[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"emergency-care\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:emergency-care":24},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,44,73,105],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":23,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":4},"100645011","ivc-window-agreement-study-100645011",false,"NCT07676968","IVC Window Agreement Study","Are Subcostal, Transhepatic, and Coronal Windows Interchangeable for IVC Ultrasonography? A Multicenter Prospective Agreement Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients (≥18 years) requiring ultrasonographic assessment of intravascular volume status will be consecutively enrolled.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnancy, refusal to participate, and inability to obtain any IVC image via the SC approach.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},900,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Ultrasonographic evaluation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is widely used in emergency and critical care settings for noninvasive assessment of intravascular volume status. The subcostal (SC) window is the standard approach; however, it is frequently limited by obesity, bowel distension, or postoperative anatomical changes. In such cases, the right coronal (RC) and anterior transhepatic (aTH) windows have been proposed as alternatives.",[24,25,26,27],"Emergency Care","Volume Assessment","POCUS","Venous Hemodynamics",[29,30,31,26],"inferior vena cava","ultrasonography","volume status","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-24",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-06-30","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":20},"2026-08-01",{"date":40,"type":20},"2026-12-30",{"name":42,"class":43},"Gazi University","OTHER",{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":52,"minAge":53,"maxAge":54,"enrollmentInfo":55,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":58,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":63,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":64,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":72},"100612055","emergency-obstetric-care-protocol-100612055","NCT07248605","Emergency Obstetric Care Protocol","Effect of Applying Emergency Obstetric Care Protocol on Maternity Nurses' Practices","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* of maternity nurses who are works in Obstetric departments , Emergency obstetric operating room and delivery unit\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* nurses who are on long vocations at the time of data collection or have administrative work.",true,"FEMALE","20 Years","35 Years",{"count":56,"type":20},60,"INTERVENTIONAL",[59],"NA","This study aims to investigate the effect of applying emergency obstetric care protocol on maternity nurses' practices.",[24,62],"Obstetric","2026-02-28",{"date":65,"type":36},"2026-03-03",{"date":67,"type":20},"2026-03-01",{"date":69,"type":20},"2027-01-01",{"name":71,"class":43},"Mansoura University",1,{"id":74,"slug":75,"hasResults":11,"nctId":76,"briefTitle":77,"officialTitle":77,"acronym":78,"eligibilityCriteria":79,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":80,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":82,"briefSummary":83,"conditions":84,"keywords":87,"overallStatus":94,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":95,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":96,"startDateStruct":98,"completionDateStruct":100,"leadSponsor":102,"locationsCount":104},"100586093","hemodynamic-evaluation-using-microcirculation-for-early-treatment-of-septic-patients-100586093","NCT06910891","Hemodynamic Evaluation Using Microcirculation for Early Treatment of Septic Patients","HEMOCAP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age ≥ 18 years\n2. Admitted to the Emergency Department for suspected Sepsis for less than 6 hours according to international Sepsis-3 definitions (high probability of infection defined by a fever greater than or equal tol to 38.3°C with a suspected infectious source + Score NEWS 2 greater than or equal to 2)\n3. Affiliated to a social security system\n4. Having agreed to participate in this study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patient with arterial hypotension (SBP ≤ 100 mmHg) on admission\n2. Patient having already received a 500mL filling test over 30 minutes\n3. Patients moribund according to the investigator\n4. Pregnancy or breastfeeding\n5. Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice",{"count":81,"type":20},556,[59],"Despite early treatment, the deterioration and mortality of sepsis patients remains high. A possible explanation could be persistent tissue hypoperfusion, or undetected in the early phase despite the normalization of macro-hemodynamic parameters. This interventional study evaluates the impact of measuring microcirculation parameters by nurses on patient prognosis through early initiation of vascular filling.",[85,24,86],"Sepsis","Microcirculation",[88,89,90,91,92,93],"microcirculation","septic patient","organ dysfunction","sepsis","peripheral perfusion index","emergency unit","RECRUITING","2025-11-18",{"date":97,"type":36},"2025-11-21",{"date":99,"type":36},"2025-09-20",{"date":101,"type":20},"2027-03-28",{"name":103,"class":43},"University Hospital, Limoges",6,{"id":106,"slug":107,"hasResults":11,"nctId":108,"briefTitle":109,"officialTitle":110,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":111,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":112,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":114,"briefSummary":115,"conditions":116,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":94,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":119,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":120,"startDateStruct":122,"completionDateStruct":124,"leadSponsor":126,"locationsCount":72},"100603533","effect-and-cost-of-a-physiotherapy-led-care-model-in-emergency-departments-for-patients-with-minor-musculoskeletal-injuries-100603533","NCT07137754","Effect and Cost of a Physiotherapy-led Care Model in Emergency Departments for Patients With Minor Musculoskeletal Injuries","Effect and Cost-effectiveness of a Physiotherapy-led Care Model for Patients Referred to an Emergency Department Due to Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Multicentre Quasi-randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Musculoskeletal pain and injury to the upper or lower extremities\n* Triaged non-urgent (blue) in the emergency department\n* Speaks and understands Danish\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* High velocity trauma\n* Cognitively unable to participate\n* Non-malignant conditions (cancer, inflammation, infection)",{"count":113,"type":20},800,[59],"Both in Denmark and internationally, emergency departments have been overwhelmed for several years by a growing number of patients, combined with a shortage of doctors and nurses. This problem is expected to continue because the number of elderly people with multiple health problems is increasing. To keep providing good quality care in emergency departments, we need to consider new ways of organizing treatment.\n\nIn Canada, Australia, and the UK, some hospitals have tried a model where specially trained physiotherapists examine and treat patients who come in with muscle and joint injuries and pain. Since these patients make up about 25% of all those referred to emergency departments, this model could help take some pressure off doctors and nurses. That way, doctors and nurses can spend more time caring for seriously ill patients who need urgent help.\n\nSeveral studies on these physiotherapist-led models show benefits for both patients and the healthcare system. Patients report being more satisfied and better informed about their injury and treatment. They wait less, have fewer unnecessary tests, and need fewer repeat visits to the emergency department.\n\nHowever, similar studies have never been done in Scandinavia, even though some Danish emergency departments have tested similar models. Healthcare systems and the education of physiotherapists differ between Scandinavian countries and the countries mentioned above. So, we don't know if we would see the same benefits here. Also, there has been no research on whether this model is cost-effective, which is important for decision-makers when planning future healthcare budgets.\n\nWith this research project, we want to test a model in Danish hospitals where specially trained physiotherapists take care of examining, treating, and discharging patients with muscle and joint pain and injuries. We will look at how this model affects patient experiences (like pain and satisfaction) and clinical outcomes (like repeat emergency visits and use of imaging tests), compared to the usual practice where doctors handle these patients. We will also study whether the model is cost-effective, meaning whether the benefits of using this approach are worth the costs, or even greater than the costs.\n\nThe study will be conducted at 4-5 hospitals, where a total of 800 patients with minor musculoskeletal injuries will be included in connection with their visit at the emergency department. Patients will receive questionnaires at 1, 4, 12 and 26 weeks after injury regarding patient reported outcomes. Register data will be retrieved at 26 weeks regarding the patients' health care use during follow-up.",[117,24,118],"Musculoskeletal Disorders","Physiotherapy","2025-08-22",{"date":121,"type":36},"2025-08-28",{"date":123,"type":36},"2025-08-15",{"date":125,"type":20},"2028-03-01",{"name":127,"class":43},"Aarhus University Hospital"]