[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"geriatrics\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:geriatrics":24},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,15,0,[8,41,69,98,109,143,173,203,229,251,287,311,345,372,397],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":23,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":40},"100053824","aging-geriatric-syndromes-and-clonal-hematopoiesis-100053824",false,"NCT02604563","Aging, Geriatric Syndromes and Clonal Hematopoiesis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* At least 50 years of age.\n* Able to understand written and spoken English.\n* Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB-approved written informed consent document (or that of a legally authorized representative, if applicable for the trauma cohort)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inability or unwillingness to complete health questionnaire (with the exception of hip and knee replacement participants).\n* History of a recent (\\\u003C30 days) acute viral illness.\n* Current cancer diagnosis and currently receiving chemotherapy or undergoing radiation therapy. A prior history of cancer is allowed if the participant completed therapy \\> 1 year prior to enrollment; participants with a prior diagnosis of cancer will be asked to sign a release of information for the research team to obtain records regarding their prior cancer treatment.\n* Current use of drugs that cause DNA damage (e.g. Cytoxan, azathioprine, etc.) for the treatment of a non-malignant disease.\n* Vulnerable populations (e.g. prisoners).\n* Known infection with Hepatitis B or C, HTLV, or HIV.\n* Additional exclusion for optional bone marrow aspirate\u002Fbiopsy substudy:\n\n  * Use of medications for anticoagulation or \"blood thinning\" including warfarin, low molecular weight heparins (enoxaparin, daltaparin) or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban or betrixaban)\n  * allergy to lidocaine or other local anesthetics.",true,"ALL","50 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},2000,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","In this study the investigators will incorporate a wide range of clinical variables associated with aging and cardiovascular disease to determine whether they are associated with mutation status independent of chronologic age. Clinically, aging can be operationalized using geriatric assessment, which entails a comprehensive multi-dimensional assessment of the health of an older adult, including measures of comorbidity, polypharmacy, functional status, cognition, depression, falls, social activities and social support. Given that aging is heterogeneous, geriatric assessment allows greater specificity for aging than chronological age alone.",[24,25,26,27],"Geriatrics","Aged","Geriatric Syndromes","Cardiovascular Diseases","RECRUITING","2026-07-09",{"date":31,"type":32},"2026-07-13","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":32},"2016-03-10",{"date":36,"type":20},"2030-04-30",{"name":38,"class":39},"Washington University School of Medicine","OTHER",1,{"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":11,"nctId":44,"briefTitle":45,"officialTitle":46,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":47,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":49,"enrollmentInfo":50,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":53,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":59,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":60,"startDateStruct":62,"completionDateStruct":64,"leadSponsor":66,"locationsCount":68},"100639467","patient-experience-of-older-adults-living-alone-with-injuries-100639467","NCT07610161","Patient Experience of Older Adults Living Alone With Injuries","Patient Experience of Older Adults Living Alone With Injuries and Long-Term Effects of Geriatric Trauma Care Program for Living Alone Older Adults With Injuries","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. willing to join this study for 12 weeks\n2. limb injuries,\n3. living alone without any family,\n4. 65 to 74 years old,\n5. independent before an injury,\n6. have a smart phone\n7. be able to communicate in Mandarin\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. with an ISS greater than 16 (severe injuries)\n2. severe cognitive impairment\n3. severe illness such as organ system insufficiency\n4. diagnosed with depression","65 Years","74 Years",{"count":51,"type":20},110,"INTERVENTIONAL",[54],"NA","This study aims to explore the patient experiences of living alone older adults with injuries, and to examine the effects of a \"Geriatric Trauma Care Program\" in older adults with limb injuries who live alone. A three-year design will be used to reach the purposes of this study. The first stage of this study will use descriptive phenomenology to get patient experiences of living alone older adults with injuries. In the second stage of this study, a two-arm experimental design will be used.",[24,57,58],"Trauma Injury","Living