[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"emotions\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:emotions":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,51,83,107,135,160,188,218,268],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":33,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":39,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":40,"startDateStruct":43,"completionDateStruct":45,"leadSponsor":47,"locationsCount":50},"100490484","state-dependent-interoception-value-based-decision-making-and-introspection-100490484",false,"NCT05666726","State-dependent Interoception, Value-based Decision-making, and Introspection","State-Dependent Interoception, Value-Based Decision Making, and Introspection","* INCLUSION CRITERIA:\n\nSubject selections will be equitable among those individuals who meet the inclusion criteria. Every effort will be made to balance sex and race. In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:\n\n* Ability of subject to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.\n* All sexes; Age 18 to 55.\n* Able to read and write in English to guarantee understanding of all written and spoken instructions, which are in English.\n\nEXCLUSION CRITERIA:\n\nAn individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:\n\nFor all experiments:\n\n* Unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits\n* Has any serious or unstable medical condition or history that in a clinician s assessment implies a cardiovascular, neurological, or physical risk from the study procedures performed to induce negative valence states. This may include chronic systemic disorders that could worsen due to stress (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, coronary artery disease for example a history of myocardial infarction or stable or unstable angina, or diabetes)\n* Has any current psychiatric diagnosis (based on SCID or the MINI Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview) or no diagnosis but scores \\>=29 on Beck Depression Inventory II or \\>=26 on Beck Anxiety Inventory\n* Meets criteria for diagnosis of any substance-related or addictive disorder, or endorses any kind of problematic gambling behavior or problematic media-based addictive behavior (such as videogames, social-networking, online shopping, etc.)\n* Regular use of psychoactive medications or psychoactive substances\n* Regular use of corticosteroids\n* Is pregnant\n\nFor stress and pain induction:\n\n* Has a major medical condition or medical history that in a clinician s assessment could affect temperature sensitivity, pain thresholds, or ability to comply with study procedures. This may include cardiovascular, autonomic, neurological, psychiatric, or chronic systemic disorders (including but not limited to stroke, blindness, deafness, history of brain damage, neurodegenerative, neurotoxic or demyelinating disorder, or diabetes)\n* Has a medical condition that in a clinician s assessment might affect somatosensation (e.g., Raynaud s disease, peripheral neuropathy, or circulatory disorder)\n\nFor pain induction:\n\n* Has a current chronic pain condition or has had chronic pain in the past (painful condition lasting more than six months)\n* Has a dermatological condition such as scars or burns, or has had a tattoo in the testing region within the previous 4 weeks that might influence cutaneous sensibility\n* Regular and recent use of prescription or over-the-counter medication that has a significant effect on pain or heat perception. These include medications such as centralacting agents such as opiates (morphine, tramadol), antidepressants (amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran), anticonvulsants (gabapentin, pregabalin), anxiolytics (barbiturates, benzodiazepines), hypnotics (zolpidem, sodium oxybate), antipsychotics (valproate, lithium, olanzapine), antimigraine agents (sumatriptan, ergotamine), and muscle relaxants (cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol). Use of analgesic medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, salicylates, and acetaminophen, taken on an as needed basis is acceptable as long as the last dose taken was within 5 half-lives of testing.\n\nFor craving induction:\n\n* Has a condition that in a clinician s assessment could preclude the ability to hold 4-6 hours of fasting or that is associated with a risk of hypoglycemia (such as diabetes, kidney disease, insulinoma, adrenal or pituitary tumors or disorders, or anorexia nervosa)\n* Is currently engaged in any kind of diet medically- or self-prescribed or endorses a very strong desire to start a diet that involves eliminating or decreasing carbohydrate consumption\n* Has a history of food allergies such as tree-nut or peanut allergy.