[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"elbow-fractures\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:elbow-fractures":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,48,82,108],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":4,"maxAge":16,"enrollmentInfo":17,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":21,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100629382","performance-and-safety-follow-up-of-bioabsorbable-headless-inion-compressontm-screws-in-the-fixation-of-bone-fractures-in-ankle-knee-and-elbow-of-pediatric-and-adolescent-patients-100629382",false,"NCT07473947","Performance and Safety Follow-up of Bioabsorbable Headless Inion CompressOnTM Screws in the Fixation of Bone Fractures in Ankle, Knee and Elbow of Pediatric and Adolescent Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1\\. Informed consent signed by parents or legal guardians, and assent from the child if of appropriate age and cognitive ability \\\u003C 18 years 3. Suitable and in need for an operation indicated for subject device 4. Ability to give adequate input for the PROM questionnaires 5. Willingness and ability to comply with rehabilitation instructions. 6. Availability for follow-up visits.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Active infection\n2. Patient conditions including limited blood supply (e.g. patients with severe circulatory disorder of the lower or upper limb)\n3. Patient conditions including insufficient quality or quantity of bone (diagnosed osteoporosis, conditions causing secondary osteoporosis e.g. diabetes, rheumatism, eating disorder)\n4. Patient conditions where patient cooperation cannot be guaranteed (alcohol use, drug abuse etc.)\n5. Patients with known allergy to the implant constituents or its degradation products.\n6. Spinal and craniomaxillofacial indications.\n7. High-load bearing indications (e.g., diaphyseal fractures of long bones) unless used in conjunction with traditional rigid fixation","ALL","17 Years",{"count":18,"type":19},80,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[22],"NA","The study in question is a post market clinical follow up (PMCF) study to follow up the safety and performance of bioabsorbable headless compression screw Inion CompressOn in fracture fixation of the ankle, knee and elbow of pediatric and adolescent patients. The study aims to recruit 80 patients who meet the acceptance criteria. The follow-up time for each study patient is 4 years. The study is a single center single group study which is conducted in Lighthouse Hospital at Turku University Hospital (TYKS) in Finland. The main focus of the study in terms of performance is to follow up the bone healing\u002Fossification of operated areas. The main focus of the study in terms of safety is to evaluate the occurrence of adverse events and required revision surgeries that are or might be related to the study device.",[25,26,27],"Ankle Fractures","Knee Fractures","Elbow Fractures",[29,30,31,32,33,34],"bioabsorbable","resorbable","ankle fracture","knee fracture","elbow fracture","fracture fixation","RECRUITING","2026-06-01",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-06-03","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":39},"2026-05-29",{"date":43,"type":19},"2032-12",{"name":45,"class":46},"Inion Oy","INDUSTRY",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":54,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":56,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":66,"overallStatus":72,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":73,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":74,"startDateStruct":76,"completionDateStruct":77,"leadSponsor":79,"locationsCount":4},"100612884","neuro-inflammation-in-extremity-trauma-risk-verification-in-elbow-trauma-the-nerve-study-100612884","NCT07259382","Neuro-Inflammation in Extremity Trauma: Risk Verification in Elbow Trauma: The NERVE Study","Neuro-Inflammation in Extremity Trauma: Risk Verification in Elbow Trauma: The NERVE Pilot Cohort Study","NERVE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults 18 years or older with an acute elbow fracture and\u002For dislocation less than a week old\n* Open surgery as the chosen treatment\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with a history of ipsilateral upper limb trauma or pathology, neurological disorder.\n* Patient unable to answer questionnaires.\n* Patient unavailable for a one-year follow-up, for example from another country.\n* Patient with vascular injury or open fracture\n* Patient with an active inflammatory disease (ex: rheumatoid arthritis)\n* Patient using anti-inflammatory drugs or immunosuppressants at the time of the injury.\n* Patient with another acute ipsilateral injury to the upper limb\n* Polytrauma patients with other injuries than the elbow fracture and concomitant central or peripheral neurological injury.","18 Years",{"count":58,"type":19},60,"OBSERVATIONAL","The primary goal of this proposal is to improve the understanding of the mechanisms causing persistent pain and disability in elbow fracture patients and their associated functional limitations. The specific objectives are as follows for elbow fractures:\n\n1\\) To describe NI mechanisms using biomarkers; 2) To identify factors related to increased NI biomarkers level; 3) To describe the associations between NI and outcomes; 4) To use these findings to refine a larger fully powered prognostic cohort study Hypotheses\n\n1. Level of neuro-inflammation (NI) biomarkers\\* will be significantly higher in patients presenting with both elbow fracture and CNS injury or PNI.\n2. Consumption of opioid in mg of morphine equivalent will be higher in patients with a higher level of NI biomarkers.