Alone","2026-05-20",{"date":61,"type":32},"2026-05-27",{"date":63,"type":32},"2023-11-22",{"date":65,"type":20},"2026-10-31",{"name":67,"class":39},"Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital",2,{"id":70,"slug":71,"hasResults":11,"nctId":72,"briefTitle":73,"officialTitle":74,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":75,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":76,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":78,"briefSummary":79,"conditions":80,"keywords":85,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":90,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":91,"startDateStruct":93,"completionDateStruct":94,"leadSponsor":96,"locationsCount":40},"100637544","manual-versus-autoflow-ventilation-during-anesthesia-inducton-in-geriatric-patients-100637544","NCT07582913","Manual Versus Autoflow Ventilation During Anesthesia Inductıon in Geriatric Patients","Effects of Manual Versus Autoflow Ventilation During Anesthesia Induction on Cerebral and Peripheral Oxygenation in Geriatric Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 65 years and older.\n* Patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia.\n* Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I, II, or III.\n* Volunteer patients who are willing to participate and provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with severe heart failure or severe pulmonary disease.\n* Patients with a presence or history of brain tumors or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA\u002Fstroke).\n* Patients with impaired cooperation or cognitive dysfunction (e.g., dementia, delirium, Alzheimer's disease).\n* Patients with a known history or preoperative prediction of a difficult airway.\n* Patients with a known allergy to the monitoring sensor materials.",{"count":77,"type":20},106,[54],"The objective of this study is to compare the effects of manual ventilation and AutoFlow ventilation, administered during the induction of general anesthesia, on cerebral (s-rSO₂) and peripheral (somatic) oxygenation (p-rSO₂) in geriatric patients.",[81,82,24,83,84],"Cerebral Oxygenation","Peripheral Oxygenation","Ventilation","Near-Infrared Spectroscopy",[24,84,86,87,88,89],"Cerebral Oximetry","Cerebral Autoregulation","Mask Ventilation","Autoflow","2026-05-13",{"date":92,"type":32},"2026-05-15",{"date":90,"type":32},{"date":95,"type":20},"2026-12-05",{"name":97,"class":39},"Ankara City Hospital Bilkent",{"id":99,"slug":4,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":100,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":101,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":102,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":103,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":104,"startDateStruct":106,"completionDateStruct":107,"leadSponsor":108,"locationsCount":40},"100255479","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* At least 50 years of age.\n* Able to understand written and spoken English.\n* Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB-approved written informed consent document (or that of a legally authorized representative, if applicable for the trauma cohort)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inability or unwillingness to complete health questionnaire (with the exception of hip replacement participants).\n* History of a recent (\\\u003C30 days) acute viral illness.\n* Current cancer diagnosis and currently receiving chemotherapy or undergoing radiation therapy. A prior history of cancer is allowed if the participant completed therapy \\> 1 year prior to enrollment; participants with a prior diagnosis of cancer will be asked to sign a release of information for the research team to obtain records regarding their prior cancer treatment.\n* Current use of drugs that cause DNA damage (e.g. Cytoxan, azathioprine, etc.) for the treatment of a non-malignant disease.\n* Vulnerable populations (e.g. prisoners).\n* Known infection with Hepatitis B or C, HTLV, or HIV.\n* Additional exclusion for optional bone marrow aspirate\u002Fbiopsy substudy:\n\n  * Use of medications for anticoagulation or \"blood thinning\" including warfarin, low molecular weight heparins (enoxaparin, daltaparin) or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban or betrixaban)\n  * allergy to lidocaine or other local anesthetics.",{"count":19,"type":20},[24,25,26,27],"2026-05-07",{"date":105,"type":32},"2026-05-12",{"date":34,"type":32},{"date":36,"type":20},{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":110,"slug":111,"hasResults":11,"nctId":112,"briefTitle":113,"officialTitle":114,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":115,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":116,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":117,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":119,"briefSummary":120,"conditions":121,"keywords":126,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":134,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":135,"startDateStruct":137,"completionDateStruct":139,"leadSponsor":141,"locationsCount":40},"100562641","optimizing-prescribing-decisions-for-hospitalized-older-adults-with-chronic-conditions-100562641","NCT06605807","Optimizing Prescribing Decisions for Hospitalized Older Adults With Chronic Conditions","Optimizing Prescribing Decisions for Hospitalized Older Adults With Chronic Conditions: Aim 3","Clinician Participants:\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Attending clinicians who practice on the general medicine or hospital medicine service at UPMC Presbyterian, UPMC Montefiore, UPMC Shadyside, UPMC Mercy, or UPMC Magee-Women's Hospital campuses.