[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"gait-hemiplegic\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:gait-hemiplegic":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,45,69,97,119],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100541221","evolution-of-walking-abilities-in-subacute-stroke-patients-hospitalized-in-neurorehabilitation-center-100541221",false,"NCT06327035","Evolution of Walking Abilities in Subacute Stroke Patients Hospitalized in Neurorehabilitation Center","Neurological Recovery of the Paretic Lower Limb and Balance and Walking Abilities in the Subacute Phase of Stroke in Patients Hospitalized in Medical and Rehabilitation Units: A Prospective Multicenter Longitudinal Study","PROWALK","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient hospitalized in one of the investigating centers after acute\u002Fsubacute stroke.\n* Affiliated to a social security scheme\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Opposed to its participation in this study\n* Neurodegenerative disease impacting gait prior to stroke onset\n* Patient not walking before stroke\n* Progressive pathology with life-threatening consequences within 6 months\n* Patient under legal protection","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},400,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to describe the evolution of gait recovery during the subacute phase of stroke up to six months after stroke, in patients hospitalized in medical and neurological rehabilitation units.",[25,26],"Stroke","Gait, Hemiplegic",[28,29,30,31],"stroke","lower limb","gait recovery","balance","RECRUITING","2026-03-16",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-03-17","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":36},"2024-03-26",{"date":40,"type":21},"2028-04-01",{"name":42,"class":43},"Clinique Les Trois Soleils","OTHER",3,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":51,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":53,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":59,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":60,"startDateStruct":62,"completionDateStruct":64,"leadSponsor":66,"locationsCount":68},"100469503","focused-intensive-repeated-stepping-during-inpatient-rehabilitation-poststroke---a-quality-improvement-project-100469503","NCT05393661","Focused Intensive Repeated Stepping During Inpatient Rehabilitation Poststroke - A Quality Improvement Project","Implementation of Focused Intensive Repeated Stepping Training (FIRST) During Inpatient Rehabilitation Poststroke - A Quality Improvement Project","FIRST-IN","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* \\\u003C 2 months poststroke\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* restrictions in lower extremity weightbearing (e.g., amputation or lower limb fracture)\n* unable to ambulate \\> 50 m prior to their most recent stroke\n* discharged to home from inpatient rehabilitation after \\\u003C 1 week","89 Years",{"count":55,"type":21},2000,"The purpose of this quality improvement project was first to monitor usual physical therapy care (types \\& cardiovascular intensity of interventions and amount of stepping practice provided) and outcomes. Following which educational training and support was provided to treating physical therapists to encourage implementation of evidence-based practices. Specifically, therapists were encouraged to prioritize the practice of walking, particularly at higher cardiovascular intensities during scheduled therapy sessions. Fidelity metrics in the form of chart audits and pedometer-based step counts were utilized to determine compliance with the evidence-based intervention and ultimately investigated for potential effects on patient outcome measures.",[58,26],"Stroke, Acute","2025-07-10",{"date":61,"type":36},"2025-07-15",{"date":63,"type":36},"2017-01-01",{"date":65,"type":21},"2030-12-31",{"name":67,"class":43},"Indiana University",1,{"id":70,"slug":71,"hasResults":11,"nctId":72,"briefTitle":73,"officialTitle":74,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":75,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":76,"maxAge":77,"enrollmentInfo":78,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":80,"phases":81,"briefSummary":83,"conditions":84,"keywords":87,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":88,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":89,"startDateStruct":91,"completionDateStruct":93,"leadSponsor":95,"locationsCount":68},"100581084","effects-of-otago-and-gaze-stabilization-exercises-on-balance-gait-and-qol-in-elderly-stroke-patients-100581084","NCT06845709","Effects of Otago and Gaze Stabilization Exercises on Balance, Gait and QOL in Elderly Stroke Patients","Effects of Otago Exercises and Gaze Stabilization Exercises on Balance, Gait and Quality of Life in Elderly Stroke Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Had ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke ≤6 months\n* Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score between 35 and 45\n* Dynamic Gait Index score between 11 and 19\n* Mini-mental status exam scores \\> 24\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participants with severe vision or hearing impairment\n* Neurological disorders including epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, vertigo, Parkinson disease, and stroke, muscular disorders which limit functional activity (OA, RA, etc)\n* Medications that affect balance, severe cardiovascular conditions, recent lower limb injury or surgery\n* Peripheral vestibular disorder","50 Years","70 Years",{"count":79,"type":21},46,"INTERVENTIONAL",[82],"NA","To compare effects of otago exercises and Gaze stabilization exercises on Balance, gait and quality of Life in elderly stroke patients",[85,26,86],"Balance; Distorted","Quality of Life",[85,26,86],"2025-02-20",{"date":90,"type":36},"2025-02-25",{"date":92,"type":36},"2024-09-01",{"date":94,"type":21},"2025-04-15",{"name":96,"class":43},"Riphah International University",{"id":98,"slug":99,"hasResults":11,"nctId":100,"briefTitle":101,"officialTitle":101,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":102,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":77,"enrollmentInfo":103,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":80,"phases":105,"briefSummary":106,"conditions":107,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":110,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":111,"startDateStruct":113,"completionDateStruct":115,"leadSponsor":117,"locationsCount":68},"100509032","gait-analysis-in-patients-with-hemiplegia-using-insole-splint-100509032","NCT05908149","Gait Analysis in Patients With Hemiplegia Using Insole Splint.