[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"hearing\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:hearing":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,45,106,132,171],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100551891","perception-of-speech-in-context-by-listeners-with-healthy-and-impaired-hearing-100551891",false,"NCT06465979","Perception of Speech in Context by Listeners With Healthy and Impaired Hearing","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Be able to recognize spoken words in English\n* Be a competent speaker of north American English\n* Be an adult between the age of 18 to 65 years\n* Have normal audiometric thresholds below 25 decibels hearing loss (dB HL) at frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz OR have audiometric thresholds not exceeding 40 dB HL at frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz OR have audiometric thresholds not exceeding 55 dB HL at frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz OR use a cochlear implant\n* Lack language-learning or other cognitive disabilities\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inability to recognize spoken words in English\n* Not a competent speaker of north American English\n* Be younger than 18 years of age\n* Be older than 65 years of age\n* Have normal audiometric thresholds exceeding 25 dB HL at frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz OR have audiometric thresholds exceeding 40 dB HL at frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz OR have audiometric thresholds exceeding 55 dB HL at frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz\n* Language-learning or other cognitive disabilities",true,"ALL","18 Years","65 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},680,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Recognition of speech sounds is accomplished through the use of adjacent sounds in time, in what is termed acoustic context. The frequency and temporal properties of these contextual sounds play a large role in recognition of human speech. Historically, most research on both speech perception and sound perception in general examine sounds out-of-context, or presented individually. Further, these studies have been conducted independently of each other with little connection across labs, across sounds, etc. These approaches slow the progress in understanding how listeners with hearing difficulties use context to recognize speech and how their hearing aids and\u002For cochlear implants might be modified to improve their perception. This research has three main goals. First, the investigators predict that performance in speech sound recognition experiments will be related when testing the same speech frequencies or the same moments in time, but that performance will not be related in further comparisons across speech frequencies or at different moments in time. Second, the investigators predict that adding background noise will make this contextual speech perception more difficult, and that these difficulties will be more severe for listeners with hearing loss. Third, the investigators predict that cochlear implant users will also use surrounding sounds in their speech recognition, but with key differences than healthy-hearing listeners owing to the sound processing done by their implants. In tandem with these goals, the investigators will use computer models to simulate how neurons respond to speech sounds individually and when surrounded by other sounds.",[27,28],"Hearing","Hearing Loss",[30,31],"speech perception","hearing","RECRUITING","2026-06-01",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-06-03","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":36},"2023-09-19",{"date":40,"type":21},"2028-07-31",{"name":42,"class":43},"Marquette University","OTHER",2,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":51,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":53,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":56,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":85,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":96,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":97,"startDateStruct":99,"completionDateStruct":101,"leadSponsor":103,"locationsCount":105},"100616316","phase-1-a-treatment-for-a-form-of-age-related-central-auditory-processing-disorder-consisting-of-clemastine-fumarate-plus-engineered-sound-100616316","NCT07304024","A Treatment for a Form of Age-Related Central Auditory Processing Disorder Consisting of Clemastine Fumarate Plus Engineered Sound","A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 1\u002F2a Clinical Study to Test the Safety and Efficacy of a Treatment for a Form of Age-Related Central Auditory Processing Disorder Consisting of Clemastine Fumarate Plus Engineered Sound","CAPD-LOOT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male or female between 45 and 65 years old (middle aged) at the screening\u002Fenrollment visit (Visit 1).\n* Written informed consent obtained from the subject and ability for the subject to comply with the requirements of the study.\n* Documentation of no more than a mild high-frequency hearing sensitivity loss and normal middle-ear function will be obtained using standard audiometric equipment with measurements done by an audiologist; Specifically, testing will show:\n\n  * bilateral hearing thresholds \\\u003C 20 dB HL at audiometric frequencies from 250 Hz to 4000 Hz inclusively, with no air-bone gaps \\> 10 dB.\n  * symmetrical hearing thresholds between the ears through 8000 Hz, defined as \\\u003C20 dB difference at any single audiometric frequency or \\\u003C 15 dB difference at 2 or more contiguous frequencies.\n  * normal (Type A) tympanograms bilaterally.\n* No cognitive deficit shown upon screening with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) test (Nasreddine et al. 2005).