effect of COSTARS on service timeliness, implementation fidelity, and parent outcomes within Ohio START?\n\nResearchers will compare public children services agencies implementing COSTARS to those implementing supervision practices as usual to see if there are differences between groups in the outcomes described above.\n\nParticipating supervisors will:\n\n* Complete a 6-hour training workshop in the FOCUS model of supervision.\n* Participate in monthly group coaching sessions with other supervisors, for approximately one year.\n* Receive individualized feedback from coaches about their supervision performance.",[260,261,28,262,263],"Substance Use Disorder","Opioid Use Disorder","Implementation","Peer Recovery Supporters","2026-02-23",{"date":266,"type":56},"2026-02-27",{"date":268,"type":21},"2026-03-30",{"date":60,"type":21},{"name":271,"class":63},"Alicia Bunger",{"id":273,"slug":274,"hasResults":11,"nctId":275,"briefTitle":276,"officialTitle":277,"acronym":278,"eligibilityCriteria":279,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":280,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":282,"briefSummary":283,"conditions":284,"keywords":287,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":291,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":292,"startDateStruct":294,"completionDateStruct":296,"leadSponsor":297,"locationsCount":64},"100226430","ilookout-for-child-abuse--online-learning-module-for-early-childcare-providers-100226430","NCT02225301","iLookOut for Child Abuse -Online Learning Module for Early Childcare Providers","Early Childhood Practitioner's Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Reporting Child Abuse\u002FNeglect-iLookOut","iLookOut","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Paid or volunteer staff at childcare facility\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Younger than 18 years of age",{"count":281,"type":21},35000,[77],"Phase 1 was a randomized control trial that used a test-retest model to evaluate the impact of iLook Out for Child Abuse, an online, interactive learning module about reporting suspected child abuse. Delivered via a learning management system to early childhood professionals who work with infants and young children, this study assessed iLookOut's effect on 1) knowledge about reporting suspected child abuse; 2) attitudes toward reporting suspected child abuse; and 3) preparedness to protect children at risk.\n\nFindings from Phase 1 were that iLookOut will improved knowledge, changed attitudes, and increase self-reported preparedness of early childhood providers to report suspected child abuse.\n\nPhase 2 of this trial is an open-enrollment study that records pre-\u002Fpost- data on the same measurements as Phase 1, and is available for use (free of charge) for all childcare providers in Pennsylvania at https:\u002F\u002Fwww.ilookoutforchildabuse.com.",[285,286,28],"Child Abuse","Child Neglect",[43,288,289,290],"Child Care","Knowledge","Attitude","2026-01-23",{"date":293,"type":56},"2026-01-26",{"date":295,"type":56},"2014-11-01",{"date":198,"type":21},{"name":298,"class":63},"Milton S. Hershey Medical Center",{"id":300,"slug":301,"hasResults":11,"nctId":302,"briefTitle":303,"officialTitle":303,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":304,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":305,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":306,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":308,"conditions":309,"keywords":310,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":317,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":318,"startDateStruct":320,"completionDateStruct":322,"leadSponsor":323,"locationsCount":64},"100498646","children-at-risk-and-oral-health-the-dental-record-study-100498646","NCT05772962","Children at Risk and Oral Health, The Dental Record Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children enrolled at CAC\n* Control group matched by age and gender\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with developmental disorders that affect oral health\n* Children with mental retardation","0 Years",{"count":307,"type":21},2400,"The objectives of this retrospective dental record study, are to increase knowledge of the oral health, - history and -needs of children enrolled at the Childrens Advocacy Centers (CAC)by:\n\n* assessing if it is possible to identify oral indicators of child maltreatment.\n* assessing if and to what degree the children enrolled at CAC are in need of close, adapted and trauma sensitive treatment and follow up at the Public Dental Health Service (PDHS)\n* assessing if there is a need for new routines in terms of interdisciplinary collaboration and sharing of information between CAC, Child Welfare Services (CWS) and PDHP.