[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"femoro-acetabular-impingement\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:femoro-acetabular-impingement":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,55,84,108,139,167,187,210,236],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":43,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":44,"startDateStruct":47,"completionDateStruct":49,"leadSponsor":51,"locationsCount":54},"100635080","ultrasound-guided-needle-percutaneous-electrolysis-with-therapeutic-exercise-in-femoroacetabular-impingement-syndrome-100635080",false,"NCT07548034","Ultrasound-guided Needle Percutaneous Electrolysis With Therapeutic Exercise in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome","Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis Combined With Therapeutic Exercise in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: a Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Anterior hip pain (inguinal region) lasting more than 3 months\n* Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score ≥ 4\u002F10 during at least one provocative test\n* Positive result in at least one of the following clinical tests: Straight Leg Raise (SLR), Flexion-Adduction-Internal Rotation (FADIR), or Hip-External Rotation-Flexion-Ceiling (HEC)\n* Ultrasound findings compatible with pseudofibrotic tissue near the iliopsoas tendon at the anterosuperior acetabular recess\n* Age between 18 and 55 years\n* Able to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous hip surgery\n* Moderate or severe hip osteoarthritis (diagnosed radiographically)\n* Neurological pathology affecting the lower limb\n* Dominant lumbar spine pathology\n* Active rheumatic or systemic inflammatory diseases\n* Any contraindication to percutaneous electrolysis\n* Belonephobia","ALL","18 Years","55 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},30,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Hip pain in the front of the hip is common and can make daily activities and sports difficult. One frequent cause is femoroacetabular impingement, also known as hip impingement.\n\nThis clinical trial is studying whether adding ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrolysis - a minimally invasive physiotherapy technique that uses a fine needle and a small electrical current - to a program of specific exercises works better than doing the exercises alone.\n\nParticipants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:\n\n* One group will receive two sessions of percutaneous electrolysis plus a home exercise program.\n* The other group will follow the same home exercise program without percutaneous electrolysis.\n\nThe study will last five weeks. Researchers will measure pain, hip movement, and hip function at the beginning, after one week, and after four weeks. They will also record any side effects.\n\nThe main goal is to find out if adding percutaneous electrolysis helps reduce hip pain and improve function more than exercise alone. This pilot study will help determine if this technique could be a safe and effective non-surgical treatment option for people with pain in the front of the hip.",[27,28,29,30],"Femoro Acetabular Impingement","Hip Pain","Iliopsoas Syndrome","Groin Pain",[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41],"Percutaneous needle electrolysis","Therapeutic exercise","Anterior hip pain","Iliopsoas","Hip function","Range of motion","Pain intensity","Ultrasound-guided therapy","Conservative treatment","Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis","RECRUITING","2026-04-29",{"date":45,"type":46},"2026-05-05","ACTUAL",{"date":48,"type":46},"2026-04-22",{"date":50,"type":21},"2027-07-01",{"name":52,"class":53},"CEU San Pablo University","OTHER",1,{"id":56,"slug":57,"hasResults":11,"nctId":58,"briefTitle":59,"officialTitle":60,"acronym":61,"eligibilityCriteria":62,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":63,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":65,"briefSummary":66,"conditions":67,"keywords":70,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":75,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":76,"startDateStruct":78,"completionDateStruct":80,"leadSponsor":82,"locationsCount":54},"100504846","education-and-exercise-for-patients-with-longstanding-hip-and-groin-pain-100504846","NCT05853640","Education and Exercise for Patients With Longstanding Hip and Groin Pain","Patients With Longstanding HIP and Groin Pain Referred to Orthopedic Care: Effectiveness of Education and exerciSe ThERapy (HIPSTER)","HIPSTER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Men and women aged 18-55 years\n* Referred to the Dept of Orthopedics due to hip and\u002For groin pain\n* Activity-related unilateral or bilateral groin pain \\>3 months\n* Pain reproduced with the FADIR test.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Groin pain originating from any diagnosis with other treatment pathways, i.e., i) Acute traumatic hip injuries (such as hip dislocation, hip fractures); ii) Verified moderate or severe OA (Tönnis grade \\>1); iii) Palpable hernia; iv) Low-back pain with a positive straight leg raise test and\u002For hip and groin pain provoked primarily by repeated motions of the lumbar spine; v) Sacroiliac joint pain with thigh thrust test.\n* Co-morbidities potentially interfering with treatment, i.e., i) Co-morbidities overriding the hip and groin-related symptoms and dysfunction (such as other acute lower limb injuries, rheumatoid arthritis etc), ii) Co-morbidities prohibiting physical activity and training (heart disease etc), iii) Current psycho-social disorders requiring treatment.