[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"electric-countershock\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:electric-countershock":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":5},"100636694","bis-guided-sedation-versus-standard-clinical-sedation-during-elective-electrical-cardioversion-for-atrial-fibrillation-100636694",false,"NCT07569016","BIS-Guided Sedation Versus Standard Clinical Sedation During Elective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation","Bispectral Index-Guided Sedation Versus Standard Clinical Assessment-Guided Sedation During Elective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled, Assessor-Blinded Trial","BIS-ECV-RCT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥18 years\n* Documented atrial fibrillation with indication for elective electrical cardioversion\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I, II, or III\n* Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥30% on echocardiography\n* Adequate anticoagulation: INR ≥2.0, OR ≥3 weeks of therapeutic anticoagulation, OR absence of left atrial thrombus confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography\n* Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known allergy or contraindication to propofol or fentanyl, or their excipients (soy, egg)\n* Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure \\\u003C90 mmHg or symptomatic hypotension)\n* Decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV)\n* Severe obstructive sleep apnea requiring CPAP or BiPAP therapy\n* Anticipated difficult airway (modified Mallampati classification class III or IV)\n* Baseline oxygen saturation \\\u003C94% or active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease\n* Severe hepatic impairment (transaminases \\>3× upper limit of normal) or severe renal impairment (eGFR \\\u003C30 mL\u002Fmin\u002F1.73m²)\n* Active psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment precluding questionnaire completion\n* Pregnancy or breastfeeding\n* Alcohol or substance use within the preceding 24 hours\n* Prior participation in this trial","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},60,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a standard procedure used to restore normal heart rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by delivering a brief electrical shock to the heart. Because the procedure is painful and distressing, patients receive sedation - a controlled state of reduced consciousness - using short-acting intravenous medications. However, the optimal depth of sedation for ECV has not been well defined: too deep may cause breathing problems and low blood pressure, while too light may result in pain, awareness, or patient movement during the shock.\n\nBispectral index (BIS) monitoring is a non-invasive technology that continuously measures brain activity using an EEG sensor placed on the forehead, generating a numerical score from 0 (no brain activity) to 100 (fully awake). BIS scores between 61 and 80 correspond to moderate sedation, which preliminary observations suggest may be sufficient for ECV without the risks associated with deeper sedation.\n\nThis randomized controlled trial will compare two approaches to sedation monitoring during elective ECV for AF:\n\n* Group 1 (BIS Group): Sedation is guided by BIS monitoring, targeting a score of 61-80.\n* Group 2 (Control Group): Sedation is guided by standard clinical assessment (loss of response to verbal commands and eyelash reflex), with BIS recorded but not visible to the treating team.\n\nBoth groups will receive the same medications (propofol and fentanyl). The primary outcome is how quickly patients recover after the procedure, measured by the Modified Aldrete Score - a standard clinical recovery assessment tool. Secondary outcomes include patient and physician satisfaction, procedural pain, risk of awareness during the procedure, cardioversion success rate, hemodynamic stability, and complication rates.\n\nThe trial will enroll 60 adult patients at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cardiology Institute. Findings are expected to provide evidence-based guidance for standardizing sedation protocols during ECV.",[27,28,29],"Atrial Fibrillation","Electric Countershock","Deep Sedation",[31,28,32,33,34,35],"atrial fibrillation","sedation","bispectral index","propofol","anesthesia recovery","RECRUITING","2026-05-12",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-05-15","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":40},"2026-04-13",{"date":44,"type":21},"2026-07-15",{"name":46,"class":47},"Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa","OTHER"]