\n\nBy increasing knowledge in regard to child maltreatment and oral health, the study will raise PDHS and CAC ability to prevent, detect and help children being victims of maltreatment, and contribute to strengthen PDHS, CAC and CWS interdisciplinary interaction for the benefit of children at risk.",[285,286,28],[311,312,313,314,315,316],"Oral health","Dental health service","Childrens advocacy center","Prevention","Detection","Collaboration","2026-01-12",{"date":319,"type":56},"2026-01-14",{"date":321,"type":56},"2024-12-05",{"date":198,"type":21},{"name":324,"class":63},"Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western Norway",{"id":326,"slug":327,"hasResults":11,"nctId":328,"briefTitle":329,"officialTitle":330,"acronym":331,"eligibilityCriteria":332,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":333,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":335,"conditions":336,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":143,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":337,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":338,"startDateStruct":340,"completionDateStruct":342,"leadSponsor":344,"locationsCount":4},"100612168","sentinella-registry-and-training-for-child-protection-100612168","NCT07250074","\"Sentinella\": Registry and Training for Child Protection","\"Sentinella\" Project: a Digital Registry and Education Network for Child Maltreatment Protection.","Sentinella","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Healthcare professionals (e.g., pediatricians, psychologists, nurses, social workers) working within the regional pediatric network.\n* Voluntary participation in the Sentinella project.\n* Completion of the planned training program (theoretical and practical components).\n* Willingness to use the digital registry and complete evaluation questionnaires.\n* Provision of written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Failure to complete the full training program.\n* Partial participation in simulation or practical sessions.\n* Incomplete pre- and post-training questionnaires.\n* Refusal or withdrawal of informed consent.",{"count":334,"type":21},30,"The \"Sentinella\" project aims to improve the early recognition and prevention of child maltreatment by creating a digital registry and education network for healthcare professionals. The study will test a new online registry built on the REDCap platform to collect standardized, anonymous data about suspected cases of abuse or neglect. It also includes a structured training program for pediatricians and other healthcare workers to strengthen their skills in identifying and reporting maltreatment.\n\nThis observational study will assess how easy the registry is to use and whether the training improves participants' knowledge and reporting practices. The project is expected to enhance collaboration between hospitals and community services, reduce reporting delays, and create a model for regional or national systems to protect vulnerable children.",[285,286,28],"2025-11-18",{"date":339,"type":56},"2025-11-26",{"date":341,"type":21},"2025-12-03",{"date":343,"type":21},"2027-11-03",{"name":345,"class":63},"Buzzi Children's Hospital",{"id":347,"slug":348,"hasResults":11,"nctId":349,"briefTitle":350,"officialTitle":351,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":352,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":353,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":355,"briefSummary":356,"conditions":357,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":358,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":359,"startDateStruct":361,"completionDateStruct":363,"leadSponsor":365,"locationsCount":64},"100544039","building-community-health-volunteers-capacity-to-support-parents-with-young-children-with-safecare-kenya-100544039","NCT06363695","Building Community Health Volunteers' Capacity to Support Parents With Young Children With SafeCare Kenya","Implementing the Adapted Parenting Program, SafeCare Kenya, to Reduce Noncommunicable Disease Burden: Building Community Health Volunteers' Capacity to Support Parents With Young Children","Parents Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* being the female primary caregiver\n* at least 18 years old of age\n* at least one child between 18 months and age 5\n* reside in Kibera\n* have ability to participate virtually (i.e., owns a smart phone) in English or Swahili.\n\nParent Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* younger than 18 years old\n* unable to participate in English or Swahili\n* does not own smart phone to participate in virtual sessions.