\n* Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) showing no more than 20 dB hearing loss at audiometric frequencies from 250 Hz to 4000 Hz.\n* Subjects failing the hearing in noise test at 15 degrees. Failing is defined as SNR being 12 dB below from what is found in normal hearing subjects without central hearing loss.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any subjects who do not fall under the criteria defined above.\n* Any of the following conditions which are listed as contraindications or warnings for use of the clinical trial drug (from labeling):\n\n  * Known sensitivity to clemastine fumarate or other antihistamines of similar composition\n  * Pregnancy or nursing mother as determined objectively with a urine pregnancy test\n  * Lower respiratory tract disease including asthma, or breathing difficulties such as emphysema or chronic bronchitis\n  * Glaucoma or increased intraocular pressure\n  * Stenosing peptic ulcers or pyloroduodenal obstruction\n  * Trouble urinating due to an enlarged prostate gland. Mild urinary issues (Stage 1 Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) will not be considered an automatic exclusion but it must be emphasized to patients with this diagnosis that difficulty urinating is a possible side effect that may compound their BPH symptoms.\n  * Significant cardiovascular disease, chronic hypertension or hypotension\n  * Hyperthyroidism\n  * Alcoholism- as defined by consuming on average 3+ drinks per day for women or 4+ drinks per day for men or previous diagnosis of alcohol use disorder by a clinician as defined by DSM V criteria.\n  * Patients with a history of seizures will be excluded.\n  * Patients with evidence of suicidal ideation\u002Fbehavior as assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).\n* We will generally exclude subjects with significant or uncontrolled medical disorders (e.g., hepatic, hematologic, renal, gastrointestinal, neurological, psychiatric disorders). We will define these patients as those who fall outside of normal ranges for a physical examination of vital signs, a 12-lead EKG, and a safety clinical laboratory assessment including complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP). Exclusion with these tests will specifically focus on identifying the following disorders based on the listed criteria:\n* Leukopenia as defined as a CBC white blood cell count \\\u003C 4000\u002Ful\n* Anemia as defined by a CBC Hemoglobin \\\u003C9.0 g\u002FdL or \\\u003C10.0 g\u002FdL (Grade 2+ CTCAE)\n* Lymphopenia as defined by CBC Absolute lymphocyte count \\\u003C1000\u002FµL.\n* Neutropenia as defined by CBC ANC \\\u003C1500\u002FµL (solid tumors), ANC \\\u003C1000\u002FµL (hematologic malignancies). In the case of participants with African, Middle Eastern or West Indian descent a clinician's judgement will be considered to assess the possibility of benign ethnic neutropenia which is not an exclusion criteria.\n* Thrombocytopenia as defined by CBC Platelet count \\\u003C75000\u002FµL\n* Hepatic Impairment based on CMP: Total bilirubin \\>1.5× ULN, AST\u002FALT \\>3× ULN (or \\>5× ULN if liver metastases), Alkaline phosphatase \\>3× ULN.\n* Hepatic Impairment based on CMP: Serum creatinine \\>2.0 mg\u002FdL (alternative threshold).\n* Metabolic abnormalities based on CMP: Albumin \\\u003C3.0 g\u002FdL\n* Taking medications that would contraindicate taking the clinical trial drug; Specifically, (from labeling):\n\n  * Monoamine oxidase inhibitor therapy\n  * CNS depressants (sedatives, tranquilizers, hypnotics)\n* A history of significant otologic disorder such as repetitive ear infections or Meniere's disease\n* A history of significant neurologic disorder, or current neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis, which could present a confound and impact the electrophysiological outcome measures.\n* A history of traumatic brain or closed head injury because this can cause symptoms of central auditory processing problems unrelated to aging and demyelination.\n* English as a second language (non-native English speakers), which is known to negatively impact scores on speech recognition testing.\n* Presence of any other condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator or his co-PIs would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.","45 Years",{"count":55,"type":21},344,[57,58],"PHASE1","PHASE2","The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of Clemastine Fumarate in the presence of engineered sound to treat age-related central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). This disorder impacts 800M patients worldwide, including \\~1\u002F3 people over 40 years of age and \\~1\u002F2 people over 65, resulting in an inability to hear in noisy environments.\n\nThe primary hypothesis this study aims to test is: engineered sound, driving localized neural circuit activity, will enable Clemastine Fumarate to mature Oligodendrocyte cells and thus remyelinate these activated neural circuits. This Localized Oligodendrocyte Optimization Therapy (LOOT) was highly effective in preclinical animal studies so this clinical trial aims to answer if this therapy will translate to humans.\n\nThe study is an adaptive design intended to compare the efficacy of the drug in the presence or absence of the engineered sound for improving hearing in noise ability. Trial participants will be tested for hearing thresholds and ability to isolate a sound signal from background noise. If they meet the inclusion criteria, they will be enrolled into one of the four arms of the study and undergo the proposed one-month treatment (drug and sound or respective placebos). After the treatment period, trial participants will be tested again for hearing thresholds and their ability to isolate s sound source of interest from background noise. The hypothesis to be tested in this clinical trial is that the one-month treatment will significantly improve the participant's ability to isolate a sound source of interest from background noise.