\n\nFor fMRI experiments:\n\n* Individuals with conditions that could pose a risk relating to the safety of the fMRI procedure but do not meet specific exclusion criteria for all experiments or for specific inductions will be excluded from the MRI portion of the protocol but may participate in the non-MRI sessions. Such conditions include:\n* Those with ferromagnetic metal in the cranial cavity or eye (e.g. aneurysm clip, implanted neural stimulator, cochlear implant, ocular foreign body)\n* Those with an abnormality on a structural MRI\n* Those with an implanted cardiac pacemaker or auto-defibrillator\n* Those with an insulin pump\n* Those with an irremovable body piercing\n* Pregnancy (based on urine test completed within 24 hours prior to scan)\n* Left-handed (only for fMRI experiments involving thermal pain stimulation)",true,"ALL","18 Years","55 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},900,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Background:\n\nNegative emotional states can affect a person s behavior as they make decisions. For example, hunger may make people more impatient; they may then make riskier choices. Other negative emotional states that can change behavior include stress, pain, and sadness. By learning more about how emotions affect thinking and behavior in healthy people, researchers hope to better understand how to identify and treat people with mental disorders.\n\nObjective:\n\nTo learn how negative emotions affect the brain and decision-making behavior.\n\nEligibility:\n\nHealthy people aged 18 to 55 years.\n\nDesign:\n\nParticipants will have 3 clinic visits in 3 weeks.\n\nParticipants will fill out questionnaires. They will be asked about their personal history, their personality, and state of mind.\n\nFor 2 visits, participants will be assigned to different groups. Each group will experience 1 type of emotional stressor:\n\nSome participants will watch a video.\n\nSome will have to do arithmetic problems.\n\nSome will have heat applied to an arm or leg.\n\nSome will experience cold by immersing their hand in ice water.\n\nFor a snack craving test, some will be tempted by food after a 4-hour fast.\n\nDuring these tests, participants will have sensors attached to their bodies. They will be videotaped. Saliva samples will be collected.\n\nAfter the stressors, participants will do tasks on a computer. They will need to make choices.\n\nSome participants will perform these decision-making tasks while lying in a brain scanner for functional magnetic resonance imaging. The brain scan involves lying on a table that slides into a cylinder that takes images of the brain.\n\n...",[28,29,30,31,32],"Stress","Pain","Emotions","Craving","Frustration",[34,35,36,28,29,37],"Decision-Making","Interoception","Metacognition","Negative Emotion","RECRUITING","2026-06-27",{"date":41,"type":42},"2026-06-30","ACTUAL",{"date":44,"type":42},"2023-07-25",{"date":46,"type":22},"2029-12-31",{"name":48,"class":49},"National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)","NIH",1,{"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":11,"nctId":54,"briefTitle":55,"officialTitle":56,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":57,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":60,"briefSummary":61,"conditions":62,"keywords":67,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":73,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":74,"startDateStruct":76,"completionDateStruct":78,"leadSponsor":80,"locationsCount":50},"100512176","smartphone-based-cognitive-emotion-regulation-training-for-unpaid-primary-caregivers-of-persons-with-alzheimers-disease-100512176","NCT05949047","Smartphone-based Cognitive Emotion Regulation Training for Unpaid Primary Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease","Biobehavioral Mechanisms of Smartphone-based Cognitive Emotion Regulation Training for Unpaid Primary Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nHealthy Adult Caregivers\n\n* Unpaid primary caregiver of patient with Alzheimer's Disease\u002FAlzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (AD\u002FADRD)\n* At least 18 years of age, with no maximum age, provided that all other inclusion\u002Fexclusion criteria are met\n* Must be able to speak, read, and write in English\n* Must be free of any current or past DSM diagnosis (i.e. healthy adults), with the exception of current or past mood or anxiety disorders or past substance-related disorders (i.e., current or past mood or anxiety disorders and\u002For past substance-related disorders would not represent an exclusion factor)\n* Must have a smartphone. This represents any major iOS or Android-based smartphone. The smartphone will also be used for collection of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data via SurveySignal.\n* Must provide significant level of caregiving to their care recipient\n* Must be at least minimally-stressed\n\nCognitively Impaired Adults\n\n* Must have diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease\u002FAlzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (AD\u002FADRD)\n* Must be the care recipient of the primary caregiver who is completing the study\n* Must be able to understand and willing to complete a questionnaire and the consent form\n* Must have minimum level of dementia symptoms\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nHealthy Adult Caregivers\n\n* Current or past psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychotic and personality disorders) with the exception of current or past mood or anxiety disorders or past substance-related disorders (i.e., current or past mood or anxiety disorders and\u002For past substance-related disorders would not represent an exclusion factor)\n* Currently receiving psychotherapy that specifically addresses caregiver burden\u002Fdistress or employs cognitive reappraisal as a major component\n* Significant visual, auditory, or cognitive impairment that compromises their ability to understand and complete the task\n* Caregiver participants who cease meeting inclusion criteria during the study will be dismissed from the study and compensated pro-rata.