[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"cochlear-implant-recipients\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:cochlear-implant-recipients":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":5},"100645169","patient-oriented-research-to-optimize-cochlear-implant-outcomes-100645169",false,"NCT07678879","Patient-Oriented Research to Optimize Cochlear Implant Outcomes","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Adults between ages of 18 years and 95 years\n2. Native language is American English\n3. Have one or two CIs from any of the three FDA-approved CI manufacturers (Cochlear Americas, Advanced Bionics, MED-EL).\n4. Experience of \\>6 of CI use.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Score 24 or below on a visual Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE; Folstein et al., 1975) to rule out dementia\n2. Known diagnosis of dementia\n3. Under the age of 18 years\n4. Unable to read and write in English (WRAT score \\\u003C70)\n5. Poorer than 20\u002F40 near vision on near-vision screening.","ALL","18 Years","95 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},100,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","The rationale is that only through understanding how individual Cochlear Implant (CI) patients respond to interventions investigators further develop precision-medicine approaches to optimize outcomes. In the proposed research study to investigate the hypotheses, investigators will address two Specific Aims:\n\nSpecific Aim #1: Define the auditory (bottom-up), cognitive-linguistic (top-down), and functional neuroimaging profiles of adult CI users. Investigators will enroll experienced CI users (\\> 6 months of CI use).\n\nSpecific Aim #2: Determine the feasibility of \"auditory\" (bottom-up) and \"cognitive\" (top-down) interventions to improve speech processing in adult CI users.\n\nThe main hypothesis is that the two interventions are feasible. Investigators also hypothesize that our study protocol will detect the variance in auditory processing profiles and that investigators will show promise in improving both speech processing (using speech recognition and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) responses)) and real-world functioning (using patient-reported measures), compared with no intervention.\n\nAdditional hypotheses to be explored are that baseline profile (as defined in Aim #1) will impact the magnitude of participants' responses to the interventions, as will order of interventions (Auditory-Cognitive vs. Cognitive-Auditory, AC vs CA).",[26,27,28,29],"Cochlear Implant","Cochlear Implant Users","Cochlear Implant Recipients","Cochlear Implant Listeners",[31,32,33,34,35],"CI users","CI","cochlear implant","cochlear implant user","cochlear","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-24",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-07-01","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":20},"2026-07",{"date":44,"type":20},"2032-06",{"name":46,"class":47},"Vanderbilt University Medical Center","OTHER"]