[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"chronic-non-specific-neck-pain\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:chronic-non-specific-neck-pain":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,45,72,100,128,153,175,198,221],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":4},"100645216","comparing-between-mulligan-technique-and-active-release-technique-in-treatment-of-chronic-mechanical-neck-pain-100645216",false,"NCT07679438","Comparing Between Mulligan Technique and Active Release Technique in Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain","Effect of Mulligan Mobilization Technique Versus Active Release Technique on Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain","MWM\u002FART","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inclusion Criteria\n\nThe participants will be included in this study if they meet the following criteria:\n\n1. Have referred from orthopedic surgeon diagnosed with NSCNP that has been localized to the cervical and periscapular areas for at least three months\n2. Aged from 18-40 years\n3. Having a score more than 10 on the Neck disability index (NDI)\n4. BMI from 18.5 to 29.9 kg\u002Fm2.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nThe Participants will be excluded from this study if they meet any of the following criteria\n\n1. History of previous neck surgery.\n2. Recent or old fractures.\n3. Cognitive impairment and inability to understand the scale.\n4. Systematic inflammatory disease e.g., rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, neck pain with radiculopathy or neuropathy.\n5. A score of below 10 or above 40 points out of 50 on the NDI.","ALL","18 Years","40 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},36,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This study will be conducted to compare between Mulligan mobilization technique and Active release technique in management of non-specific chronic neck pain as regard to neck pain, cervical range of motion and neck function.",[28],"Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain",[30,31,32],"Mulligan","Active release technique","neck pain","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-25",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-07-01","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":22},"2026-07",{"date":41,"type":22},"2026-08",{"name":43,"class":44},"Cairo University","OTHER",{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":53,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":57,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":63,"startDateStruct":65,"completionDateStruct":67,"leadSponsor":69,"locationsCount":71},"100643666","effects-of-telerehabilitation-and-supervised-clinic-based-rehab-with-pain-neuroscience-education-for-painkinesiophobia-and-functional-disability-among-chronic-non-specific-neck-pain-patients-100643666","NCT07617623","Effects of Telerehabilitation and Supervised Clinic Based Rehab With Pain Neuroscience Education for Pain,Kinesiophobia and Functional Disability Among Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age between 18-40 years of both male and female gender.\n2. Currently suffering from neck pain \\& bilateral neck pain for at least three months.\n3. Moderate pain intensity (30mm to 70mm) on Visual Analogue Scale .\n4. Access \\& knowledge of mobile phone and internet use .\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Any previous neck surgery or cervical trauma .\n2. Fibromyalgia \\& Myelopathy .\n3. Spinal deformities like thoracic hyper kyphosis or scoliosis .\n4. Cervical radiculopathy ,vertigo, cancer \\& vertebral fractures.\n5. Infection or inflammatory arthritis in cervical spine .\n6. History of the whiplash injury .\n7. Physiotherapeutic treatment in the last six months .\n8. Cognitive disorder that prohibited the pain neuroscience education intervention from being followed .",{"count":52,"type":22},45,[25],"Chronic non-specific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition affecting a large proportion of the population worldwide. It is characterized by persistent neck pain lasting more than three months without a specific underlying pathology. Many patients experience ongoing symptoms such as pain, reduced range of motion, functional limitations, and psychological factors like kinesiophobia, which can negatively affect recovery and quality of life.\n\nConventional physiotherapy, including supervised clinic-based rehabilitation, is widely used for the management of chronic non-specific neck pain. These programs typically involve exercise therapy and patient education; however, access to regular in-clinic treatment can be limited due to factors such as travel, cost, and time constraints.\n\nTelerehabilitation has emerged as an alternative approach that allows delivery of physiotherapy services through online platforms, improving accessibility and convenience for patients. In addition, pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an evidence-based strategy that helps patients understand pain mechanisms, reduce fear-avoidance behaviors, and improve treatment outcomes when combined with exercise therapy.