\n* Has formerly participated in a study from our lab involving the same or essentially same design (e.g., former participants who provided pilot\u002Fpreliminary data for this study)\n\nCognitively Impaired Adults\n\n* The care recipient does not wish to participate, and\u002For their caregiver does not want them to participate\n* Significant visual, auditory, or cognitive impairment that compromises their ability to understand and complete questionnaires, even with their caregiver's help will exclude them from the study\n* Has formerly participated in a study from our lab involving the same or essentially same design (e.g., former participants who provided pilot\u002Fpreliminary data for this study)",{"count":59,"type":22},270,[25],"Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias (ADRD) not only exact a heavy toll on patients, they also impose an enormous emotional, physical, and financial burden on unpaid, often family, caregivers. The strain of providing care for a loved one diagnosed with AD, often across several years, is associated with elevated depression risk and poorer overall health. Emotion regulation skills represent an ideal target for psychological intervention to promote healthy coping in ADRD caregivers. The project seeks to use an experimental medicine approach to test the efficacy and biobehavioral mechanisms of a novel, relatively brief, targeted, scalable, smartphone-based cognitive emotion regulation intervention aimed at improving psychological outcomes (i.e., reducing perceived stress, caregiver burden, and depressive symptoms) in ADRD unpaid primary caregivers as well as examine potential benefits of the caregiver intervention on quality of life in care recipients. Cognitive reappraisal is the ability to modify the trajectory of an emotional response by thinking about and appraising emotional information in an alternative, more adaptive way. Reappraisal can be operationalized via two primary tactics: psychological distancing (i.e. appraising an emotional stimulus as an objective, impartial observer) and reinterpretation (i.e., imagining a better outcome than what initially seemed apparent). The project will investigate the efficacy and underlying biobehavioral mechanisms of a novel, one-week cognitive reappraisal intervention in this population, with follow-up assessments at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months. ADRD unpaid primary caregivers will be randomly assigned to receive training in either distancing, reinterpretation, or a no regulation natural history control condition, with ecological momentary assessments of self-reported positive and negative affect, remotely- collected psychophysiological health-related biomarkers (i.e., heart rate variability data) using pre-mailed Polar H10 chest bands, and health-related questionnaire reports. Distancing training is expected to result in longitudinal reductions in self-reported negative affect, longitudinal increases in positive affect, and longitudinal increases in HRV that are larger than those attributable to reinterpretation training and no-regulation control training.",[63,30,64,28,65,66],"Caregivers","Emotion Regulation","Psychological","Psychophysiology",[68,69,70,71,72],"emotion regulation","caregiving","affective science","psychophysiology","psychoneuroimmunology","2026-05-27",{"date":75,"type":42},"2026-05-29",{"date":77,"type":42},"2023-09-14",{"date":79,"type":22},"2027-05-31",{"name":81,"class":82},"Bryan Denny","OTHER",{"id":84,"slug":85,"hasResults":11,"nctId":86,"briefTitle":87,"officialTitle":88,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":89,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":90,"enrollmentInfo":91,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":93,"briefSummary":94,"conditions":95,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":98,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":99,"startDateStruct":101,"completionDateStruct":103,"leadSponsor":105,"locationsCount":50},"100515454","geolocation-positional-system-gps-experience-100515454","NCT05991713","Geolocation Positional System (GPS) Experience","Individual Differences in Emotional and Behavioral Patterns and Their Relationship to Cognition","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Must agree to give informed consent\n* Must be willing to have an functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) scan\n* Must be able to receive and respond to daily text messages assessing current emotion\n* Must be willing to download and run a GPS tracking application (FollowMee) onto their smartphone for a four-month period\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* history of head trauma, seizures, or neurological