[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"hemiplegic-shoulder-pain\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:hemiplegic-shoulder-pain":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,6,0,[8,48,78,100,126,150],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100608566","comparison-of-effectiveness-of-low-dose-laser-and-transcutaneous-electrical-stimulation-in-hemiplegic-shoulder-100608566",false,"NCT07203222","Comparison of Effectiveness of Low Dose Laser and Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Hemiplegic Shoulder","Comparison of the Efficacy of Low-Dose Laser and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Subacute Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain, and the Effect of Treatments on Upper Extremity Function and Quality of Life","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-75 years\n* Patients with shoulder pain on the hemiplegic side \\*Mini mental state examination ≥ 25\n* History of stroke within the last 2 weeks to 6 months\n* Patients with shoulder pain scoring 40-100 points on the visual analogue scale (moderate to severe) will be included.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who refuse to provide written consent or attend follow-up visits\n* Being under 18 years of age\n* Patients with motor aphasia\n* Patients who have had a shoulder injection within the last 3 months\n* Patients who have undergone upper extremity botulinum toxin application within the last 6 months\n\n  \\*Pregnant women or those planning to become pregnant\n* Inflammatory rheumatic disease\n* Patients who have undergone shoulder injury and surgery prior to stroke\n* Patients with other conditions that could explain shoulder pain\n* Patients with complex regional pain syndrome\n* Patients with a history of epilepsy, pacemaker, or arrhythmia diagnosis\n* Malignancy\n* Diseases such as Alzheimer's or dementia that cause cognitive impairment -History of psychiatric disorders such as major depression or personality disorders\n* Alcohol and drug addiction","ALL","18 Years","75 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},45,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), which are analgesic modalities that play an important role in the treatment of this frequently encountered complication. The secondary aim of the study is to evaluate its effectiveness on upper extremity function, quality of life, sleep, and fatigue.",[27],"Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain",[29,30,31,32,33,34],"Hemiplegic shoulder pain","Low Dose Laser","TENS","Ultrasonographic evaluation","Upper extremity function","stroke","RECRUITING","2026-06-16",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-06-17","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":39},"2025-09-24",{"date":43,"type":21},"2026-08-31",{"name":45,"class":46},"Ankara Etlik City Hospital","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":54,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":47},"100632443","focal-vibration-therapy-in-post-stroke-shoulder-pain-100632443","NCT07513753","Focal Vibration Therapy in Post-stroke Shoulder Pain","Efficacy of Focal Vibrational Therapy in Reducing Post-stroke Shoulder Pain: a Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial","VIBRA-HSP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI\n* Chronic post-stroke phase (≥ 6 months from event)\n* Presence of hemiplegic shoulder pain (NRS ≥ 4)\n* Preserved cognitive function sufficient to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe cognitive impairment or language deficits (e.g., severe aphasia) that prevent understanding of study procedures or reliable reporting of pain (e.g., inability to complete NRS or questionnaires).\n* Severe neglect, apraxia, or disorders of consciousness that interfere with participation in rehabilitation or outcome assessments.\n* Pre-existing shoulder pathology of the affected side unrelated to stroke (e.g., full-thickness rotator cuff tear, advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, prior shoulder surgery).\n* Fixed shoulder contractures or severe joint deformities limiting passive range of motion and preventing standardized assessment.\n* Botulinum toxin injections to shoulder upper limb muscles within the last 3-4 months prior to enrollment .\n* Current treatment with other experimental or non-conventional physical therapies for shoulder pain during the study period.","80 Years",{"count":58,"type":21},60,[24],"Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain (HSP) is a common and disabling complication after stroke, negatively affecting upper limb function, participation in rehabilitation, and quality of life. Despite the widespread use of conservative and physical therapies, evidence supporting the efficacy of specific non-invasive neuromodulation techniques remains limited.\n\nFocal Vibration Therapy (FVT) is a non-invasive physical modality that delivers localized mechanical vibration to targeted muscles or tendons and may modulate pain, muscle tone, and proprioception through frequency-dependent mechanisms.\n\nThis randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal FVT protocol, in addition to standard rehabilitation, compared with a sham intervention plus standard rehabilitation, in reducing pain in patients with chronic post-stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain.",[62,27,63],"Stroke","Chronic Stroke Survivors",[65,34,66,27],"Focal vibration Therapy","pain","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-03-30",{"date":70,"type":39},"2026-04-07",{"date":72,"type":21},"2026-04-01",{"date":74,"type":21},"2026-12-01",{"name":76,"class":77},"University of Foggia","OTHER",{"id":79,"slug":80,"hasResults":11,"nctId":81,"briefTitle":82,"officialTitle":83,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":84,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":87,"phases":4,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":90,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":93,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":94,"startDateStruct":96,"completionDateStruct":97,"leadSponsor":99,"locationsCount":47},"100625771","stroke-hemiplegic-shoulder-pain-ultrasound-findings-and-vas-cross-sectional-100625771","NCT07426965","Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: