[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"hip-surgery\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:hip-surgery":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,12,0,[8,49,79,109,136,180,206,232,259,287,316,336],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":38,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":39,"startDateStruct":42,"completionDateStruct":44,"leadSponsor":46,"locationsCount":4},"100641331","digitally-assisted-rehabilitation-at-home-for-older-adults-after-hip-surgery-grimsel-100641331",false,"NCT07658664","Digitally Assisted Rehabilitation at Home for Older Adults After Hip Surgery (GRIMSEL)","Digitally Assisted Geriatric Home-rehabilitation in Older Patients After Hip Surgery (GRIMSEL): a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial","GRIMSEL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Community-dwelling adults aged 55 to 80 years\n* Hospitalized for hip surgery with unrestricted weight bearing at University Hospital Bern\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Discharge to inpatient rehabilitation\n* inability to comply with a rehabilitation program (e.g. comorbidity that prevents 30min light workout, major cognitive impairment)\n* end-of life situation","ALL","55 Years","80 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},66,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a 12-week digitally supported, multimodal home rehabilitation program using the medical application Akina is as effective compared to routine care regarding functional independence in older adults undergoing hip surgery.\n\nHow is this multimodal home rehabilitation program received by patients? Is this multimodal home program at least as effective in terms of functional indpendence, muscle status, mobility and quality of life compared to routine care?\n\nResearchers will compare the multimodal rehabilitation program using the application Akina to routine care to see if the program works to treat patients after hip surgery.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nUndergo the rehab program at home or receive routine care (outpatient physiotherapy) for 12 weeks Visit the clinic after 6 and 12 weeks",[28,29,30,31],"Hip Surgery","Rehabilitation Program","Geriatrics Rehabilitation","Digital Health Intervention",[33,34,35,36],"functional independence","home-based rehabilitation","self-management","orthogeriatrics","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-16",{"date":40,"type":41},"2026-06-22","ACTUAL",{"date":43,"type":22},"2026-08",{"date":45,"type":22},"2028-08",{"name":47,"class":48},"Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern","OTHER",{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":55,"eligibilityCriteria":56,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":63,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":78},"100637466","the-quadro-iliac-plane-qip-block-in-hip-arthroplasty-100637466","NCT07591311","The Quadro-Iliac Plane (QIP) Block in Hip Arthroplasty","The Effectiveness of the \"Quadro-Iliac Plane Block\" in Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Observational Clinical Study","QIP in hip","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Patients undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery, either elective or for a proximal femoral fracture\n* Expected postoperative hospital stay ≥ 24 hours\n* ASA physical status I-III\n* Neuraxial and\u002For locoregional anesthesia according to standard clinical practice\n* Provision of informed consent to participate in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Absence of informed consent\n* Contraindications to locoregional and\u002For spinal anesthesia\n* Allergy to local anesthetic agents\n* Cognitive impairment preventing reliable assessment of outcomes\n* Coagulation disorders and\u002For platelet abnormalities\n* Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy that contraindicates spinal anesthesia\n* Presence of localized infection or sepsis at the sites to be treated",{"count":58,"type":22},80,"OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of different locoregional anesthesia techniques, particularly the Quadro-Iliac Plane (QIP) block, in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\nDoes the QIP block improve postoperative recovery and pain control compared to other routinely used locoregional anesthesia techniques in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery?