[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"fall-prevention\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:fall-prevention":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,19,0,[8,42,74,103,139,167,194,225,251,276,307,334,364,387,415,437,470,496,526],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":4},"100594886","the-effects-of-cognitive-motor-dual-task-intervention-on-fall-prevention-among-older-adults-100594886",false,"NCT07025278","The Effects of Cognitive-motor Dual-task Intervention on Fall Prevention Among Older Adults","The Effects and Mechanisms of Game-based Cognitive-motor Dual-task Intervention on Fall Prevention Among Older Adults","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age ≥ 65 years old;\n2. Able to walk independently for at least 10 meters without obvious pain or difficulty;\n3. Free from lower limb and foot deformities, wounds, ulcers, or other diseases, and capable of wearing flexible devices;\n4. Scored as low or moderate fall risk on the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale;\n5. Scored \\> 40 points on the Berg Balance Scale and \\\u003C 20 seconds on the Time Up and Go Test (TUG);\n6. Scored ≥ 21 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE);\n7. With an educational level of primary school or above, able to correctly understand instructions and make corresponding responses;\n8. Without diseases that severely affect cognitive and motor functions, including cardiovascular diseases (such as uncontrolled hypertension, heart failure, etc.), neurological diseases (such as Parkinson's disease, stroke, epilepsy, etc.), musculoskeletal diseases (such as severe arthritis, recent fractures, etc.), etc.;\n9. Normal vision and hearing or corrected to normal, without affecting the understanding of instructions and participation in interventions;\n10. Conscious and able to understand the test requirements;\n11. Able to understand and sign the informed consent form voluntarily, and willing to cooperate in completing the research procedures.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Must rely on assistive walking devices or others to walk;\n2. Individuals with color vision disorders, including various types of color blindness and color weakness;\n3. Unable to correctly perform addition and subtraction operations;\n4. Those allergic to the materials of research equipment;\n5. Currently participating in other research or intervention projects that may affect the effectiveness of this intervention.",true,"ALL","65 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},125,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","1. Develop an evidence-based dual-task intervention programme incorporating gamification for fall risk reduction in older adults.\n2. Examine the effects of the gamified dual-task intervention on fall risk in older adults.\n3. Elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the optimal gamified dual-task intervention programme in reducing falls in older adults.",[27,28,29,30],"ELDERLY PEOPLE","Cognitive-motor Dual-task","Fall Prevention","Intervention","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-25",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-06-29","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":21},"2027-03-31",{"date":37,"type":21},{"name":40,"class":41},"Jinyao Wang","OTHER",{"id":43,"slug":44,"hasResults":11,"nctId":45,"briefTitle":46,"officialTitle":46,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":47,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":48,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":51,"briefSummary":52,"conditions":53,"keywords":60,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":67,"completionDateStruct":69,"leadSponsor":71,"locationsCount":73},"100467352","fall-risk-assessment-and-speech-intelligibility-enhancement-using-in-ear-device-100467352","NCT05365646","Fall Risk Assessment and Speech Intelligibility Enhancement Using In-ear Device","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 55 years or older\n* Bilateral hearing aid user\n* Able to consent in English\n* Having access to a phone capable of running the mobile app required for the study\n* Screen for fall risk (\"Yes\" to any question: Feels unsteady when standing or walking? Worries about falling? Has fallen in past year? If the participant has fallen: how many times? were they injured\u002Fhurt?)\n* Ambulatory without need for a wheelchair\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* People with mobility restrictions (e.g., wheelchair bound) that would prevent the performance of the functional assessments.\n* People with severe movement (e.g., Advanced Parkinson's disease) or cognitive (e.g., advanced dementia) disorders that would prevent the individual from either performing the functional assessments, or would lead to restricted activities that would prevent motion data from being collected according to the goal of the study.\n* Inability to understand, consent, and complete requirements including verbal instructions and non-ambulatory\u002Fwheelchair-dependent.","55 Years",{"count":50,"type":21},350,[24],"The purpose of this study is to develop and validate methods to use hearing aids equipped with embedded sensors and artificial intelligence to assist in the assessment of fall risk and in the implementation of interventions aimed at reducing the risk of falling, as well as to improve speech intelligibility in quiet and in background noise, track physical activity, and social engagement. The investigators hope is that the knowledge that is generated through this study will ultimately translate to the clinical setting and will help reduce the likelihood that individuals experience a fall, and improve the quality of hearing in individuals who wear hearing aids.",[54,55,56,57,29,58,59],"Hearing Loss","Dizziness","Vertigo","Fall Related Injury Risk","Imbalance","Speech Intelligibility",[61,62],"Fall risk","Hearing loss","RECRUITING","2026-04-25",{"date":66,"type":35},"2026-04-28",{"date":68,"type":35},"2022-05-23",{"date":70,"type":21},"2026-10",{"name":72,"class":41},"Stanford University",1,{"id":75,"slug":76,"hasResults":11,"nctId":77,"briefTitle":78,"officialTitle":79,"acronym":80,"eligibilityCriteria":81,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":82,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":84,"briefSummary":85,"conditions":86,"keywords":88,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":93,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":94,"startDateStruct":96,"completionDateStruct":98,"leadSponsor":100,"locationsCount":73},"100600029","steady-stride-fall-prevention-protocol-vs-standard-of-care-100600029","NCT07092176","Steady Stride Fall Prevention Protocol vs Standard of Care","Randomized Controlled Study on Fall Prevention in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Physiatry Based Steady Strides Intervention vs Primary Care","SteadyStrides","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAge: Participants must be community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older.\n\nFall History: Participants must have reported experiencing at least two falls in the six months prior to the intake visit.\n\nIndependence: Participants must report the ability to drive independently at the time of the intake visit and ambulate at least 10 feet with or without an assistive device (e.g. cane or walker, wheelchair ambulators are not included). Participants must report their ability to independently make medical decisions and sign their medical paperwork, including consent to participate in the study.