[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"gingival-recessions\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:gingival-recessions":25},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,6,0,[8,43,78,110,134,158],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":17,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":21,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":31,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":32,"startDateStruct":35,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":42},"100638591","influence-of-keratinized-tissue-width-and-attached-gingiva-width-on-root-coverage-in-patients-with-recession-defects-a-prospective-clinical-study-100638591",false,"NCT07576439","Influence of Keratinized Tissue Width and Attached Gingiva Width on Root Coverage in Patients With Recession Defects: A Prospective Clinical Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients with Millers class Ⅰ and II \u002F RT1 isolated recession defects in labial maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth region.\n2. Recession depth ≥2mm\n3. Systemically healthy individuals.\n4. Age \\>18 years old.\n5. Full mouth bleeding and plaque score ≤20%\n6. Patients who agreed to participate in the study and signed an informed consent form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients having systemic disease such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperthyroidism or on medication that influence the outcome of periodontal therapy.\n2. Patient with active periodontal disease\n3. Smokers and tobacco users\n4. Mal-aligned anterior teeth.\n5. Patients who had already undergone root coverage procedure on the selected site.\n6. Pregnant and lactating females\n7. Involved tooth with trauma from occlusion.\n8. Involved tooth with prosthesis.\n9. Endodontically involved\u002F RCT treated tooth\n10. Tooth with cervical abrasion \u002F undetectable CEJ\u002F carious","ALL","18 Years",{"count":18,"type":19},30,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[22],"NA","To evaluate the association between the width of keratinized tissue and attached gingiva with root coverage outcomes in RT1 gingival recession defects of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth treated with subepithelial connective tissue graft using a minimally invasive technique (VISTA + CTG).\n\nOBJECTIVES\n\n1. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES\n\n   1. To analyze relation and association at 3 and 6 months outcomes in terms of CRC, mRC and gingival margin position with baseline parameters including width of keratinized tissue and width of attached gingiva, after providing mucogingival plastic surgery in the form of VISTA+CTG for the treatment of RT1recession defects.\n   2. To evaluate 3 and 6 months outcomes (percentage of root coverage, width of keratinized tissue and width of attached gingiva), after providing mucogingival plastic surgery in the form of VISTA+CTG for the treatment of RT1recession defects.\n   3. To access the long-term stability of gingival margin achieved from 3 months to 6 months.\n2. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES\n\n   1. To access recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), probing pocket depth (PPD), mid buccal clinical attachment loss (bCAL), change in gingival thickness (GT) at baseline, at 3 months and 6 months.\n   2. To access patient related outcomes measures (PROM) in pain and hypersensitivity in teeth with gingival recession undergoing recession coverage.",[25],"Gingival Recessions",[27,28,29],"keratinized tissue width","attached gingiva width","RT 1 gingival recession defect","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-22",{"date":33,"type":34},"2026-05-27","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":19},"2026-05-01",{"date":38,"type":19},"2027-12",{"name":40,"class":41},"Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak","OTHER",1,{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":49,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":50,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":52,"briefSummary":53,"conditions":54,"keywords":57,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":42},"100633216","management-of-postoperative-pain-following-free-gingival-graft-harvesting-using-ora-aid-versus-acrylic-palatal-stent-100633216","NCT07523802","Management of Postoperative Pain Following Free Gingival Graft Harvesting Using Ora-Aid Versus Acrylic Palatal Stent","Clinical Effectiveness of Oral Wound Dressing (Ora-Aid) in Comparison to Palatal Stent in Management of Postoperative Pain Following Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient over 18 years of age\n* Systemically healthy\n* Patients with good oral hygiene\n* Patients with mucogingival defects scheduled for free gingival graft (FGG)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnancy or breastfeeding\n* Severe gagging reflex\n* Smokers\n* Patients allergic to the materials used in the study",{"count":51,"type":19},20,[22],"This randomized clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of Ora-Aid oral wound dressing compared to an acrylic palatal stent in managing postoperative pain following free gingival graft harvesting. Patients undergoing graft harvesting will be randomly assigned to receive either Ora-Aid dressing or a palatal stent at the donor site. The primary outcome is postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include analgesic consumption, wound size, patient satisfaction, and color match over a 42-day follow-up period.",[55,56,25],"Postoperative Pain","Mucogingival Defects",[58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67],"Free Gingival Graft","Palatal Donor Site","Ora-Aid","Oral Wound Dressing","Palatal Stent","Postoperative Pain Management","Wound Healing","Periodontal Surgery","Graft Harvesting","Mucogingival Therapy","RECRUITING","2026-04-09",{"date":71,"type":34},"2026-04-14",{"date":73,"type":34},"2026-01-14",{"date":75,"type":19},"2026-07-01",{"name":77,"class":41},"Cairo University",{"id":79,"slug":80,"hasResults":11,"nctId":81,"briefTitle":82,"officialTitle":83,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":84,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":87,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":93,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":101,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":102,"startDateStruct":104,"completionDateStruct":106,"leadSponsor":108,"locationsCount":42},"100588334","comparing-caf-and-tcaf-with-soft-tissue-grafting-for-treating-multiple-recessions-in-the-premandibula-100588334","NCT06940050","Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Premandibula.","An RCT Between Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) and Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap (TCAF) in Combination With Soft Tissue Graft for Multiple Recession Coverage.