\n\nParticipants undergoing hip arthroplasty as part of their standard clinical care will receive one of the locoregional anesthesia techniques already in use at the hospital (including QIP block, fascia iliaca block, PENG block, or others, according to anesthesiologist choice). Postoperative outcomes will be collected prospectively, including quality of recovery (QoR-15 at 24 hours), pain scores at rest and during movement at predefined time points up to 48 hours, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, time to mobilization, and occurrence of complications.",[28,62],"Hip Arthroplasty",[64,65,66,67],"regional anesthesia","hip","hip fracture","QIP","RECRUITING","2026-05-18",{"date":71,"type":41},"2026-05-22",{"date":73,"type":22},"2026-05",{"date":75,"type":22},"2027-11",{"name":77,"class":48},"San Giovanni di Dio Hospital",2,{"id":80,"slug":81,"hasResults":11,"nctId":82,"briefTitle":83,"officialTitle":84,"acronym":85,"eligibilityCriteria":86,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":88,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":90,"briefSummary":91,"conditions":92,"keywords":93,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":99,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":100,"startDateStruct":102,"completionDateStruct":104,"leadSponsor":106,"locationsCount":108},"100600946","comparison-between-2-techniques-for-lumbar-espb-100600946","NCT07104097","Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Lumbar-ESPB","Regional Anesthesia in Hip Arthroplasty- Comparison Between Two Techniques for Erector Spinae Plane Block","ESPTA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* primary total hip replacement\n* informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* allergies to study drugs\n* spinal anesthesia contraindicated\n* kidney failure (GFR\\\u003C30)\n* epilepsy, psychiatric disease, neurologic deficits\n* revision surgery\n* neuropathies in the lumbar area (tingling, hypoestesia, numbness, motor deficit)\n* no informed consent\n* pregnancy\n* alcohol\u002Fopioid abuse\n* emergency surgery\u002Fintensive care","18 Years",{"count":89,"type":22},44,[25],"Diffusion of local anesthetics after a lumbar ESPB within fascial planes towards nerve structures is a matter of debate.\n\nThe main objective of the study is to compare the incidence of sensory block between two techniques of needle placement (superficial or translaminar) during lumbar ESPB block.\n\nPatients are treated with lumbar ESPB (randomized to superficial or translaminar), spinal anesthesia and multimodal analgesia.\n\nThe primary endpoint will be the incidence of numbness\u002Freduced skin sensitivity to cold (ice test) in the area innervated by the lumbar plexus. Secondary outcomes are pain and analgesic's consumption, motor block, quality of recovery and discharge ability.",[28],[94,95,96,97,98],"erector spinae plane block","hip surgery","sensory block","motor block","local anesthetic","2026-05-11",{"date":101,"type":41},"2026-05-12",{"date":103,"type":41},"2025-10-06",{"date":105,"type":22},"2026-08-20",{"name":107,"class":48},"Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital",1,{"id":110,"slug":111,"hasResults":11,"nctId":112,"briefTitle":113,"officialTitle":114,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":115,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":116,"enrollmentInfo":117,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":119,"briefSummary":120,"conditions":121,"keywords":123,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":127,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":128,"startDateStruct":130,"completionDateStruct":132,"leadSponsor":134,"locationsCount":108},"100632442","peng-vs-deep-iliacus-plane-block-in-intertrochanteric-femur-fractures-100632442","NCT07513740","PENG vs Deep Iliacus Plane Block in Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures","Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of the PENG Block and the Deep Iliacus Plane Block During Positioning for Spinal Anesthesia and in the Postoperative Period in Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients scheduled for elective surgery for intertrochanteric femur fractures\n* Patients with ASA physical status I, II, or III\n* Patients aged between 30 and 85 years\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with ASA physical status IV or higher\n* Patients undergoing emergency surgery\n* Patients who refuse to participate or withdraw consent during the study\n* Patients with cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer's disease, dementia, or delirium\n* Patients with a history of local anesthetic toxicity\n* Patients with infection at the planned block site\n* Patients with bleeding diathesis\n* Patients undergoing additional surgical procedures or additional anesthesia (e.g., general anesthesia)\n* Patients with a history of chronic opioid use or receiving treatment for neuropathic pain","75 Years",{"count":118,"type":22},75,[25],"Intertrochanteric femur fractures are common in elderly patients and are associated with significant pain. Providing effective analgesia is clinically important both during positioning for spinal anesthesia and in the postoperative period in this patient population.\n\nThe Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block is a regional anesthesia technique that targets the articular branches of the hip capsule and may provide effective analgesia with motor-sparing potential. The Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB) is a newer approach that may spread to both the articular branches and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve.\n\nAlthough both blocks are used in patients with intertrochanteric fractures, there is a lack of sufficient randomized controlled data comparing their effectiveness for pain during positioning for spinal anesthesia and for postoperative analgesia. Therefore, it is important to determine which technique provides greater clinical benefit.\n\nThe aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of the PENG block and the Deep Iliacus Plane Block during positioning for spinal anesthesia and in the postoperative period in patients undergoing surgery for intertrochanteric femur fractures.",[122,28],"Postoperative Analgesia",[124,28,125,126],"Deep İliacus Plane Block","PENG","Meta-PENG","2026-03-31",{"date":129,"type":41},"2026-04-07",{"date":131,"type":41},"2026-03-01",{"date":133,"type":22},"2027-03-01",{"name":135,"class":48},"Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi",{"id":137,"slug":138,"hasResults":11,"nctId":139,"briefTitle":140,"officialTitle":141,"acronym":142,"eligibilityCriteria":143,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":144,"maxAge":87,"enrollmentInfo":145,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":147,"briefSummary":148,"conditions":149,"keywords":157,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":171,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":172,"startDateStruct":174,"completionDateStruct":176,"leadSponsor":178,"locationsCount":108},"100523273","studying-melatonin-and-recovery-in-teens-100523273","NCT06093477","Studying Melatonin and Recovery in Teens","SurgerySMART: Studying Melatonin and Recovery in Teens","SurgerySMART","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients\u002Fyouth:\n\n* Age 12-18 years\n* Participants undergoing elective major musculoskeletal surgery for eligible conditions\n* California state resident\n* Regular access to internet and smartphone\n* Can read and understand English or Spanish\n\nParents\u002Fcaregivers\n\n* Biological parent or legal guardian of youth\n* Can read and understand English or Spanish\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients\u002Fyouth\n\n* Prescription medication for premorbid insomnia\n* Cognitive impairment or developmental delay\n* Does not agree to a 1-week washout if taking over the counter supplements or other sleep aids prior to the start of the study medication\n* High risk for sleep related breathing disorder\n* Chronic medical condition that is severe\u002Fsystemic or requires regular treatment regimen\n* Psychiatric admission in prior 30 days\n* Patients that underwent major surgery in the last 3 months, or those that have not fully recovered from a prior surgery\n* BMI ≥ 99th percentile\n* Enrollment in another therapeutic study\n* Any serious underlying medical or psychiatric condition, that, in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate the patient's participation in the study","12 Years",{"count":146,"type":22},45,[25],"The goal of this feasibility clinical trial is to learn if melatonin can help teens having major musculoskeletal surgery by promoting healthy sleep. Melatonin is available as a dietary supplement that may be effective in promoting longer, higher quality sleep. This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of melatonin for teens undergoing major musculoskeletal surgery, as well as determine optimal measured outcomes (sleep, pain, health-related quality of life) at short- and long-term follow-up.",[150,151,152,153,154,155,156,28],"Juvenile; Scoliosis","Scoliosis Idiopathic","Scoliosis; Adolescence","Scoliosis;Congenital","Kyphosis","Spondylolisthesis","Pectus Surgery",[158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,95,170],"sleep","pain medicine","pediatric pain medicine","melatonin","pilot feasibility trial","acute pain","chronic pain","CPSP","chronic postsurgical pain","spinal fusion surgery","adolescent","perioperative melatonin","pectus surgery","2026-03-16",{"date":173,"type":41},"2026-03-18",{"date":175,"type":41},"2024-05-30",{"date":177,"type":22},"2028-03-31",{"name":179,"class":48},"Stanford University",{"id":181,"slug":182,"hasResults":11,"nctId":183,"briefTitle":184,"officialTitle":185,"acronym":186,"eligibilityCriteria":187,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":188,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":190,"briefSummary":191,"conditions":192,"keywords":193,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":195,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":196,"startDateStruct":198,"completionDateStruct":200,"leadSponsor":202,"locationsCount":205},"100513496","post-market-clinical-follow-up-of-hip-surgery-using-fh-ortho-company-medical-devices-100513496","NCT05966220","Post Market Clinical Follow-up of Hip Surgery Using FH ORTHO Company Medical Devices.","Post Market Clinical Follow-up of Hip Surgery Using FH ORTHO Company Medical Devices (FH ORTHO Company Hip Observatory).","HipFHOrtho","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Any patient undergoing or having undergone implantation of medical devices distributed by FH ORTHO Company for hip arthroplasty and traumatology, used in accordance with their approved Instruction For Use, in one of the centers participating in the Observatory.