\n\nSetting: Participants must reside in a community setting, not in a long-term care facility or hospital.\n\nLanguage: Participants must report ability to speak, read and comprehend English fluently.\n\nExclusion Criteria: No additional exclusion criteria beyond those specified in the inclusion criteria. All individuals who meet the inclusion criteria are eligible to participate in the study.",{"count":83,"type":21},102,[24],"Falls are the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in community dwelling older US adults (65 years old and older) . This is a research study to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the structured physiatry-based Steady Strides Fall Prevention Protocol compared to the standard of care treatment provided by primary care providers in preventing falls in community-dwelling older adults.",[29,87],"Falls",[87,89,90,91,92],"Fall Risk","Physiatry","Physical Therapy","Occupational Therapy","2026-04-23",{"date":95,"type":35},"2026-04-29",{"date":97,"type":35},"2026-04-01",{"date":99,"type":21},"2029-01-01",{"name":101,"class":102},"Steady Strides: Fall Prevention and Stroke Rehabilitation Medical Institute","INDUSTRY",{"id":104,"slug":105,"hasResults":11,"nctId":106,"briefTitle":107,"officialTitle":108,"acronym":109,"eligibilityCriteria":110,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":111,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":113,"briefSummary":114,"conditions":115,"keywords":120,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":130,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":131,"startDateStruct":133,"completionDateStruct":135,"leadSponsor":137,"locationsCount":73},"100573381","impact-of-screening-and-multicomponent-exercise-on-fall-rates-fractures-and-cardiovascular-health-in-diabetes-100573381","NCT06745544","Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes","Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes: Protocol for a Randomized Control Trial: DIACTIVE","DiaACTIVE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Men and women with either T1D or T2D with a minimum of 65 years of age with no upper limit.\n2. Living in their own home\n3. A diagnosis of diabetes at least one year prior to inclusion of the study to avoid honeymoon diabetes.\n4. Signed the informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. No previous experience with rhythm-based multitask exercise.\n2. Having significant neurological diseases (e.g., Parkinson's and Multiple Sclerosis), vestibular diseases, or orthopedic surgeries (e.g., hip\u002Fknee replacement) affecting their ability to participate in the study.\n3. Having severely impaired cognitive function, defined as a score below 8 on the cognitive assessment \"the short orientation-memory-concentration test.\"\n4. Being fully dependent on walking aids.\n5. Pregnancy or breast feeding\n6. Active malignancy or terminally ill.\n7. Not being able to understand Danish written and\u002For verbally.\n8. Participating in other interventional clinical studies within the last six months\n9. People with a weekly exercise activity above 5 hours a week",{"count":112,"type":21},490,[24],"The DIACTIVE study is a randomized controlled trial with a 5- year follow-up designed to evaluate the impact of comprehensive screening and multicomponent interventions on fall prevention, bone health, nerve function and cardiovascular outcomes in people with diabetes aged 65 years and older on the short and longer term. Diabetes significantly increases risks of falls, fractures, and cardiovascular disease, yet these areas remain underexplored in clinical research. This trial addresses these gaps with a novel, multidimensional approach.\n\nParticipants undergo extensive baseline assessments, including fall risk stratification, bone mineral density measurements via DXA scans, neuropathy evaluations, and cardiovascular profiling. Based on these evaluations, participants are allocated to risk-based intervention arms. The study's centerpiece is the RYMA and ADL exercise program, a tailored cognitive-motor training regimen integrating strength, balance, and executive function exercises with music-based coordination tasks. Pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis and optimization of cardiovascular risk profiles (e.g., SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists) are also incorporated.\n\nPrimary outcomes focus on reducing fall rates by at least 30%, improving bone density, mitigating fracture risks, enhancing nerve function, and lowering cardiovascular event rates. Secondary endpoints explore mechanisms underlying fall reduction, quality of life improvements, and adherence to interventions. Advanced methodologies such as gait analysis, seismocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide detailed insights into the intervention's effects. Follow-ups at 26 weeks, 52 weeks, 2 years, and 5 years ensure long-term efficacy evaluation.\n\nThis trial is conducted at Steno Diabetes Center North and involves interdisciplinary collaboration. By addressing key complications of diabetes through integrated care, the study aims to improve patient outcomes and inform future healthcare strategies for older people with diabetes.",[116,117,118,29,119],"Type 2 Diabetes","Osteoporosis","Diabetic Neuropathies","Cardiovascular Diseases",[121,122,123,124,87,125,126,127,128,129],"Diabetes","T1D","T2D","RYMA","Neuropathy","CVD","Diabetic Complications","Bone health","Fractures","2026-04-14",{"date":132,"type":35},"2026-04-17",{"date":134,"type":35},"2025-10-01",{"date":136,"type":21},"2027-12-31",{"name":138,"class":41},"Aalborg University Hospital",{"id":140,"slug":141,"hasResults":11,"nctId":142,"briefTitle":143,"officialTitle":143,"acronym":144,"eligibilityCriteria":145,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":146,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":147,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":149,"briefSummary":150,"conditions":151,"keywords":154,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":158,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":159,"startDateStruct":161,"completionDateStruct":163,"leadSponsor":165,"locationsCount":4},"100633819","from-screening-to-safety-implementing-the-al-steadi-initiative-in-assisted-living-communities-100633819","NCT07531641","From Screening to Safety: Implementing the AL-STEADI Initiative in Assisted Living Communities","AL-STEADI","Inclusion Criteria: This is a pragmatic trial. All residents living in one of the seven participating assisted living communities will be potentially eligible. Residents who screen positive for fall risk will be enrolled.\n\n\\-\n\nExclusion Criteria: Not living in one of seven partnering assisted living centers. Not screening at-risk for falls.