[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"colostomy-stoma\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:colostomy-stoma":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,47,75],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":17,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":21,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100463933","evaluation-of-single-port-sp-robotic-technology-in-colorectal-surgery-100463933",false,"NCT05321134","Evaluation of SINGLE PORT (SP) Robotic Technology in Colorectal Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* The subject is male or female, greater than or equal to 18 years of age. If female, the subject has a negative urine pregnancy test and is not lactating, or has not been of childbearing potential for at least 3 months prior to use of study product. To be considered to be not of childbearing potential, the subject must be postmenopausal for at least 2 years; have had a hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or be proven to be otherwise incapable of pregnancy. If of childbearing potential, the subject must have been practicing one of the following methods of contraception consistently for at least 1 month prior to study entry and agree to continue practicing it during the study: hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device, spermicide and barrier, spouse\u002Fpartner sterility; or is practicing abstinence and agrees to continue abstinence or to start an acceptable method of contraception from the above list if sexual activity commences.\n* There is documentation of a colorectal diagnosis requiring operative interventions with clinical plans for a robotic operation.\n* For robotic transanal procedures, patients who would meet standard guidelines for a transanal procedures (T1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma, Precancerous adenomas, and localized neuroendocrine tumors) distal to 15 cm from the anal verge.\n* The subject is in good general health as evidenced by medical history and physical examination\n* The subject is able and willing to provide written informed consent.\n* The subject agrees to comply with the requirements of the protocol and complete study measures.\n* The subject has stable residence and telephone.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* The subject is child less than 18 years of age\n* The subject is a female who is pregnant or lactating\n* The subject falls under the American Society of Anesthesia Class IV (Patients with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life).\n* The subject falls under American Society of Anesthesia Class V (Moribund patients who is not expected to survive without the operation)\n* The subject has a history of clinically significant renal, hepatic, neurological, cardiac or chronic pulmonary disease that in the judgment of the investigator precludes participation.\n* The subject has advanced\u002F Stage IV cancer\n* The subject has received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy\n* The subject requires an emergency operation.\n* The subject is unable to fully comprehend or consent to the study\n* The subject is unwilling to be available for follow-up assessments.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":18,"type":19},25,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[22],"NA","Currently a multiport robotic surgery platform (Intuitive Xi) is widely available and used for colorectal surgery indications. A Single port platform (Intuitive SP) is FDA approved for Head and Neck and Urology but has not been widely used in colorectal surgery. This study seeks to evaluate the safe and effective use of the SP platform for colorectal surgery indications.",[25,26,27,28],"Colo-rectal Cancer","Rectal Prolapse","Colostomy Stoma","Colorectal Disorders",[30,31,32,33],"robotic surgery","colorectal surgery","single port","Intuitive SP platform","RECRUITING","2026-05-26",{"date":37,"type":38},"2026-05-29","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":38},"2022-04-28",{"date":42,"type":19},"2028-04",{"name":44,"class":45},"University of California, Davis","OTHER",1,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":56,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":66,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":67,"startDateStruct":69,"completionDateStruct":71,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":46},"100635968","the-effects-of-colostomy-care-training-based-on-jeffries-simulation-theory-on-nursing-students-100635968","NCT07559578","The Effects of Colostomy Care Training Based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory on Nursing Students","The Effects of Colostomy Care Training Based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory on Nursing Students: A Randomised Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Volunteering to participate in the study,\n* Being a fourth-year nursing student,\n* Being enrolled in the HEM-402 course.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Being a nurse working in the clinic,\n* Not participating in the training programme,\n* Not wishing to continue with the research, wishing to withdraw from the research at any stage\n* Incomplete or incorrect completion of data collection tools",{"count":55,"type":19},64,[22],"The aim of this study is to examine the effect of colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory on nursing students' knowledge, skills, stress, self-efficacy, readiness, state anxiety, satisfaction, and self-confidence.\n\nThe study seeks to answer the following hypotheses: H1: Colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory affects nursing students' knowledge levels. H2: Colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory affects nursing students' skill levels. H3: Colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory affects nursing students' stress levels. H4: Colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory affects nursing students' self-efficacy levels. H5: Colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory affects nursing students' preparedness levels. H6: Colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory affects nursing students' levels of situational anxiety. H7: Colostomy care training based on Jeffries' Simulation Theory affects nursing students' levels of learning satisfaction and self-confidence. According to the Colostomy Care Training Booklet prepared by the researchers, all students will receive training on colostomy care procedures. Students in the intervention group will be individually taken to the simulation laboratory for colostomy care applications using moulage on standardized (simulated) patients, and they will be asked to perform the skills acquired during the training. The effectiveness of this intervention will be evaluated by comparing the intervention group with a control group. Participants: Students in the standardized patient simulation group will perform colostomy bag change and colostomy care skills in the simulation laboratory. Students in the low-fidelity simulation group (control group) will perform colostomy bag change and colostomy care skills using a low-fidelity patient model.",[27],[60,61,62,63,64,65],"Readiness","colostomy","care","self-sufficiency","self-confidence","simulation","2026-04-24",{"date":68,"type":38},"2026-04-30",{"date":70,"type":38},"2026-03-16",{"date":72,"type":19},"2026-06-16",{"name":74,"class":45},"Aybike Cici",{"id":76,"slug":77,"hasResults":11,"nctId":78,"briefTitle":79,"officialTitle":80,"acronym":81,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":83,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":85,"phases":4,"briefSummary":86,"conditions":87,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":89,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":90,"startDateStruct":92,"completionDateStruct":94,"leadSponsor":96,"locationsCount":98},"100384191","peristomal-hernia-rate-5-years-after-a-terminal-colostomy-with-the-parietex--tcm-parietal-prosthesis-versus-without-mesh-100384191","NCT04282473","Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh","Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh: Material-epidemiology Study","RESEDAE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* The patient must be affiliated with a health insurance programme\n* Patient was included in the GRECCAR 07 cohort (PHRC National 2011; N° RCB: 2011-A01572-39 - ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01380860)\n* Patient received colostomy 5 years ago\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* The subject is participating in another category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study\n* The subject signals opposition to participating in the study\n* The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship\n* The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding",{"count":84,"type":19},134,"OBSERVATIONAL","This study is a follow-up of the GRECCAR 07 cohort (NCT01380860). Patients will be evaluated 5 years following terminal colostomy to observe patient long-term patient outcomes from colostomy with and without mesh placement.",[27,88],"Parastomal Hernia","2024-06-24",{"date":91,"type":38},"2024-06-25",{"date":93,"type":38},"2022-05-24",{"date":95,"type":19},"2026-05",{"name":97,"class":45},"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes",16]