[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"disabled-persons\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:disabled-persons":25},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,6,0,[8,42,71,96,117,147],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":17,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":21,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":30,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":31,"startDateStruct":34,"completionDateStruct":36,"leadSponsor":38,"locationsCount":41},"100638334","quantitative-monitoring-of-disability-care-quality-for-long-term-care-facilities-2-100638334",false,"NCT07579832","Quantitative Monitoring of Disability Care Quality for Long-Term Care Facilities 2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Older adults with disabilities:\n\n  * Aged ≥ 65 years.\n  * Classified as CMS level 2-6 under Taiwan Long-Term Care Need Assessment.\n  * Currently receiving at least one Long-Term Care 2.0 service (e.g., home care, home-based rehabilitation, or respite care).\n  * Have normal cognitive function, or a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 23 when cognitive screening is performed.\n  * Own and are able to use a smartphone.\n  * Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.\n* Family caregivers:\n\n  * Have normal cognitive function, or a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 23 when cognitive screening is performed.\n  * Own and are able to use a smartphone.\n  * Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.\n* Multidisciplinary rehabilitation professionals:\n\n  * Employed or contracted by a home-based long-term care institution with at least three professional disciplines (e.g., physical therapists, occupational therapists, nurses, social workers).\n  * Own and are able to use a smartphone.\n  * Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Older adults with disabilities:\n\n  * Severe acute medical conditions or unstable physiological status.\n  * Severe cognitive impairment without a caregiver capable of assisting with questionnaires.\n  * Not currently receiving any long-term care services.\n* Family caregivers:\n\n  * Severe acute medical conditions or unstable physiological status.\n  * Severe cognitive impairment without ability to complete questionnaires.\n  * Not currently involved in long-term care services.\n* Multidisciplinary rehabilitation professionals:\n\n  * Providing services exclusively in non-home-based settings (e.g., institutional or hospital-only care).","ALL","65 Years",{"count":18,"type":19},1080,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[22],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a smart wearable wristband-based care system can improve the quality of care and physical activity levels among older adults with disabilities receiving home-based care. The study population includes older adults with disabilities, their family caregivers, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation service providers.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1. Whether the use of a smart wearable wristband can improve functional performance, as measured by Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), and Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) assessments?\n2. Whether the intervention can increase physical activity levels and improve overall care quality, while reducing caregiver burden and enhancing satisfaction?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n1. Wear a smart wearable wristband continuously for 8 weeks to record physical activity data, including step count, activity level, heart rate, and fatigue index.\n2. Undergo assessments at baseline and after the 8-week intervention, including Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), and the Chinese Version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-C).\n3. Provide data on caregiver stress, satisfaction, and service utilization for the analysis of care quality.",[25,26,27,28],"Disabled Persons","Activities of Daily Living","Aged","Motor Activity","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-06",{"date":32,"type":33},"2026-05-12","ACTUAL",{"date":35,"type":19},"2026-05-15",{"date":37,"type":19},"2027-12-31",{"name":39,"class":40},"National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan","OTHER",1,{"id":43,"slug":44,"hasResults":11,"nctId":45,"briefTitle":46,"officialTitle":47,"acronym":48,"eligibilityCriteria":49,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":50,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":53,"phases":4,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":61,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":62,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":63,"startDateStruct":65,"completionDateStruct":67,"leadSponsor":69,"locationsCount":41},"100625175","professional-impact-of-osteoarticular-trauma-100625175","NCT07419217","Professional Impact of Osteoarticular Trauma","Professional Impact of Osteoarticular Trauma: Retrospective Study on Return to Work, Accommodations, and Recognition in the Workplace","IPTO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults who were treated for osteoarticular trauma at the hospital between June 2021 and June 2024\n* Patients who were employed prior to the injury\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Death or major disability preventing completion of the questionnaire\n* Protected persons\n* Refusal to participate or no contact after follow-up\n* Patients who were unemployed prior to the trauma","18 Years",{"count":52,"type":19},200,"OBSERVATIONAL","This study aims to describe the medical, social, and organizational determinants of returning to work after an osteoarticular injury, particularly limb fractures.\n\nUsing observational data, the study will evaluate the modalities of returning to work within 12 months of the injury and analyze the factors influencing professional reintegration, including the severity of the injury, functional recovery, pain, professional characteristics, workplace accommodations, and administrative support measures such as recognition of disabled worker status.