\n\n\\-","18 Years",{"count":148,"type":21},700,[24],"The goal of this trial is to test the real-world efficacy of AL-STEADI, a fall prevention program, in seven assisted living centers. We will randomly assign 700 residents from seven assisted living centers who screen at-risk of falling to either existing fall monitoring protocols or the enhanced AL-STEADI fall prevention program. We will evaluate the effect of AL-STEADI on the rate of falls over 12 months. We will also closely monitor implementation fidelity in these seven assisted living centers.",[152,153,29],"Fall","Fall Injury Prevention",[155,156,157],"assisted living","fall prevention","STEADI","2026-04-09",{"date":160,"type":35},"2026-04-15",{"date":162,"type":21},"2027-06",{"date":164,"type":21},"2029-09",{"name":166,"class":41},"Brown University",{"id":168,"slug":169,"hasResults":11,"nctId":170,"briefTitle":171,"officialTitle":172,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":173,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":174,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":175,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":176,"briefSummary":177,"conditions":178,"keywords":180,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":187,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":188,"startDateStruct":189,"completionDateStruct":190,"leadSponsor":192,"locationsCount":73},"100632543","educational-interventions-to-reduce-concerns-about-falling-falls-and-associated-outcomes-among-older-adults-100632543","NCT07515053","Educational Interventions to Reduce Concerns About Falling, Falls and Associated Outcomes Among Older Adults","Effectiveness of Educational Interventions to Reduce Concerns About Falling, Falls and Associated Outcomes Among Older Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participants with 60 years old or older\n* At least one fall in the previous 12 months.\n* A minimum score for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) according to educational level: Illiterate: 13, 1 to 7 years of schooling: 18, More than 7 years of schooling: 26\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* MMSE score below the minimum cutoff for educational level.\n* Current participation in regular physical therapy treatment.\n* Presence of severe neurological, motor, and\u002For visual impairments that may interfere with participation in the study.\n* Refusal or inability to provide informed consent","60 Years",{"count":83,"type":21},[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an active educational intervention (using interactive and active methods of teaching) works better than the traditional lecture teaching to reduce concerns of falling, falls and other health problems among older adults.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes having more dynamic interactive educational interventions can performed better than using just traditional lectures? Are these interventions able to reduce concerns of falling, fears and other outcomes among older adults?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nReceive one of the interventions (active\u002Finteractive or traditional lecture) Answer self-report questionnaires related to concerns of falls and falls Perform some fall-related tests Be followed for 3 and 6 months",[179,87,29],"Concerns About Falling",[181,182,183,184,185,186],"concerns of falling","falls","older adults","clinical trial","educational intervention","active methods of teaching","2026-04-06",{"date":158,"type":35},{"date":160,"type":21},{"date":191,"type":21},"2027-03",{"name":193,"class":41},"Federal University of Juiz de Fora",{"id":195,"slug":196,"hasResults":11,"nctId":197,"briefTitle":198,"officialTitle":199,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":200,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":146,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":201,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":203,"briefSummary":204,"conditions":205,"keywords":211,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":216,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":217,"startDateStruct":219,"completionDateStruct":221,"leadSponsor":223,"locationsCount":73},"100625910","online-watch-summarize-question-ask-method-in-falls-education-for-nursing-students-100625910","NCT07428772","Online Watch-Summarize-Question-Ask Method in Falls Education for Nursing Students","The Effect of the Online Watch-Summarize-Question-Ask Learning Method on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding Patient Falls","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Volunteers from the 4th year students of the Nursing Faculty at İnönü University\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Graduates of high school, associate's degree, or bachelor's degree programs in a health-related field\n* Students who have enrolled in the 4th grade for the second time\n* Students who do not have the technical means to access the online education platform\n* Students who wish to withdraw from the research at any stage\n* Students who do not participate in the training sessions\n* Students who do not complete the data collection forms",{"count":202,"type":21},66,[24],"This randomized controlled study will evaluate the effectiveness of an online Watch-Summarize-Question-Ask (WSQA) learning method on nursing students' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors related to patient fall prevention and management. Sixty-six nursing students will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Both groups will receive standard patient safety education, while the intervention group will additionally participate in an online, evidence-based fall prevention training program structured according to the WSQA method, including video-based learning, summarization, question generation, and interactive discussions. Outcomes will be assessed using validated instruments measuring fall management knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes toward fall prevention, care planning performance, and student satisfaction. The study aims to determine the effectiveness of an innovative educational approach to improve fall prevention competencies and enhance the quality and safety of nursing care.",[206,207,29,208,209,210],"Education","Online Learning","Fall, Accidental","Nursing Students","Patient Safety",[212,213,156,214,215],"online learning","patient falls","patient safety","nursing students","2026-02-17",{"date":218,"type":35},"2026-02-24",{"date":220,"type":21},"2026-02-27",{"date":222,"type":21},"2026-06-07",{"name":224,"class":41},"Inonu University",{"id":226,"slug":227,"hasResults":11,"nctId":228,"briefTitle":229,"officialTitle":229,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":230,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":146,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":231,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":233,"briefSummary":234,"conditions":235,"keywords":238,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":241,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":242,"startDateStruct":244,"completionDateStruct":246,"leadSponsor":248,"locationsCount":250},"100606450","evaluating-methods-to-replicate-stumbles-and-slips-during-walking-100606450","NCT07175714","Evaluating Methods to Replicate Stumbles and Slips During Walking","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 40 kg \\\u003C body weight \\\u003C 136kg\n* Cognitive ability to understand all instructions and questionnaires in the study\n* Willing and able to participate in the study and following the protocol\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Able to walk independently without the use of assistive device such as a cane or walker\n* Able-bodied subjects OR Regular prosthesis users for at least 1 year with unilateral lower limb amputation at or below the transfemoral level (or equivalent level limb deficiency)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subjects with pain which can affect their mobility\n* Users with socket comfort score less than 7\n* Subjects with cognitive impairment\n* Pregnant subjects\n* Musculoskeletal disorders or neurological conditions that affect motor function, gait or balance\n* Use of medications that are known to impair balance and coordination\n* Any other conditions deemed by the investigator to make participation unsafe",{"count":232,"type":21},20,[24],"This protocol outlines a study designed to investigate three different methodologies for inducing gait perturbations.