disorders\n* severe\u002Funstable medical conditions\n* conditions that interfere with MRI\n* pregnancy\n* lifetime psychotic\u002Fbipolar disorder\n* chronic\u002Fsevere substance or alcohol abuse\u002Fdependence\n* antipsychotic medication","50 Years",{"count":92,"type":22},100,[25],"The purpose of this study is to use smartphone technology to capture individual location emotional and cognitive data, to examine how real-world behaviors thoughts, emotions, and brain activity are related to one another.",[30,96,97],"Anhedonia","Depression","2026-04-29",{"date":100,"type":42},"2026-05-05",{"date":102,"type":42},"2023-11-02",{"date":104,"type":22},"2028-09-01",{"name":106,"class":82},"University of Miami",{"id":108,"slug":109,"hasResults":11,"nctId":110,"briefTitle":111,"officialTitle":112,"acronym":113,"eligibilityCriteria":114,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":115,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":117,"phases":4,"briefSummary":118,"conditions":119,"keywords":120,"overallStatus":124,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":125,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":126,"startDateStruct":128,"completionDateStruct":130,"leadSponsor":132,"locationsCount":50},"100631944","emotions-from-salivary-biomarkers-in-an-architectural-context-100631944","NCT07507266","Emotions From Salivary Biomarkers in an Architectural Context","Evaluation of Emotions From Salivary Molecular Biomarkers in an Architectural Context","Archi'Motion","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subject over 18 years old\n* Subject agreeing to follow the study procedures\n* Subject capable of understanding the purpose, nature, and methodology of the study\n* Subject affiliated with a French social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subject not affiliated with a French Social Security scheme or not a beneficiary of such a scheme\n* Subject deprived of liberty, protected adult, vulnerable person, or minor\n* Subject with proven or suspected chronic infectious disease that could pose a risk of contamination during sample handling (laboratories not equipped to handle this type of sample)\n* Subject with a deficiency (vision, anosmia) preventing proper interaction with the architectural work\n* Subject presenting signs of active oral inflammation, advanced periodontitis, or severe gingivitis\n* Subject suffering from Gougerot-Sjögren syndrome (dry syndrome) or mouth cancer\n* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.",{"count":116,"type":22},60,"OBSERVATIONAL","Architecture influences our well-being. People's behavior and mood changes in different spaces are directly related to the architectural qualities of the built environment. Neuroarchitecture is a discipline that combines neuroscience and architecture to design spaces adapted to the psychological and physiological needs of users. Several studies related to neuroarchitecture have been conducted according to different architectural parameters such as style, natural environment, lighting, color, and sunlight pattern. Recent studies show that emotional states can be evaluated by physiological responses. This physiological regulation comes from the action of enzymes and hormones that represent the activity of the autonomic nervous system. Measuring specific biomarkers through non-invasive biological tests in saliva provides physiological data on an individual's emotional state in response to stimuli, particularly visual or tactile.",[30],[121,122,123],"Biomarkers","Architecture","Stimuli","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-09",{"date":127,"type":42},"2026-04-14",{"date":129,"type":22},"2026-06-09",{"date":131,"type":22},"2028-06-14",{"name":133,"class":134},"Sys2Diag","OTHER_GOV",{"id":136,"slug":137,"hasResults":11,"nctId":138,"briefTitle":139,"officialTitle":140,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":141,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":142,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":144,"briefSummary":145,"conditions":146,"keywords":148,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":151,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":152,"startDateStruct":154,"completionDateStruct":156,"leadSponsor":158,"locationsCount":50},"100578244","stories-to-prevent-stop-hpv-cancers-100578244","NCT06808776","Stories to Prevent (StoP) HPV Cancers","Stories to Prevent (StoP) HPV Cancers: A Communication Intervention to Increase HPV Vaccination Among Diverse Populations.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Parent\u002Fguardian of a 9-12 year old receiving primary care at a Penn State Health clinic\n* Their child has not previously received or initiated the HPV vaccine\n* Is able to read and understand spoken English or Spanish\n* Has a valid email address and access to a mobile phone, table, desktop or laptop computer to engage in the intervention\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Parent of guardian is less than 18 years of age\n* Unable to read and understand spoken English or Spanish\n* Does not have access to a mobile phone, table, desktop or laptop computer",{"count":143,"type":22},200,[25],"This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the association of a narrative communication intervention on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates among 9- to 12-year-olds. The intervention is a brief video from local cancer survivors narrating their stories with an HPV-related cancer diagnosis and recommending the HPV vaccine for cancer prevention. RCT participants will be the parents (n=200) of children ages 9-12 who have not initiated HPV vaccination. