[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"dental-implant-abutment-design\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:dental-implant-abutment-design":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,45,71,93,112],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100547384","effect-of-abutment-configuration-on-peri-implant-soft-and-hard-tissue-in-the-esthetic-zone---randomized-clinical-trial-100547384",false,"NCT06407271","Effect of Abutment Configuration on Peri-implant Soft and Hard Tissue in the Esthetic Zone - Randomized Clinical Trial","Effect of Abutment 3-dimensional Configuration on Peri-implant Soft and Hard Tissue in the Esthetic Zone - Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* patients over 18 years\n* good general health\n* good oral hygiene (FMPS \\\u003C 25%)\n* healthy periodontium (PPD \\\u003C 4mm)\n* thick phenotype\n* maxilla anterior region (extended to 15-25 positions)\n* solo missing teeth, intact adjacent teeth\n* type 1 alveolar shape after extraction 1\n* retained occlusion\n* baseline buccal bone wall thickness at least 1.5 mm, based on intact CBCT scan\n* patient voluntarily accepts and signs the information and consent form for the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* general ill health\n* general surgical or oral surgery contraindication\n* a patient who has undergone local radiotherapy\n* active periodontal inflammation, inflammation of the alveolar cavity\n* smoking\n* posterior region\n* pregnancy, lactation\n* psychological or mental involvement affecting individual plaque control\n* presence of an implant adjacent to the planned implant\n* inadequate oral hygiene\n* need for vertical bone augmentation\n* gingival recession\n* Inappropriate implant position for screw fixation\n* bruxism",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},30,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The aims of our study are to investigate in patients with immediate implantation replacing a single tooth in the maxillary anterior (#FDI 15-25) region the effect of (a) custom vs cylindrical stock healing abutments, then (b) screw retained single ceramic crowns, on the peri implant hard- and soft-tissue formation and blood flow.",[27,28],"Dental Implants, Single-Tooth","Dental Implant-Abutment Design",[30,31,27,28],"Peri-Implant Tissue Management","CAD-CAM","RECRUITING","2024-05-06",{"date":35,"type":36},"2024-05-09","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":36},"2023-12-13",{"date":40,"type":21},"2028-12-30",{"name":42,"class":43},"Semmelweis University","OTHER",1,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":52,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":54,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":58,"overallStatus":61,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":62,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":63,"startDateStruct":65,"completionDateStruct":67,"leadSponsor":69,"locationsCount":44},"100538111","soi-immediately-vs-delayed-100538111","NCT06286579","SOI Immediately vs Delayed","The Efficacy of New SOI Implant Surface for Immediately Loaded, Post-extractive Versus Delayed Implants","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any patient with at least one hopeless tooth in the mandible or maxilla, located between premolars, with intact post extractive alveolus. The implants must to engage at least 3 (mandible) to 5 (maxilla) mm of residual native bone over the socket.\n* Patients with 18 years or older, and able to sign an informed consent.\n* Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes\u002Fday); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes\u002Fday). Heavy smokers will be excluded.\n* Biotype will be categorized in thin (≤1 mm), medium (\\>1 - \\\u003C2 mm) or thick (≥2 mm).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* General contraindications to implant surgery.\n* Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.\n* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.\n* Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.\n* Patients with untreated periodontitis.\n* Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.\n* Uncontrolled diabetes.\n* Heavy smokers.\n* Pregnancy or nursing.\n* Substance abuser.\n* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.\n* Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients with infection and or inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol cannot be properly adhered to.\n* Patients referred only for implant placement and cannot be followed ant the treating centre.\n* Patients unable to be followed for 5 years",{"count":53,"type":21},70,[24],"The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical and radiographic of immediately loaded, immediate (post-extractive, test group) versus delayed (control group) implants with new SOI surface",[57,28],"Dental Implant",[57,59,60],"Immediately vs Delayes","Implant-abutment connection","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2024-02-28",{"date":64,"type":36},"2024-02-29",{"date":66,"type":21},"2024-03-01",{"date":68,"type":21},"2028-01-31",{"name":70,"class":43},"Università degli Studi di Sassari",{"id":72,"slug":73,"hasResults":11,"nctId":74,"briefTitle":75,"officialTitle":76,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":77,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":78,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":80,"briefSummary":81,"conditions":82,"keywords":84,"overallStatus":61,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":86,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":87,"startDateStruct":89,"completionDateStruct":90,"leadSponsor":92,"locationsCount":4},"100537352","rct-comparing-ks-versus-ts-for-ovedenture-100537352","NCT06276712","RCT Comparing KS Versus TS for Ovedenture","A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Titanium Grade V (KS) Versus Titanium Grade IV (TS) Implants for the Treatment of Edentulous Mandible","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any edentulous patient (post-extractive sites must to be healed from at least 3 months), with sufficient bone height and width in the anterior mandible (between canines) to allow the placement of two implants of 3.5 mm diameter of at least 8.5 mm of length.\n* 18 years or older, and able to sign an informed consent.\n* Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes\u002Fday); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes\u002Fday).\n* In case of post-extractive sites, they must have been healing for at least 3 months before being treated in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nExclusion criteria\n\n* General contraindications to implant surgery.\n* Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.\n* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.\n* Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.\n* Patients with untreated periodontitis.