[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"health-communication\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:health-communication":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,48,78,109,138],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100641376","improving-sexual-and-reproductive-health-communication-for-adolescent-and-young-adult-oncology-patients-100641376",false,"NCT07658937","Improving Sexual and Reproductive Health Communication for Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients","Improving Sexual and Reproductive Health Communication Between Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients and Clinicians: ReSPECT Intervention Proof-of-Concept Testing","ReSPECT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 15-25 years old\n* Has a cancer diagnosis\n* ≥2 months from diagnosis\u002Finitiation of therapy, whichever occurred later\n* Currently on cancer-directed therapy\n* Speaks and reads English\n* Approval from primary oncology team\n* Study participation by primary oncology clinician\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Not able to provide informed consent\u002Fassent\n* Insufficient cognitive functioning to complete study measures, as determined by a member of the patient's primary oncology team\n* Exceeds primary oncologist's participant limit (3 patients\u002Fclinician)","ALL","15 Years","25 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},30,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if ReSPECT, which includes a pre-visit checklist for patients to complete and an informational website, can work well in practice to help adolescent and young adult oncology patients communicate with their clinicians about sexual and reproductive health (SRH). SRH includes topics such as how cancer may impact puberty and development, best methods for contraception during cancer treatment, fertility risk and fertility preservation strategies, and dating\u002Frelationships during and after cancer. The study will also help researchers better understand how to best measure the impact of ReSPECT on improving SRH communication for future testing of ReSPECT.\n\nThe main questions the study aims to answer are:\n\nHow well does ReSPECT work in practice? Do patients and clinicians like ReSPECT, and do they find it helpful? What are the best ways to test ReSPECT and measure whether it works?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nUse ReSPECT to support a conversation about SRH during an outpatient oncology clinic appointment Complete surveys before and after using ReSPECT Provide feedback on their experience using ReSPECT in a short interview",[28,29,30],"Health-Related Quality-of-Life","Cancer","Health Communication",[28,32,33,34,30,29],"Adolescent","Young Adult","Psychosocial Intervention","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-15",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-06-22","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":22},"2026-11-15",{"date":43,"type":22},"2029-06-30",{"name":45,"class":46},"Connecticut Children's Medical Center","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":55,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":58,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":63,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":47},"100592588","study-ehr-risk-stratification-tools-100592588","NCT06995378","Study EHR Risk Stratification Tools","Evaluation of Patient and Provider Facing EHR-embedded Risk Stratification Tools","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 65 years or older\n* Most recent hemoglobin A1c in the prediabetes range (5.7-6.0%)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Have lab results outside the defined inclusion range\n* No UCLA primary care provider\n* Age \\\u003C65 years\n* Eligibility for Surveys:\n\nAll randomized participants are eligible to receive study surveys. No additional eligibility criteria apply for survey participation.","65 Years",{"count":57,"type":22},1200,[25],"This study evaluates whether adding machine learning-based risk information to electronic health record (EHR) lab result messages helps older adults better understand their risk of developing diabetes and influences their emotional responses, quality of life, and healthcare use.\n\nEligible participants are adults aged 65 years and older with a UCLA primary care provider and a hemoglobin A1c level in the range (5.7-6.0%). Participants are identified automatically at the time their lab results are processed and are randomly assigned to receive either standard lab result messages or modified messages that include a \"very low risk\" label generated by a machine learning model.