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to our intervention or control (placebo video) one week before their child's next primary care visit. Our primary outcome is HPV vaccine initiation (first dose of the HPV vaccine series) among children ages 9-12 at the time of the wellness visit. The study also explores the effect of narratives on theory-based mediators of HPV vaccination, including parents' cognitive (e.g., risk perception) and emotional reactions (e.g., hope, anticipated regret).",[147,30],"Human Papillomavirus Vaccination",[149,150,30],"Human papillomavirus vaccine","Narrative communication","2026-02-20",{"date":153,"type":42},"2026-02-24",{"date":155,"type":42},"2025-11-18",{"date":157,"type":22},"2027-03-31",{"name":159,"class":82},"Milton S. Hershey Medical Center",{"id":161,"slug":162,"hasResults":11,"nctId":163,"briefTitle":164,"officialTitle":164,"acronym":165,"eligibilityCriteria":166,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":167,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":169,"briefSummary":170,"conditions":171,"keywords":176,"overallStatus":124,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":179,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":180,"startDateStruct":182,"completionDateStruct":184,"leadSponsor":186,"locationsCount":50},"100578042","the-inspire-study-investigation-of-swiss-physicians-inner-life-resilience-and-emotions-100578042","NCT06806150","The INSPIRE Study: INvestigation of Swiss Physicians Inner-life, Resilience, and Emotions","INSPIRE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Be a practicing physician in Switzerland\n2. Working at least 40% in a clinical capacity\n3. Be willing and able to provide informed consent\n4. Expecting to be professionally active until 2028\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Retired physician or physician seeking retirement within 3 years from first participation in the study\n2. Physician unable to participate in one of the study languages: English, German, or French",{"count":168,"type":22},450,[25],"The goal of this clinical trial, nested within an observational cohort study, is to evaluate whether two positive psychology web-based interventions can reduce emotional exhaustion and improve overall well-being in practicing physicians in Switzerland. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes participation in positive psychology interventions reduce emotional exhaustion at three months post-intervention? How do these interventions impact physician wellness, job satisfaction, comfort with end-of-life communication and other aspects of physicians' emotional well-being?\n\nResearchers will compare the effects of two intervention arms (general reflection vs. work-specific reflection) to a control group to determine whether focusing on work-specific aspects leads to greater improvements in emotional exhaustion and job-related outcomes.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Complete an 8-day intervention consisting of positive psychology activities delivered online.\n* Complete baseline and follow-up assessments over the study period",[172,173,30,174,175],"Burnout, Professional","Emotional Exhaustion","Wellness, Psychological","Satisfaction, Personal",[177,178],"Psychological resilience","Positive Psychology","2026-02-11",{"date":181,"type":42},"2026-02-13",{"date":183,"type":22},"2026-04-15",{"date":185,"type":22},"2027-08-15",{"name":187,"class":82},"University of Bern",{"id":189,"slug":190,"hasResults":11,"nctId":191,"briefTitle":192,"officialTitle":193,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":194,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":195,"minAge":196,"maxAge":197,"enrollmentInfo":198,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":200,"briefSummary":201,"conditions":202,"keywords":206,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":209,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":210,"startDateStruct":212,"completionDateStruct":214,"leadSponsor":216,"locationsCount":50},"100528293","alcohol--mens-sexual-risk-behaviors-100528293","NCT06158880","Alcohol & Men's Sexual Risk Behaviors","Men's Sexual Risk Behaviors: Alcohol, Sexual Aggression, and Emotional Factors (Extension)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Single\n* Male\n* Ages 21-30\n* Engagement in unprotected intercourse with a woman at least once in the past year\n* Consumed alcohol at least 1 time per week in the past 30 days\n* Had sex with a woman at least 2 times in the past 30 days\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* A history of alcohol problems\n* A medical condition and\u002For medications which contraindicate alcohol consumption\n* In a relationship that is monogamous