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* at least 18 years old\n* good oral hygiene\n* presence of at least 2 recessions in the premandible\n* good general health\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* smoker\n* pregnant women (assessed at each visit; if the patient appears pregnant during follow-up, x-rays will not be taken)",{"count":86,"type":19},34,[22],"Multiple techniques can be used for recession coverage. The most common techniques are : tunnel technique (T), coronally advanced flap (CAF) or a combination of both (TCAF). Tunnel and coronally advanced flap are frequently used in clinical practice, whereas the combined technique is a rather recent developed surgical approach.\n\nThis randomized controlled trial compares CAF and TCAF to determine which technique provides better root coverage for receding gums in the lower front teeth. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\n\\- What is the average root coverage achieved with each technique in the short and long term?\n\nThis may be clinically relevant because covering gum recession can reduce tooth sensitivity, improve aesthetics and make oral hygiene easier.\n\nResearchers will compare the coronally advanced flap (CAF = the gum is detached and repositioned higher) with the tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF = the gum is undermined, only partially detached and repositioned higher). In both techniques, a small piece of tissue is removed from the palate, which is used to cover the recession. The purpose of the connective tissue graft under the flap\u002Ftunnel is to increase thickness and provide support.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Undergo surgery (CAF or TCAF, randomly assigned) to cover recessions\n* Attend regular check-ups for up to 10 years after surgery\n* Keep a postoperative journal (recording medication use, pain levels, tooth sensitivity, etc.)",[90,91,25,92],"Gingival Recession, Localized","Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery","Gingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery",[94,95,96,97,98,99,100],"TCAF","tunneled coronally advanced flap","CAF","coronally advanced flap","multiple adjacent gingival recessions","MAGR","premandible","2025-09-25",{"date":103,"type":34},"2025-10-01",{"date":105,"type":34},"2025-04-30",{"date":107,"type":19},"2037-12-31",{"name":109,"class":41},"University Hospital, Ghent",{"id":111,"slug":112,"hasResults":11,"nctId":113,"briefTitle":114,"officialTitle":115,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":116,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":117,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":118,"briefSummary":119,"conditions":120,"keywords":124,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":127,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":128,"startDateStruct":130,"completionDateStruct":132,"leadSponsor":133,"locationsCount":42},"100605131","comparing-caf-and-tcaf-with-soft-tissue-grafting-for-treating-multiple-recessions-in-the-maxilla-100605131","NCT07158528","Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Maxilla.","An RCT Comparing Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) and Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap (TCAF) in Combination With a Soft Tissue Graft for Multiple Recessions Coverage in the Maxilla.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* At least 18 years of age\n* Good oral hygiene\n* Presence of multiple gingival recessions in the maxilla\n* Good general health\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Smoker\n* Pregnant women (assessed at each visit; if the patient becomes pregnant during follow-up, radiographs will not be taken)",{"count":86,"type":19},[22],"Multiple techniques can be used for recession coverage. The most common techniques are: tunnel technique (T), coronally advanced flap (CAF) or a combination of both (TCAF). Tunnel and coronally advanced flap are frequently used in clinical practice, whereas the combined technique is a relatively recently developed surgical approach.\n\nThis randomized controlled trial compares CAF and TCAF to determine which technique provides better root coverage for receding gums at multiple adjacent teeth in the upper jaw. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\n\\- What is the average root coverage achieved with each technique in the short and long term? This may be clinically relevant because covering gum recession can reduce tooth sensitivity, improve aesthetics and make oral hygiene easier.\n\nResearchers will compare the coronally advanced flap (CAF = the gum is detached and repositioned higher) with the tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF = the gum is undermined, only partially detached and repositioned higher). In both techniques, a small piece of tissue is removed from the palate, which is used to cover the recession. The purpose of the connective tissue graft under the flap\u002Ftunnel is to increase thickness and provide support.