\n2. Practicing on the general medicine or hospital medicine service. This population may include physicians with training in general internal medicine, hospital medicine, family practice, internal medicine subspecialities, as well as advance practice clinicians.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Anticipating leaving current clinical position within next 3 months\n2. Less than 4 weeks of inpatient attending service scheduled within 3 months of recruitment\n\nPatient Participants:\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Adult aged 65 years or older who are hospitalized under the care of a participating clinician and discharged home.\n2. Eligible patients must recieve at least one cardiometabolic medication change at hospital discharge (can include new medication starts, stops, or dose changes). Cardiometabolic medications include any class of antihypertensive, lipid lowering, anti-platelet, or glucose lowering medications regardless of indication for use.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Incapacity for informed consent \u002F unable to answer survey questions due to cognitive impairment\n2. Enrolled in hospice care","18 Years",{"count":118,"type":20},150,[54],"The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn if providing a clinical decision framework for managing older adults chronic conditions during hospitalization to inpatient clinicians improves clinicians' ability to individualize chronic condition prescribing decisions for hospitalized older adults (65 and older). The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Will the clinical decision framework lead to clinicians having greater confidence to individualize discharge prescribing?\n* Will clinicians using the framework discharge make fewer changes to hospitalized older adults with home diabetes and hypertension medications than they did prior to receiving the framework?\n* Will older adult patients of participating clinicians will report fewer gaps in understanding of medication changes after the clinician is exposed to the framework?\n\nResearchers will compare participating clinician survey responses and prescribing records from before and after an educational session presenting the clinical decision framework.\n\nParticipants will be asked to\n\n* Attend a one-time educational session on the clinical decision framework\n* Complete 2 electronic surveys, one before and one following the educational session.\n* Agree for researchers to contact their patients, in order for patients to complete a one-time phone survey about changes made to home medications during hospitalization and quality of communication from the hospital team.",[122,123,124,125,24],"Prescribing Decisions","Diabetes","Multimorbidity","Hypertension",[127,128,129,130,131,132,133],"prescribing","hypertension","diabetes","geriatrics","polypharmacy","multimorbidity","hospital medicine","2026-04-08",{"date":136,"type":32},"2026-04-14",{"date":138,"type":32},"2025-11-13",{"date":140,"type":20},"2027-01-30",{"name":142,"class":39},"University of Pittsburgh",{"id":144,"slug":145,"hasResults":11,"nctId":146,"briefTitle":147,"officialTitle":148,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":149,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":150,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":151,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":153,"briefSummary":154,"conditions":155,"keywords":157,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":164,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":165,"startDateStruct":167,"completionDateStruct":169,"leadSponsor":171,"locationsCount":40},"100579109","strength-based-tailored-exercise-program-at-home-for-geriatric-patients-100579109","NCT06820021","Strength-based Tailored-Exercise Program at Home for Geriatric Patients","The Effects of a Strength-based Tailored-Exercise Program at Home (STEP@Home) on Health Outcomes of Geriatric Patients at Risk of Hospitalization-associated Functional Decline: A Sequential Mixed-method Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* i) aged 60 or above\n* ii) has an acute hospitalization and the length of hospital stay is of ≥ 2 days2,\n* iii) has risk of functional decline in 3 months following hospitalization as measured by the Screening for High-Risk Patients (SHERPA) score of \\>3.5. SHERPA is a brief measure to identify the high risk by screening for the risk factors, including old age, poor health perception, IADL dysfunction, mild cognitive impairment and fall in the previous year.