\n\nCHV Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 18 years or older\n* able to participate in English or Swahili\n* has ability to participate virtually (i.e., owns a smart phone)\n* female community health volunteer who is affiliated with one of the project's agencies in Kibera\n\nCHV Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* younger than 18 years old\n* not able to participate in English or Swahili\n* does not have a smart phone\n* is not female\n* is not a community health volunteer affiliated with one of the project's agencies\n\nTrainer Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 18 years or older\n* able to participate in English and Swahili\n* trained as a SafeCare trainer\n\nTrainer Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* younger than 18 years old\n* not able to participate in English and Swahili\n* not trained as a SafeCare Trainer\n\nStakeholder Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 18 years or older\n* able to participate in English\n* involved in the project as a stakeholder\n\nStakeholder Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* younger than 18 years old\n* not able to participate in English\n* not a stakeholder for this project",{"count":354,"type":21},369,[77],"The goal of this clinical trial is to implement and examine the impact of SafeCare Kenya, an adapted parenting program, to improve parents' skills and knowledge related to the care of their children between the ages of 18 months and 5 years old. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Will SafeCare Kenya improve child and parent outcomes?\n* Is virtual delivery as effective as in-person delivery of SafeCare Kenya?\n* Is SafeCare Kenya feasible to deliver by community health volunteers?\n\nMothers will:\n\n* Complete study assessments at three timepoints: baseline, 6 months and 18 months\n* Mothers in the SafeCare Kenya group will receive the program from their community health volunteer\n\nResearchers will compare SafeCare Kenya to care as usual by community health volunteers to see if SafeCare Kenya families show improvements in parent interaction skills, safety and health knowledge, potential for child abuse, child behavior problems, child injuries, parenting stress, and child and parent quality of life.",[28,213],"2025-04-15",{"date":360,"type":56},"2025-04-18",{"date":362,"type":56},"2024-03-14",{"date":364,"type":21},"2028-05",{"name":366,"class":63},"Pacific University",{"id":368,"slug":369,"hasResults":11,"nctId":370,"briefTitle":371,"officialTitle":372,"acronym":373,"eligibilityCriteria":374,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":375,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":377,"briefSummary":378,"conditions":379,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":381,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":382,"startDateStruct":384,"completionDateStruct":386,"leadSponsor":388,"locationsCount":115},"100528383","preserve--connect-impact-study-of-the-bpc-100528383","NCT06160050","PRESERVE & CONNECT: Impact Study of the BPC","Randomized Control Trial of the Breakthrough Parenting Curriculum: Transforming Trauma Across Generations","(BPC)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Parents involved in, or at risk of involvement in, the child welfare system.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* active psychosis without medication stabilization\n* ongoing major depressive episodes\n* active suicidal ideation\n* active homicidal ideation",{"count":376,"type":21},240,[77],"The PRESERVE \\& CONNECT project is a multi-site randomized control trial of the Breakthrough Parenting Curriculum: Navigating Trauma Across Generations (BPC) in rural and racially and ethnically diverse communities in Vermont and Connecticut.",[28,380],"Trauma","2025-04-14",{"date":383,"type":56},"2025-04-17",{"date":385,"type":56},"2024-02-01",{"date":387,"type":21},"2027-09-20",{"name":389,"class":63},"University of Vermont",{"id":391,"slug":392,"hasResults":11,"nctId":393,"briefTitle":394,"officialTitle":395,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":396,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":397,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":399,"briefSummary":400,"conditions":401,"keywords":403,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":408,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":409,"startDateStruct":411,"completionDateStruct":413,"leadSponsor":415,"locationsCount":64},"100584452","lighthouse-parenting-nanai-a-mentalization-based-group-therapy-for-caregivers-with-history-of-trauma-100584452","NCT06889519","Lighthouse Parenting Nanai: a Mentalization-based Group Therapy for Caregivers with History of Trauma","A Mentalization-based Intervention to Enhance the Quality of Caregiver-child Interaction and Reduce the Risk of Child Maltreatment: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Biological parents of children (0-36 months old) with custody of their child.\n2. Parents who have gone through adverse childhood experiences, have a history of parental substance abuse or incarceration, have current exposure to relationship violence, or social isolation, or have lost custody of a child in the past.