[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"feedback\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:feedback":25},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,44,71,102],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":17,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":21,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100642248","simulation-based-training-for-ultrasound-guided-popliteal-sciatic-nerve-block-100642248",false,"NCT07659145","Simulation-based Training for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block","Simulation-based Training for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block Performance: a Randomized Non-inferiority Study Comparing Direct Synchronous Feedback With Remote Asynchronous Feedback","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Medicine students\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* No exclusion Criteria","ALL",{"count":18,"type":19},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[22],"NA","The goal of this study is to evaluate whether remote asynchronous feedback is non-inferior to direct synchronous feedback during simulation-based training for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block performance. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes asynchronous feedback achieve technical skill acquisition outcomes comparable to direct synchronous feedback? Can asynchronous feedback optimize teaching resources without compromising training quality?\n\nResearchers will compare two feedback modalities within a simulation-based training program for deliberate practice of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block techniques.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nReceive training with either direct synchronous feedback or remote asynchronous feedback Perform simulation-based deliberate practice sessions Be assessed using validated instruments for technical skill performance",[25],"Feedback",[27,28,29,30],"Procedural skills","Distance-based simulation","simulation-based training","feedback","RECRUITING","2026-06-16",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-06-22","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":35},"2026-05-28",{"date":39,"type":19},"2027-03-27",{"name":41,"class":42},"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","OTHER",1,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":16,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":62,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":63,"startDateStruct":65,"completionDateStruct":67,"leadSponsor":69,"locationsCount":43},"100599690","optimizing-gait-symmetry-after-stroke-using-mechanical-constraints-and-sensory-feedback-100599690","NCT07087769","Optimizing Gait Symmetry After Stroke Using Mechanical Constraints and Sensory Feedback","Optimizing Post-Stroke Gait Symmetry: Integrating Mechanical Constraints and Sensory Feedback to Enhance Paretic Leg Propulsion","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAged 20 years or older\n\nFor stroke group: clinical diagnosis of stroke at least 1 month prior to participation\n\nAbility to walk at least 10 meters with or without assistive devices\n\nFor healthy group: able to walk independently without assistive devices\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nLife expectancy less than one year\n\nComatose or unable to follow three-step commands\n\nAmputation of any lower limb\n\nPoorly controlled diabetes (e.g., foot ulceration)\n\nBlindness\n\nProgressive neurological disease\n\nMedically unstable condition\n\nSignificant musculoskeletal impairments affecting gait\n\nCongestive heart failure or unstable angina\n\nPeripheral vascular disease\n\nSevere neuropsychiatric conditions (e.g., dementia, cognitive deficits, severe depression)",true,"20 Years",{"count":54,"type":19},30,[22],"This single-session study aims to evaluate a novel gait training protocol that integrates mechanical constraints and sensory feedback to enhance paretic leg propulsion in individuals post-stroke. The study will include 15 individuals who have experienced a stroke and 15 healthy adults, each aged 20 years or older. Participants will walk on both tied-belt and split-belt treadmills under various training conditions, including backward-directed resistance (applied at the pelvis, ankle, or both) and real-time sensory feedback (visual, auditory, or combined). These interventions will be applied individually and in combination to identify the most effective environment for promoting symmetrical gait patterns. Each session will last approximately two hours. The equipment used is non-invasive, and the risk to participants is minimal.",[58,59,60,25,61],"Stroke","Split-belt Treadmill","Resistance Exercise","Gait Training","2026-03-31",{"date":64,"type":35},"2026-04-01",{"date":66,"type":35},"2025-07-25",{"date":68,"type":19},"2026-12-01",{"name":70,"class":42},"The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston",{"id":72,"slug":73,"hasResults":11,"nctId":74,"briefTitle":75,"officialTitle":76,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":77,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":78,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":79,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":81,"briefSummary":82,"conditions":83,"keywords":88,"overallStatus":93,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":94,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":95,"startDateStruct":97,"completionDateStruct":98,"leadSponsor":100,"locationsCount":43},"100626096","british-columbia-prescriber-feedback-program---antimicrobial-resistance-100626096","NCT07431190","British Columbia Prescriber Feedback Program - Antimicrobial Resistance","Building a National Framework to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance in Primary Care (CANBuild-AMR): Study Protocol for an Impact Evaluation of the British Columbia Prescriber Feedback Program","Practitioner Inclusion Criteria:\n\nRegistered in 2024 with the BC Medical Services Plan (MSP) with:\n\n* A valid MSP billing number;\n* Status of Salaried, Private Practice, Temporary Licence, or Post Graduate;\n* Prescribed \\>100 dispensed medications in 2024.