Ultrasound Findings and VAS (Cross-Sectional)","The Relationship Between Shoulder Ultrasound Findings and Pain Levels in Acute\u002FSubacute Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Being between 18-75 years of age\n2. Patients with a history of stroke within the last 2 weeks to 6 months\n3. Patients with shoulder pain on the hemiplegic side\n4. Mini-mental status test score \\>25\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Motor aphasic patient group\n2. Patients with a history of previous surgery on the hemiplegic shoulder for any reason\n3. Those with other diseases that can explain the shoulder pain\n4. Those with neurodegenerative diseases that cause impairment in cognitive functions, such as dementia",{"count":86,"type":21},100,"OBSERVATIONAL","Hemiplegic shoulder pain is a frequent complication after stroke and may be associated with structural abnormalities detectable by musculoskeletal ultrasound. This prospective cross-sectional observational study aims to evaluate the relationship between shoulder ultrasound abnormality score and pain severity in patients with post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain. Pain severity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for rest, movement, and night pain. Shoulder ultrasound will be performed using a standardized scoring system to quantify structural abnormalities. The primary objective is to investigate whether ultrasound abnormality burden is associated with pain severity in different clinical conditions (rest, exercise, and night).",[27],[91,27,92],"Visual Analog Scale","Ultrasound","2026-02-17",{"date":95,"type":39},"2026-02-23",{"date":93,"type":39},{"date":98,"type":21},"2026-09",{"name":45,"class":46},{"id":101,"slug":102,"hasResults":11,"nctId":103,"briefTitle":104,"officialTitle":105,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":106,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":107,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":109,"briefSummary":110,"conditions":111,"keywords":114,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":117,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":118,"startDateStruct":120,"completionDateStruct":122,"leadSponsor":124,"locationsCount":47},"100619602","suprascapular-nerve-block-and-proprioception-in-hemiplegic-shoulder-pain-a-randomized-controlled-study-100619602","NCT07346755","Suprascapular Nerve Block and Proprioception in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study","Effects of Suprascapular Nerve Block on Proprioception in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 80 years\n* Presence of shoulder pain on the hemiplegic side with a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score \\> 3\n* At least 1 month since the cerebrovascular event (subacute and chronic stroke patients)\n* Active shoulder flexion range of motion \\> 90 degrees (required for the application of the laser pointer-assisted joint position sense test)\n* First-ever, unilateral hemiplegia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Mini-Mental State Examination score \\\u003C 24 indicating cognitive impairment\n* Presence of aphasia\n* Shoulder spasticity with a Modified Ashworth Scale score \\> 2\n* Brunnstrom upper extremity motor stage \\\u003C 3\n* Botulinum toxin type A injection within the last 3 months to muscles affecting shoulder joint movement (trapezius, levator scapulae, pectoralis major, deltoid, serratus anterior, latissimus dorsi, rhomboids, teres major, biceps, coracobrachialis, triceps, supraspinatus, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and teres minor)\n* Pre-existing shoulder pathology causing pain in the hemiplegic shoulder\n* Presence of neglect syndrome\n* Complex regional pain syndrome, central pain, traumatic brachial plexus injury\n* Change in pain medication during the study period\n* Hypersensitivity to the medication used for suprascapular nerve block (lidocaine)\n* Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)\n* Other shoulder pathologies such as fractures or joint replacement",{"count":108,"type":21},40,[24],"The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of suprascapular nerve block on shoulder joint proprioception in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.\n\nFourteen patients aged 18-80 years with hemiplegic shoulder pain will be randomized into two groups. One group will receive suprascapular nerve block followed by a standardized physical therapy program, while the control group will receive the same physical therapy program alone.\n\nThe primary outcome is shoulder joint proprioception. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, shoulder range of motion, motor recovery, stroke-specific quality of life, and upper extremity functional outcomes.\n\nThe results of this study are expected to clarify the role of suprascapular nerve block on proprioception and rehabilitation outcomes in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.",[27,112,113],"Proprioception","Suprascapular Nerve Block",[27,112,115,116],"Suprascapular nerve block","Hemiplegia","2026-01-18",{"date":119,"type":39},"2026-01-21",{"date":121,"type":39},"2025-05-01",{"date":123,"type":21},"2026-05",{"name":125,"class":77},"Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital",{"id":127,"slug":128,"hasResults":11,"nctId":129,"briefTitle":130,"officialTitle":131,"acronym":31,"eligibilityCriteria":132,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":133,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":134,"briefSummary":135,"conditions":136,"keywords":138,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":141,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":142,"startDateStruct":144,"completionDateStruct":146,"leadSponsor":148,"locationsCount":4},"100620097","comparison-of-the-effectiveness-of-tens-and-tens--nmes-treatment-in-stroke-patients-with-shoulder-pain-100620097","NCT07353190","Comparison of the Effectiveness of TENS and TENS + NMES Treatment in Stroke Patients With Shoulder Pain","Comparison of the Effectiveness of TENS and TENS + NMES Treatment in Stroke Patients With Shoulder Pain: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals aged 18 and over\n* Patients with a history of clinically and radiologically confirmed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke\n* Hemiplegic shoulder pain in the affected shoulder\n* Shoulder pain severity VAS\u002FNRS ≥ 2\n* At least 2 weeks and at most 1 year have passed since the onset of stroke\n* Have a level of cognitive and communicative competence that will not hinder the application of clinical evaluations and scales\n* Must have signed the Informed Volunteer Consent Form to participate in the study.