\n2. Patient is at least 18 years of age.\n3. Patient agreeing to participate after having been informed orally and in writing (with written consent if required locally).\n4. In some countries, such as France, the patient will have to be socially insured to be included in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. An infection, or latent infection.\n2. A mental or neuromuscular disorder that would create an unacceptable risk of prosthetic instability, failure of prosthetic fixation, or post-operative complications (except for the HIP\\&GO Double mobility cemented cup and, if applicable, the associated stems and heads when assembled together).\n3. Known Insufficient bone quality and\u002For bone stock.\n4. Known allergy to any component of the material listed on the product label.\n5. Metabolic diseases that could compromise bone regrowth.\n6. Metabolic and\u002For vascular treatment or disease that may compromise bone healing or consolidation.\n7. Drug dependency.\n8. Uncooperative patient unable to follow recommendations.\n9. Protected adult",{"count":189,"type":22},800,[25],"The objective of this observatory is to generate additional real life clinical data in accordance with local regulation (i.e. Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study, a study carried out following the European Conformity (CE) marking of a device and intended to answer specific questions relating to clinical safety or performance (i.e. residual risks) of a device when used in accordance with its approved labelling).\n\nThe difficulty of such an observatory is to be able to collect data on the different versions of the devices, on the different possible combinations of implants of an arthroplasty. The observatory must also be able to cover devices used in surgery to repair osteoarticular trauma.\n\nThe observatory will be based on the principle of a \"dynamic\" cohort during the inclusion period, i.e. with possible inclusions to replace the premature exits.\n\nTechnical solutions will be implemented to facilitate data collection from surgeons (electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and from patients (Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) on phone\u002Ftablet\u002Fcomputer).",[28],[194],"hip prosthesis, observatory","2026-01-29",{"date":197,"type":41},"2026-02-02",{"date":199,"type":41},"2024-01-08",{"date":201,"type":22},"2038-12",{"name":203,"class":204},"FH ORTHO","INDUSTRY",5,{"id":207,"slug":208,"hasResults":11,"nctId":209,"briefTitle":210,"officialTitle":211,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":212,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":213,"enrollmentInfo":214,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":216,"briefSummary":217,"conditions":218,"keywords":220,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":224,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":225,"startDateStruct":227,"completionDateStruct":229,"leadSponsor":230,"locationsCount":108},"100610912","comparison-of-qipb-and-sificb-in-hip-surgery-100610912","NCT07233746","Comparison of QIPB and SIFICB in Hip Surgery","Comparison of the Effects of Quadroiliac Plane Block Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on Postoperative Pain in Hip Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients over 18 years of age who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia and were I-II-III according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk classification were included in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* patients who did not give consent,\n\n  * patients with coagulopathy,\n  * patients with signs of infection at the block application site,\n  * patients using anticoagulants,\n  * patients with known allergies to any of the study drugs,\n  * patients with unstable hemodynamics,\n  * patients who could not cooperate during postoperative pain assessment\n  * patients who wanted to withdraw from the study,\n  * patients with alcohol and drug addiction,\n  * patients with musculoskeletal abnormalitie","99 Years",{"count":215,"type":22},60,[25],"The aim is to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of Quadroiliac Plane Block (QIPB) and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (SIFICB) in patients undergoing hip surgery.",[219,28],"Postoperative Pain",[221,95,64,222,223],"postoperative pain","quadroiliac plane block","suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block","2025-11-14",{"date":226,"type":41},"2025-11-18",{"date":228,"type":22},"2025-12-15",{"date":73,"type":22},{"name":231,"class":48},"Cumhuriyet