\n\nThe design has four arms, drug+sound, placebo+sound, drug+white noise, and placebo+white noise. Based on our preclinical data, control arms are all expected to show identical results, thus our adaptive design includes interim analyses to allow for dropping of two of the three placebo arms should the preclinical results be replicated as anticipated.\n\nWe will also monitor each participant's general health during the duration of the clinical trial, which will be done by performing a number of blood tests, an EKG and a general physical before and after the one-month treatment period. We expect no significant changes since participants will take the drug for the one-month period at dosages already demonstrated safe in several Phase II studies of multiple sclerosis. Similarly, the engineered sound will be listened to for one hour per day during this month at sound intensities well below threshold that might cause noise-induced hearing damage.",[61,62,27,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,28,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84],"Central Auditory Processing Disorder","Hearing Impaired (Partially)","Hearing Abnormality","Hearing Disability","Hearing Disorder","Hearing Disorders","Hearing Impairment, Sensorineural","Hearing Handicap","Hearing Impaired","Hearing Impairment","Central Auditory Disease","Noise Exposure","Noise Induced Hearing Loss","Noise-Induced Hearing Loss","Sound Perception","Myelin Degeneration","Myelinopathy","Myelin Integrity","Remyelination","Hidden Hearing Loss","Cocktail Party Skill","Cocktail Party Syndrome","CAPD","Age Problem",[86,80,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,83,95],"clemastine fumarate","Cocktail Party","Engineered Sound","Sound Therapy","central auditory processing disorder","Hearing in noise","oligodendrocyte","Localized Oligodendrocyte Optimization Therapy","LOOT","Age-Related Hearing Loss","2026-04-28",{"date":98,"type":36},"2026-04-30",{"date":100,"type":36},"2025-03-31",{"date":102,"type":21},"2028-07",{"name":104,"class":43},"University of Colorado, Denver",1,{"id":107,"slug":108,"hasResults":11,"nctId":109,"briefTitle":110,"officialTitle":110,"acronym":111,"eligibilityCriteria":112,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":113,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":115,"phases":4,"briefSummary":116,"conditions":117,"keywords":121,"overallStatus":123,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":124,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":125,"startDateStruct":126,"completionDateStruct":128,"leadSponsor":130,"locationsCount":105},"100635499","chemotherapy-induced-hearing-loss-and-health-inequality-100635499","NCT07553481","Chemotherapy-Induced Hearing Loss and Health Inequality","CANHEAR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy drugs\n* Living and treated within North West England\n* Able to complete an online hearing and cognitive test\n* Fluent in English\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Following cancer types: brain tumour\u002Fmetastasis, head + neck, skin cancers around the ear, and adenoid cystic carcinoma of the auditory cortex\n* World Health Organisation performance status score of 3 or more\n* Stage 4 cancer\n* History of childhood deafness\n* Current or recent ear infections\n* Cochlear implant user\n* Known neurological impairment (e.g., stroke, traumatic brain injury, dementia)\n* Patients who look capacity to consent or complete study tasks",{"count":114,"type":21},172,"OBSERVATIONAL","This project aims to understand how platinum-based chemotherapy affects hearing function in cancer patients from different socioeconomic backgrounds in the North West of England. Platinum-based chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin, are ototoxic, meaning that they cause permanent damage to the hair cells of the ear, resulting in hearing loss. Patients from more deprived backgrounds face additional risk factors to their hearing health, including limited healthcare access, greater occupational noise exposure, and poorer overall health, making them more vulnerable to hearing loss.\n\nThis is especially concerning as hearing loss can make communication more challenging, which creates a greater reliance on cognitive processes such as thinking and memory to navigate social interactions. This challenge is exacerbated when individuals experience cognitive dysfunction related to chemotherapy, commonly referred to as 'chemo brain'. Addressing these communication difficulties is crucial for promoting healthy ageing and maintaining social engagement. It is expected that cancer patients from the most deprived backgrounds would experience greater hearing loss following chemotherapy than those from less deprived backgrounds.\n\nAs a secondary aim, this study will also investigate how hearing loss may affect cognitive function. Specifically, it will assess whether differences in speech-in-noise performance from pre- to post-treatment predict cognitive performance post-treatment, to understand if changes in hearing over time are associated with changes in cognition. The study will also explore how socioeconomic deprivation, cumulative chemotherapy dose, and treatment duration influence these relationships. By identifying disparities in hearing loss and possible associations with cognition, this research will help guide future hearing screening and intervention strategies for cancer patients.",[118,119,120,27],"Cancer","Chemo Brain","Chemotherapy",[118,122,120,27],"Chemo brain","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-20",{"date":96,"type":36},{"date":127,"type":21},"2026-05-02",{"date":129,"type":21},"2028-09-01",{"name":131,"class":43},"Lancaster