[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"elder-mistreatment\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:elder-mistreatment":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,46,81],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100609620","knowledge-and-interpersonal-skills-to-develop-enhanced-relationships-kinder-100609620",false,"NCT07216950","Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER)","Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER): Testing the Efficacy of an Intervention to Prevent Psychological Elder Abuse in Family Caregiving","KINDER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Family member, including family of choice, to an individual living with AD\u002FADRD\n* Is aged 18 years or older;\n* Provides assistance with at least two instrumental activities of daily living or one activity of daily living;\n* Provides at least 4 hours of caregiving per day\n* The care recipient is at least age 65 or older\n* The care recipient has an AD8 score of 2 or higher per caregiver\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Sees the care recipient in-person less than 2 times per week\n* Has plans to place the care recipient in a skilled nursing facility within the next 8 months\n* Previously participated in the Learning Skills Together clinical trial (NCT05846984)\n* Does not have reliable access to internet, email, and a computer, smartphone, or tablet to complete study activities",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},260,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","The Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER) intervention was developed to prevent psychological elder abuse (EA) and promote high-quality caregiving by lowering relationship strain and developing CG resourcefulness. The goal of this two-arm, randomized control trial is to determine the efficacy of KINDER at mitigating psychological EA by family caregivers to persons living with dementia and to describe how the intervention may work to reduce psychological EA.",[28,29,30,31,32],"Elder Mistreatment","Elder Abuse","Quality of Care","Dementia","Caregiving","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-19",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-05-20","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":22},"2026-07-31",{"date":41,"type":22},"2029-05-11",{"name":43,"class":44},"Case Western Reserve University","OTHER",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":51,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":53,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":4,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":66,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":71,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":72,"startDateStruct":74,"completionDateStruct":76,"leadSponsor":78,"locationsCount":45},"100630957","a-path-to-prevention-of-elder-abuse-in-long-term-care-prevalence-study-among-staff-in-long-term-care-100630957","NCT07494422","A Path to Prevention of Elder Abuse in Long-term Care. Prevalence Study Among Staff in Long-term Care.","APPEAL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Working in home care services or a long-term care facility in Sweden\n* Working in direct contact with older adults (e.g., providing care, nursing, rehabilitation to older adults)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* None","69 Years",{"count":55,"type":22},6000,"OBSERVATIONAL","Globally, studies indicated that 16% of community dwelling older adults have been exposed to some form of abuse in the past 12 months. Furthermore, a global meta-analysis about AOP in long-term care facilities used staff as respondents and found that the pooled estimate of overall self-reported perpetration of staff to resident abuse during the past 12 months was 64.2% (95% CI 53.3-73.9%). Similar findings was also reported in a study from Norway in which the overall prevalence of observed staff-to-resident abuse was 76% and 60% of respondents report self-perpetration of abusive acts during the past 12 months. Resident-to-resident aggression was even more common, observed by 88% of respondents.\n\nThis study is part of the Swedish national research program APPEAL (A Path to Prevention of Elder Abuse in Long-term care) with the long-term goal to co-create an intervention for abuse of older people (AOP) in nursing homes together with stakeholders, i.e., staff, managers, care recipients and relatives.\n\nStudy design and data collection:\n\nA cross-sectional study design will be used with slightly different data collection modes.\n\n1. Population sample. Statistics Sweden combine data from the Swedish Occupational Register with data about industry codes (SNI-codes) to make a national randomized sample of staff working in home care services (n=12000) and nursing homes (n=11000) in Sweden. Data will be collected through a digital survey. Data will be combined with available register data from Statistics Sweden, including for example sex, age, civil state and occupational related data.\n2. Workplace sample. Sweden has 290 Municipalities. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) have an official categorization of the municipalities based on e.g., urban area size, proximity to a larger urban area, and commuting patterns. One municipality in each of the nine categories has been randomly selected for participation. In the randomization process, geographical location of the municipalities has been considered to assure national representativeness, meaning that in case several municipalities in the same geographical region were selected a new randomization was conducted. Staff in each selected municipalities will be invited to participate through managers in each organization. Data will be collected through a digital questionnaire. Organizations will be encouraged to set a side time at a staff meeting for completing the questionnaire. If this is not possible, a link to the questionnaire will be sent out by e-mail. Data will be collected anonymously.\n\nMaterial:\n\nThe questionnaire used in the previously mentioned Norwegian study about AOP in long-term care facilities has been translated and culturally adapted. In addition, items about background characteristics of respondents as well as risk factors for AOP on both an individual and system level are included, e.g., workload and perceived support at the workplace and ageist attitudes.\n\nAnalysis:\n\nPrimary outcomes will be proportion of staff reporting different types of abuse (psychological, physical, sexual, financial abuse and neglect) in different relational contexts, i.e., self-perpetrated, staff-to-resident and relative-to resident abuse, and in long-term care facilities resident-to-resident abuse.\n\nSecondary outcome will be staff reported own exposure to different forms of abuse at the workplace, including by residents, co-workers, relatives and managers.\n\nLogistic regression analysis will be used to investigate associations between reporting different forms of abuse and potentially explanatory factors.",[59,60,61,62,63,64,29,28,65],"Abuse Domestic","Abuse Neglect","Abuse Physical","Abuse Verbal","Abuse, Sexual","Violence and Victimization","Long Term Care",[67,68,69,70],"Abuse of older people","Long-term care facilities","Home care","Home health care","2026-03-20",{"date":73,"type":37},"2026-03-27",{"date":75,"type":22},"2026-03-24",{"date":77,"type":22},"2027-04-30",{"name":79,"class":80},"Linkoeping University","OTHER_GOV",{"id":82,"slug":83,"hasResults":11,"nctId":84,"briefTitle":85,"officialTitle":86,"acronym":87,"eligibilityCriteria":88,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":89,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":91,"briefSummary":92,"conditions":93,"keywords":94,"overallStatus":95,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":96,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":97,"startDateStruct":99,"completionDateStruct":101,"leadSponsor":103,"locationsCount":105},"100512915","detect-rpc-universal-em-screening-100512915","NCT05958654","DETECT-RPC Universal EM Screening","Detection of Elder Mistreatment Through Emergency Care Technicians - Revised for Primary Care (DETECT-RPC) Universal EM Screening","DETECT-RPC","Inclusion Criteria (Clinicians):\n\n* Clinician who actively provides home-based primary care (HBPC) to patients enrolled in one of our partner home-based primary care programs at least part time.\n\nExclusion Criteria (Clinicians):\n\n* HBPC Clinicians must be a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant who actively provides home-based primary care to patients enrolled at a partner site HBPC at least part time\n\nInclusion Criteria (patients):\n\n* in home-based primary care\n* 60 years or older\n* seen by a clinician participating in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria (patients)\n\n* Must be aged 60 and older, enrolled in a site-specific partner HBPC and treated in their primary residence",{"count":90,"type":22},43,[25],"The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of the Detection of Elder Mistreatment Through Emergency Care Technicians-Revised for Primary Care (DETECT-RPC) screening tool increases the average reporting of elder mistreatment (EM) by homebased primary care (HBPC) clinicians.",[29,28],[28],"RECRUITING","2025-06-12",{"date":98,"type":37},"2025-06-13",{"date":100,"type":37},"2025-02-18",{"date":102,"type":22},"2029-08-31",{"name":104,"class":44},"The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston",7]