\n* iv) discharged home without any referral for exercise-based rehabilitation\n* v) has a Smartphone to access video calls\n* vi) consented to participate.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* i) admitted with a disabling condition leading to significant functional loss such as stroke,)\n* ii) bed-bound or chair bound\n* iii) with conditions contradictory to exercise training (e.g., acute muscular-skeletal problem, acute and unstable cardio-respiratory disease, etc),\n* iv) engaging in moderate or vigorous exercise (\\>60min\u002Fweek) in the past 6 months.","60 Years",{"count":152,"type":20},256,[54],"This study focuses on the \"Strength-based Tailored-Exercise Program at Home (STEP@Home)\" aimed at improving health outcomes for geriatric patients at risk of hospitalization-associated functional decline. It is a sequential mixed-method study that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches.",[156,24],"Frailty",[158,159,160,161,162,163],"Strength-based Tailored-Exercise Program","geriatric care","Hospitalization-associated functional decline","health aging","functional outcome","post-discharge period","2026-03-31",{"date":166,"type":32},"2026-04-06",{"date":168,"type":32},"2025-05-23",{"date":170,"type":20},"2030-03-01",{"name":172,"class":39},"The University of Hong Kong",{"id":174,"slug":175,"hasResults":11,"nctId":176,"briefTitle":177,"officialTitle":178,"acronym":179,"eligibilityCriteria":180,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":181,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":182,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":184,"briefSummary":185,"conditions":186,"keywords":188,"overallStatus":193,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":194,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":195,"startDateStruct":197,"completionDateStruct":199,"leadSponsor":201,"locationsCount":68},"100624191","evaluation-of-efficacy-of-coconut-oil-mouth-care-for-non-autonomous-hospitalised-elderly-people-100624191","NCT07406425","Evaluation of Efficacy of Coconut Oil Mouth Care for Non-autonomous Hospitalised Elderly People.","Evaluation of Efficacy of Coconut Oil Mouth Care for Non-autonomous Hospitalised Elderly People: a Multicentric Randomised Controlled Trial","COCO-CARE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 75 and over\n* Patients hospitalised in geriatric medicine and geriatric SMR departments\n* Patients able to open their mouths for treatment\n* Patients not able to carry out their oral hygiene on their own\n* Patients who have given their written consent (consent of the patient or patient consent accompanied by the designated representative if the patient is unable to give written consent)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a known allergy to coconut\n* Patients requiring medicated mouth care as prescribed by a doctor\n* Patients under guardianship, tutorship or curatorship\n* Confused patients who have had medically diagnosed dehydration for less than 48 hours\n* Patients with swallowing difficulties\n* Patients in the terminal phase of end of life\n\nSecondary exclusion criteria:\n\n* Patients leaving the department between D1 and D8 (whatever the reason for discharge, and including in the event of death)\n* Patients whose condition progresses towards a terminal phase of the end of life between D1 and D8\n* Patients experiencing an allergic reaction to Coconut Oil during the study\n* Patients who may present with dehydration during the study","75 Years",{"count":183,"type":20},94,[54],"This is a prospective, longitudinal, randomised, open-label, multicentric, interventional, comparative superiority study.\n\nThe main objective is to demonstrate the superiority of oral care with coconut oil on the oral status of elderly people hospitalised in geriatrics, versus oral care with glycerol sticks.",[24,187],"Oral Health Care",[130,189,190,191,192],"oral health care","elderly","coconut oil","palliative care","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-02-05",{"date":196,"type":32},"2026-02-12",{"date":198,"type":20},"2026-03-15",{"date":200,"type":20},"2026-10-15",{"name":202,"class":39},"University Hospital, Limoges",{"id":204,"slug":205,"hasResults":11,"nctId":206,"briefTitle":207,"officialTitle":208,"acronym":209,"eligibilityCriteria":210,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":116,"maxAge":211,"enrollmentInfo":212,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":214,"conditions":215,"keywords":216,"overallStatus":193,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":194,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":221,"startDateStruct":223,"completionDateStruct":225,"leadSponsor":227,"locationsCount":40},"100593051","geriatrics-in-the-intensive-care-unit-100593051","NCT07001410","Geriatrics in the Intensive Care Unit","Geriatrics in the Intensive Care Unit. An Observational Clinical Trial","GICU","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Registry of adults older than 18 years, discharged from the critical care unit.