\n\nSubjects will be divided into two groups: prosthetic users and able-bodied individuals.\n\nEach group will undergo a series of tests where controlled perturbations are applied using up to three methodologies with the number depending on factors such as time and fatigue. These methodologies may include mechanical, visual, or auditory perturbations designed to mimic unexpected obstacles or changes in terrain.",[29,236,237],"Balance, Falls","Amputation of Lower Limb",[239,182,156,240],"amputation","balance","2026-02-10",{"date":243,"type":35},"2026-02-13",{"date":245,"type":35},"2025-05-26",{"date":247,"type":21},"2026-12-31",{"name":249,"class":102},"Össur Iceland ehf",2,{"id":252,"slug":253,"hasResults":11,"nctId":254,"briefTitle":255,"officialTitle":256,"acronym":257,"eligibilityCriteria":258,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":259,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":261,"briefSummary":262,"conditions":263,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":267,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":268,"startDateStruct":270,"completionDateStruct":272,"leadSponsor":274,"locationsCount":73},"100595579","modifying-the-geriatric-acute--post-acute-care-coordination-program-for-fall-prevention-in-the-emergency-department-for-telehealth-100595579","NCT07034287","Modifying the Geriatric Acute & Post-acute Care Coordination Program for Fall Prevention in the Emergency Department for Telehealth","eGAPcare: Modifying the Geriatric Acute & Post-acute Care Coordination Program for Fall Prevention in the Emergency Department for Telehealth","eGAPcare","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Community-dwelling adult (non-institutionalized) 65 years-old or older presenting to ED after a fall\n* Fall not due to syncope or external force (i.e., struck by car or assault)\n* Fall not due to serious illness (i.e., stroke, acute myocardial infarction)\n* Will be discharged to home\u002Fassisted living\u002Frehabilitation at completion of ED visit (i.e., not admitted)\n* Proxy available to give informed consent if patient lacks capacity\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unable to give informed consent due to intoxication or acute change in mental status\n* Presence of injuries that prevent mobilization (i.e., pelvic or lower extremity fractures)",{"count":260,"type":21},40,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the feasibility of eGAPcare, a telehealth modification of the GAPcare fall prevention intervention, in older adults in a community emergency department. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Can telehealth physical therapy and pharmacy consultations be conducted in a community emergency department?\n* Does the telehealth modification of GAPcare decrease recurrent falls at 6 months? Participants will\n* Receive telehealth physical therapy and pharmacy consultation while in the emergency department\n* Participate in follow-up visits over the phone for 6 months following the initial emergency department visit\n* Complete study questionnaires delivered by study staff.",[264,29,265,266],"Older Adults (65 Years and Older)","Telehealth","Emergency Department","2026-02-09",{"date":269,"type":35},"2026-02-11",{"date":271,"type":35},"2026-01-13",{"date":273,"type":21},"2027-01-01",{"name":275,"class":41},"University of Colorado, Denver",{"id":277,"slug":278,"hasResults":11,"nctId":279,"briefTitle":280,"officialTitle":281,"acronym":282,"eligibilityCriteria":283,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":284,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":286,"briefSummary":287,"conditions":288,"keywords":292,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":298,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":299,"startDateStruct":301,"completionDateStruct":303,"leadSponsor":305,"locationsCount":73},"100621347","community-based-power-training-in-faller-and-non-faller-older-adults-a-feasibility-and-fall-risk-study-100621347","NCT07369440","COMMUNITY-BASED POWER TRAINING IN FALLER AND NON-FALLER OLDER ADULTS: A FEASIBILITY AND FALL RISK STUDY.","Community-based Power Training in Faller and Non-faller Older Adults: a Feasibility and Fall Risk Study.","POWER-AEQ","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 65-85 years;\n* Fall history over the 12 months prior to enrollment (fallers group).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any existing medical conditions or injuries which would affect the ability or safety to perform exercise;\n* Taking medication affecting balance (such as sedatives, anti-depressives);\n* Regular (more than 1d\u002Fweek) participation in resistance training with loading greater than bodyweight during the last year;\n* BMI greater than 32 kg\u002Fm2.",{"count":285,"type":21},120,[24],"Aging leads to substantial alterations in the nervous and skeletal muscle systems that ultimately lead to a reduction in \"neural drive\" and motor performance. While maximal strength starts declining as early as 50 years of age, aging brings even greater reductions in rate of force development and muscle power, that has been shown to be a stronger predictor of functional independence and balance impairments.\n\nFalls are a major health concern as one third of adults over 65 years loses balance and falls every year, and based on a published report, the estimated health care costs associated with falls in the European Union is €25 billion.\n\nThe ability to recover balance declines with aging, where older individuals often recover balance with a greater number of balance recovery steps and non-optimal stepping strategies. In addition, older adults have more difficulty recovering balance in the medio-lateral direction. The hip abductors are fundamental in controlling the motion of the body centre of mass in this direction during weight transfers of standing, stepping, and walking.\n\nFurthermore, these muscles appear to be more susceptible to age-related composition and performance declines than other muscles of the lower limbs, especially in individuals at a higher risk for falls.\n\nUnfortunately, common balance interventions, such as, functional balance training, Tai-Chi, or dance, have a very limited capacity to reduce the risk of falls in older adults. Interestingly, resistance training is relatively better than the mentioned interventions at reducing this problem. This may come about through mitigating the agerelated neuromuscular performance deficits. However, traditional resistance training lacks the emphasis in high velocity movements required for adequate fall prevention protective stepping strategies. Muscle power training is a safe and effective alternative to traditional resistance training. By emphasizing in maximum speed of execution, its results are often better than with traditional resistance training, especially in functional outcomes, with the potential to enhance balance recovery. However, there is little and inconsistent evidence on the optimal exercise parameters (such as velocity) for prevention of falls.