\n* Must have a general medical condition to participate in a conventional rehabilitation program\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n\\-",{"count":108,"type":21},[24],"In this study, the effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (TENS + NMES) applied in addition to TENS on pain, shoulder joint range of motion and upper extremity functions will be comparatively evaluated in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. In this direction, in the study; The effectiveness of both treatment approaches on the severity of hemiplegic shoulder pain, their contribution to shoulder functionality and daily living activities will be examined; It will be investigated whether NMES application added to TENS provides an additional clinical benefit compared to TENS.",[62,137,116,27],"Shoulder Disease",[34,139,31,140],"shoulder pain","NMES","2026-01-15",{"date":143,"type":39},"2026-01-20",{"date":145,"type":21},"2026-02-01",{"date":147,"type":21},"2026-06-30",{"name":149,"class":77},"Medical Park Bursa Hospital",{"id":151,"slug":152,"hasResults":11,"nctId":153,"briefTitle":154,"officialTitle":155,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":156,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":157,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":159,"briefSummary":160,"conditions":161,"keywords":162,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":168,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":169,"startDateStruct":171,"completionDateStruct":173,"leadSponsor":175,"locationsCount":47},"100552461","efficacy-of-suprascapular-radiofrequency-ablation-in-hemiplegic-shoulder-pain-100552461","NCT06473389","Efficacy of Suprascapular Radiofrequency Ablation in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain","Efficacy of Suprascapular Radiofrequency Ablation Versus USG-guided Suprascapular Nerve Blockade and Intra-articular Steroid Injections in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Three-blind Randomized Controlled Study.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Being over 18 years old\n2. Those who were diagnosed with hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke at least 3 months ago\n3. Patients with shoulder pain with VAS \\> 5 severity after hemiplegia\n4. Those who agree to participate with a consent document (their own or their foster family)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Those who did not provide a consent document\n2. Those under 18 years of age\n3. Those who cannot cooperate\n4. Severely aphasic patients\n5. Patients with shoulder pain VAS \\>5 severity\n6. Patients who have undergone interventional procedures such as RF, suprascapular nerve blockade, steroid injection, etc. for the shoulder area in the last 3 months\n7. Patients with bleeding diathesis\n8. Those with a history of surgery or radiotherapy in the shoulder area\n9. Those who had shoulder complaints before the stroke\n10. Patients with pacemakers\n11. Patients with MMT Score \\\u003C24",{"count":158,"type":21},84,[24],"Stroke, one of the most important causes of disability and death in the world, is an acute focal deficit of the central system caused by vascular origin such as cerebral infarction, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Hemiplegic shoulder pain, which is one of the most common complications after stroke, is an important problem affecting extremity rehabilitation. Although there are many factors thought to cause haemiplegic shoulder pain, there is still controversy about its treatment. Although there are many treatment strategies for this complication such as analgesics, antispasmotics, local corticosteroid injections, suprascapular nerve blockade, physical therapy modalities and exercise therapy, sometimes very resistant cases are also seen. For the treatment of persistent haemiplegic shoulder pain unresponsive to conventional treatment modalities, intra-articular injection of corticosteroids into the shoulder joint is commonly used, but its palliative effect has only a relatively short duration.Corticosteroids may also have adverse effects such as allergic reactions, rash, hyperglycaemia, menstrual disorders and adrenal suppression. Suprascapular nerve block is another option to relieve haemiplegic shoulder pain. The suprascapular nerve provides 70% of the sensory innervation of the shoulder joint. Thus, blocking pain transmission through the SS provides effective control of haemiplegic shoulder pain. However, the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block varies according to the study population and depends on the therapeutic modality to which it is compared. In addition, the effect of suprascapular nerve blockade may be limited due to the short duration of action of local anaesthetic agents. Neurolysis may cause permanent paralysis of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. For this reason, a deconstructive method is not preferred. Pulse RF applications, which is a non-deconstructive, neuromodulatory method, may be preferred in this regard. So far, there are very few studies investigating the efficacy of intra-articular steroid injection, suprascapular block and pulse RF in hemiplegic shoulder pain separately, but there is no study investigating the efficacy of Pulse RF treatment against other treatment methods together. In this study, investigator's aim was to compare the efficacy of suprascapular pulse radiofrequency against USG-guided suprascapular nerve block and intra-articular steroid injections in hemiplegic shoulder pain.",[27],[163,34,66,164,165,166,167],"Hemiplegic shoulder","radiofrequency","suprascapular nerve","corticosteroid","injection","2024-09-09",{"date":170,"type":39},"2024-09-19",{"date":172,"type":39},"2024-08-01",{"date":174,"type":21},"2025-07-01",{"name":176,"class":46},"Yunus Burak Bayır"]