and has lasted longer than 6 months","MALE","21 Years","30 Years",{"count":199,"type":22},320,[25],"This project extends the investigators' previous research regarding the intersecting risks of alcohol, sexual risk behavior (SRB), and sexual aggression (SA) in male drinkers who have sex with women by examining the mediating and moderating roles of both intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional factors. While independent streams of research consistently document alcohol's role in SRB and SA, the investigators' work has demonstrated that these behaviors are related, and that alcohol exacerbates their likelihood both independently and synergistically. The researchers' investigations focus on a particular type of SRB: men's resistance to condom use with female partners who want to have protected sex. Condom use resistance (CUR) is common and normative among young male drinkers, with up to 80% of men reporting engaging in CUR. Of particular concern, research demonstrates that up to 42% of men report using coercive CUR tactics such as emotional manipulation, deception, condom sabotage, and force to obtain unprotected sex. Investigators will evaluate hypotheses that distal and proximal emotional and alcohol factors influence in-the-moment SRB\u002FCUR intentions as well as daily alcohol use and SRB\u002FCUR. The investigators will also examine whether the relationships among assessed variables are similar across experimental and naturalistic settings. That is, investigate the extent to which men's responses in the lab parallel their real-world drinking and SRB\u002FCUR behaviors, particularly regarding self and partner emotions, empathy, and interpersonal stress.",[203,204,205,30],"Sexual Behavior","Alcohol Drinking","Sexual Aggression",[207,208],"Condom use resistance","Emotion dysregulation","2025-07-02",{"date":211,"type":42},"2025-07-04",{"date":213,"type":42},"2024-06-17",{"date":215,"type":22},"2027-12",{"name":217,"class":82},"Arizona State University",{"id":219,"slug":220,"hasResults":11,"nctId":221,"briefTitle":222,"officialTitle":223,"acronym":224,"eligibilityCriteria":225,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":226,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":117,"phases":4,"briefSummary":227,"conditions":228,"keywords":239,"overallStatus":124,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":259,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":260,"startDateStruct":262,"completionDateStruct":264,"leadSponsor":266,"locationsCount":50},"100579648","global-survey-on-newborns-hospitalisation-and-parental-experiences---the-hope-study-100579648","NCT06827028","Global Survey on Newborns' HOspitalisation and Parental Experiences - the HOPE Study","Global Survey on Newborns' HOspitalisation and Parental Experiences","HOPE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nParent or caregiver of a newborn infant born on January 1, 2023, or thereafter, who received\u002Fis receiving special\u002Fintensive care starting within the first week of life such as oxygen therapy or other respiratory support, incubator treatment, intravenous infusions, treatment of (suspected) sepsis, pneumonia, necrotising enterocolitis, malformations, jaundice, nutritional\u002Ffeeding problems, hypoglycemia, etc.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Other family members than parents\u002F(primary) caregivers\n* Parents of newborns that did not receive special\u002Fintensive care starting within the first week of life\n* Parents or caregivers of infants born before 1 January 2023\n* Persons with insufficient proficiency of one of the languages of the questionnaire",{"count":92,"type":22},"This study aims to explore parents' experiences and emotional burdens related to their newborn's hospital stay using an online survey. Our target population consists of parents of newborns born preterm, with low birthweight, or critically ill. Particularly the presence of infant- and family-centred developmental care (IFCDC) principles as well as support through political framework conditions will be investigated.",[229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,30,238],"Infant, Premature","Infant, Low Birth Weight","Parents","Life Change Events","Needs Assessment","Anxiety","Fear","Stress, Psychological","Uncertainty","Caregiver Burden",[240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,233,249,231,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258],"Parental needs","Infant- and Family-centred developmental care","IFCDC","EFCNI","NICU","Global Parent Survey","Breastfeeding","Breastfeeding support","Politics","HRQoL","Infant, Newborn","Family","Family Support","Family Health","Intensive Care, Neonatal","Patient-Centered Care","Infant Care","Surveys and Questionnaires","Health Care