\n\nCommunity-based multi-component exercise programs are often used to promote health and functional benefits in the older adult population. These programs not only have a positive impact in a larger number of communitydwelling individuals, but can also lead to significant improvements. Nonetheless, these programs limited in reducing the risk for falls. Considering the robust effects of muscle power training in the older population, it is conceivable that a multi-component community-based exercise intervention, that focuses on developing muscle power and reduce fall risk, can improve the older individuals' ability to recover balance and consequently, bring greater benefits to the older adult community. However, there is no information on the feasibility of conducting an exercise program to develop muscle power and reduce fall risk in a community-based setting. Furthermore, it is generally unknown if such an exercise intervention can improve function, balance, and reduce the occurrence of falls in older adults especially, among those that have fallen in the past- which are the most relevant target population for both clinical studies and practice.",[29,289,290,291],"Muscle Power Performance","Functional Mobility","Balance Control in Elderly",[293,294,295,296,297],"Older adults","Fallers","Power Training","Functional mobility","Balance","2026-01-18",{"date":300,"type":35},"2026-01-27",{"date":302,"type":35},"2024-09-01",{"date":304,"type":21},"2027-08-30",{"name":306,"class":41},"University of Maia",{"id":308,"slug":309,"hasResults":11,"nctId":310,"briefTitle":311,"officialTitle":311,"acronym":312,"eligibilityCriteria":313,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":146,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":314,"targetDuration":316,"studyType":317,"phases":4,"briefSummary":318,"conditions":319,"keywords":321,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":327,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":328,"startDateStruct":330,"completionDateStruct":331,"leadSponsor":332,"locationsCount":73},"100620279","technology-supported-improvement-management-and-prevention-of-accidental-falls-in-hospitals-100620279","NCT07355556","Technology Supported Improvement, Management and Prevention of Accidental Falls in Hospitals","TechSIMPAFiH","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any member of the ward team as defined by the ward manager including students. All healthcare professional groups, ancillary and administrative staff who work on the selected study ward and any temporary staff from agency or other wards who consent to participate.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any staff under 18 years old",{"count":315,"type":21},200,"12 Months","OBSERVATIONAL","The student will observe fall prevention systems in practice in 2 different hospitals considering how fall prevention technology influences staff behaviour and patients safety in the context of accidental falls in hospital. Accidental falls in hospital are rare but can be life changing for those that suffer them as they are often frail patients who are already vulnerable. Current research shows little improvement with any interventions tested which leaves patient facing clinicians with few resources to assist in the prevention of falls. The investigator believes this is because the measure of accidental falls in hospital is not sensitive enough to calibrate for the different contexts in which patients fall. The student would posit that it is the context that is most influential and addressing the context may lead to improved measures so progress can be made in finding solutions.",[320,29],"Accidental Falls",[322,323,324,325,326],"ethnographic case study","contextual enquiry","observation of clinical staff","The use of technology to prevent falls","mixed methods research","2026-01-12",{"date":329,"type":35},"2026-01-21",{"date":97,"type":21},{"date":37,"type":21},{"name":333,"class":41},"University of Nottingham",{"id":335,"slug":336,"hasResults":11,"nctId":337,"briefTitle":338,"officialTitle":339,"acronym":340,"eligibilityCriteria":341,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":342,"maxAge":343,"enrollmentInfo":344,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":346,"briefSummary":347,"conditions":348,"keywords":351,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":355,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":356,"startDateStruct":358,"completionDateStruct":360,"leadSponsor":362,"locationsCount":73},"100595549","adapting-implementing-and-evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-harp-for-people-with-disabilities-100595549","NCT07033897","Adapting, Implementing and Evaluating the Effectiveness of HARP for People With Disabilities","Adapting, Implementing and Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Home Hazard Removal Program for People With Disabilities","HARP3","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* age 45-64 years\n* self-report of difficulty with ≥2 daily activities\n* have had a physical disability for ≥5 years (e.g., spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, post-polio syndrome, stroke, amputation)\n* live in the City of St. Louis\n* had a fall in the past year, or are worried about falling, or feel unsteady when standing or walking\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n• individuals who are institutionalized","45 Years","64 Years",{"count":345,"type":21},80,[24],"The Home Hazard Removal Program (HARP) is an effective fall prevention intervention program which targets home hazard identification\u002Fremoval. In this study the investigators will examine the effectiveness and implementation potential of HARP, adapted for PwD. Investigators will conduct a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) to test the implementation, cost, and preliminary efficacy of an adapted version of HARP for community-dwelling PwD. The single-blinded feasibility RCT will randomize 40 participants to treatment (adapted HARP) and 40 to a waitlist control group. Data on specific types of fall hazards and resulting home modifications as well as falls and fall-related injuries (collected monthly over 12 months) and fear of falling (collected at baseline and 12 months) will inform the preliminary efficacy of adapted HARP among PwD. To ensure usefulness, relevance, and broad dissemination of findings, the investigators will adopt a \"designing for implementation and dissemination\" approach. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework will guide intervention adaptation, trial design, and future implementation. The Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) guides study development by identifying multi-level contextual factors hypothesized to affect the RE-AIM outcomes.",[349,87,29,350],"Disabilities Physical","Adults",[352,87,353,350,354,92],"Fall prevention","People with disabilities","Home Hazard Removal Program","2025-11-13",{"date":357,"type":35},"2025-11-14",{"date":359,"type":35},"2025-08-20",{"date":361,"type":21},"2028-03-14",{"name":363,"class":41},"Washington University School of Medicine",{"id":365,"slug":366,"hasResults":11,"nctId":367,"briefTitle":368,"officialTitle":369,"acronym":370,"eligibilityCriteria":371,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":372,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":374,"briefSummary":375,"conditions":376,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":377,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":378,"startDateStruct":380,"completionDateStruct":382,"leadSponsor":384,"locationsCount":386},"100592670","evaluation-of-a-foot-health-program-incorporating-minimalist-footwear-on-fall-risk-factors-in-older-people-living-in-senior-nursing-homes-a-pilot-study-100592670","NCT06996444","Evaluation of a Foot Health Program Incorporating Minimalist Footwear on Fall Risk Factors in Older People Living in Senior Nursing Homes: a Pilot Study.","Évaluation d'un Programme de santé du Pied Incorporant Des Chaussures Minimalistes Sur Les Facteurs de Risque de Chute Chez Des Personnes âgées Vivant en EHPAD : Une étude Pilote","GRAND'PAS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* People over 65 years of age\n* Able to walk independently with or without a walking aid (cane, walker, etc.)