\n* Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.\n* Previous guided bone reconstruction at the intended implant sites.\n* Uncontrolled diabetes.\n* Pregnancy or nursing.\n* Substance abuser.\n* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.\n* Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients with infection and or inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol cannot be properly adhered to.\n* Patients referred only for implant placement and cannot be followed ant the treating centre.\n* Patients unable to be followed for 5 years.",{"count":79,"type":21},48,[24],"To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of KS implants used to rehabilitate edentulous mandible with dental-retained overdentures, and to compare it with same treatment on TS implants",[57,28,83],"Edentulous Jaw",[57,85,60],"Overdenture","2024-02-21",{"date":88,"type":36},"2024-02-26",{"date":66,"type":21},{"date":91,"type":21},"2028-01-30",{"name":70,"class":43},{"id":94,"slug":95,"hasResults":11,"nctId":96,"briefTitle":97,"officialTitle":98,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":99,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":100,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":102,"briefSummary":103,"conditions":104,"keywords":105,"overallStatus":61,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":86,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":108,"startDateStruct":109,"completionDateStruct":110,"leadSponsor":111,"locationsCount":44},"100538110","soi-ts3-surface-in-patients-with-and-without-type-2-diabetes-100538110","NCT06286566","Soi TS3 Surface in Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes","Comparison of Osstem TS3 With SOI Surface in Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients of at least 18 years old able to sign an informed consent.\n* Patients with at least a single tooth loss in the maxilla or mandible. Patient will provide only one site for the research. Implant sites must allow the placement of implants of at least 3.5 mm (upper laterals and lower incisors); 4 mm (central incisors, canines, and premolars) or 4.5 (molars) mm of diameter and at least 7 mm of length.\n* Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes\u002Fday); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes\u002Fday).\n* Patients with a plaque index (PI) of less than, or equal to 25% at the time of surgery.\n* In case of post-extractive sites, they must have been healing for at least 3 months before being treated in the study.\n* Only in the test group, patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus with at least 2 years of disease evaluation of HbA1C values between 6% and 10 % at the time of implant placement will be included.\n* Only in the control group, healthy patients without any sign of type 2 diabetes mellitus will be included\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* General contraindications to implant surgery (except for type two diabetes in test group).\n* Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.\n* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients (except for type two diabetes in test group).\n* Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.\n* Patients with untreated periodontitis.\n* Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.\n* Previous guided bone reconstruction at the intended implant sites.\n* Uncontrolled diabetes (except for type two diabetes in test group).\n* Pregnancy or nursing.\n* Substance abuser.\n* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.\n* Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients with infection and or inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol cannot be properly adhered to.\n* Patients referred only for implant placement and cannot be followed ant the treating centre.\n* Patients unable to be followed for 5 years.",{"count":101,"type":21},84,[24],"The aim of this prospective cohort study is to compare clinical and radiographic data of Osstem implants with SOI surface placed in patients with or without diabetes.",[57,28],[57,106,107],"Diabetics Patients","SOI Surface",{"date":64,"type":36},{"date":66,"type":21},{"date":68,"type":21},{"name":70,"class":43},{"id":113,"slug":114,"hasResults":11,"nctId":115,"briefTitle":116,"officialTitle":117,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":118,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":119,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":121,"briefSummary":122,"conditions":123,"keywords":124,"overallStatus":61,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":86,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":126,"startDateStruct":128,"completionDateStruct":129,"leadSponsor":130,"locationsCount":44},"100504107","comparison-ks-versus-ts-100504107","NCT05843981","Comparison KS Versus TS","The Use of an Innovative, Thickened and Lasting Implant Comparing KS Versus TS Implants for Prosthetic Rehabilitations","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAny partially edentulous patient with partial edentulism, requiring at least two dental implant-supported rehabilitations, being 18 years or older, and able to sign an informed consent. Implant sites must allow the placement of two implants of at least 4 (premolars) or 4.5 (molars) mm of diameter and 8.5 mm of length. Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes\u002Fday); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes\u002Fday). In case of post-extractive sites, they must have been healing for at least 3 months before being treated in the study. Implants can be adjacent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* General contraindications to implant surgery.\n* Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.\n* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.\n* Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.\n* Patients with untreated periodontitis.\n* Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.\n* Previous guided bone reconstruction at the intended implant sites.\n* Uncontrolled diabetes.\n* Pregnancy or nursing.\n* Substance abuser.\n* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.\n* Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients with infection and or inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.\n* Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol cannot be properly adhered to.\n* Patients referred only for implant placement and cannot be followed ant the treating centre.\n* Patients unable to be followed for 5 years.",{"count":120,"type":21},42,[24],"To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different implant systems with different implant-abutment connection: Osstem TS III (control group) versus Osstem KS (study group).",[57,28],[28,125,60],"KS dental implant",{"date":127,"type":36},"2024-02-23",{"date":66,"type":21},{"date":68,"type":21},{"name":70,"class":43}]