\n3. Parents must be over the age of 18.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Parents who are unable to provide informed consent due to mental or cognitive impairment,\n2. Parents not fluent in Spanish.\n3. Child's diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder or severe cognitive delay.",{"count":398,"type":21},60,[77],"The goal of this feasibility randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of the Lighthouse Mentalization-Based Treatment Parenting Program (Lighthouse MBT-P) as an intervention for parents at risk of maltreating their children. The study focuses on parents with a history of childhood trauma, aiming to improve parent-child relationships, reduce parenting stress, and ultimately decrease the risk of child maltreatment.\n\nThe goal of this study is to test how well the Lighthouse Mentalization-Based Treatment Parenting Program (Lighthouse MBT-P) works for parents who may be at risk of harming their children. The program aims to help parents understand and manage their own and their children's emotions better. By improving these skills, the program hopes to reduce stress in parenting and lower the chances of child abuse or neglect.\n\nThe main questions this study will answer are:\n\n* Can parents follow and complete the Lighthouse MBT-P program?\n* Does the program help lower stress in parenting and improve relationships between parents and their children?\n\nParticipants in this study will:\n\n* Attend weekly group sessions for 12 weeks. These sessions will teach them how to better understand and manage emotions.\n* Take part in discussions led by trained psychologists.\n\nResearchers will compare the results of parents who take part in the Lighthouse MBT-P program with those who receive standard parenting support to see which approach works better.",[28,402],"Trauma, Psychological",[404,405,406,407],"mentalization-based treatments",", cultural adaptation","child maltreatment","caregiving relationship","2025-03-16",{"date":410,"type":56},"2025-03-21",{"date":412,"type":56},"2024-08-17",{"date":414,"type":21},"2025-10-31",{"name":416,"class":63},"University Diego Portales",{"id":418,"slug":419,"hasResults":11,"nctId":420,"briefTitle":421,"officialTitle":422,"acronym":423,"eligibilityCriteria":424,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":425,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":427,"briefSummary":428,"conditions":429,"keywords":436,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":442,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":443,"startDateStruct":445,"completionDateStruct":447,"leadSponsor":449,"locationsCount":64},"100558208","evaluation-of-the-parenting-in-the-moment-online-program-for-forcibly-displaced-families-100558208","NCT06548126","Evaluation of the Parenting in the Moment Online Program for Forcibly Displaced Families","Evaluation of the Parenting in the Moment Program for Forcibly Displaced Families","PIMonline","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. The person is a primary Caregiver to a Child age 6 - 12 years in their care and living with them at least half the time\n2. The Caregiver is at least 18 years of age\n3. The Caregiver is able to do a program delivered in English, Spanish, Arabic or French, and to answer questions in English, Spanish, Arabic or French.\n4. The Caregiver resides in the United States\n5. The Caregiver has reliable access to a smart phone, tablet, or computer with stable internet access.\n6. One Parent, not necessarily the PCG, has experienced forced displacement in the past 10 years\n7. The Parent is able to consent for self and Child If the PCG does not have the legal right to provide Parent permission for the Child to participate, the Child's legal Parent\u002FCaregiver can provide consent while the PCG actively participates in the study with the Child.\n8. The Child is able to answer questions in English, Spanish, Arabic or French.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Prisoners\n2. Impaired decision-making capacity\n3. Disclosed active psychosis of Parent or Child\n4. Open Child protection case for abuse or neglect in the family",{"count":426,"type":21},720,[77],"This Randomized Controlled Trial will test the effectiveness of the Parenting in the Moment (PIM) online parenting program for parents with experiences of forced displacement.\n\nThe primary objective of this study is to conduct a summative (impact) evaluation of the PIM online parenting program as an in-home parent, skill-based program for parents of school-aged children, using a randomized controlled trial research design with community partnerships that inform the research throughout. The longer-term objectives are to build the evidence-base for in-home parent skill-based programs with strong empirical support (i.e., eligible for listing on the Families First Clearinghouse) and increase access to parenting programs for forcibly displaced families thereby improving child safety and wellbeing and strengthening their public health support.