\n* Persons affiliated with a social security system or assimilated\n* Persons (participants, guardians, or curators where applicable) who have been informed and have given their written consent to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* People who already wear minimalist shoes.\n* People with a contraindication to wearing minimalist shoes\n* People wearing orthopedic shoes prescribed by a health professional.\n* People taking part in a falls prevention program.\n* Persons unable to walk\n* Persons with any other contraindication at the investigator's discretion",{"count":373,"type":21},50,[24],"Every year in France, 2 million falls by people over 65 are responsible for 10,000 deaths, the leading cause of accidental death, and more than 130,000 hospitalizations.\n\nThe main objective of this study is to evaluate the evolution of mobility in older people living in nursing homes, following 12 foot health workshops, carried out by a health professional, including the wearing of minimalist shoes.",[29],"2025-07-30",{"date":379,"type":35},"2025-08-03",{"date":381,"type":35},"2025-04-07",{"date":383,"type":21},"2026-07-01",{"name":385,"class":41},"Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux",5,{"id":388,"slug":389,"hasResults":11,"nctId":390,"briefTitle":391,"officialTitle":392,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":393,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":174,"maxAge":394,"enrollmentInfo":395,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":397,"briefSummary":400,"conditions":401,"keywords":402,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":407,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":408,"startDateStruct":409,"completionDateStruct":411,"leadSponsor":413,"locationsCount":73},"100600220","phase-1-aging-and-task-specific-training-to-reduce-falls-100600220","NCT07094659","Aging and Task-specific Training to Reduce Falls","Aging and Task-Specific Training to Reduce Falls","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 60 to 90 years of age to include community dwelling older adults\n* Understand English to ensure ability to safely complete study protocols\n* Able to walk independently for 1 block and 10 meters without an assistive device to ensure ability to complete exercises and reactive balance assessments\n* 'At-risk' adults: Participants who report experience of at least 1 fall in the past 12 months or participants who are categorized as at high fall- risk using our fall risk prediction model which can predict the risk of both slip and trip related falls.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Major surgery less than 6 months ago to avoid complications due to training\n* Hospitalization less than 3 months ago to avoid complications due to training\n* Taking any sedative drugs to avoid interference with training\n* Acute or uncontrolled neurological or cardiopulmonary or musculoskeletal or cancer diagnosis to avoid complications due to training\n* Have intact visual and auditory ability with or without corrective aids to avoid confounding effects on balance\n* Severe osteoporosis measured by a score of less than negative two point five on heel bone density scan to avoid complications due to training\n* Loss of sensation on monofilament test to avoid confounding effects on outcome assessments\n* Cognitive impairment indicated by a score of less than 25 out of 30 on the mini mental state exam to ensure ability to follow instructions for safety\n* Shortness of breath or uncontrolled pain higher than a three out of ten or inability to achieve age specified minimal distance on the 6 minute walk test for endurance to avoid complications due to training","90 Years",{"count":396,"type":21},315,[398,399],"PHASE1","PHASE2","The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effects of a novel task-specific balance training for reducing environmental falls in community ambulatory older adults who are at-risk of falling. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does task-specific balance training improve the ability to prevent falling when unexpected perturbations such as slips and trips occur, and\u002For improve balance control during self-initiated movements?\n* Does task-specific balance training reduce real-life falls for 18 months after training?\n\nResearchers will compare task-specific balance training with conventional balance training and treadmill perturbation-based training to examine how this novel intervention compares to established interventions for improving balance.\n\nParticipants who participate in the study will be asked to do the following:\n\n* Complete a pre-training assessment of their balance control, and then be randomized to one of three training groups: 1) task-specific balance training, 2) treadmill perturbation-based training, and 3) conventional balance training\n* Complete their assigned training protocol for 8 weeks (2x per week for a total of 16 sessions)\n* Complete 2 post-training assessments of their balance control, the first being completed immediately after the training is completed, and the second being completed 18 months after the training is completed\n* Wear a physical activity monitor for 18 months after completing the intervention to monitor their real life falls.",[29],[240,403,156,404,405,183,406],"fall risk","slips","trips","reactive balance","2025-07-23",{"date":377,"type":35},{"date":410,"type":21},"2025-08-15",{"date":412,"type":21},"2029-08-31",{"name":414,"class":41},"University of Illinois at Chicago",{"id":416,"slug":417,"hasResults":11,"nctId":418,"briefTitle":419,"officialTitle":420,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":421,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":422,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":424,"briefSummary":425,"conditions":426,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":428,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":429,"startDateStruct":431,"completionDateStruct":433,"leadSponsor":435,"locationsCount":73},"100594289","the-effects-of-a-proprioception-enhancing-assistive-orthosis-on-balance-and-joint-sense-in-geriatric-patients-100594289","NCT07017504","THE EFFECTS OF A PROPRIOCEPTION-ENHANCING ASSISTIVE ORTHOSIS ON BALANCE AND JOINT SENSE IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS","The Effects of a Proprioception-enhancing Assistive Orthosis on Balance and Joint Sense in Geriatric Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients with age-related diseases affecting balance and joint sense, who meet two or more of the following criteria for sarcopenia:\n\n   * Muscle strength: Handgrip strength \\\u003C 28 kg (men), \\\u003C 18 kg (women)\n   * Physical performance: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ≤ 8 points\n   * Muscle mass: Bioimpedance analysis showing \\\u003C 7.0 kg\u002Fm² (men), \\\u003C 5.7 kg\u002Fm² (women)\n2. Able to fully understand and follow instructions related to walking, sitting, and balance.