[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"circumcision\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:circumcision":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,47,80,105,127],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100570371","compared-reversed-us-guided-dorsal-penile-nerve-block-rusdpnb-with-dpnb-in-circumcisions-for-pediatric-patients-100570371",false,"NCT06706375","Compared Reversed US-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (RUSDPNB) With DPNB in Circumcisions for Pediatric Patients","A Comparison of Reversed-Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (RUS-DPBP) and DPNB in Circumcisions for Pediatric Patients","CIRCUSPRO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* male\n* undergoing circumcision\n* informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* other surgery than circumcision in the same time\n* contraindication to local anesthesia\n* allergy to bupivacaine\n* chronic opiates treatment","MALE","17 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},216,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Circumcision is a widely performed surgical procedure. For this reason, optimal analgesic management is essential. Loco-regional anesthesia, particularly penile blocks, combined with general anesthesia is the technique of choice for managing analgesia during circumcisions.\n\nUltrasound is increasingly used in locoregional anesthesia techniques. There is already human research on penile blocks and the use of ultrasound. Studies carried out to date describe an optimization of pain relief in children after circumcision compared with the alternative technique without ultrasound, as well as a reduction in local complications due to injection. However, other studies tend to contradict these findings.\n\nIn order to provide additional knowledge and to verify whether ultrasound could provide with more optimal relief after your circumcision, the investigators are carrying out this study.\n\nThe investigators are proposing to every patient aged 0 to under 18 who is going to undergo circumcision to take part in this project. A letter is sent to all potential participants no later than 3 days before the operation. Consent can be signed no later than the day of the operation. The cooling-off period is the same regardless of age.\n\nTaking part in the study does not affect the operation in any way. The block will take place in the operating room, prior to surgery.\n\nIn this study, participants are randomized into groups. This method is important for obtaining reliable results.\n\n* Group 1 (intervention group): The penile block will be performed using ultrasound.\n* Group 2 (control group): The penile block will be performed using anatomical landmarks.\n\nThis is a \"single-blind\" study, which means that only the anaesthetists, investigators and operating room team will be aware of the allocation to one of the two groups.\n\nData on opiate consumption will be registered as well as the different durations preoperatively, intraoperatively, postoperatively, back in the recovery room and before returning home or any complications as well as pain assessment.",[27,28,29,30],"Circumcision","Ultrasound","Opioid Consumption","Penile Surgery",[32,33],"circumcision","reversed ultrasound guided dorsal penile nerve block","RECRUITING","2026-03-24",{"date":37,"type":38},"2026-03-27","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":38},"2024-11-29",{"date":42,"type":21},"2027-09",{"name":44,"class":45},"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois","OTHER",1,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":54,"minAge":55,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":68,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":71,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":72,"startDateStruct":74,"completionDateStruct":76,"leadSponsor":78,"locationsCount":46},"100618951","virtual-reality-induced-pain-and-anxiety-relief-in-outpatient-urological-procedures-100618951","NCT07338292","VIrtual Reality Induced Pain and anxiEty Relief in Outpatient UROlogical Procedures","VIrtual Reality Induced Pain and anxiEty Relief in Outpatient UROlogical Procedures: a Post-marketing Clinical Investigation of REALICA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male\u002Ffemale with age ≥ 18 years\n* Patient who are undergoing one of the interventions mentioned in the study for the first time;\n* Eligibility for minimally invasive ambulatory urological procedures, possibly requiring vascular access (circumcision, prostate biopsy, flexible cystoscopy);\n* Ability to understand instructions and complete study questionnaires;\n* Signed informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Absolute contraindications to the planned urological procedure (e.g., active urinary tract infection, anatomical urethral abnormalities);\n* Recent urological manipulations (e.g., urethral dilation, bladder biopsy, insertion or removal of a double-J stent);\n* Medical contraindications to the use of virtual reality, including uncontrolled photosensitive epilepsy and relevant neurological, ophthalmologic, or otolaryngologic disorders;\n* Presence of severe psychiatric disorders or major cardiovascular diseases that may interfere with study participation;\n* Previous adverse reactions to virtual reality exposure;\n* Use of analgesic medications within 24 hours prior to the procedure;\n* Use of drugs that may alter consciousness or impair the ability to complete psychological assessments;\n* Severe communication disabilities or significant hearing impairment that would prevent completion of questionnaires.","ALL","18 Years","99 Years",{"count":58,"type":21},56,[24],"Though the efficacy of VRH is documented in various outpatient urological procedures and has provided promising preliminary information in prostate biopsy, its systematic use in urology remains poorly studied. Considering the potential of invasive urological procedures to induce significant patient discomfort, the application of innovative immersive approaches, such as those offered by medical devices, could lead to an overall clinical benefit. Among these, REALICA® (available from https:\u002F\u002FREALICA.io\u002Fen\u002F), a class I CE medical device, widely used in hospitals and validated by numerous studies, represents a valuable resource in urology, supported by high satisfaction rates received in abdominal surgery and extracorporeal lithotripsy",[62,63,64,27,65,66,67],"Urologic Diseases","Prostate Biopsy","Flexible Cystoscopy","Stress","Anxiety","Pain",[69,70],"virtual reality","medical device","2026-01-07",{"date":73,"type":38},"2026-01-13",{"date":75,"type":38},"2025-12-17",{"date":77,"type":21},"2026-10-31",{"name":79,"class":45},"Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS",{"id":81,"slug":82,"hasResults":11,"nctId":83,"briefTitle":84,"officialTitle":85,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":86,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":88,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":90,"briefSummary":91,"conditions":92,"keywords":95,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":96,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":97,"startDateStruct":99,"completionDateStruct":101,"leadSponsor":103,"locationsCount":46},"100577086","technological-devices-in-circumcision-100577086","NCT06793722","Technological Devices in Circumcision","The Effect of Technological Devices on the Child's Pain and Anxiety Level in Circumcision Performed With Local Anesthesia","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Circumcision for medical or religious reasons.