Surveys","2025-04-24",{"date":261,"type":42},"2025-04-27",{"date":263,"type":22},"2025-09-01",{"date":265,"type":22},"2027-12-31",{"name":267,"class":82},"Global Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants",{"id":269,"slug":270,"hasResults":11,"nctId":271,"briefTitle":272,"officialTitle":272,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":273,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":274,"maxAge":275,"enrollmentInfo":276,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":278,"briefSummary":279,"conditions":280,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":124,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":285,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":286,"startDateStruct":288,"completionDateStruct":290,"leadSponsor":291,"locationsCount":50},"100521556","emotion-aging-and-decision-making-100521556","NCT06071130","Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Experiment 4A: We will follow the standard exclusion protocol used in previous Fit \\& Strong! studies (e.g., Hughes et al., 2004; 2006). The participant's physician will be contacted for clearance to participate if they have a history of high blood pressure, or experience dizziness, lightheadedness, or chest pain or pressure during physical activities (walking, climbing stairs, and household chores, etc.) (see document: \"E4\\_NeedforPhysicianScreeningQuestionnaire.docx\"). Additionally, physicians will be contacted if participants indicate that they fall, feel unsteady, or use an assistive walking or standing device. For these conditions and any special considerations that a participant may express, physicians will be contacted for clearance.\n\nExperiment 4B: Only participants who participated in Experiment 4A are eligible to participate in Experiment 4B.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Experiment 4A: We will follow the standard exclusion protocol used in previous Fit \\& Strong! studies (e.g., Hughes et al., 2004; 2006). For instance, participants will be excluded for joint steroid injections within 3 months, knee or hip surgery within the previous 6 months or next year, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory arthritis, or uncontrolled diabetes. The participant's physician will be contacted for clearance to participate if they have a history of high blood pressure, or experience dizziness, lightheadedness, or chest pain or pressure during physical activities (walking, climbing stairs, and household chores, etc.) (see document: \"E4\\_NeedforPhysicianScreeningQuestionnaire.docx\"). Additionally, physicians will be contacted if participants indicate that they fall, feel unsteady, or use an assistive walking or standing device. For these conditions and any special considerations that a participant may express, physicians will be contacted for clearance (see document: \"StatementofMedicalClearanceforExercise.docx\" and \"CoverLetterforMedicalClearanceforExercise.docx\").\n\nExperiment 4B: Participants who did not participate in Experiment 4A are not eligible to participate in Experiment 4B.","65 Years","80 Years",{"count":277,"type":22},240,[25],"Exercise is routinely recommended because of its benefits for physical, cognitive, and mental health. It is especially beneficial for older adults due to its potential buffering effects against Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (Luck et al., 2014). However, little is known about how to best encourage older adults to exercise. Based on behavior change theory, different intrapersonal and interpersonal motivational factors are likely to be relevant during the contemplation, action, and maintenance stages of behavior change. Generally, as a result of motivational shifts toward prioritizing positivity and socially meaningful goals with advancing age (Carstensen, 2006), socioemotional aspects of decision making may become more salient and influential for older adults (Mikels et al., 2015; Peter et al., 2011). Our previous work has demonstrated that positive affect (Mikels et al., 2020) and social goals (Steltenpohl et al., 2019) play a critical role in older adults' motivation to exercise, but these two lines of research have not been integrated to date. Recent work indicates that positive affect is particularly beneficial for health when shared in social connections (Fredrickson, 2016; Major et al., 2018), and the proposed work will, for the first time, examine how shared interpersonal positivity may impact exercise decision making and behavior, especially during the contemplation and action\u002Fmaintenance stages of behavior change.\n\nBut who are the older adults that benefit the most from exercise in terms of physical, cognitive, and mental health (and should be hence be targeted with messages)? Not all older adults reap the benefits of exercise (Sparks, 2014) and, conversely, sedentary older adults have the most to gain. Overall, the current proposed research program is innovative in its (a) translational application of insights from affective, cognitive, and aging theory and research to understand the antecedents and outcomes of exercise decision making in younger and older adults, (b) conceptualization of both the social and emotional aspects of decision making, (c) development of novel methods for health messaging that incorporate social influences, and (d) novel assessments of the exercise-health link.",[281,282,283,30,284],"Motivation","Aging","Health Behavior","Social Behavior","2025-02-10",{"date":287,"type":42},"2025-02-12",{"date":289,"type":22},"2025-09-03",{"date":265,"type":22},{"name":292,"class":82},"DePaul University"]