[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"gynecologic\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:gynecologic":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,43],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":23,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":31,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":32,"startDateStruct":35,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":42},"100583714","a-study-to-understand-the-utility-of-the-force-feedback-instruments-in-robotic-procedures-using-da-vinci-5-robot-100583714",false,"NCT06879912","A Study to Understand the Utility of the Force Feedback Instruments in Robotic Procedures Using da Vinci 5 Robot","A Prospective, Post-Market Study to Evaluate the Clinical Utility of the Force Feedback Instruments in RAS Procedures Using the da Vinci 5 Surgical System","Pre-Operative Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age 22 years or older\n2. ASA ≤ 3\n3. The clinical decision has been made to perform multi-port robotic assisted surgery with da Vinci 5 with Force Feedback instruments for the study specified procedure as primary procedure prior to enrollment in the study\n4. Subject or a legally authorized representative is able to provide written informed consent using the study informed consent form prior to the study\n5. Subject is willing and able to comply with the study protocol requirements including follow up schedule\n\nPre-operative Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subject receiving an emergent procedure\n* Subject planned to undergo major concomitant surgery for the treatment of a different medical condition than was originally planned\n* Subject with previous ipsilateral surgery (open, endoscopic or robotic) with the same surgical indication\n* Subject with past or ongoing medical conditions (for example: inflammatory bowel disease) which, in the judgment of the Investigator, puts them at high risk for surgery and not appropriate for the study\n* Subject is pregnant or suspected to be pregnant or breastfeeding\n* Subject has any other condition or personal circumstance that, in the judgment of the Investigator, might interfere with the collection of complete quality data\n* Subject is currently participating in or has participated in a study of an investigational agent or a significant risk investigational device study within the past 6 months\n* Subject belongs to a vulnerable population.\n* Subject is contraindicated for anesthesia or surgery.\n* Subject has had previous neoadjuvant therapy, previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and\u002For radiation therapy for the treatment of the cancer to be resected within the past 6 months\n\nIntra-operative Exclusion Criteria\n\n* Subject with hemodynamic or respiratory instability, which precludes the Investigator from performing the RAS.\n* Subject in whom inadequate visualization makes a minimally invasive approach not feasible, as determined from the investigator assessment prior to docking the robot.\n* Subject with adhesions, scarring and disease status in the body which in the opinion of the investigator limits the ability to perform the minimally invasive procedure.","ALL","22 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},200,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to understand the utility of force feedback instruments in surgeries that are done using the da Vinci 5 robot.",[24,25,26,27,28,29],"Hernia, Inguinal","Hernia, Ventral","Colorectal","Thoracic","Gynecologic","Partial Nephrectomy","RECRUITING","2026-02-23",{"date":33,"type":34},"2026-02-25","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":34},"2025-05-22",{"date":38,"type":20},"2026-08",{"name":40,"class":41},"Intuitive Surgical","INDUSTRY",5,{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":49,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":50,"minAge":51,"maxAge":52,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":58,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":59,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":60,"startDateStruct":62,"completionDateStruct":64,"leadSponsor":66,"locationsCount":4},"100583573","eras-and-postoperative-recovery-in-gynecologic-patients-a-qor-15-study-100583573","NCT06878079","ERAS and Postoperative Recovery in Gynecologic Patients: A QoR-15 Study","Assessing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Intervention Impact on Postoperative Recovery in Gynecological Patients Using QoR-15 Questionnaire","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 20 and 80 years.\n* Undergoing routine gynecological surgery, including total or subtotal hysterectomy, myomectomy, oophorectomy, gynecologic cancer staging surgery, cytoreductive surgery, and pelvic exenteration.\n* Cancer patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤2.\n* Receiving either standard perioperative care or ERAS protocol-based care.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age below 20 years.\n* Lack of decision-making capacity.\n* Undergoing emergency surgery.\n* History of clinical depression.\n* Undergoing palliative surgery.\n* History of chronic pain.","FEMALE","20 Years","80 Years",{"count":54,"type":20},130,"The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire is a widely used Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for evaluating postoperative recovery, including pain, physical function, and emotional well-being. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary care model designed to optimize perioperative management through standardized protocols.\n\nFor gynecological surgery, ERAS emphasizes preoperative education, early interventions (e.g., smoking cessation, anemia management, nutrition optimization), intraoperative strategies (e.g., fluid balance, nausea prevention, temperature control), and postoperative care (e.g., early mobilization, pain control, ileus prevention). However, while ERAS is gaining acceptance, its effectiveness can vary due to workload, patient variability, and institutional resources, and its superiority over traditional care remains inconclusive.\n\nThis study aims to objectively compare ERAS and traditional perioperative care using the QoR-15 questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction, recovery speed, surgical risk reduction, and complication prevention. Rather than solely promoting ERAS, this research seeks to evaluate its applicability, enhance personalized care, and provide scientific evidence for perioperative management optimization.",[28,57],"ERAS","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-03-10",{"date":61,"type":34},"2025-03-14",{"date":63,"type":20},"2025-03",{"date":65,"type":20},"2026-06",{"name":67,"class":68},"National Taiwan University Hospital","OTHER"]