University",{"id":233,"slug":234,"hasResults":11,"nctId":235,"briefTitle":236,"officialTitle":237,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":238,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":239,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":240,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":242,"briefSummary":244,"conditions":245,"keywords":246,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":250,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":251,"startDateStruct":253,"completionDateStruct":255,"leadSponsor":257,"locationsCount":108},"100604282","phase-4-effectiveness-and-safety-of-the-electrically-powered-orthopedic-exercise-device-on-gait-ability-in-patients-with-who-have-undergone-hip-surgery-100604282","NCT07147491","Effectiveness and Safety of the Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device on Gait Ability in Patients With Who Have Undergone Hip Surgery","Study to Verify the Effectiveness and Safety of the Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device on Gait Ability in Patients Who Have Undergone Hip Surgery: Investigator-Initiated, Single-Center, Single-Group Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Individuals aged 19 or older\n2. Individuals who have undergone hip surgery due to hip osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or hip fracture\n3. Individuals who are at least two days post-hip surgery and are assessed to be medically stable\n4. Individuals who have adequate cognitive ability (Korean Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 20)\n5. Individuals able to sit at the edge of a bed without assistance and stand for 10 seconds regardless of support\n6. Individuals who are Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) score of 1-3\n7. Individuals who visited Yongin Severance Hospital, understood the study, and signed informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Individuals who, after undergoing hip surgery, present with exudate at the surgical site or report symptoms such as heat, redness, swelling, or severe pain at the affected area\n2. Individuals who have contraindications for lower limb weight-bearing such as severe joint contractures, osteoporosis, or untreated fractures\n3. Individuals who have progressive or unstable brain diseases or neurological paralysis from stroke\n4. Individuals who have active infections or open wounds hindering device use\n5. Individuals who have significant leg length discrepancies\n6. Individuals who have severe deformities or contractures in the lower extremities\n7. Individuals who have history of poliomyelitis\n8. Individuals inable to maintain seated or standing positions independently\n9. Individuals who have severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale grade ≥ 2)\n10. Individuals who have bone metastases from cancer\n11. Individuals who have severe internal diseases affecting device use (e.g., cardiovascular or respiratory diseases)\n12. Individuals who have cognitive impairments preventing cooperation with device use\n13. Individuals who have complaints of device-related side effects or potential rehabilitation discontinuation (e.g., severe obesity, skeletal deformity)\n14. Patients who are determined to be pregnant or potentially pregnant based on the medical interview\n15. Individuals who have any other clinically significant findings deemed inappropriate by the investigator","19 Years",{"count":241,"type":22},30,[243],"PHASE4","Gait is an essential daily activity performed through the complex coordination of the central and peripheral nervous systems and the musculoskeletal system. Gait disorders can negatively affect quality of life, increase the risk of falls, decrease the ability to perform daily activities, and limit physical activity. Gait disorders can result from various musculoskeletal conditions, with hip osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and hip fractures being the most representative causes.\n\nIn the early stages of hip osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or non-severely displaced hip fractures, various intervention therapies, including rehabilitation exercise therapy and injection treatments, can be attempted. However, these intervention therapies only alleviate symptoms and cannot prevent disease progression. Consequently, most patients eventually experience thinning of the full-thickness hip cartilage, collapse of the femoral head, nonunion, or worsening displacement, which leads to restricted hip range of motion. As a result, lower limb muscle weakness and functional decline occur, ultimately requiring hip surgeries such as total hip arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation. Although most patients experience a recovery in gait ability after hip surgery, some show a slower recovery rate or fail to achieve normal walking.