\n3. Function, assessed by validated joint and limb specific functional questionnaires and QoL will be worse in patients with a higher level of NI biomarkers.\n4. Chronic pain at 3 months will be higher (McGill Pain questionnaire V2, Neuropathic pain questionnaire, NPRS) in patients with a higher level of NI biomarkers.\n5. Duration of tourniquet use and nerve dissection will be correlated to elbow fracture outcome with a higher level of NI biomarkers.\n\n   * Target biomarkers based on preliminary study will include, but not be limited to: TNFa, IL6, Substance P, IL-1B, TREM-2, IL-16, CCL22, VEGF-a, BMPs (table 1).",[62,27,63,64,65],"Elbow Dislocation","Inflammation Biomarkers","TBI Traumatic Brain Injury","Nerve Injury",[67,68,69,70,71],"Biomarkers","Elbow fracture","elbow dislocation","Nerve injury","TBI","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-27",{"date":75,"type":39},"2026-04-28",{"date":36,"type":19},{"date":78,"type":19},"2030-12-31",{"name":80,"class":81},"Université de Montréal","OTHER",{"id":83,"slug":84,"hasResults":11,"nctId":85,"briefTitle":86,"officialTitle":86,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":87,"healthyVolunteers":88,"sex":15,"minAge":89,"maxAge":90,"enrollmentInfo":91,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":93,"briefSummary":94,"conditions":95,"keywords":96,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":98,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":99,"startDateStruct":101,"completionDateStruct":103,"leadSponsor":105,"locationsCount":107},"100632989","efficacy-of-the-buzzy-system-on-pain-and-fear-reduction-in-elbow-fracture-pin-removal-100632989","NCT07520851","Efficacy of the Buzzy System on Pain and Fear Reduction in Elbow Fracture Pin Removal","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* between 3 to 10 years old\n* undergoes percutaneous pinning of an elbow fracture\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* under age 3 or over age 10\n* unable to quantify or express their pain\n* Lack of parental consent\n* Absence of caregiver during procedure",true,"3 Years","10 Years",{"count":92,"type":19},75,[22],"The goal of this study is to determine if the Buzzy System, a vibrating ice pack shaped like a bee reduces pain in removal of elbow fracture pin.",[27],[97],"Pin Pulling","2026-04-13",{"date":100,"type":39},"2026-04-17",{"date":102,"type":19},"2026-04",{"date":104,"type":19},"2027-04",{"name":106,"class":81},"University of Oklahoma",2,{"id":109,"slug":110,"hasResults":11,"nctId":111,"briefTitle":112,"officialTitle":113,"acronym":114,"eligibilityCriteria":115,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":116,"maxAge":117,"enrollmentInfo":118,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":120,"conditions":121,"keywords":127,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":138,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":139,"startDateStruct":141,"completionDateStruct":143,"leadSponsor":145,"locationsCount":147},"100625954","easy-algorithm-trial-elbow-trauma-assessment-using-sonography-in-children-and-youth-diagnostic-accuracy-and-safety-of-point-of-care-ultrasound-as-a-screening-tool-for-suspected-elbow-fractures-in-children-aged-5-to-15-years-a-multicenter-prospective-cohort-study-100625954","NCT07429344","EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study","EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study by the German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT)","EASY Algorithm","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* children and adolescents aged 5-15 years with anamnestic and clinically justified need for the exclusion of a fracture after elbow trauma\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* elbow trauma as part of a polytrauma,\n* parents' insufficient German language skills (spoken or written),\n* trauma more than 72 hours ago,\n* presentation at the emergency room with current, post-traumatic external X-ray images of the affected elbow joint from another clinic or practice,\n* open fracture of the affected elbow joint,\n* skin avulsion of the affected elbow joint,\n* visible deformity of the affected elbow joint,\n* and pathological status of peripheral circulation, motor function, and\u002For sensitivity.","5 Years","15 Years",{"count":119,"type":19},543,"The goal of this observational study is to learn about the safety and accuracy of ultrasound as a screening tool to detect broken bones (fractures) in the elbow area in children and youth aged 5 to 15 years. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\n\\- Can ultrasound reliably show that there is a fracture in the elbow area after an accident?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Have an ultrasound of their elbow to look for fluid in the joint.\n* Have standard X-rays of their elbow to check if there is a fracture.\n* Have their medical records checked and answer a phone call 6 weeks later to see how their elbow has healed (only if no fracture was found during the first visit).",[27,122,123,124,125,126],"Distal Humerus Fracture","Pediatric Trauma","Radius Fracture","Olecranon Fracture","Supracondylar Humerus Fracture",[128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137],"EASY Algorithm Trial","pediatric trauma","Diagnostic accuracy","point-of-care ultrasound","elbow fractures","children","Elbow Trauma Assessment using Sonography in Children and Youth","German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT)","screening tool","supracondylar humerus fracture","2026-04-02",{"date":140,"type":39},"2026-04-08",{"date":142,"type":39},"2026-03-02",{"date":144,"type":19},"2027-01-15",{"name":146,"class":81},"Timo Munz",13]