\n\nAlthough both telerehabilitation and supervised clinic-based rehabilitation are effective, there is limited evidence directly comparing these two approaches when combined with standardized pain neuroscience education.\n\nTherefore, this randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of telerehabilitation with pain neuroscience education and supervised clinic-based rehabilitation with pain neuroscience education on pain intensity, functional disability, and kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain.",[56],"Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain",[58,59,60,61,56],"Pain Neuroscience Education","Telerehabilitation","Supervised Clinic Based Rehab","Kinesiophobia","RECRUITING",{"date":64,"type":37},"2026-06-29",{"date":66,"type":22},"2026-06",{"date":68,"type":22},"2026-11-20",{"name":70,"class":44},"Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences",1,{"id":73,"slug":74,"hasResults":11,"nctId":75,"briefTitle":76,"officialTitle":77,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":78,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":79,"enrollmentInfo":80,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":82,"briefSummary":83,"conditions":84,"keywords":85,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":91,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":92,"startDateStruct":94,"completionDateStruct":96,"leadSponsor":98,"locationsCount":71},"100632592","efficacy-and-safety-of-acupuncture-combined-with-chinese-herbal-fumigation-for-chronic-non-specific-neck-pain-100632592","NCT07515690","Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture Combined With Chinese Herbal Fumigation for Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain","Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture Combined With Chinese Herbal Fumigation in the Treatment of Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged 18 to 65 years, any gender\n* Diagnosed with chronic non-specific neck pain lasting ≥ 3 months\n* Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 4\n* Cervical range of motion reduced by ≥ 20% compared to normal range\n* Conformity to both Western diagnostic criteria and Traditional Chinese Medicine pattern differentiation for \"cold coagulation type\" neck pain\n* Voluntarily participate and provide signed informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of confirmed cervical disc herniation, nerve compression, or other specific pathologies (e.g., infection, tumor, fracture, etc.)\n* History of cervical spine surgery or recent acute neck trauma\n* Concomitant severe systemic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, hematological, or psychiatric disorders)\n* Pregnancy or breastfeeding\n* Known allergy to acupuncture needles or herbal fumigation components\n* Receipt of other neck pain-related treatments (e.g., physical therapy, medication, or acupuncture) within the past month\n* Presence of open wounds or skin lesions in the treatment area\n* Any patient not meeting the inclusion criteria","65 Years",{"count":81,"type":22},120,[25],"Chronic non-specific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder that significantly affects quality of life and functional ability. Conventional treatments often provide limited relief and may be associated with adverse effects. Acupuncture and Chinese herbal fumigation are commonly used therapies in traditional Chinese medicine and have shown potential benefits in pain relief and functional recovery.\n\nThis multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal fumigation in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. A total of 120 participants will be randomly assigned to three groups: acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal fumigation, acupuncture combined with sham fumigation, and acupuncture alone. All participants will receive five treatment sessions within three weeks, followed by a four-week follow-up period.\n\nThe primary outcome measure is pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures include the Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical range of motion, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), quality of life scale, and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). This study aims to provide high-quality clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal fumigation for chronic non-specific neck pain.",[28],[86,87,88,89,90],"Acupuncture","Chinese herbal fumigation","Chronic neck pain","Traditional Chinese medicine","Randomized controlled