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* None.","120 Years",{"count":213,"type":20},1000,"Life expectancy is longer in populations of medium- and high-income countries. Older adults are an increasingly large population in intensive care units (ICUs). There are limited publications about the epidemiology, benefits, expenditure, and outcomes of elderly and very old critically ill patients.\n\nWe are designing a study to characterize older adults admitted to the intensive care unit and determine factors associated with adverse outcomes. The discharge registry of the ICU of a third-level hospital was reviewed. Records from January to December 2024 were reviewed. Three age groups were selected for comparison: A. \\\u003C65 years; B. 65-79 years; C. 80 years and above. The outcomes to compare will be: mortality, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation.",[24],[25,217,218,219,220],"Frail Older Adults","Intensive Care Units","Critical Illness","Colombia",{"date":222,"type":32},"2026-02-09",{"date":224,"type":20},"2026-12",{"date":226,"type":20},"2027-12",{"name":228,"class":39},"Hospital Departamental de Villavicencio",{"id":230,"slug":231,"hasResults":11,"nctId":232,"briefTitle":233,"officialTitle":233,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":234,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":235,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":237,"conditions":238,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":242,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":243,"startDateStruct":245,"completionDateStruct":247,"leadSponsor":249,"locationsCount":40},"100578650","carotid-artery-corrected-flow-time-and-inferior-vena-cava-collapsibility-index-for-prediction-of-hypotension-after-induction-of-general-anesthesia-in-geriatric-patients-undergoing-elective-surgery-100578650","NCT06814054","Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time and Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index for Prediction of Hypotension After Induction of General Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status I to Ⅱ\n* receiving general anesthesia for elective surgery\n* fasted for at least 6 to 8 hours were recruited in this study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • patients who refused to participate in the study\n\n  * American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Ⅲ or Ⅳ\n  * Patients with a history of peripheral arterial diseases or atherosclerosis\n  * Patients with body mass index of greater than 30 kg\u002Fm2\n  * Patients with arrhythmia or cardiomyopathy\n  * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)\n  * baseline systolic arterial pressure (SAP) ≥ 180 mmHg or \\\u003C 90mmHg\n  * Any episode of desaturation or difficult intubation during general anasethia induction",{"count":236,"type":20},189,"In this observational study, we will assess cFT by Carotid ultrasound and IVC collapsibility index for prediction of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery.",[24,239,240,241],"Hypotension on Induction","General Anesthetic Drug Adverse Reaction","Elective Surgery","2025-06-29",{"date":244,"type":32},"2025-07-01",{"date":246,"type":32},"2025-03-01",{"date":248,"type":20},"2026-05",{"name":250,"class":39},"Tanta University",{"id":252,"slug":253,"hasResults":11,"nctId":254,"briefTitle":255,"officialTitle":256,"acronym":257,"eligibilityCriteria":258,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":259,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":260,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":262,"briefSummary":263,"conditions":264,"keywords":269,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":277,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":278,"startDateStruct":280,"completionDateStruct":282,"leadSponsor":284,"locationsCount":286},"100566257","perturbation-based-treadmill-training-to-prevent-unrecovered-falls-in-geriatric-patients-100566257","NCT06652828","Perturbation-Based Treadmill Training to Prevent Unrecovered Falls in Geriatric Patients","Training at the Limit of Balance Control on a Perturbation Treadmill to Prevent Unrecovered Falls in Geriatric Patients With and Without Cognitive Impairment","TRAIL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ≥ 70 years\n* ≥40% prospective fall risk for the following year according to the Fall Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT-up)\n* Walking distance ≥ 70 m in the 2 Minute Walk Test\n* Possibility to reach the study site at least via taxi\n* Written informed consent, obtained according to international guidelines and local laws\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* MoCA score \\\u003C 10 pts (or MMSE \\\u003C 17 pts)\n* Performing a Timed up and Go test (TUG) \\\u003C10 s\n* Leg amputation\n* Osteosynthesis or joint replacement of lower extremities within the past 6 weeks.