\n\n720 families will be recruited with forced migration backgrounds and within 10 years of arrival in the USA; 360 families will be assigned to the PIMonline program and 360 to a family resource list only, wait-list control group. Families will be recruited using stratified random sampling within the four PIM language groups: English, Spanish, Arabic, French. Within each language, half the families will be assigned to the PIMonline intervention program and the other half will be assigned to receiving a Family Resource List with access to the PIMonline program once the study ends.\n\nOne parent and one child per eligible family may participate. Data collection with participating families will take place at baseline (T1), 4-months after baseline (T2) and finally, 16 months after baseline (T3). Data collection includes caregiver online surveys, caregiver and child Zoom recorded Family Interaction Task conversations and interviewer administered child surveys for children aged 8-12 at each time point. Standardized, reliable and valid measures in the four languages will be used to assess change in outcomes through the surveys. Longitudinal growth curve analysis will be used to test PIM intervention effects. Our extensive dissemination plan involves nationwide community partners in child welfare and services to forcibly displaced families.",[430,431,214,432,213,433,434,28,380,435],"Child Safety","Coercion","Adjustment","Post Traumatic Stress Disorder","Mental Health","Emotional Regulation",[437,438,439,440,441],"Forced displacement","Refugees","Parenting Program","Immigrant Parenting Program","Refugee Parenting Program","2024-09-16",{"date":444,"type":56},"2024-09-19",{"date":446,"type":56},"2024-09-12",{"date":448,"type":21},"2026-06-15",{"name":450,"class":63},"Arizona State University",{"id":452,"slug":453,"hasResults":11,"nctId":454,"briefTitle":455,"officialTitle":456,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":457,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":458,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":460,"briefSummary":461,"conditions":462,"keywords":465,"overallStatus":143,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":467,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":468,"startDateStruct":469,"completionDateStruct":471,"leadSponsor":473,"locationsCount":4},"100562205","screening-to-identify-parents-in-need-of-mental-health-support-a-feasibility-study-in-child-welfare-services-100562205","NCT06600139","Screening to Identify Parents in Need of Mental Health Support: a Feasibility Study in Child Welfare Services","A Feasibility Study of the Collaboration-Screening-Referral Model - an Approach to Identify Parents in Child Welfare Services Who Need Mental Health Support","SOCIAL WORKERS:\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n* Working at the participating units.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* None.\n\nPARENTS:\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n* A parental role in relation to a child 0-17 years old (the participant does need not be a guardian or biological parent, can also be, for example, a partner to a parent).\n* A child welfare report has been filed for the child or the parent has reached out to the CWS themselves.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* None.",{"count":459,"type":21},355,[77],"The main aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, preliminary effects and experiences of the Collaboration-Screening-Referral approach (in Swedish: Samverkan-Screening-Hänvisning - SSH) when used with parents referred to the Swedish child welfare services. The SSH is an approach to screen parents for symptoms of mental illness using structured questionnaires, establish intra-agency collaboration, and refer to mental health services. Additionally, to increase social workers\\' competence in assessing and handling mental illness through receiving training in the SSH and administering the screening to parents.\n\nThe main questions the project aims to answer are:\n\n* Are parents engaged with child welfare services willing to undergo screening for symptoms of depression and anxiety?\n* How have the implementation of the SSH proceeded and to what degree is it sustained?\n* How do parents and social workers experience the SSH?\n* Do social workers' behaviors, knowledge and competence relevant to supporting parents with mental illness increase when implementing the SSH?