trial","2026-04-07",{"date":93,"type":37},"2026-04-13",{"date":95,"type":22},"2026-05",{"date":97,"type":22},"2027-03",{"name":99,"class":44},"Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman",{"id":101,"slug":102,"hasResults":11,"nctId":103,"briefTitle":104,"officialTitle":104,"acronym":105,"eligibilityCriteria":106,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":107,"enrollmentInfo":108,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":110,"briefSummary":111,"conditions":112,"keywords":113,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":120,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":121,"startDateStruct":123,"completionDateStruct":125,"leadSponsor":126,"locationsCount":4},"100627715","effects-of-transcutaneous-neuromodulation-and-cervical-exercise-in-students-with-chronic-nonspecific-cervical-pain-100627715","NCT07452237","Effects of Transcutaneous Neuromodulation and Cervical Exercise in Students With Chronic Nonspecific Cervical Pain","TN-E-CNCP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* University students aged 18-30 years\n* Chronic non-specific neck pain lasting ≥ 3 months\n* Pain intensity \\>3\u002F10 on VAS\n* No pharmacological or physiotherapy treatment in the past 3 months\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Specific cervical pathology (e.g., radiculopathy)\n* Neurological, cardiovascular, systemic, or infectious disease\n* Diagnosed psychological disorders\n* Pregnancy or postpartum period \\\u003C 1 year\n* Regular use of analgesics, opioids, or antidepressants\n* Previous cervical spine or shoulder surgery\n* Electronic implants\n* Neck pain associated with vertigo","30 Years",{"count":109,"type":22},51,[25],"This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of a cervical exercise program, transcutaneous neuromodulation of the spinal accessory nerve, and a placebo intervention on pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, cervical proprioception, functional disability, depression, anxiety, and stress in university students with chronic non-specific neck pain. The study will include a six-week intervention period with pre- and post-treatment assessments. The findings may contribute to the development of accessible physiotherapy interventions within university settings.",[28],[56,114,115,116,117,118,119],"Neck Pain","University Students","Cervical Exercise","Deep Cervical Flexor Training","Transcutaneous Neuromodulation","Low-Frquency Electrical Stimulation","2026-03-05",{"date":122,"type":37},"2026-03-09",{"date":124,"type":22},"2026-04-01",{"date":36,"type":22},{"name":127,"class":44},"Universidad Francisco de Vitoria",{"id":129,"slug":130,"hasResults":11,"nctId":131,"briefTitle":132,"officialTitle":132,"acronym":133,"eligibilityCriteria":134,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":135,"maxAge":136,"enrollmentInfo":137,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":139,"briefSummary":140,"conditions":141,"keywords":142,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":145,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":146,"startDateStruct":148,"completionDateStruct":150,"leadSponsor":152,"locationsCount":71},"100616234","telerehabilitation-face-to-face-exercises-and-a-mixed-model-in-chronic-non-specific-neck-pain-100616234","NCT07302958","Telerehabilitation, Face-to-Face Exercises, and a Mixed Model in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain","TR Neck pain","Inclusion Criteria\n\nPatients will be included in the study if they fulfil the following criteria:\n\n* Adults (20-40 years) with chronic non-specific neck pain (≥3 months' duration).\n* Participants with stable internet, and experienced in using either computer, laptop, tablet, or smartphone.\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\nPatients will be excluded if they had:\n\n1. Neck pain due to specific pathologies (e.g., fractures, infections, or malignancies) and severe neurological deficits.\n2. History of neck surgery.\n3. Participants with cognitive impairments or language barriers that would prevent them from following the interventions.","20 Years","45 Years",{"count":138,"type":22},68,[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of different physical therapy delivery models in treating chronic non-specific neck pain in adults aged 20-40 years with a history of neck pain for three months or longer.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Which approach (tele-rehabilitation, face-to-face exercises, or a mixed model) is most effective at reducing neck pain intensity and functional disability?\n* Are there significant differences between the three models in improving cervical range of motion, kinesiophobia (fear of movement), patient satisfaction, and adherence to the exercise program?\n\nResearchers will compare three groups to see if the delivery model affects outcomes:\n\n1. A tele-rehabilitation group receiving real-time, video-guided exercise sessions.\n2. A face-to-face group receiving traditional, in-person supervised exercise sessions.\n3. A mixed-model group receiving a combination of both tele-rehabilitation and face-to-face sessions.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Be randomly assigned to one of the three groups.\n* Engage in a structured exercise program for 45-60 minutes per session, three times a week for six weeks.