\n* Other: i) History of drug abuse within the last year; ii) Not understanding the language of interest (Scandinavian languages, or English).",{"count":64,"type":21},122,[24],"Longstanding hip and groin pain (LHGP) is a common and debilitating problem in young to middle aged individuals. These patients often get referred to orthopedic departments. Consensus statements on the management of these patients commonly recommend a physical therapist-led intervention as the first line intervention. However, the optimal content and delivery of this intervention is currently unknown. In this study we will compare the effectiveness of usual care (unstructured physical therapist-led intervention) to a semi-structured, progressive individualized physical therapist-led intervention on hip-related quality of life in people with longstanding hip and groin pain referred to an orthopedic department.",[68,27,69],"Hip Pain Chronic","Groin Injury",[71,72,73,74],"Hip-related pain","Longstanding hip and groin pain","Exercise therapy","Rehabilitation","2026-03-26",{"date":77,"type":46},"2026-04-02",{"date":79,"type":46},"2023-07-24",{"date":81,"type":21},"2030-12",{"name":83,"class":53},"Lund University",{"id":85,"slug":86,"hasResults":11,"nctId":87,"briefTitle":88,"officialTitle":88,"acronym":89,"eligibilityCriteria":90,"healthyVolunteers":91,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":92,"enrollmentInfo":93,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":95,"briefSummary":96,"conditions":97,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":99,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":100,"startDateStruct":102,"completionDateStruct":104,"leadSponsor":106,"locationsCount":54},"100491420","single-center-comparative-study-of-variation-in-acetabular-anteversion-according-to-pelvic-tilt-in-patients-with-femoro-acetabular-impingement-and-healthy-volunteers-100491420","NCT05678894","Single-center Comparative Study of Variation in Acetabular Anteversion According to Pelvic Tilt in Patients With Femoro-acetabular Impingement and Healthy Volunteers.","VARIA-CFA","Inclusion criteria for symptomatic patients:\n\n* Patient at least 18 years of age but \\\u003C 50 years of age\n* Patient with a confirmed diagnosis of DWI for whom arthroscopic impingement surgery is proposed\n* Patient who has given and signed free and informed consent\n* A patient who is a member of a social security plan or a beneficiary of such a plan\n\nHealthy volunteer inclusion criteria:\n\n* Person at least 18 years of age but \\\u003C 50 years of age\n* Person with no existing DWI diagnosis\n* Person who has given and signed free and informed consent\n* Person affiliated with a social security plan or beneficiary of such a plan\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient who has already undergone surgery on the same hip\n* Patient with previous spine surgery\n* Patient already included in the study for the opposite hip\n* Pregnant or breastfeeding patient\n* Patient who did not give consent\n* Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information\n* Mentally impaired or any other reason that may interfere with understanding\n* Patient under court protection, guardianship or curatorship\n* Patient in an exclusion period as determined by another study",true,"50 Years",{"count":94,"type":21},140,[24],"The main objective is to show that the upper acetabular anteversions calculated in standing, sitting, sitting hip in maximum flexion and supine positions are lower in patients with symptomatic DWI compared to healthy volunteers.",[98],"Femoro-acetabular Impingement","2025-11-25",{"date":101,"type":46},"2025-12-03",{"date":103,"type":46},"2023-09-28",{"date":105,"type":21},"2027-09-30",{"name":107,"class":53},"GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche",{"id":109,"slug":110,"hasResults":11,"nctId":111,"briefTitle":112,"officialTitle":113,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":114,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":115,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":117,"phases":4,"briefSummary":118,"conditions":119,"keywords":124,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":130,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":131,"startDateStruct":133,"completionDateStruct":135,"leadSponsor":137,"locationsCount":54},"100355529","use-of-bmac-with-hip-arthroscopy-treatment-of-fai-and-labral-tear-100355529","NCT03909139","Use of BMAC With Hip Arthroscopy Treatment of FAI and Labral Tear","Prospective PROMs Outcomes in Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Repair With and Without Application of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Harvested From the Body of the Ilium","Inclusion Criteria and Rationale:\n\n1. Age 18 or older: patients of any age have the capacity to potentially benefit from labral repair\n2. Symptoms consistent with a tear of the acetabular labrum (i.e., catching, clicking, popping, pain with sitting, episodic pain, pain with hip flexion, adduction, and\u002For internal rotation): asymptomatic labral tears do exist in the general population however there is not definitive evidence to suggest treatment of asymptomatic tears is beneficial.