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent\n2. High risk of falls due to severe visual impairment or dizziness\n3. Communication difficulties due to speech, language, or hearing problems\n4. Inability to walk independently without assistive devices\n5. History of diseases affecting gait, efficiency, or endurance, such as:\n\n   * Neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease)\n   * Musculoskeletal disorders affecting the lower limbs\n   * History of major orthopedic surgery on the lower limbs\n   * Severe back pain or musculoskeletal pain affecting gait\n   * Cardiovascular disease including heart failure or uncontrolled hypertension\n   * Pulmonary diseases requiring regular oxygen therapy\n   * Cancer requiring treatment within the past 3 years (except for non-melanoma skin cancer or early-stage breast\u002Fprostate cancer)\n   * Psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, other psychoses, or bipolar disorder\n   * Any other disease that significantly limits mobility",{"count":423,"type":21},30,[24],"This study investigates the effects of a proprioception-enhancing assistive orthosis on balance and joint sense in geriatric patients with age-related diseases. The study uses wearable devices that deliver vibration stimuli to improve proprioceptive feedback. A total of 20 participants will be enrolled in a 24-month, IRB-approved trial at Seoul National University Hospital. The study assesses functional balance and joint position sense before and after using the device.",[297,29,427],"Orthotic Device","2025-06-03",{"date":430,"type":35},"2025-06-12",{"date":432,"type":21},"2025-07-01",{"date":434,"type":21},"2027-07-01",{"name":436,"class":41},"Seoul National University Hospital",{"id":438,"slug":439,"hasResults":11,"nctId":440,"briefTitle":441,"officialTitle":442,"acronym":443,"eligibilityCriteria":444,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":445,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":446,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":448,"briefSummary":449,"conditions":450,"keywords":455,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":460,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":461,"startDateStruct":463,"completionDateStruct":465,"leadSponsor":467,"locationsCount":469},"100566257","perturbation-based-treadmill-training-to-prevent-unrecovered-falls-in-geriatric-patients-100566257","NCT06652828","Perturbation-Based Treadmill Training to Prevent Unrecovered Falls in Geriatric Patients","Training at the Limit of Balance Control on a Perturbation Treadmill to Prevent Unrecovered Falls in Geriatric Patients With and Without Cognitive Impairment","TRAIL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ≥ 70 years\n* ≥40% prospective fall risk for the following year according to the Fall Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT-up)\n* Walking distance ≥ 70 m in the 2 Minute Walk Test\n* Possibility to reach the study site at least via taxi\n* Written informed consent, obtained according to international guidelines and local laws\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* MoCA score \\\u003C 10 pts (or MMSE \\\u003C 17 pts)\n* Performing a Timed up and Go test (TUG) \\\u003C10 s\n* Leg amputation\n* Osteosynthesis or joint replacement of lower extremities within the past 6 weeks.\n* Blindness\n* Parkinson's disease with Hoehn and Yahr stage \\> 3\n* Body weight \\>135 kg and height \\>185 cm\n* Life-expectancy \\\u003C12 months, instable or severe illness\n* Inability to communicate verbally and coorporate appropriatly\n* (Prior) participation perturbation training programs\n* Gait-relevant foot-drop paresis","70 Years",{"count":447,"type":21},396,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of perturbation-based balance training (PBT) in preventing unrecovered falls among geriatric patients aged ≥70 years with a prospective fall risk of ≥40%. The study will also assess the safety and feasibility of PBT. The main research questions are:\n\nA total of 396 participants will receive 9 training sessions of either PBT or conventional treadmill training and will attend an assessment before and after the intervention, as well as 6 and 12 months follow up. Falls will be documented throughout the entire study period using calendars, telephone interviews, and proxy information. The primary outcome, unrecovered falls, will be recorded after the end of the intervention until 12 months follow up.",[29,451,452,453,454],"Exercise","Geriatrics","Cognitive Impairment","Perturbation",[456,457,403,458,182,240,459],"treadmill","unrecovered falls","training","rehabilitaion","2025-05-08",{"date":462,"type":35},"2025-05-14",{"date":464,"type":35},"2024-11-25",{"date":466,"type":21},"2027-04-30",{"name":468,"class":41},"University of Oldenburg",3,{"id":471,"slug":472,"hasResults":11,"nctId":473,"briefTitle":474,"officialTitle":474,"acronym":475,"eligibilityCriteria":476,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":174,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":477,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":479,"briefSummary":480,"conditions":481,"keywords":483,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":488,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":489,"startDateStruct":490,"completionDateStruct":492,"leadSponsor":494,"locationsCount":73},"100590007","validation-of-the-self-assessment-for-falls-in-the-elderly-safe-questionnaire-to-assess-the-risk-of-falls-in-people-aged-60-or-over-100590007","NCT06961812","Validation of the Self-Assessment for Falls in the Elderly (SAFE) Questionnaire to Assess the Risk of Falls in People Aged 60 or Over.","SAFE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* People aged 60 or over, judged by the investigator to be in stable clinical condition as regards walking and balance for at least one month,\n* Able to perform the necessary physical assessments\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unable, according to the investigator, to answer a self-questionnaire,\n* Patient's refusal to take part in the study\n* Absence of a caregiver if the participant is unable to answer the questionnaire alone\n* Unable to understand the information note\n* Opposition of the proxy or legal guardian if the participant is under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)\n* Subject deprived of liberty (art. L. 1121-6) (by judicial or administrative decision, or forced hospitalization)\n* Not affiliated to a French social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme (L1121-8-1)\n* Participation in other research involving a period of exclusion still in progress (Article L1121-12)",{"count":478,"type":21},300,[24],"This single-centre, cross-sectional diagnostic study will determine whether the new self-completed Self-Assessment for Falls in the Elderly (SAFE) questionnaire can classify fall-risk level (low, moderate, high) in adults ≥ 60 years as accurately as the current clinician-administered international algorithm that mixes yes\u002Fno questions with physical tests; to do so, about 300 participants will (1) sign consent, (2) answer the 5-minute SAFE, and (3) undergo guideline assessment and tests by a clinician in the same visit, after which researchers will compare SAFE and clinician results for sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, examine agreement and correlations, and give immediate risk-based prevention advice:\n\n* Eligibility: men or women ≥ 60 y, stable walking\u002Fbalance ≥ 1 month, able to read French and perform brief tests; legal guardianship or refusal excludes.\n* Participant tasks: complete SAFE; perform Timed Up-and-Go, 4 m gait speed, Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) under supervision\n* Benefits\u002FRisks: instant personalised fall-risk feedback; SAFE is risk-free and physical tests carry only minimal supervised exertion.