[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"csf-leak\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:csf-leak":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,43],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":14,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":31,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":32,"startDateStruct":35,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":42},"100621263","evaluation-of-internal-nasal-splint-supported-free-graft-versus-nasoseptal-flap-for-endoscopic-skull-base-repair-in-cerebrospinal-fluid-leaks-100621263",false,"NCT07368348","Evaluation of Internal Nasal Splint-Supported Free Graft Versus Nasoseptal Flap for Endoscopic Skull Base Repair in Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks","CSF","Inclusion Criteria: 1- Adults (≥18 years). 2- Patients with bilateral CSF leaks confirmed by imaging and biochemical testing (e.g., beta-2 transferrin).\n\n3- Patients with bilateral CSF leak and sever septal spur. 4- Patients with bilateral CSF leak and history of submucosal resection of nasal septum.\n\n5- Patients with bilateral CSF leak and large septal perforation. 6- Patients with bilateral CSF Leak and septal granuloma.\n\nExclusion Criteria: 1- Patients with contraindications to endoscopic surgery. 2- Active sinus or nasal infections. 3- Previous nasal or skull base surgery affecting the repair site.\n\n\\-","ALL","18 Years","70 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},20,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The study aims to compare the feasibility and effectiveness of using an internal nasal splint- supported free graft versus a nasoseptal flap alone for endoscopic repair of bilateral CSF leaks.\n\nResearch question:\n\nDoes the use of an internal nasal splint to support a free graft during endoscopic repair of bilateral CSF leaks improve outcomes compared to the use of a nasoseptal flap alone?",[27],"CSF Leak",[29],"CSF, Stent","RECRUITING","2026-05-23",{"date":33,"type":34},"2026-05-27","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":34},"2026-02-01",{"date":38,"type":21},"2026-11-01",{"name":40,"class":41},"Kafrelsheikh University","OTHER",1,{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":49,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":52,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":65,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":66,"startDateStruct":68,"completionDateStruct":70,"leadSponsor":72,"locationsCount":42},"100641040","conservative-vs-interventional-management-of-postsurgical-csf-pseudomeningocele-100641040","NCT07614399","Conservative vs Interventional Management of Postsurgical CSF Pseudomeningocele","Conservative Versus Interventional Management of Postsurgical CSF Pseudomeningocele: A Randomized Controlled Trial","PSEUDO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pseudomeningocele after elective intracranial surgery\n* Willing and able to give informed consent\n* No prior cranial or spinal surgical intervention\n* Pseudomeningocele Palpation Scale (PPS) II-IV, no severe pain of the PMC (VAS 7-10) - Tension MK\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* PMC following emergency or trauma surgery\n* Known or suspected infection at the PMC site at recruitment\n* Severe comorbidities preventing participation (e.g. terminal illness, organ failure)\n* Conditions requiring urgent unrelated surgical intervention",true,"80 Years",{"count":54,"type":21},60,[24],"Dear Sir or Madam,\n\nYou have been invited to participate in a clinical study whose aim is to compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pseudomeningocele - conservative management and interventional treatment (surgical or drainage procedures). CSF pseudomeningocele is a complication that may occur after brain surgery and is characterized by an accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid beneath the skin. At present, there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment approach.\n\nHow the study will be conducted\n\nAfter enrollment in the study, you will be randomly assigned (by chance) to one of two groups:\n\nConservative management: no surgical intervention, regular follow-up, and wound care.\n\nInterventional treatment: simple aspiration\u002Fpuncture, insertion of a lumbar drain, or reoperation.\n\nDuring the study, you will be followed for a period of 1 year. Follow-up examinations will include clinical assessment and brain imaging (CT or MRI) at 4 months and 12 months after enrollment.\n\nRisks associated with the interventional group Simple cyst aspiration\u002Fpuncture: infection, bleeding into the pseudomeningocele.\n\nLumbar drainage: infection, meningitis, bleeding at the insertion site, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, nerve root irritation, headaches.\n\nReoperation: bleeding, infection, complications related to general anesthesia. Expected duration of participation in the study\n\n12 months\n\nExpected total number of participants enrolled in the study\n\n20 participants\n\nBenefit of the study\n\nThe aim of the study is to compare the effect of surgical intervention with conservative management.\n\nCompensation for participation\n\nParticipation in this study is not associated with any financial compensation.",[27,58,59,60],"CSF Pressure Increased","CSF Circulation Disorder","Puncture",[62,63,64],"Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak","Postoperative Complications","Neurosurgery","2026-05-22",{"date":67,"type":34},"2026-05-29",{"date":69,"type":34},"2025-11-01",{"date":71,"type":21},"2030-11-01",{"name":73,"class":41},"Charles University, Czech Republic"]