\n* Follow a phased exercise protocol that begins with mobility and pain reduction, progresses to strengthening, and finishes with endurance and functional training.\n* Complete assessments for pain, disability, range of motion, and other outcomes at the beginning and end of the 6-week intervention, with a final follow-up at 3 months.",[28],[59,143,144],"Chronic Non specific Neck pain","Face to face physiotherapy","2026-02-27",{"date":147,"type":37},"2026-03-02",{"date":149,"type":22},"2026-02-24",{"date":151,"type":22},"2026-12-31",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":154,"slug":155,"hasResults":11,"nctId":156,"briefTitle":157,"officialTitle":157,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":158,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":159,"enrollmentInfo":160,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":161,"briefSummary":162,"conditions":163,"keywords":164,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":167,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":168,"startDateStruct":170,"completionDateStruct":172,"leadSponsor":174,"locationsCount":4},"100615266","mckenzie-versus-maitland-cervical-mobilization-technique-in-management-of-non-specific-neck-pain-100615266","NCT07290374","Mckenzie Versus Maitland Cervical Mobilization Technique in Management of Non-specific Neck Pain.","Inclusion criteria:\n\n* 45 Subjects diagnosed and referred from orthopedist with chronic NSNP.\n* All participants will have neck pain with mobility deficit according to ICF classification of neck pain..\n* Duration of symptoms is more than 3 months to be chronic.\n* Subjects of both genders will be involved in the study.\n* Subject are young adult with the age span between 18 \\&29 years because this period is characterized by extensive changes, handling choices and opportunities such as moving out from home, choice of education and career, and establishing an adult lifestyle.\n* All participants will be selected with body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 24.9kg\u002Fcm2 which is considered the normal range of BMI.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* History of cervical surgery.\n* Whiplash injuries.\n* Inflammatory arthropathy.\n* Myelopathy.\n* If neck pain is associated with radiculopathy.\n* Vertebrobasilar insufficiency.\n* Red flags suggesting of cancer or infection .\n* Fracture.\n* Diabetic patients.\n* Hypertensive patients.\n* Obese subjects.\n* Vertigo.\n* Thoracic outlet syndrome.","29 Years",{"count":52,"type":22},[25],"This study will be conducted to compare between Mckenzie exercises and Maitland cervical mobilization technique in management of non-specific neck pain as regard to neck pain, cervical range of motion, neck function and cervical proprioception.",[28],[165,166,32],"Maitland","Mckenzie","2025-12-05",{"date":169,"type":37},"2025-12-18",{"date":171,"type":22},"2025-12-12",{"date":173,"type":22},"2026-04-15",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":176,"slug":177,"hasResults":11,"nctId":178,"briefTitle":179,"officialTitle":180,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":181,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":135,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":182,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":184,"briefSummary":185,"conditions":186,"keywords":187,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":190,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":191,"startDateStruct":193,"completionDateStruct":195,"leadSponsor":197,"locationsCount":71},"100603108","impact-of-cervical-high-intensity-resistive-exercises-in-patients-with-chronic-non-specific-neck-pain-100603108","NCT07132229","Impact Of Cervical High-Intensity Resistive Exercises In Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain","Impact of Cervical High-Intensity Resistive Exercises on Ventilatory Measures in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Thirty-four patients diagnosed CNSNP.\n2. Age of the patients between 20-40 years.\n3. Non-specific neck pain started more than 3 months.\n4. Reduce ventilatory function; FVC \\>= 70% from predicted.\n5. Waist to height ratio (WtHR)\\> 60 %.\n6. Positive craniocervical flexion test.\n7. Positive neck flexor endurance test.\n8. Pain at neck after prolonged static weight bearing positions.\n9. Pain with palpation of the neck paraspinal or suboccipital or trapezius muscles.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. History of whiplash injury.\n2. Clinical sign of cervical radiculopathy.\n3. Clinical signs of cervical myelopathy.\n4. Rheumatoid Arthritis or any other autoimmune diseases.\n5. Any respiratory disorders.\n6. Tumors.