\n\nSocial workers answer questions before and after their training and after 6 and 12 months. Additionally, social workers and parents will be interviewed. Qualitative and quantitative within-group analyses will be conducted to examine experiences and preliminary effects of the SSH.",[463,81,464,285,286,28],"Mental Disorder","Anxiety",[213,466,28,81,464],"Screening","2024-09-13",{"date":444,"type":56},{"date":470,"type":21},"2024-09-20",{"date":472,"type":21},"2025-09-30",{"name":474,"class":63},"Karolinska Institutet",{"id":476,"slug":477,"hasResults":11,"nctId":478,"briefTitle":479,"officialTitle":480,"acronym":481,"eligibilityCriteria":482,"healthyVolunteers":98,"sex":17,"minAge":483,"maxAge":484,"enrollmentInfo":485,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":75,"phases":487,"briefSummary":488,"conditions":489,"keywords":494,"overallStatus":52,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":506,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":507,"startDateStruct":509,"completionDateStruct":511,"leadSponsor":513,"locationsCount":64},"100507904","beneficial-or-fostering-future-struggles-bffs-characterizing-the-role-of-friends-in-the-development-of-13--to-17-year-old-adolescents-100507904","NCT05893459","Beneficial or Fostering Future Struggles (B.F.F.s)? Characterizing the Role of Friends in the Development of 13- to 17-Year-Old Adolescents","Beneficial or Fostering Future Struggles (B.F.F.s)? Characterizing the Role of Friends in Adolescent Development","BFFs","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 13 to 17 years old at first study visit\n* Qualify as either maltreated (endorses history of maltreatment - physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional maltreatment, or neglect and\u002For has substantiated record of child maltreatment per Department of Social Services \\[DSS\\] records) or non-maltreated (denies history of maltreatment and\u002For no substantiated record of child maltreatment per DSS records)\n* Parent participating in the study visit is a non-offending caregiver (no record of substantiated maltreatment against the adolescent participant)\n* Participant identifies a best friend who is not a sibling or previous\u002Fcurrent romantic partner who can accompany them to the study visit\n* Participant, caregiver, and friend are fluent in written and spoken English\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* \\\u003C13 or \\>17 at time of first study visit\n* No available non-offending parent or guardian\u002Fcaregiver to participate in the study\n* No best friend identified to accompany the participant to the study\n* Participant, caregiver, or friend is not fluent in written and spoken English","13 Years","17 Years",{"count":486,"type":21},120,[77],"The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate how the friendship experiences of maltreated (i.e., abused and\u002For neglected) and non-maltreated adolescents differentially influence their risk for adverse outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1. How do the friendships of maltreated adolescents differ from those of non-maltreated adolescents?\n2. Which friendship experiences influence the associations between maltreatment and ability to regulate stress, as well as future mental health difficulties and revictimization?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Attend the initial study visit on the campus of the University of South Carolina with their primary caregiver and a best friend during which they will:\n\n  * Complete study questionnaires\n  * Be connected to a device that records their physical ability to manage stress\n  * Complete a task during which they will be audio and video recorded and complete a brief assessment rating how they are feeling at different times during task completion\n  * Depending on which research group they are placed in, be assigned to discuss their experience doing this task with their friend (intervention group) or sit quietly in a room for 5 minutes (comparison group)\n* The follow-up study visit will involve completion of study questionnaires online or via mail 6 months later\n\nAdditionally, the participant's caregiver and friend will complete study questionnaires.\n\nResearchers will compare the intervention group (debriefs with a friend) and comparison group (sits quietly for 5 minutes) to see if the presence of and discussion with the friend influences their physical ability to regulate stress and future outcomes.",[28,490,491,492,493],"Interpersonal Relations","Victimisation","Psychopathology","Electrocardiography",[495,496,497,498,499,500,434,492,501,502,285,286,28,503,504,505],"Adolescents","Teenagers","Teens","Youth","Friendship","Friends","Psychological Trauma","Childhood Trauma","Psychophysiology","Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia","Longitudinal Studies","2024-07-12",{"date":508,"type":56},"2024-07-16",{"date":510,"type":56},"2023-12-02",{"date":512,"type":21},"2025-03-01",{"name":514,"class":63},"University of South Carolina"]