\n\nAll participants who are randomized are invited to complete two surveys: one shortly after their lab result is posted in MyChart and a follow-up survey approximately 30 days later. The study also uses de-identified EHR data to examine patterns of healthcare utilization and progression to diabetes. Provider comments related to lab result messaging will be analyzed to explore differences in response patterns between the two groups.",[61,30,62],"Prediabetes","Patient Comprehension",[61,64,65,66,67,68,62],"Machine Learning","Risk Stratification","Electronic Health Record","Lab Result Communication","Predictive Modeling","2026-05-06",{"date":71,"type":39},"2026-05-08",{"date":73,"type":22},"2026-04",{"date":75,"type":22},"2029-09",{"name":77,"class":46},"University of California, Los Angeles",{"id":79,"slug":80,"hasResults":11,"nctId":81,"briefTitle":82,"officialTitle":83,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":84,"healthyVolunteers":85,"sex":17,"minAge":86,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":87,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":89,"phases":4,"briefSummary":90,"conditions":91,"keywords":94,"overallStatus":99,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":100,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":101,"startDateStruct":103,"completionDateStruct":105,"leadSponsor":107,"locationsCount":47},"100635243","dental-communication-and-social-media-legal-and-ethical-framework-100635243","NCT07550153","Dental Communication and Social Media: Legal and Ethical Framework","Legal Considerations on Dental Communication Via Social Media: Liability, Ethics, and Regulatory Evolution","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* For Group 1 (Dental Professionals): Registered Dentists or Dental Hygienists currently practicing in Italy.\n* For Group 2 (Patients): Individuals who use social media platforms and have accessed or are interested in dental healthcare information online.\n* For Group 3 (General Healthcare Professionals): Medical doctors and health practitioners from various specialties interested in digital communication ethics.\n* Age: Minimum 18 years of age.\n* Consent: Participants must be willing to provide informed consent for data collection and analysis.\n* Language: Ability to understand and read Italian.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals under 18 years of age.\n* Individuals who do not use social media platforms.\n* Incomplete survey submissions where the primary data points are missing.\n* Healthcare professionals not registered with their respective Italian professional orders.",true,"18 Years",{"count":88,"type":22},300,"OBSERVATIONAL","This observational study explores the legal and ethical boundaries of dental communication on social media, analyzing Italian regulatory evolution. Through surveys involving dental professionals and patients, it assesses awareness of advertising regulations and the impact of digital communication on the patient-practitioner relationship. The research identifies knowledge gaps regarding deceptive advertising and highlights the need for transparent, deontologically compliant digital practices to protect public health.",[92,30,93],"Professional Ethics","Social Media",[95,92,96,97,98],"Healthcare Communication","Medical Jurisprudence","Social Media in Health","Health Advertising Regulations","RECRUITING","2026-04-23",{"date":102,"type":39},"2026-04-29",{"date":104,"type":39},"2025-01-01",{"date":106,"type":22},"2027-01-01",{"name":108,"class":46},"University of Roma La Sapienza",{"id":110,"slug":111,"hasResults":11,"nctId":112,"briefTitle":113,"officialTitle":114,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":115,"healthyVolunteers":85,"sex":17,"minAge":86,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":116,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":118,"briefSummary":119,"conditions":120,"keywords":122,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":129,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":130,"startDateStruct":132,"completionDateStruct":134,"leadSponsor":136,"locationsCount":47},"100630806","effects-of-motivational-interviewing-training-on-nursing-students-counselling-skills-self-efficacy-and-reluctance-100630806","NCT07492459","Effects of Motivational Interviewing Training on Nursing Students' Counselling Skills, Self-Efficacy, and Reluctance","The Effect of Motivational Interviewing-Based Communication Training on Nursing Students' Counseling Skills, Self-Efficacy, and Reluctance in Communication","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Being a second-year nursing student\n* Volunteering to participate in the research\n* Not having communication problems that would prevent answering data collection forms\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Having communication problems that would prevent answering data collection forms\n* Being a 1st, 3rd or 4th year nursing student",{"count":117,"type":22},72,[25],"This research is designed to determine the effect of motivational interview-based communication training on nursing students' counselling skills, communication self-efficacy, and communication reluctance levels. The project will be conducted using a randomised controlled experimental design. The sample will consist of 72 second-year nursing students studying at the Department of Nursing, Ankara University Faculty of Nursing. Participants will be randomly assigned to experimental (n=36) and control (n=36) groups. The experimental group will receive motivational interview-based communication training, while the control group will receive training on basic communication and interpersonal interaction skills in nursing. The training will consist of five sessions; theoretical sessions will be 60 minutes each, and the standard patient interview practice to be applied to the experimental