University",{"id":133,"slug":134,"hasResults":11,"nctId":135,"briefTitle":136,"officialTitle":136,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":137,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":138,"targetDuration":140,"studyType":115,"phases":4,"briefSummary":141,"conditions":142,"keywords":155,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":161,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":162,"startDateStruct":164,"completionDateStruct":166,"leadSponsor":168,"locationsCount":44},"100589754","apple-health-study-100589754","NCT06958523","Apple Health Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Be at least 18 years old (at least 19 years old in Alabama and Nebraska, at least 21 years old in Puerto Rico);\n* Live in the United States of America;\n* Have an iPhone;\n* Have installed Apple Research app on your iPhone;\n* Be comfortable communicating in written and spoken English;\n* Be willing and able to provide informed consent to participate in the Study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Share your iCloud account, iPhone, or devices that collect health data such as Apple Watch with anyone else, because it could result in sharing another person's health information with the Study, making it challenging for researchers to use your information.",{"count":139,"type":21},500000,"5 Years","The Apple Health Study aims to build a diverse and inclusive group of participants to help researchers advance our understanding of how signals and information collected from apps and devices relate to health and may be used to predict, detect, monitor, and manage changes in health.\n\nTo enroll, US residents who have an iPhone can download the Apple Research app from the App Store and go through the introduction and informed consent for the Apple Health Study. This study is fully remote, and all are invited to enroll if the eligibility criteria are met.\n\nParticipants will be asked to complete tasks and surveys, using their iPhone and Apple Research app which include:\n\n* Selecting the types of data they would like to share with the study such as health and sensor data\n* Completing tasks and surveys including areas such as personal demographic information, personal medical history, family history, and social determinants of health",[143,144,145,146,147,27,148,149,150,151,152,153,154],"Mental Health","Sleep","Exercise","Hormones","Metabolic Health","Aging","Lifestyle Factors","Functional Capacity","Neurological Conditions","General Health","Wellbeing","Women&#39;s Health",[136,156,157,158,159,160],"Large Scale Digital Study","Digital Biomarkers","Research App","Apple Research App","iPhone","2025-07-24",{"date":163,"type":36},"2025-07-29",{"date":165,"type":36},"2025-02-12",{"date":167,"type":21},"2030-02",{"name":169,"class":170},"Apple Inc.","INDUSTRY",{"id":172,"slug":173,"hasResults":11,"nctId":174,"briefTitle":175,"officialTitle":175,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":176,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":177,"enrollmentInfo":178,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":180,"briefSummary":181,"conditions":182,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":183,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":184,"startDateStruct":186,"completionDateStruct":188,"leadSponsor":190,"locationsCount":105},"100588493","investigating-the-effect-of-caffeine-consumption-on-speech-understanding-in-noise-in-young-adults-100588493","NCT06942117","Investigating the Effect of Caffeine Consumption on Speech Understanding in Noise in Young Adults","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* For both groups, it was planned to include individuals who had no hearing loss (SSO\\\u003C25 dB nHL), no history of neurological or psychological disorders, were non-smokers, and did not use ototoxic drugs.\n\nExclusion Criteria:","30 Years",{"count":179,"type":21},60,[24],"Caffeine is a widely consumed substance worldwide and is often used to increase alertness and improve cognitive functions. Caffeine stimulates brain activity by binding to adenosine receptors, which increases alertness instead of sleepiness. Studies on the effects of caffeine on cognitive functions have shown that it improves basic cognitive functions such as attention, reaction time, and alertness, while a less pronounced effect is seen on sensory functions such as vision and hearing. However, no study has been found investigating the effect of caffeine consumption on understanding speech in noise. Understanding speech in noise is a skill that includes not only auditory functions but also cognitive functions. This skill is affected by cognitive elements such as selective attention and executive functions. In this context, it is thought that this study, which aims to examine the relationship between caffeine and understanding speech in noise, will contribute to the literature. 60 participants between the ages of 18-30 will be included in this study. Participants will consist of individuals without hearing loss (SSO\\\u003C25 dB nHL), no history of neurological or psychological disorders, non-smokers, and those who do not use ototoxic drugs. Participants will be randomly divided into a placebo group that consumes decaffeinated coffee and a study group that consumes coffee containing 300 mg caffeine. The Turkish Matrix Test will be administered 30 minutes after coffee consumption. In addition, participants will be asked to keep a caffeine diary for one week to determine their daily caffeine consumption and will be asked to fill out the Caffeine Use Disorder Scale. Thus, they will be divided into low and high caffeine consumption groups and their speech understanding skills in noise will be compared.",[27],"2025-04-21",{"date":185,"type":36},"2025-04-24",{"date":187,"type":36},"2025-04-12",{"date":189,"type":21},"2026-04-13",{"name":191,"class":43},"Istanbul Aydın University"]