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Undergo surgery (CAF or TCAF, randomly assigned) to cover recessions\n* Attend regular check-ups for up to 10 years after surgery\n* Keep a postoperative journal (recording medication use, pain levels, tooth sensitivity, etc.)",[121,122,123,90,91,25,92],"Gingival Recession Generalized Moderate","Gingival Recession Localized Moderate","Gingival Recession, Generalized",[94,96,95,97,125,126,99,98],"maxilla","multiple recessions","2025-09-09",{"date":129,"type":34},"2025-09-16",{"date":131,"type":34},"2025-08-18",{"date":107,"type":19},{"name":109,"class":41},{"id":135,"slug":136,"hasResults":11,"nctId":137,"briefTitle":138,"officialTitle":139,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":140,"healthyVolunteers":141,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":142,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":143,"briefSummary":144,"conditions":145,"keywords":146,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":149,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":150,"startDateStruct":152,"completionDateStruct":154,"leadSponsor":156,"locationsCount":4},"100574131","vestibular-incision-subperiosteal-tunnel-access-vista-technique-versus-coronally-advanced-flap-caf-combined-with-a-connective-tissue-graft-for-the-treatment-of-maxillary-gingival-recessions-100574131","NCT06755294","Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions","Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Healthy adults: men and women between 18 and 75 years of age.\n* Accepts and signs informed consent.\n* Systemically healthy patients with periodontal health or controlled periodontitis.\n* Presence of at least two maxillary Cairo Type I or II (RT1\u002F2) recessions \\> 2 mm deep on buccal aspect.\n* Plaque index ≤20%\n* No previous periodontal surgeries performed.\n* Presence of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), a 1 mm step in the CEJ and\u002For presence of root abrasion, but with an identifiable CEJ will be accepted.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Smoker of 10 ≥ cigarettes per day.\n* Contraindications to periodontal surgery.\n* Medications that affect the gingiva or their healing.\n* Active orthodontic treatment.\n* Pregnant women\n* Caries or restorations in the area to be treated.\n* Patients who cannot follow the post-surgical medication adequately",true,{"count":18,"type":19},[22],"Gingival recession (GR) is a common oral health problem that causes sensitivity, esthetic concerns and hygiene problems. Successful root coverage can be achieved by various surgical techniques. The VISTA technique may overcome some of the limitations of other techniques and present equal results to techniques that are considered the \"Gold Standard\" in this area of periodontology.\n\nThe objective of the research is to study the VISTA technique in terms of complete root coverage, % root coverage, gingival thickness gain, bleeding on probing, keratinized gingival width, PROMS, vestibular depth and esthetic results.",[25],[147,96,148],"VISTA TECHNIQUE","Root Coverage","2025-01-25",{"date":151,"type":34},"2025-01-28",{"date":153,"type":19},"2025-01-30",{"date":155,"type":19},"2026-06-15",{"name":157,"class":41},"Universitat Internacional de Catalunya",{"id":159,"slug":160,"hasResults":11,"nctId":161,"briefTitle":162,"officialTitle":163,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":164,"healthyVolunteers":141,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":165,"enrollmentInfo":166,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":168,"briefSummary":169,"conditions":170,"keywords":172,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":176,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":177,"startDateStruct":179,"completionDateStruct":181,"leadSponsor":183,"locationsCount":42},"100570018","optimizing-clinical-outcomes-in-caf--sctg-the-impact-of-compressive-sutures-100570018","NCT06701786","Optimizing Clinical Outcomes in CAF + SCTG: the Impact of Compressive Sutures","Compressive Sutures Improve Clinical Outcomes in CAF + SCTG for Treatment of RT1 Recessions\"","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* systemic factors (no systemic diseases; no coagulation disorders; no medications affecting periodontal status in the previous 6 months; no pregnancy or lactation\n* never smokers\u002Fformer smokers \\>=10years\n* a full-mouth plaque score (FMPS)and a full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) lower than 15%\n* no periodontal surgery on the experimental sites\n* \\>= 20 teeth without mobility\n* no presence of cervical carious lesions or periapical lesions at experimental sites\n* at least one RT1 buccal gingival recession\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* systemic diseases\n* coagulation disorders\n* medications affecting periodontal status in the previous 6 months\n* pregnancy or lactation\n* Smokers","80 Years",{"count":167,"type":19},40,[22],"This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the additional effect on clinical outcomes of compressive sutures associated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of RT1 gingival recessions (as classified by Cairo et al.).\n\nForty patients presenting with at least one RT1 recession will be enrolled in the study. Twenty participants will undergo CAF + SCTG with compressive sutures while the other 20 participants will receive the same procedure without compressive sutures. The primary outcome, complete root coverage (CRC), will be assessed six months after treatment.\n\nAdditional clinical parameters, including gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD), keratinized tissue width (KT), keratinized tissue thickness (GT), and Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES), will be evaluated at baseline and at the six-month follow-up.\n\nPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) will also be measured, including the degree of general discomfort (D) experienced, assessed on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, as well as patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction (PRES) and overall treatment satisfaction (OTS), both quantified on a VAS scale from 0 to 10.",[25,92,171],"Suture",[173,174,175,171],"Periodontal Plastic Surgery","Gingival recession","Coronally Advanced Flap","2024-11-19",{"date":178,"type":34},"2024-11-22",{"date":180,"type":19},"2024-12-01",{"date":182,"type":19},"2025-11-30",{"name":184,"class":41},"G. d'Annunzio University"]