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with chronic diseases.\n* Children with genital medical problems.\n* Children with mental and communication disabilities and their parents.","6 Years",{"count":89,"type":21},50,[24],"It aims to investigate the effect of circumcision on the pain and anxiety level of children who are circumcised by watching videos\u002Fplaying games during the procedure. Previous studies have been conducted to explain the procedure with informative videos and games before circumcision, and reductions in anxiety and pain levels have been detected. The research will start with hospitalization and end with a check-up after discharge.",[93,94,27],"Circumcision Adult","Circumcision, Male",[32],"2025-09-29",{"date":98,"type":38},"2025-10-02",{"date":100,"type":38},"2025-01-20",{"date":102,"type":21},"2025-12-31",{"name":104,"class":45},"Adiyaman University",{"id":106,"slug":107,"hasResults":11,"nctId":108,"briefTitle":109,"officialTitle":110,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":111,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":112,"enrollmentInfo":113,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":115,"briefSummary":116,"conditions":117,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":119,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":120,"startDateStruct":122,"completionDateStruct":123,"leadSponsor":125,"locationsCount":46},"100598861","dilemma-of-neonatal-circumcision-in-egypt-100598861","NCT07076992","Dilemma of Neonatal Circumcision in Egypt","The Dilemma of Neonatal Circumcision in Egypt: A Comparative Randomized Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male infants less than 3 months old.\n* Undergoing circumcision.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male infants more than 3 months old.\n* Infants with bleeding disorders.\n* Neonates with hypospadias, epispadias, micropenis, disorders of sex development (DSD)\n* Neonates with buried or webbed penis.","3 Months",{"count":114,"type":21},60,[24],"The study aims to compare wound healing, wound healing complications, cosmetic outcome, and level of parental satisfaction amongst four techniques of neonatal circumcision.",[118,27],"Neonate","2025-07-22",{"date":121,"type":38},"2025-07-23",{"date":119,"type":38},{"date":124,"type":21},"2025-12-30",{"name":126,"class":45},"Tanta University",{"id":128,"slug":129,"hasResults":11,"nctId":130,"briefTitle":131,"officialTitle":132,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":133,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":54,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":134,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":136,"briefSummary":137,"conditions":138,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":143,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":144,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":145,"startDateStruct":147,"completionDateStruct":149,"leadSponsor":151,"locationsCount":46},"100576780","enhanced-recovery-after-urologic-surgery-100576780","NCT06789744","Enhanced Recovery After Urologic Surgery","Enhanced Recovery After Urologic Surgery: a Prospective Observational Study Comparing Regional with Conventional Anesthetic Techniques","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* any age.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III.\n* undergo urological surgery.\n* receive one of the following analgesic techniques: epidural analgesia (EA), paravertebral block (PVB), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), or intrathecal morphine.\n* provided voluntary informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* a bleeding disorder or coagulopathy.\n* infection at the intended puncture site or systemic infection.\n* a known allergy to local anesthetics.\n* spinal deformity or spinal injury.\n* a psychiatric disorder that could impair their ability to cooperate with the study protocol.\n* pregnant or breastfeeding.\n* severe cardiovascular or pulmonary dysfunction.\n* chronic opioid use (defined as \\>1 month) at high doses.",{"count":135,"type":21},150,[24],"This clinical trial aims to investigate the analgesic efficacy of several perioperative pain management strategies-specifically, epidural analgesia, paravertebral blockade, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and intrathecal morphine-in patients undergoing a range of urological procedures. These procedures include pediatric circumcision, hydrocelectomy, inguinal hernia repair, renal cyst excision, and transurethral resection of the prostate. The trial will also evaluate the safety profiles of two specific local anesthetics, liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The primary research question is whether these different analgesic techniques reduce postoperative opioid requirements in patients undergoing urological surgery. A secondary question explores the adverse events associated with the use of liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine in this population.\n\nParticipants will be:\n\nUrological surgery patients undergoing one of the aforementioned procedures. These participants will be randomized to receive one of the following pain management modalities: epidural analgesia, paravertebral blockade, TAP block, intravenous PCA, or intrathecal morphine. Patient assessments will be conducted in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Outcome measures will include: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, total postoperative analgesic consumption, recovery status, patient satisfaction, and time to return of bowel function.",[27,139,140,141,142],"Hydrocelectomy","Hernia","Renal Cyst","Prostate","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-01-22",{"date":146,"type":38},"2025-01-24",{"date":148,"type":21},"2025-02-01",{"date":150,"type":21},"2025-05-20",{"name":152,"class":45},"Xiaguang Duan"]