\n* Blindness\n* Parkinson's disease with Hoehn and Yahr stage \\> 3\n* Body weight \\>135 kg and height \\>185 cm\n* Life-expectancy \\\u003C12 months, instable or severe illness\n* Inability to communicate verbally and coorporate appropriatly\n* (Prior) participation perturbation training programs\n* Gait-relevant foot-drop paresis","70 Years",{"count":261,"type":20},396,[54],"The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of perturbation-based balance training (PBT) in preventing unrecovered falls among geriatric patients aged ≥70 years with a prospective fall risk of ≥40%. The study will also assess the safety and feasibility of PBT. The main research questions are:\n\nA total of 396 participants will receive 9 training sessions of either PBT or conventional treadmill training and will attend an assessment before and after the intervention, as well as 6 and 12 months follow up. Falls will be documented throughout the entire study period using calendars, telephone interviews, and proxy information. The primary outcome, unrecovered falls, will be recorded after the end of the intervention until 12 months follow up.",[265,266,24,267,268],"Fall Prevention","Exercise","Cognitive Impairment","Perturbation",[270,271,272,273,274,275,276],"treadmill","unrecovered falls","fall risk","training","falls","balance","rehabilitaion","2025-05-08",{"date":279,"type":32},"2025-05-14",{"date":281,"type":32},"2024-11-25",{"date":283,"type":20},"2027-04-30",{"name":285,"class":39},"University of Oldenburg",3,{"id":288,"slug":289,"hasResults":11,"nctId":290,"briefTitle":291,"officialTitle":292,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":293,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":181,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":294,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":296,"briefSummary":297,"conditions":298,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":303,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":304,"startDateStruct":306,"completionDateStruct":308,"leadSponsor":310,"locationsCount":40},"100585618","pericapsular-nerve-group-and-lumbar-erector-spinae-plane-blocks-for-geriatrics-undergoing-total-hip-arthroplasty-100585618","NCT06904703","Pericapsular Nerve Group and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Geriatrics Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty","Combination of Pericapsular Nerve Group and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Geriatrics Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged \\>75 years.\n* Both sexes.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III.\n* Undergoing total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient refusal.\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\> 30 kg\u002Fm2.\n* Allergy to local anesthesia drugs.\n* Infection at the site of intervention.\n* Coagulopathies.\n* Preexisting advanced diseases of the kidney or liver.",{"count":295,"type":20},120,[54],"This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of pericapsular nerve group and erector spinae plane block as adjuvants to general anesthesia in geriatrics undergoing total hip arthroplasty.",[299,300,24,301,302],"Pericapsular Nerve","Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks","Total Hip Arthroplasty","General Anesthesia","2025-03-29",{"date":305,"type":32},"2025-04-01",{"date":307,"type":32},"2024-12-01",{"date":309,"type":20},"2026-11-01",{"name":250,"class":39},{"id":312,"slug":313,"hasResults":11,"nctId":314,"briefTitle":315,"officialTitle":316,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":317,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":318,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":320,"briefSummary":321,"conditions":322,"keywords":325,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":336,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":337,"startDateStruct":339,"completionDateStruct":341,"leadSponsor":343,"locationsCount":40},"100566220","understanding-the-preferences-and-views-of-older-adults-on-the-use-of-geriatric-and-objective-functional-assessments-for-cancer-treatment-planning-100566220","NCT06652347","Understanding the Preferences and Views of Older Adults on the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning.","Facilitating the Engagement and Satisfaction of Older Adults in Their Cancer Care Planning: A Randomized Study to Understand the Preferences and Views of Older Adults Regarding the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 65\n\nAt the time of study screening either:\n\n* Started a new qualifying index regimen within the last 30 days (inclusive)\n* Are being considered for a new qualifying index regimen\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients will be excluded if they\n\n  * Do not have the capacity to consent to study procedures\n  * Are unable to complete English language questionnaires\n  * Are already using an activity tracker on a daily basis (and therefore may be aware of their current level of activity)\n  * Are enrolled in another study in which physical activity is a substantial part or all of the therapeutic intervention or where physical activity is specifically being evaluated and shared with patients. Patients on studies not evaluating or sharing physical activity are eligible for the present study if they meet the other inclusion\u002Fexclusion criteria and participation in the present study is not excluded by other studies in which they are enrolled.",{"count":319,"type":20},100,[54],"This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition and make informed decisions about their care.