[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"functional-recovery\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:functional-recovery":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,43,77,106,130],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":31,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":32,"startDateStruct":35,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":42},"100618314","inter--and-intra-observer-reliability-of-the-iowa-level-of-assistance-scale-and-the-effect-of-staff-retraining-100618314",false,"NCT07330011","Inter- and Intra-Observer Reliability of the Iowa Level of Assistance Scale and the Effect of Staff Retraining","Inter- and Intra-observer Reliability of the Iowa Level of Assistance (ILoA) Scale for Measuring Postoperative Functional Recovery in Orthopedic Patients: an Observational Study","ILOA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* For Observers (Physiotherapists):\n\nAll physiotherapists working at the main Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IOR) site in Bologna or at the two satellite sites in Argenta and Bagheria.\n\nPhysiotherapists must have the role of observers in the study. All physiotherapists affiliated with the SAITeR service who have previously received initial training in the use of the ILoA scale; newly hired staff must have completed the specific training pathway.\n\nFor Patients:\n\nPatients admitted to IOR Bologna or Argenta for whom administration of the ILoA scale is part of routine clinical practice.\n\nPatients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty. Patients undergoing hip arthroplasty or osteosynthesis for femoral fracture.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Refusal or inability to provide informed consent (for both physiotherapists and patients).","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},42,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The aim of this study is to evaluate, in routine clinical practice, the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Iowa Level of Assistance (ILoA) scale, which is regularly used to assess functional recovery in orthopedic patients. A secondary objective is to investigate the impact of a structured retraining program for healthcare staff on the use of the ILoA scale and to determine whether this intervention influences the reliability indices of the scale.",[25,26,27],"Joint Replacement","Functional Recovery","Reliability",[29],"ILOA scale","RECRUITING","2026-01-08",{"date":33,"type":34},"2026-01-09","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":34},"2025-11-15",{"date":38,"type":21},"2026-09",{"name":40,"class":41},"Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli","OTHER",1,{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":47,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":48,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":51,"phases":52,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":74,"locationsCount":76},"100589358","implementation-of-neuromuscular-electrical-stimulation-after-total-knee-arthroplasty-100589358","NCT06953375","Implementation of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation After Total Knee Arthroplasty","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nSite Inclusion Criteria:\n\n• UCHealth or Intermountain Health outpatient physical therapy clinic\n\nPatient Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Underwent primary unilateral TKA\n* Attended outpatient rehabilitation at a participating clinic within 5 days after TKA\n* Attended at least 3 total outpatient physical therapy visits in total\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatient Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* NMES Contraindications \\[Patients with implanted cardiovascular cardiovertedefibrillator (ICD), active cancer, post-operative diagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in involved lower extremity\\]\n* Previous lower extremity arthroplasty less than 12 weeks prior to scheduled TKA surgical date",{"count":50,"type":21},3250,"INTERVENTIONAL",[53],"NA","Patients experience dramatic quadriceps strength loss after total knee replacement, which contributes to persistent weakness and reduced long-term function after surgery. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reduces quadriceps weakness and improves patient function after knee replacement, but it is drastically underused in rehabilitation practice. This randomized trial will examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a comprehensive strategy for implementing neuromuscular electrical stimulation after knee replacement in two large healthcare organizations.",[56,26,57,58],"Total Knee Arthroplasty","Aging","Physical Therapy",[60,61,62,58,63,64,65,66],"NMES (Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation)","TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty)","Rehabilitation","RE-AIM: Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance","Implementation Science","Older Adults","Physical Function","2025-09-25",{"date":69,"type":34},"2025-09-29",{"date":71,"type":34},"2025-05-12",{"date":73,"type":21},"2029-04",{"name":75,"class":41},"University of Colorado, Denver",3,{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":84,"maxAge":85,"enrollmentInfo":86,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":51,"phases":88,"briefSummary":89,"conditions":90,"keywords":93,"overallStatus":96,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":97,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":98,"startDateStruct":100,"completionDateStruct":102,"leadSponsor":104,"locationsCount":4},"100600352","coupling-of-ipack-block-with-adductor-canal-block-versus-adductor-canal-block-alone-on-pain-functional-recovery-and-inflammatory-response-after-knee-replacement-100600352","NCT07096375","Coupling of IPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Alone on Pain, Functional Recovery and Inflammatory Response After Knee Replacement","Competency of Coupling of IPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Alone on Postoperative Pain, Functional Recovery and Inflammatory Response After Total Knee Replacement","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing total knee replacement.