\n3. Symptoms not due to some other acute process in or around the hip (including septic arthritis, osteonecrosis, hemarthrosis, iliotibial band syndrome, fractures of the femoral neck or head, fractures of the acetabulum, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, sacroiliac joint pain, piriformis syndrome, low back pain associated with hip pain and not knee nor acute low back injury): certain conditions are not treatable by either arthroscopy or physical therapy. Some of these conditions can be managed with physical therapy but not arthroscopy.\n4. Availability of hip radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI and\u002For MRA): needed to assess eligibility\n5. Evidence of labral tear on MRI and\u002For MRA: documentation of acetabular labrum tear\n6. Willingness to participate and ability to understand and sign informed consent document: ability to understand study and consent willingly\n7. Returning subjects enrolled in protocol 2017P001391\u002FPHS\n\nExclusion Criteria and Rationale:\n\n1. Non-English speaking subjects: PROMs are only validated in English.\n2. Systemic infection: surgery is generally contraindicated when systemic infection is present.\n3. Systemic heparinization: the vascularity of the bone and adjacent tissues is significant, posing a potential problem for bleeding when the patient is anti-coagulated.\n4. Pregnant women\u002Ffetuses: although surgery can be performed on pregnant women, pregnant women are excluded under federal regulations.",{"count":116,"type":21},400,"OBSERVATIONAL","Femoro-acetabular impingement is a well known cause of damage to the acetabular labrum and chondrolabral junction. Additionally, it has been proposed that disruption of hip biomechanics resulting from a labral tear causes a faster progression towards osteoarthritis (OA). This progression has been observed to begin with breakdown of the chondrolabral junction with later development of diffuse osteoarthritis. Use of hip arthroscopy has increased dramatically in recent years to treat symptomatic labral tears and potentially avoid the morbidity and cost associated with hip osteoarthritis.\n\nCorrection of labral pathology presents a technical challenge and many techniques currently exist. Increased understanding of the structure-functional relationship dictated by labral anatomy has led to the development of methods aimed at restoring functional anatomy by re-establishing the labrum's native position and contour on the rim of the acetabulum. Therefore, akin to repairing a torn meniscus in the knee, restoring the anatomic footprint of a torn labrum will reconstitute normal joint biomechanics.\n\nDespite the advances in techniques for labral repair, strategies for mitigating or repairing damage to the chondrolabral junction do not yet exist. This area has been shown to consist of hyaline and fibro cartilage. Many techniques for cartilage repair exist, although most are not feasible due to technical challenges specific to the hip joint.\n\nThe management of articular cartilage defects is one of the most challenging clinical problems for orthopaedic surgeons. Articular cartilage has a limited intrinsic healing capacity, and pathology frequently results in gradual tissue deterioration. Currently, the standard surgical intervention for end-stage degenerative joint pathology is total joint replacement. Early surgical interventions for symptomatic cartilage lesions including cell based therapies such as autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) implantation, or microfracture have been suggested to restore normal joint congruity and minimize further joint deterioration. Techniques such as ACI, which have been successfully used in the knee joint, have limited application in the hip due to the technical difficulties of open procedures.",[120,27,121,122,123],"Acetabular Labrum Tear","Chondral Defect","Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate","Mesenchymal Stromal Cell",[120,27,121,122,123,125,126,127,128,129],"Chondrolabral Junction","Osteoarthritis","Femoroacetabuloplasty","Hip Arthroscopy","BMAC","2025-10-24",{"date":132,"type":46},"2025-10-27",{"date":134,"type":46},"2019-09-06",{"date":136,"type":21},"2027-06-30",{"name":138,"class":53},"Massachusetts General Hospital",{"id":140,"slug":141,"hasResults":11,"nctId":142,"briefTitle":143,"officialTitle":143,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":144,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":145,"minAge":17,"maxAge":146,"enrollmentInfo":147,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":149,"briefSummary":151,"conditions":152,"keywords":153,"overallStatus":157,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":158,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":159,"startDateStruct":161,"completionDateStruct":163,"leadSponsor":165,"locationsCount":4},"100551622","phase-4-peri-operative-testosterone-administration-in-primary-hip-arthroscopy-100551622","NCT06462482","Peri-Operative Testosterone Administration in Primary Hip Arthroscopy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with labral tear will be recruited to the study and screened for eligibility. Inclusion criteria include clinical diagnosis of FAI, age 18 and older, and hypogonadism, defined as a testosterone level \\\u003C300ng\u002FdL.