\n\nThe main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.",[323,24,324],"Care Delivery","Geriatric Assessment",[326,327,328,329,330,331,332,333,334,335],"fitness tracking","Care delivery Intervention","Functional Status in Older Adults","Cancer Treatment Preferences","Quality vs Quantity of Life","Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology","Randomized Controlled Trial","Quality of Life in Cancer care","Functional Health Assessments","Patient-Centered Cancer Treatment","2025-02-25",{"date":338,"type":32},"2025-02-27",{"date":340,"type":32},"2025-02-21",{"date":342,"type":20},"2026-11",{"name":344,"class":39},"Fox Chase Cancer Center",{"id":346,"slug":347,"hasResults":11,"nctId":348,"briefTitle":349,"officialTitle":350,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":351,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":211,"enrollmentInfo":352,"targetDuration":354,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":355,"conditions":356,"keywords":359,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":363,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":364,"startDateStruct":366,"completionDateStruct":368,"leadSponsor":370,"locationsCount":40},"100553847","risk-factor-analysis-of-chewing-and-swallowing-performance-in-geriatrics-100553847","NCT06491407","RISK FACTOR ANALYSIS OF CHEWING AND SWALLOWING PERFORMANCE IN GERIATRICS","ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CHEWING AND SWALLOWING PERFORMANCE IN GERIATRICS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSİFİCATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY, AND HEALTH","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* being voluntary to participation,\n* Being over 65 years old,\n* Understanding and following simple instructions,\n* Being able to walk independently for 4 meters.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Having a problem that prevents communication and\u002For following simple instructions.",{"count":353,"type":20},240,"1 Day","Various structural and functional problems in neural, sensory and perceptual, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and musculoskeletal systems occur in geriatrics not associated with a specific disease. One of the problems observed in geriatrics is chewing and swallowing disorders. Failure to detect changes in chewing and swallowing performance in elderly individuals at an early stage may lead to chewing and swallowing disorders and serious complications in later stages. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively and systematically address the possible factors affecting chewing and swallowing performance in geriatric individuals.\n\nThe first aim of the study is to analyze the factors affecting chewing and swallowing performance in geriatric individuals within the scope of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The second aim of the study is to create a dysphagia risk prediction model for geriatric individuals based on the results of the analyses to be conducted.\n\nIn the study, the dependent variables, chewing performance, will be evaluated with the Chewing and Swallowing Test of Solids, and swallowing performance will be assessed with the Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test and Dysphagia Limit. Independent variables affecting chewing and swallowing performance have been considered within the scope of the ICF, and all possible factors determined for both geriatrics and swallowing have been listed, and the evaluation parameters and assessment tools have been decided. The evaluation parameters have been categorized under ICF headings such as personal factors, body structures, body functions, activity and participation, and environmental factors, and the evaluations to be conducted have been divided into two groups: geriatric and physiotherapy evaluations. The geriatric evaluations are part of routine geriatric assessment and do not include any specific evaluation for the study. Physiotherapy evaluations will be applied in a certain order to use time efficiently and will take approximately 35-45 minutes. Through geriatric and physiotherapy evaluations, a holistic assessment of participants within the scope of ICF will be ensured.",[357,358,24],"Swallowing Disorder","Chewing Problem",[360,361,130,362],"swallow","chewing","risk factor","2024-07-01",{"date":365,"type":32},"2024-07-09",{"date":367,"type":32},"2024-02-01",{"date":369,"type":20},"2024-10-01",{"name":371,"class":39},"Atılım