\n7. vertebrobasilar insufficiency VBI.",{"count":183,"type":22},34,[25],"Purposes of the study\n\nTo investigate the effect of adding Cervical High-Intensity Resistive Exercises to conventional physical therapy in patients with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain",[28],[32,188,189],"cervical pain","High-Intensity Resistive Exercises","2025-08-18",{"date":192,"type":37},"2025-08-20",{"date":194,"type":22},"2025-08-10",{"date":196,"type":22},"2026-02-01",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":199,"slug":200,"hasResults":11,"nctId":201,"briefTitle":202,"officialTitle":203,"acronym":204,"eligibilityCriteria":205,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":206,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":208,"phases":4,"briefSummary":209,"conditions":210,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":212,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":213,"startDateStruct":215,"completionDateStruct":217,"leadSponsor":219,"locationsCount":71},"100586478","predictive-variables-of-outcome-in-subjects-with-chronic-rachialgia-referred-to-different-pathways-of-physiotherapy-100586478","NCT06915896","Predictive Variables of Outcome in Subjects With Chronic Rachialgia Referred to Different Pathways of Physiotherapy.","Predictive Variables of Outcome in Subjects With Chronic Rachialgia Referred to Different Pathways of Physiotherapy: Multicenter Prospective Study","PRE-CBP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age of majority;\n* Medical diagnosis of nonspecific low back pain or nonspecific neck pain;\n* Chronic symptoms, present for at least 6 months;\n* Waiting for rehabilitation in a public health pathways\n* Signature of informed consent to participate in the study and processing of personal data.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subjects with cognitive impairment",{"count":207,"type":22},200,"OBSERVATIONAL","The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive value of various biopsychosocial variables on the outcomes of subjects with chronic spinal pain undergoing public health rehabilitation pathways. Secondly, the study aims to assess the reliability of certain questionnaires, classified as Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), which are frequently used in the evaluation of spinal pain but whose metric properties have not yet been established. These objectives will be pursued through two comprehensive assessment sessions (before and after rehabilitation), a re-test session immediately before rehabilitation (to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaires in stable subjects), and two follow-up assessments at 3 and 6 months after discharge.",[211,28],"Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain","2025-03-31",{"date":214,"type":37},"2025-04-08",{"date":216,"type":37},"2023-10-30",{"date":218,"type":22},"2026-05-01",{"name":220,"class":44},"Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus",{"id":222,"slug":223,"hasResults":11,"nctId":224,"briefTitle":225,"officialTitle":226,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":227,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":228,"enrollmentInfo":229,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":231,"briefSummary":232,"conditions":233,"keywords":235,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":238,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":239,"startDateStruct":241,"completionDateStruct":242,"leadSponsor":244,"locationsCount":71},"100577502","instrument-assisted-soft-tissue-mobilization-versus-muscle-energy-technique-on-chronic-non-specific-neck-pain-100577502","NCT06799130","Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain","Effect Of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Muscle Energy Technique Over Sternocleidomastoid In Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. The subjects are of both genders, aged between 18-35 years old .\n2. Subjects with Neck pain continued for at least the last 12 weeks .\n3. body mass index (18.5-24.9).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Any specific neck pathology as radiculopathy, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic diseases\n2. Sensory problems at the mid or upper back .\n3. A tendency to hemorrhage or anticoagulation treatment. And nonsteroidal pain medication .\n4. Signs of severe pathology such as malignancy, fractures of the cervical spine, cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy, or vascular syndromes such as vertebrobasilar insufficiency .\n5. surgery of the cervical spine, whiplash trauma (in the past or recent, as cause of the complaint).","35 Years",{"count":230,"type":22},60,[25],"the aim of this study is to investigate if there is any difference between INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION and Muscle Energy Technique over sternocleidomastoid on Neck pain, Range of motion and Functional disability in patients with Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain",[234],"CHRONIC NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN",[236,237],"instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization","muscle energy technique","2025-01-23",{"date":240,"type":37},"2025-01-29",{"date":240,"type":22},{"date":243,"type":22},"2025-03-30",{"name":43,"class":44}]