[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"fixation\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:fixation":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,47],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100644965","a-novel-suspensory-ligament-penodermal-fixation-technique-versus-dorsal-tunica-albuginea-fixation-for-pediatric-buried-penis-100644965",false,"NCT07675915","A Novel Suspensory Ligament Penodermal Fixation Technique Versus Dorsal Tunica Albuginea Fixation for Pediatric Buried Penis:","A Novel Suspensory Ligament Penodermal Fixation Technique Versus Dorsal Tunica Albuginea Fixation for Pediatric Buried Penis: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children under the age of 18 years diagnosed\n* Children with buried penis with parents seeking surgical treatment of this condition.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of previous penile surgery.\n* Patients with micro-penis.\n* Patients with other congenital anomalies such as hypospadias, epispadias and cryptorchidism.\n* Uncontrolled bleeding diathesis or patient who isn't fit for general anesthesia.\n* Buried penis due to excessive obesity.","MALE","2 Months","16 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The aim of the work to compare the outcomes of suspensory ligament fixation to the sub-dermis and dorsal tunica albuginea fixation in terms of success rate, need for auxiliary procedures, and complication rates in the buried penis.",[27,28,29],"Penis\u002FSurgery","Fixation","Ligament",[31,32,33,34],"Suspensory Ligament","Penodermal","Dorsal Tunica Albuginea Fixation","Pediatric Buried Penis","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-23",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-06-30","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":21},{"date":42,"type":21},"2027-07-30",{"name":44,"class":45},"Tanta University","OTHER",1,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":54,"minAge":55,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":65,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":66,"startDateStruct":68,"completionDateStruct":70,"leadSponsor":72,"locationsCount":46},"100581951","syndesmotic-screw-vs-suture-button-in-ankle-syndesmotic-diastasis-100581951","NCT06856980","Syndesmotic Screw Vs Suture Button in Ankle Syndesmotic Diastasis","Comparative Study Between Syndesmotic Screw and Suture Button in Ankle Syndesmotic Diastasis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Unstable unilateral syndesmotic injuries that was considered by the attending staff surgeon to require surgical fixation, including:\n\n* Age : 18 - 60 years old.\n* Closed or grade I open fractures are included.\n* Isolated syndesmotic injury.\n* associated lateral malleolus fracture with talar shift.\n* Associated with Bimalleolar fractures.\n* Associated with Trimalleolar fractures that did not require posterior fragment fixation (typically \\\u003C25% of articular surface).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Exclusion criteria include patient and injury specific factors.\n\nPatient-related exclusion factors included:\n\n* Skeletal immaturity.\n* Previous ipsilateral ankle surgery.\n* Non-ambulatory status before injury.\n* Inability to comply with postoperative protocol (i.e., advanced dementia).\n* Medical unfit patients for surgery.\n* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with charcot joint or peripheral neuropathy.\n* Polytrauma patients.\n\nInjury-related exclusion factors included:\n\n* Grade II or III open fractures\n* Tibial plafond fractures\n* Posterior malleolar fractures requiring fixation (typically \\>25% articular surface involved).","ALL","18 Years","60 Years",{"count":58,"type":21},42,[24],"The aim of this study is to compare suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injury.",[62,63,28,64],"Syndesmotic Screw","Suture Button","Ankle Syndesmotic Diastasis","2025-03-04",{"date":67,"type":39},"2025-03-06",{"date":69,"type":21},"2025-03-15",{"date":71,"type":21},"2026-01-01",{"name":44,"class":45}]