University",{"id":373,"slug":374,"hasResults":11,"nctId":375,"briefTitle":376,"officialTitle":377,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":378,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":150,"maxAge":181,"enrollmentInfo":379,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":381,"briefSummary":382,"conditions":383,"keywords":384,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":389,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":390,"startDateStruct":392,"completionDateStruct":393,"leadSponsor":395,"locationsCount":68},"100552719","comparative-effects-of-sensory-integration-therapy-and-balance-board-training-in-community-dwelling-older-adults-100552719","NCT06476743","Comparative Effects of Sensory Integration Therapy and Balance Board Training in Community Dwelling Older Adults","Comparative Effects of Sensory Integration Therapy and Balance Board Training on Balance, Postural Stability, Functional Mobility and Risk of Fall in Community Dwelling Older Adults","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Should be living independently (FIM 108-126).\n* No history of lower limb injury in the 1 year prior to the study.\n* Individuals with MMSE score greater than or equal to 24.\n* Individuals with BBS score 41-56.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with recent cardiac or neurological changes in medical status.\n* Individuals with recent surgical procedures within the last 6 months will not include in the study.\n* Individuals with the presence of inner ear problems, dizziness, long-term medication.\n* A history of injury within 1 year before the study.",{"count":380,"type":20},58,[54],"Balance plays a significant role in stability and walking and it's essential for improving the quality of life and functional autonomy while reducing the risk of falling. This research intends to shed light on the advantages of sensory integration therapy and balance board training because it is important to addressing the issues related to ageing and their possible effects.",[24],[385,386,387,388],"older adults","mobility limitation","Postural balance","Sensory","2024-06-24",{"date":391,"type":32},"2024-06-26",{"date":367,"type":32},{"date":394,"type":20},"2024-08-30",{"name":396,"class":39},"Riphah International University",{"id":398,"slug":399,"hasResults":11,"nctId":400,"briefTitle":401,"officialTitle":402,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":403,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":404,"enrollmentInfo":405,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":407,"briefSummary":408,"conditions":409,"keywords":410,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":416,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":417,"startDateStruct":419,"completionDateStruct":421,"leadSponsor":423,"locationsCount":40},"100551457","comparative-effects-of-modified-otago-and-frenkels-exercises-in-geriatric-population-100551457","NCT06460337","Comparative Effects of Modified Otago and Frenkel's Exercises in Geriatric Population","Comparative Effects of Modified Otago and Frenkel's Exercises on Balance, Motor Function, Fear of Fall, and Quality of Life in Geriatric Population","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Community-dwelling adults of both genders who have experienced a fall at least once in the previous year\n* Minimum Berg Balance score of \\>40\n* Able to independently walk and perform everyday activities without any walking aid\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unable to walk independently.\n* Previous surgeries related to knee or hip joint replacement.\n* Severe comorbidities such as stroke, unstable coronary artery disease, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy.\n* Patients with mental illness such as schizophrenia, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease\n* Uncorrected visual, auditory, or vestibular impairments\n* Having limb defects or any physical disability that prevents performing the exercises","80 Years",{"count":406,"type":20},44,[54],"The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effects of modified Otago and Frenkel's exercises on balance, motor function, fear of fall and quality of life in the geriatric population. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* How modified Otago and Frenkel's exercises affect balance, motor function, fear of fall and quality of life in the geriatric population?\n* Is there any difference between the effects of these two exercises? Researchers will compare the effects of modified Otago and Frenkel's exercises to see which kind of exercise has superior effects on the mentioned outcomes.\n\nParticipants will be randomly divided into two groups who will perform their respective exercises for 45 minutes 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Outcomes will be evaluated at the baseline, 4th week and 8th week.",[24],[411,412,413,414,266,415],"Balance","Elderly","Frail older adults","Health-related quality of life","Physical activity","2024-06-11",{"date":418,"type":32},"2024-06-14",{"date":420,"type":32},"2024-03-20",{"date":422,"type":20},"2024-11-01",{"name":396,"class":39}]