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* . Major exclusion criteria include previous surgery to the affected hip or spine, LCEA \\\u003C 18, a past medical history significant for allergy to testosterone, prostate cancer, PSA \\> 4 ng\u002Fml, breast cancer, polycythemia, diabetes mellitus with a HbA1c \\> 7, BMI \\\u003C 18 or \\> 40, and preoperative motion or strength limitations that will affect postoperative rehabilitation.","MALE","90 Years",{"count":148,"type":21},60,[150],"PHASE4","It is often observed that patients following hip surgery have a hard time with rehabilitation, as patients commonly lose muscle mass and strength around the surgical site. The goal of this study is to learn if giving patients testosterone around their hip surgery can prevent them from losing muscle mass, as well as to see if it will improve their outcomes after surgery. The main question this study aims to answer is: Will perioperative testosterone administration increase lean mass in addition to improving functional and clinical patient reported outcomes greater than placebo?\n\nResearchers will compare patients who were administered testosterone to standard of care (no administration of testosterone) to see if there is a difference in their recovery and outcomes.\n\nParticipants will be given either testosterone or saline for eight weeks beginning two weeks prior to surgery. Participants will have to answer questionnaires on how they are doing, as well as will do other testing during this time.",[27],[154,155,156],"Testosterone","Hypogonadism","Hip arthroscopy","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2024-12-30",{"date":160,"type":46},"2025-01-01",{"date":162,"type":21},"2025-01",{"date":164,"type":21},"2026-12",{"name":166,"class":53},"American Hip Institute",{"id":168,"slug":169,"hasResults":11,"nctId":170,"briefTitle":171,"officialTitle":171,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":172,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":173,"enrollmentInfo":174,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":176,"briefSummary":177,"conditions":178,"keywords":179,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":158,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":181,"startDateStruct":182,"completionDateStruct":184,"leadSponsor":186,"locationsCount":54},"100554536","phase-4-knotless-implants-as-an-alternative-for-capsular-closure-in-primary-hip-arthroscopy-a-prospective-multi-center-study-100554536","NCT06500364","Knotless Implants As an Alternative for Capsular Closure in Primary Hip Arthroscopy: a Prospective, Multi-Center Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing a primary hip arthroscopy\n* Patients younger than 60 years old.\n* Patients who will receive capsular closure with the Arthrex LoopLocTM device following hip arthroscopy.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients that had previous hip surgery,\n* Patients that had a center edge angle (CEA) less than 25 degrees or greater than 40 degrees.\n* Patients that have a cartilage damage grade greater than or equal to 3.","60 Years",{"count":175,"type":21},80,[150],"The purpose of this research is to see if the Arthrex LoopLocTM device is better for capsular closure during hip arthroscopy than other treatments available.\n\nThe hip capsule is the tissue that surrounds your hip joint. It stabilizes and supports your hip joint. During hip arthroscopy, this tissue must be cut through in order to perform the hip arthroscopy. Once the hip arthroscopy is completed, the surgeon might repair the capsule. Current ways of repairing the capsule include knotted suture that might irritate structures around the hip, leading to the possible formation of scar tissue and pain. The Arthrex LoopLocTM device is knotless and may lower the presence of irritation and scar tissue around the hip after surgery and might lead to better outcomes.\n\nTherefore, researchers will compare patients who had the LoopLocTM device used to close their hip capsule during surgery to those who did not have the device used, to see if there is a difference in their outcomes following surgery.",[27],[156,180],"Hip capsule",{"date":160,"type":46},{"date":183,"type":46},"2024-10-29",{"date":185,"type":21},"2027-08",{"name":166,"class":53},{"id":188,"slug":189,"hasResults":11,"nctId":190,"briefTitle":191,"officialTitle":192,"acronym":193,"eligibilityCriteria":194,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":195,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":197,"briefSummary":199,"conditions":200,"keywords":201,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":202,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":203,"startDateStruct":205,"completionDateStruct":207,"leadSponsor":209,"locationsCount":54},"100516329","phase-3-effect-of-prp-ppp--bmac-on-functional-outcomes-following-hip-arthroscopy-for-acetabular-labral-pathologies-100516329","NCT06003101","Effect of PRP, PPP, & BMAC on Functional Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy for Acetabular Labral Pathologies","Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Platelet-Poor Plasma, & Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Application on Functional Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy for Acetabular Labral Pathologies: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","PRP; PPP; BMAC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: \\> or equal to 18 years\n* Clinically indicated for hip arthroscopy (by the study PI) to address a labral pathology\n* Willingness to participate, amenable to randomization into either treatment arm of the research study, and the ability to understand \\& sign the informed consent document\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Non-English speaking (PROM surveys are only validated in English)\n* Prior same site (i.e., ipsilateral hip) surgery, including but not limited to previous hip arthroscopy, core decompression, or periacetabular osteotomies",{"count":196,"type":21},160,[198],"PHASE3","The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of PRP\u002FPPP\u002FBMAC application on functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy to address acetabular labral pathologies. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1. Does PRP\u002FPPP\u002FBMAC application improve functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy to address acetabular labral pathologies?\n2. Does PRP\u002FPPP\u002FBMAC application reduce the arthritic burden as measured by functional outcomes following hip arthroscopy to address labral pathologies with concomitant PRP\u002FPPP\u002FBMAC application?",[120,27,121,122],[120,27,121,122,125,126,128,129],"2024-11-18",{"date":204,"type":46},"2024-11-20",{"date":206,"type":46},"2023-08-30",{"date":208,"type":21},"2045-08-30",{"name":138,"class":53},{"id":211,"slug":212,"hasResults":11,"nctId":213,"briefTitle":214,"officialTitle":215,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":216,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":173,"enrollmentInfo":217,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":219,"briefSummary":220,"conditions":221,"keywords":224,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":227,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":228,"startDateStruct":230,"completionDateStruct":232,"leadSponsor":234,"locationsCount":54},"100538287","a-12-months-prospective-study-comparing-functional-outcome-scores-in-hip-arthroscopic-labral-repair-versus-debridement-100538287","NCT06288867","A 12 Months Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcome Scores in Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair Versus Debridement","Arthroscopic Labral Repair Versus Debridement In Hip Labral Tears: A Prospective Comparative Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Sex: both sexes.\n* Age: 18 years - 60 years.\n* Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) including all types (cam, pincer, and combined).\n* Traumatic Labral tears\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous hip surgery.\n* Hip joint dysplasia, defined by both center edge (CE) angles \\\u003C25 degrees and Acetabular Index angle \\>10 degrees.\n* Osteoarthritis grade \\>2 according to Tönnis classification.",{"count":218,"type":21},20,[24],"This study aims to address hip labral tears and compare between arthroscopic labral repair versus debridement.",[222,223,27],"Hip Injuries","Acetabular Labral Tear",[128,225,226,223],"Labral Repair","Labral Debridement","2024-08-26",{"date":229,"type":46},"2024-08-27",{"date":231,"type":46},"2024-08-01",{"date":233,"type":21},"2025-12-01",{"name":235,"class":53},"Ain Shams University",{"id":237,"slug":238,"hasResults":11,"nctId":239,"briefTitle":240,"officialTitle":241,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":242,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":243,"enrollmentInfo":244,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":117,"phases":4,"briefSummary":246,"conditions":247,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":157,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":248,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":249,"startDateStruct":251,"completionDateStruct":253,"leadSponsor":255,"locationsCount":4},"100548375","effect-of-lower-limb-rotation-on-clinical-outcomes-after-arthroscopic-management-in-patients-with-symptomatic-femoroacetabular-impingement-syndrome-100548375","NCT06420180","Effect of Lower Limb Rotation on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Management in Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome","The Effect of Lower Limb Rotation on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Management in Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Accepted to participate in the study (signing informed consent).\n\n  * Skeletal maturity (Risser V score).\n  * If their radiographic imaging, history, and physical examination demonstrated evidence of FAI or labral tears; if they experienced moderate to severe pain that was unresponsive to at least 3 months of nonsurgical treatment, including physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and activity modification\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Incomplete radiographic documentation.\n\n  * Previous surgery of the acetabulum, femur and\u002For tibia altering their version.\n  * Skeletally immature hips (stage IV according to Risser).\n  * Posttraumatic conditions.\n  * If they were previously diagnosed with an ipsilateral hip condition, such as avascular necrosis, legg-calvé-perthes disease, or slipped capital femoral epiphysis.\n  * If their tönnis grade of osteoarthritis is \\>1.\n  * Hip dysplasia will be defined as a lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) less than 22°.\n  * Patients with rheumatologic diseases.\n  * Patients at risk of radiation exposure, such as pregnant women and patients after neoplastic diseases.","45 Years",{"count":245,"type":21},50,"To determine\n\n* The prevalence of abnormalities of femoral and acetabular versions and tibial torsion in symptomatic (FAI) Syndrome.\n* Analyse the subgroups of specific hip pathomorphologies associated with rotational abnormalities of lower limb (LL).\n* Which specific hip subtypes of (FAI) are associated with rotational abnormalities,\n* Outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of (FAI) syndrome in patients with rotational abnormalities compared with a control group of patients with normal rotation.",[27],"2024-05-17",{"date":250,"type":46},"2024-05-20",{"date":252,"type":21},"2024-07",{"date":254,"type":21},"2027-11",{"name":256,"class":53},"Al-Azhar University"]