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients that can walk with or without the splint, having their first stroke episode at least two months ago and their hospitalisation period does not overcome six months, having also a diagnosis from a neurologist coming with a Brain CT-scan.\n* Patients must have use the insole splint during physiotherapy sessions for at least 1 week before their inclusion in the trial.\n* Patients must be able to communicate and fully understand the instructions given by the researchers.\n* Researchers are going to try to have a sex ratio 50\u002F50.\n* Patients' age is going to be between 18-70 years.\n* Functional Ambulation Category: FAC \\> 2\n* Modified Ashworth Scale of the affected lower Limb (MAS): MAS ≤2\n* Normal Gait before the stroke.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Peripheral Neurological Damage.\n* Past or ongoing orthopedic or reumatologic disease that bothers patient's gait.\n* Past damage of the Central Nervous System.\n* Dermatologic problems or human factors that limitate the use of insole splint.\n* Patients must not have used intramuscular botox injection recently.\n* Patients with low motivation and low perception are also excluded.",{"count":104,"type":21},12,[82],"The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the gait of patients with hemiplegia, with or without the use of insole splint. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes the insole splint improve the gait of these patients? Does any difference exist in the use of muscles?\n\nParticipants will have to walk in the gait analysis' aisle with and without the insole splint, using wireless EMG device.",[26,108,109],"Splints","EMG","2024-12-04",{"date":112,"type":36},"2024-12-06",{"date":114,"type":36},"2023-04-12",{"date":116,"type":21},"2025-12-31",{"name":118,"class":43},"University of Ioannina",{"id":120,"slug":121,"hasResults":11,"nctId":122,"briefTitle":123,"officialTitle":124,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":125,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":126,"maxAge":127,"enrollmentInfo":128,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":80,"phases":130,"briefSummary":132,"conditions":133,"keywords":135,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":140,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":141,"startDateStruct":143,"completionDateStruct":145,"leadSponsor":147,"locationsCount":68},"100557872","phase-4-effectiveness-and-safety-of-at-home-gait-rehabilitation-using-wearable-exoskeletal-robot-100557872","NCT06543758","Effectiveness and Safety of At-home Gait Rehabilitation Using Wearable Exoskeletal Robot","Study to Verify Effectiveness and Safety of At-home Gait Rehabilitation Using Wearable Exoskeletal Robot to Improve Gait in Stroke Patients, Investigator Initiated, Single Center, Single Group Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. adults aged 19 to 79 years (based on the age on their national ID at the time of consent)\n2. individuals diagnosed with cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage confirmed by MRI or CT.\n3. patients who have passed at least one month since stroke diagnosis.\n4. individuals exhibiting spastic hemiplegic gait patterns due to stroke.\n5. patients with a Functional Ambulatory Category score of less than 4.\n6. individuals who can sit on the edge of a bed without assistance and stand for 10 seconds with or without assistance.\n7. individuals with sufficient cognitive ability to follow simple instructions and understand the study's content and purpose (Mini-Mental State Examination score \\>= 20)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. individuals with severe joint contractures or osteoporosis, or untreated fractures that contraindicate weight-bearing on the lower limbs.\n2. individuals with skin conditions or open wounds that prevent device usage.\n3. individuals with significant differences in leg length.\n4. individuals with severe deformities or joint contractures in the lower limbs.\n5. individuals at high risk of fractures due to conditions like osteoporosis.\n6. individuals unable to maintain a sitting or standing position independently.\n7. individuals with severe lower limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale grade 2 or higher).\n8. individuals with severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score \\\u003C 20), delirium, or severe language impairment that hinders cooperation with wearable exoskeletal robot gait training.\n9. individuals unable to maintain prolonged standing or walking due to conditions like orthostatic hypotension or cardiopulmonary impairment.\n10. individuals with conditions affecting gait, such as peripheral neuropathy, Parkinsonism, or those with alcohol dependence or severe diabetes.\n11. pregnant women or those who could become pregnant.\n12. individuals participating in other clinical trials.\n13. individuals at high risk of falls or bleeding due to conditions like coagulopathies.\n14. individuals shorter than 140 cm, taller than 190 cm, or weighing over 80 kg.\n15. individuals with other clinical findings deemed inappropriate for the study by the principal investigator or study coordinator.","19 Years","79 Years",{"count":129,"type":21},16,[131],"PHASE4","The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a home-based robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation service using a wearable exoskeletal robot for stroke patients.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Can home-based robotic-assisted gait training improve walking speed in stroke patients?\n* Does this intervention enhance body composition, gait patterns, balance in participants?\n* How satisfied are participants with the use of the wearable exoskeletal robot ?\n\nResearchers will compare pre- and post-intervention walking speeds, body composition, spatiotemporal parameters, balance, and satisfaction survey and does not establish a control group.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Wear a wearable exoskeletal robot for gait training.\n* Undergo 10 sessions of 30-minute gait training over 4 weeks at home or in nearby indoor spaces.\n* Participate in physical function assessments including the 10-meter walk test, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Berg Balance Scale before and after the intervention.\n* Complete quality of life and depression inventories before and after the intervention.",[25,134,26],"Gait, Spastic",[136,137,138,139,25],"Wearable robot","Exoskeletal robot","At-home rehabilitation","Gait rehabilitation","2024-11-14",{"date":142,"type":36},"2024-11-19",{"date":144,"type":36},"2024-08-01",{"date":146,"type":21},"2026-07-31",{"name":148,"class":43},"Yonsei University"]