group will last three days. The standard patient interview practices will be conducted in the Communication Skills Laboratory of Ankara University Faculty of Nursing. The research data will be collected using a Demographic Information Form, the Counselling Skills Scale for Nurses, the Effective Communication Self-Efficacy Inventory, and the Communication Reluctance Scale, through pre-test, post-test, and follow-up measurements. Additionally, the project plans to train individuals to assume the role of a standard patient in the communication skills laboratory, creating a standard patient pool that can be used in future training and research. The project expects that motivational interview-based communication training will strengthen nursing students' counselling skills and communication self-efficacy, and reduce communication reluctance. The results are intended to provide a scientific contribution to the planning and development of communication training in nursing education programs.",[121,30],"Professional Competence",[123,124,125,126,127,128],"motivational interviewing","nursing students","communication skills","counseling skills","communication self-efficacy","communication reluctance","2026-03-19",{"date":131,"type":39},"2026-03-25",{"date":133,"type":22},"2026-05",{"date":135,"type":22},"2026-10",{"name":137,"class":46},"Ankara University",{"id":139,"slug":140,"hasResults":11,"nctId":141,"briefTitle":142,"officialTitle":143,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":144,"healthyVolunteers":85,"sex":17,"minAge":145,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":146,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":148,"briefSummary":149,"conditions":150,"keywords":151,"overallStatus":99,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":155,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":156,"startDateStruct":158,"completionDateStruct":160,"leadSponsor":162,"locationsCount":47},"100492411","older-peoples-preventive-care-utilization-100492411","NCT05691790","Older People's Preventive Care Utilization","Empowering Older People's Preventive Care Utilization Through Mental Model Approach and Patient Activation Approach: a Randomized Control Trial for Promoting Vaccination Uptake","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Community-dwelling older persons aged 70 years who did not persistently receive seasonal influenza vaccine over the past three years (2020-2022) and\u002For have never received the pneumococcal vaccine (one dose of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (23vPPV) or the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13)).\n* Being able to communicate with Cantonese, or Mandarin (the two main spoken language in Hong Kong) and being able to read Chinese.\n* Inclusion criteria for the informant include age above 18 and can understand Cantonese or Mandarin\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* having psychiatric disorders, dementia, or other cognitive difficulties which impede communication or understanding of the intervention and having functional disabilities which impede access to health care services.\n* subjects who had medical contraindications for immunization.","70 Years",{"count":147,"type":22},270,[25],"Objectives: To empower older people's decision making for taking the recommended vaccines including seasonal influenza vaccines, pneumococcal vaccines, and COVID-19 vaccine (if it is recommended annually).\n\nHypotheses to be tested: The interventions designed using Mental Models Approach and Patient Activation Approach will promote older people's confidence in knowledge and skills regarding vaccination decisions, perceived self-efficacy in self-management of health, positive emotional engagement with vaccination decisions and a positive future time perspective which will subsequently promote their uptake of the recommended vaccines.\n\nDesign and subjects: This will be a two-arm randomized control trial. Subjects will be community-dwelling older people aged 70 years or above.\n\nInstruments: A questionnaire will be used to collect baseline data before the interventions and follow-up data 1 months and 4 months, respectively, after the end of interventions.\n\nInterventions: Interventions included one booklet to communicate information about preventive care by bridging expert knowledge and older people's existing mental models, and six patient activation sections conducted over telephone. One patient activation section will be delivered per week by trained medical students.\n\nMain outcome measures: Main outcomes will be participants' uptake of the three recommended vaccines assessed at 1 month and 4 months after the end of interventions.\n\nData analysis and expected results: Generalized estimating equation logistic regression will be used to assess the intervention effects. The investigators expect that the interventions can promote at least 20% increase in uptake of any one of the three recommended vaccines in the intervention group compared with the control group.",[30],[152,153,154],"Older people","Preventive care","Vaccine decision-making","2025-03-25",{"date":157,"type":39},"2025-03-30",{"date":159,"type":39},"2024-10-01",{"date":161,"type":22},"2025-05-31",{"name":163,"class":46},"The University of Hong Kong"]