\n* ASA physical status I to III\n* Sex (males and females).\n* Age 20 - 70 years.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing bilateral or revision total knee replacement.\n* ASA physical status more than III\n* Age less than 20 or older than 70\n* severe renal insufficiency ( Estimated Glomerular filtration rate eGFR \\\u003C 15 mL\u002Fmin\u002F1.73 m2 ).\n* history of arrhythmia or seizures.\n* Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics.\n* Preexisting peripheral neuropathy and prior vascular surgery on femoral vessels on operated site.\n* Infection near site of injection e.g. osteomyelitis, septic knee joint, etc.\n* Patient refusal or with difficulties in comprehending numeric pain rating scale (NRS) pain scores\n* Any contraindications for spinal anesthesia. (eg.: refusal of patients, coagulopathy, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets...)","20 Years","70 Years",{"count":87,"type":21},50,[53],"The aim of this study is to compare the Competency of coupling of IPACK Block with Adductor Canal Block versus Adductor Canal Block Alone on Postoperative Pain after total knee replacement as well as Functional Recovery and Inflammatory Response and range of motion postoperatively.",[91,92,26],"Adductor Canal Block","Total Knee Replacement Surgery",[94,91,95],"IPACK block","Inflammatory Response","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-07-24",{"date":99,"type":34},"2025-07-31",{"date":101,"type":21},"2025-09-20",{"date":103,"type":21},"2026-09-28",{"name":105,"class":41},"Ain Shams University",{"id":107,"slug":108,"hasResults":11,"nctId":109,"briefTitle":110,"officialTitle":111,"acronym":112,"eligibilityCriteria":113,"healthyVolunteers":114,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":115,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":51,"phases":117,"briefSummary":118,"conditions":119,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":96,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":121,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":122,"startDateStruct":124,"completionDateStruct":126,"leadSponsor":128,"locationsCount":42},"100579590","cervical-tsdcs-on-stroke-patients-100579590","NCT06826274","Cervical TsDCS on Stroke Patients","Clinical and Neurophysiological Evaluation of the Effects of Cervical TsDCS on Stroke Patients with Distal Upper Limb Strength Deficit","AMPLI-MOV","Group Stroke:\n\nInclusion criteria:\n\n1. age over 18 years;\n2. first ischemic\u002Fhemorrhagic stroke (within 30 days of onset);\n3. mild-to-moderate stroke (NIHSS scale score\\\u003C16).\n4. residual function of the upper limb, assessed by the following scales: - MRC of the distal muscles of the upper limb: score between 2 and 4; - NHISS (items 5A and 5B): score between 1 and 3;\n5. ability to give informed consent and understand instructions.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n1. severe spasticity (Ashworth Scale score \\> 2);\n2. severe aphasia;\n3. severe neglect;\n4. history of disabling neurological disease;\n5. history of epilepsy;\n6. significant comorbidities;\n7. contraindications to tsDCS.\n\nHealthy Group:\n\nInclusion criteria:\n\n1. age over 18 years;\n2. equalized in age with the patient group.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n1. history of stroke progress;\n2. history of severe neurological disease.",true,{"count":116,"type":21},40,[53],"The present project aims to evaluate the facilitatory modulation of motor responses of the limb upper limb by tsDCS in patients with arm\u002Fhand hyposthenia after cerebral ischemia to verify the possible therapeutic benefits that this type of stimulation can induce in terms of of strength, dexterity and effectiveness in acts of daily living.",[26,120],"Motor Rehabilitation","2025-02-12",{"date":123,"type":34},"2025-02-13",{"date":125,"type":21},"2025-03",{"date":127,"type":21},"2026-03",{"name":129,"class":41},"IRCCS San Raffaele Roma",{"id":131,"slug":132,"hasResults":11,"nctId":133,"briefTitle":134,"officialTitle":134,"acronym":135,"eligibilityCriteria":136,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":137,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":139,"conditions":140,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":143,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":144,"startDateStruct":146,"completionDateStruct":148,"leadSponsor":150,"locationsCount":42},"100551874","prognostic-recovery-observations-and-guidance-for-evaluating-stroke-survivors-100551874","NCT06465758","Prognostic Recovery Observations and Guidance for Evaluating Stroke Survivors","PROGRESS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18\n* Haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke confirmed by a clinical diagnosis and by brain imaging\n* NIHSS item 5-6 ≥1\n* 3 to 10 days post-stroke\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Transient ischaemic attack\n* Premorbid Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 4\n* Acute orthopaedic complications\n* Inability to give informed consent",{"count":138,"type":21},360,"This research delves into the acute prognostic factors influencing functional recovery in individuals who have experienced a stroke. The objective is to describe patterns of functional recovery after a stroke and identify new, clinically significant outcomes or metrics that can serve as predictive indicators for post-stroke functional recovery.",[141,26,142],"Acute Stroke","Prognostic Factors","2024-06-13",{"date":145,"type":34},"2024-06-20",{"date":147,"type":34},"2024-05-21",{"date":149,"type":21},"2029-05",{"name":151,"class":41},"IRCCS San Raffaele"]