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previously opted out of the Therapeutics Initiative Portrait program\n\nPatient Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age \\\u003C18 years at time of oral antibiotic dispensation;\n* Received PharmaCare benefits through the Palliative Care program at any time during the baseline or study period;\n* Hospitalized within 1 week prior to an antibiotic prescription at any time during the baseline or study period;\n* On chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy (≥90 days' supply of any antibiotic dispensed) during the baseline or study period","18 Years",{"count":80,"type":19},7626,[22],"The goal of this study is to evaluate an educational intervention that aims to reduce the number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed by family physicians and nurse practitioners in British Columbia, Canada.\n\nThe intervention materials include a confidential personalized prescribing \"portrait\" and an evidence-based educational summary (therapeutics letter), accompanied by an introduction letter.\n\nThe main research questions are:\n\n1. Will the intervention lead to a reduction in the overall number of antibiotics prescriptions started?\n2. Will the intervention lead to a reduction in the proportion of antibiotics prescribed that are likely unnecessary, especially prescriptions for upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis?\n\nResearchers will conduct an intervention study with family physicians and nurse practitioners in British Columbia, Canada. Participant clinicians will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The Early Group will consist of 80% of the participants and will receive the intervention (prescribing portrait, evidence summary, and introduction letter) at the start of the study. The Delayed Group will consist of 20% of participants and will receive the intervention about nine months later. This study design allows most practitioners to receive the intervention early while still allowing time to compare the two groups to assess the impact. To estimate the impact of the intervention, researchers will use administrative health data to compare the prescribing of the Early Group with prescribing of the Delayed Group.",[84,25,85,86,87],"Quality Improvement","Prescribing","Antibiotics","Antimicrobial Drug Resistance",[89,90,91,86,92],"Randomized controlled trial","Prescribing feedback","Quality improvement","Antimicrobial resistance","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-02-17",{"date":96,"type":35},"2026-02-24",{"date":94,"type":19},{"date":99,"type":19},"2028-11-30",{"name":101,"class":42},"University of British Columbia",{"id":103,"slug":104,"hasResults":11,"nctId":105,"briefTitle":106,"officialTitle":107,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":108,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":16,"minAge":52,"maxAge":109,"enrollmentInfo":110,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":112,"briefSummary":113,"conditions":114,"keywords":115,"overallStatus":93,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":119,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":120,"startDateStruct":122,"completionDateStruct":124,"leadSponsor":126,"locationsCount":4},"100550629","applying-videos-feedback-learning-to-improve-skills-performance-of-physiotherapy-interns-100550629","NCT06449560","Applying Videos Feedback Learning to Improve Skills Performance of Physiotherapy Interns","Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wang Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* physical therapy interns require individuals to be over 20 years old.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals unwilling to participate in the study.","65 Years",{"count":111,"type":19},90,[22],"This project uses self-practicing videos feedback to learn to improve the skill performance of physiotherapy interns. For traditional physiotherapy intern courses, teachers will conduct core courses and demonstrate teaching, but students are less familiar with the application of skills, even if adding practice course. The learning outcomes of the course are still not good in skill performance. By recording the self-practicing videos, the teacher uses observation and feedback to let the physiotherapy interns know whether the posture of the individual case, the fixed position of the limbs are appropriate, the resistance given and whether the verbal instruction is correct, and based on the evaluation outcomes to observe the students' learning status and clinical thinking ability can improve the skill performance and learning satisfaction.",[25],[116,117,118],"Videos Feedback","Skills Performance","Physiotherapy","2024-06-05",{"date":121,"type":35},"2024-06-10",{"date":123,"type":19},"2024-07-01",{"date":125,"type":19},"2026-05-31",{"name":127,"class":42},"Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital"]