\n\nThe study will also explore the point at which the issue of returning to work is first raised with the patient during hospitalization, a period during which professional reintegration is often insufficiently anticipated. By identifying current practices and breaking points, this study aims to improve understanding of the pathways to returning to work in the context of the healthcare system and the world of work in France.",[56,57,58,59,25,60],"Rehabilitation","Return to Work","Occupational Health\u002FMedicine","Work Capacity Evaluation","Vocational Rehabilitation","RECRUITING","2026-02-20",{"date":64,"type":33},"2026-02-23",{"date":66,"type":19},"2026-02-18",{"date":68,"type":19},"2027-02-02",{"name":70,"class":40},"Hopitaux de Saint-Maurice",{"id":72,"slug":73,"hasResults":11,"nctId":74,"briefTitle":75,"officialTitle":76,"acronym":77,"eligibilityCriteria":78,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":50,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":79,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":81,"briefSummary":82,"conditions":83,"keywords":84,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":87,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":88,"startDateStruct":90,"completionDateStruct":92,"leadSponsor":94,"locationsCount":41},"100588425","our-peers---empowerment-and-navigational-support---community-living-remote-peer-navigator-intervention-for-adults-with-newly-acquired-disabilities-transitioning-to-community-living-op-ens--cl-100588425","NCT06941233","Our Peers - Empowerment and Navigational Support - Community Living: Remote Peer Navigator Intervention for Adults With Newly Acquired Disabilities Transitioning to Community Living (OP-ENS -CL)","Our Peers - Empowerment and Navigational Support - Community Living (OP-ENS - CL)","OP-ENS - CL","Inclusion Criteria: 1) Self-identify as a person with physical disability due to a neurological condition, including SCI, stroke, TBI, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease (according to the American Community Survey 6-Items), 2) onset of disability within the last 6 months, 3) transitioned to community living in the past 4 months, 4) able to speak, read and understand English, 5) own or have regular access to either a smartphone (Android or iOS operating system), tablet, laptop, or desktop computer with internet access. 6) adults 18 years of age or older, 7) able to provide informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria: 1) Cognitive, sensory, or physical functional limitations that interfere with effective use of the OP-ENS - CL app.",{"count":80,"type":19},100,[22],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a remote peer navigator intervention (OP-ENS - CL) for people with newly acquired physical disabilities returning to community living after rehabilitation improves self-reported social support, health, and community participation. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDo people with acquired physical disabilities who receive the remote peer navigator intervention experience greater social support and self-efficacy than people in the control group?\n\nDo people with acquired physical disabilities who receive the remote peer navigator intervention have better self-reported health and social participation outcomes than people in the control group?\n\nIs the OP-ENS - CL intervention acceptable to people with newly acquired physical disabilities returning to community living?",[25],[85,86],"peer navigators","community health worker","2025-04-15",{"date":89,"type":33},"2025-04-23",{"date":91,"type":19},"2025-06",{"date":93,"type":19},"2027-08",{"name":95,"class":40},"Susan Magasi",{"id":97,"slug":98,"hasResults":11,"nctId":99,"briefTitle":100,"officialTitle":100,"acronym":101,"eligibilityCriteria":102,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":50,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":103,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":53,"phases":4,"briefSummary":105,"conditions":106,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":108,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":109,"startDateStruct":111,"completionDateStruct":113,"leadSponsor":115,"locationsCount":4},"100580742","multi-methods-study-on-inclusive-cancer-diagnosis-in-people-with-disabilities-and-health-outcomes-100580742","NCT06841263","Multi-methods Study on Inclusive Cancer Diagnosis in People with Disabilities and Health Outcomes","MICaDO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nElectronic health record study:\n\n* Patients with psychiatric, intellectual, neurological, and sensory disabilities who received care at San Raffaele Hospital of Milan between 2011 and 2024\n* Patients without disabilities who received care at San Raffaele Hospital of Milan between 2011 and 2024 (ratio 4:1 of patients without vs. with disabilities)\n* Patients with psychiatric, intellectual, neurological, and sensory disabilities recorded in the Lombardy Regional Data Warehouse between 2011 and 2024\n* Patients without disabilities recorded in the Lombardy Regional Data Warehouse between 2011 and 2024 (ratio 4:1 of patients without vs. with disabilities)\n* Patients aged 18 and over\n\nQualitative Interviews:\n\n* Patients aged 18 and over with psychiatric, intellectual, neurological, and sensory disabilities who received care at San Raffaele Hospital of Milan, DAMA (Disabled Advanced Medical Assistance) in Territorial Social Health Companies \"Santi Paolo e Carlo\" and LEDHA (League for the Rights of People with Disabilities and the Promotion of Autonomy) and their caregivers\n* Healthcare provider working at San Raffaele Hospital of Milan, DAMA (Disabled Advanced Medical Assistance) in Territorial Social Health Companies \"Santi Paolo e Carlo\" and general practitioners\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 years of age\n* Patients don't speak the Italian language (for the qualitative study)",{"count":104,"type":19},80,"The MICaDO study is a multi-method study that aims to investigate inclusive cancer diagnosis in people with disabilities and health outcomes. The main objective is to examine variations in cancer diagnosis and outcomes among individuals with psychiatric, intellectual, neurological, and sensory disabilities to develop interventions aimed at improving cancer care. The hypothesis that investigators will investigate is that people with disability are diagnosed with cancer later than people without disability due to a range of barriers, including physical, sensory, cognitive, and social barriers. The study will use