\n\nFalls are a leading cause of injury and death in older adults, and current assessments require trained staff; if SAFE proves equivalent, it could enable large-scale, low-cost self-screening and support future digital monitoring tools for fall prevention.",[29,482],"Falls (Accidents) in Old Age",[87,484,485,486,487],"Functional Assessment","Predictive Value of Tests","Aging","Fallers Aged 60 Years and Older","2025-04-29",{"date":460,"type":35},{"date":491,"type":21},"2025-05-02",{"date":493,"type":21},"2026-05-02",{"name":495,"class":41},"University Hospital, Montpellier",{"id":497,"slug":498,"hasResults":11,"nctId":499,"briefTitle":500,"officialTitle":501,"acronym":502,"eligibilityCriteria":503,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":504,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":505,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":507,"briefSummary":508,"conditions":509,"keywords":513,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":517,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":518,"startDateStruct":520,"completionDateStruct":522,"leadSponsor":524,"locationsCount":73},"100563564","advanced-practice-nurses-for-fall-incidence-prevention-in-very-old-robust-adults-100563564","NCT06617806","Advanced Practice Nurses for Fall Incidence PrevenTion in Very Old Robust Adults","Advanced Practice Nurses for Fall Incidence PrevenTion in Robust Very Old Adults: Protocol for the APN-FIT Hybrid Randomized Controlled Trial","APN-FIT","Inclusion criteria:\n\n* Aged 80 or over;\n* Vigorous according to the \" Clinical Frailty Scale \" (scores 1, 2, 3) ;\n* Having a referring primary care physician working in pairs with the local Advanced Practice Nurse;\n* affiliated to a Health Care Plan\n* Informed and having signed consent to participate in the research.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* Under guardianship or trusteeship;\n* Unable to travel to the primary care office or unable to follow the adapted physical activity program;\n* Poor understanding of French.","80 Years",{"count":506,"type":21},386,[24],"APN-FIT is a hybrid type 1 clinical trial comparing the effect of an APN delivered fall prevention programme with standard care in non-frail patients. All participants will receive a full geriatric assessment at enrolment and, on a voluntary basis, physical activity programmes during the 12-month period. Falls occurring during the study will be recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months after enrolment. An ancillary study will specifically examine implementation outcomes of the tested intervention.",[29,510,511,512],"Autonomy of Older People","Frail Elderly","Advanced Practice Nursing",[352,486,514,515,516],"Frailty - robustness","Advanced practice nurses","Very old adults","2024-11-13",{"date":519,"type":35},"2024-11-15",{"date":521,"type":35},"2024-10-15",{"date":523,"type":21},"2027-10-31",{"name":525,"class":41},"Nantes University Hospital",{"id":527,"slug":528,"hasResults":11,"nctId":529,"briefTitle":530,"officialTitle":531,"acronym":532,"eligibilityCriteria":533,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":174,"maxAge":534,"enrollmentInfo":535,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":537,"briefSummary":538,"conditions":539,"keywords":541,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":544,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":545,"startDateStruct":547,"completionDateStruct":549,"leadSponsor":551,"locationsCount":73},"100523995","a-multi-domain-and-multi-component-falls-intervention-program-for-community--dwelling-older-adults-safe-tech-100523995","NCT06102954","A Multi-domain and Multi-component Falls Intervention Program for Community- Dwelling Older Adults: SAFE-TECH","Steps to Avoid Falls in the Elderly- A TECHnology Enhanced Intervention","SAFE-TECH","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged 60 to 95 years\n* Ambulatory with or without walking aid\n* Does not possess cognitive impairment with an Abbreviated Mental Score-Singapore \\>=6\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Had any significant morbidity:\n\n  * Congestive Heart Failure in the past 6 months\n  * Myocardial Infarction in the past 6 months\n  * Stroke (Intra-Cranial Haemorrhage) in the past 6 months\n  * Concussion or Head Injury in the past 6 months\n  * End Stage Renal Failure requiring dialysis\n  * Severe Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (e.g. Chronic Lung Disease or Chronic Bronchitis or Emphysema), experiencing symptoms at rest or with mild activity\n  * Lower Limb Fractures in the past 6 months\n* Blindness, with or without the use of any visual aids\n* Deafness, with or without the use of any hearing aids\n* Currently experiencing one of the following:\n\n  * Chest discomfort, or\n  * Breathlessness, or\n  * Dizziness, or\n  * Profuse sweating\n* Had an amputation of any part of the lower limbs except toes, or had an amputation of any toes in the last 30 days\n* Currently in a long-term institution\n* Currently participating in any randomized clinical or controlled trial that involves physical exercise\n* Unwilling to complete the baseline gait assessment, or complete less than 3 minutes of the 5-minute baseline gait assessment","95 Years",{"count":536,"type":21},400,[24],"Background: Falls and fall-related injuries among older adults are a significant health problem that results in injuries, prolonged hospitalisation, reduced mobility, and poorer quality of life. Previous falls prevention programs have demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-component falls prevention interventions in improving functional outcomes and reducing falls compared to usual care. A previous trial of a tailored multi-component falls intervention program for older adults recruited from the emergency department (SAFE) found that there is significant heterogeneity in terms of falls risk factors in high falls risk older adults. Thus, the effectiveness of SAFE in participants with poorer cognitive function or had more comorbidities were less effective and less cost-effective. Therefore, the aim of this trial is to demonstrate the effectiveness of a technology-enhanced, multi-domain and multi-component falls prevention intervention in reducing number of fallers and injurious fallers among older adults with elevated fall risk.\n\nHypothesis: Using novel wearable technologies to a) identify older adults who are at high risk of falls and more likely to benefit from a multi-component intervention and b) tailor the exercise and educational components by giving individualized biofeedback will improve the effectiveness of an enhanced multi-domain, multi-component falls intervention program for community dwelling older adults.\n\nMethodology: This study is a randomized controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of a technology-enhanced, multi-domain and multi-component falls prevention intervention (SAFE-TECH) in community- dwelling older adults with elevated fall risk compared with usual care. Participants in both arms are selected based on questionnaire based and wearable sensor based predictions of their falls risk. Participants in the intervention arm will receive a 12-week active falls intervention program consisting of exercise and educational components, with detailed biofeedback of their functional status.",[29,540],"Fall Injury",[152,542,543],"Injurious fall","Falls Prevention Intervention","2024-09-03",{"date":546,"type":35},"2024-09-19",{"date":548,"type":35},"2024-03-01",{"date":550,"type":21},"2026-02-28",{"name":552,"class":41},"Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School"]