a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative research (electronic health record analysis) and qualitative research (interviews). The total duration of the study is two years.",[25,107],"Cancer Diagnosis","2025-03-17",{"date":110,"type":33},"2025-03-20",{"date":112,"type":19},"2025-04-01",{"date":114,"type":19},"2027-03-31",{"name":116,"class":40},"Cristina Renzi",{"id":118,"slug":119,"hasResults":11,"nctId":120,"briefTitle":121,"officialTitle":122,"acronym":123,"eligibilityCriteria":124,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":50,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":125,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":127,"briefSummary":128,"conditions":129,"keywords":130,"overallStatus":61,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":138,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":139,"startDateStruct":141,"completionDateStruct":143,"leadSponsor":145,"locationsCount":41},"100559168","mindfulness-exercise-and-nutrition-to-optimize-resilience-mentor-100559168","NCT06560619","Mindfulness, Exercise, and Nutrition To Optimize Resilience (MENTOR)","Tele-wellness Program for People With Disabilities: Mindfulness, Exercise, and Nutrition To Optimize Resilience (MENTOR)","MENTOR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Lives in the United States\n* People 18 years or older\n* A self-reported physical disability\u002Fmobility limitation (or use an assistive device such as an ankle foot orthosis, cane, walker, scooter, or wheelchair).\n* Have internet access and a mobile device (phone, tablet, laptop, desktop) to attend sessions.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Younger than 18 years old\n* Living outside of the United States\n* No physical disability\u002Fmobility limitation\n* No internet access",{"count":126,"type":19},300,[22],"The Mindfulness, Nutrition and Exercise to Optimize Resilience (MENTOR) program is offered through the National Center on Health, Physical Activity and Disability (NCHPAD). NCHPAD is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is a public health practice that offers health promotion programs and resources to people with mobility disabilities. The purpose of this project is to provide a free-of-charge wellness program designed to improve health and wellness for people with mobility and physical disability living in the United States.",[25],[131,132,133,134,135,136,137],"Mobility impairment","People with physical disability","Mindfulness","Exercise","Nutrition","Technology","Mobile health","2024-11-26",{"date":140,"type":33},"2024-11-27",{"date":142,"type":33},"2024-10-01",{"date":144,"type":19},"2026-08-31",{"name":146,"class":40},"Shirley Ryan AbilityLab",{"id":148,"slug":149,"hasResults":11,"nctId":150,"briefTitle":151,"officialTitle":152,"acronym":153,"eligibilityCriteria":154,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":155,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":156,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":158,"briefSummary":159,"conditions":160,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":163,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":164,"startDateStruct":166,"completionDateStruct":167,"leadSponsor":169,"locationsCount":41},"100562689","acompanyem-a-community-program-accessing-lonely-disabled-neighbors-young-elder-and-midlife-100562689","NCT06606431","ACOMPANYEM: A COMmunity Program Accessing Lonely, Disabled Neighbors (Young, Elder, and Midlife)","Accompaniment of Isolated People by Volunteers From the Neighborhood: a Community Mixed Quasi-experimental\u002FQualitative Clinical Trial","ACOMPANYEM","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPreviously detected by community and professional assets among people over 16 years of age with the following criteria:\n\n* Disabled physical or mental homebound persons.\n* Unwanted loneliness, with difficulty in accessing other assets of the social prescription program.\n* less than 8 on the Oslo Social Support Scale or less than 20 on the LSNS-R scale or less than 2 on the LSNR-6 scale in people over 65 years of age.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Impossibility of communication\n* End-of-life situations.","16 Years",{"count":157,"type":19},8,[22],"Social prescription prioritizes interventions for people at risk of social isolation or unwanted loneliness based on community assets and offers them a series of activities that can contribute to their emotional well-being as a healthy alternative to medicalized healthcare. Disabled homebound people deal with more difficulty accessing the social health assets available in the community. Volunteers from the same neighborhood may accomplish the social function of accompaniment and listening accessing them at home or walking them out to attain social prescription goals. The Community Emotional Well-Being Referent (REBEC) may enhance all of this by conducting emotional counseling and management groups for volunteers.\n\nOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a community intervention of accompaniment and emotional management with volunteers on the unwanted loneliness of people with social isolation, their emotional well-being, and their quality of life.\n\nMETHODOLOGY: a community-based quasi-experimental non-randomized pre-post intervention study with control group, and a qualitative study. Candidate detection by the Driving Group, composed of neighborhood organizations and the community health team, was conducted opportunistically. Recruitment of isolated individuals and volunteers was carried out, with registration based on inclusion criteria. Implementation of the multi-level intervention for volunteers and isolated individuals took place at home or by participating in community resources on the street, with parallel support groups for volunteers using REBEC. Each round of participants was followed for three months, continuing until the sample was complete. Qualitative analysis was conducted upon reaching information saturation. In cases where architectural barriers were detected, technical aids (such as portable stairlifts) were proposed, and their impact was studied.",[161,162,25],"Social Isolation or Loneliness","Homebound Persons","2024-09-18",{"date":165,"type":33},"2024-09-23",{"date":142,"type":19},{"date":168,"type":19},"2026-12-31",{"name":170,"class":40},"Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurina"]