\n\nIt has been reported that over 80% of function is recovered by three months after surgery; however, during this period, patients experience limitations in performing daily activities. As a compensatory mechanism, excessive weight-bearing on the non-operated limb may occur, increasing the risk of overloading the non-operated hip. This may lead to the development of osteoarthritis in the non-operated limb and has also been reported to increase the risk of falls. Therefore, various methods are being studied to facilitate gait function recovery after hip surgery and promote an early return to daily activities.\n\nTherefore, this study aims to explore the clinical feasibility of the Angel Suit H10 (Angelrobotics, Seoul, Korea) by assessing whether wearing the Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device improves gait function in patients who have undergone hip surgery, along with evaluating user satisfaction and device safety.",[28],[247,248,249,28],"Rehabilitation","Gait","Wearable robot","2025-08-21",{"date":252,"type":41},"2025-08-29",{"date":254,"type":41},"2025-04-07",{"date":256,"type":22},"2026-04-06",{"name":258,"class":48},"Yonsei University",{"id":260,"slug":261,"hasResults":11,"nctId":262,"briefTitle":263,"officialTitle":264,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":265,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":266,"enrollmentInfo":267,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":269,"briefSummary":270,"conditions":271,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":278,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":279,"startDateStruct":281,"completionDateStruct":283,"leadSponsor":285,"locationsCount":108},"100594265","opposed-anterior-hip-arthroplasty-regional-anesthesia-study-study-100594265","NCT07017192","OPPOSED (anteriOr hiP arthroPlasty regiOnal aneSthEsia stuDy) Study","OPPOSED (anteriOr hiP arthroPlasty regiOnal aneSthEsia stuDy) Study. Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty Analgesia: SIFI Block Versus Lumbar ESP Block","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age \\>=18 years and =\\\u003C85 years\n* patients undergoing elective unilateral THA with direct anterior approach\n* patients able to understand the purposes of the study and provide signed informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* pregnancy\n* Age \\\u003C18 years or \\>85 years\n* revision or bilateral surgeries\n* psychiatric pathology or cognitive deficits, mental retardation, inability to provide valid informed consent\n* History of illicit drugs and\u002For alcohol abuse\n* urgent\u002Femergent surgery with admission to Intensive Care under sedation and mechanical ventilation or complications that do not allow evaluation\n* known allergy to the drugs used in the study\n* refusal to provide informed consent","85 Years",{"count":268,"type":22},50,[25],"Main indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA) are degenerative osteoarthritis of the coxofemoral joint, osteonecrosis of the hip, congenital disorders such as dysplasia and inflammatory arthritis. More recently, surgery using the direct anterior approach is getting popularity: this method, in fact, granting a significant sparing of the hip muscles, is associated with favorable results compared to other techniques, such as a lower risk of dislocation, limitated damage to soft tissues with better recovery and early discharge.\n\nPatients undergoing this procedure may although experience moderate to severe postoperative pain in the first few hours (with peaks observed in the first 12 hours), as well as potential complications such as nausea and vomiting related to opioids use.\n\nIt has been shown that adequate pain control influences early mobilization and rehabilitation, ensuring a quicker recovery. The role of regional anesthesia techniques has been established in almost all areas of orthopedic surgery, and in particularly in the management of postoperative pain following hip replacement surgery, but definitive data are missing with regard to direct anterior approach.\n\nRegional anesthesia consists of infiltrating local anesthetics in sites (fascial planes or nerves), in order to limit or even eliminate the use of traditional painkillers, with a significant reduction in the side effects.\n\nThe aim of this study is to compare the impact of two techniques, the Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca (SIFI) block and the lumbar Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block, in managing postoperative pain in subjects undergoing total hip replacement surgery performed by direct anterior approach.\n\nThe primary objective of the study is the incidence of residual femoral and obturator nerves block (knee extension and hip adduction according to ASIA score) 8 hours after surgery in the two treatment groups.\n\nSecondary objectives include: • Time elapsed between the end of surgery and the recovery of lower limb motility enough to allow the patient to mobilize independently; • Total opioid consumption (calculated as morphine equivalents) at 8, 24 and 48 hours after surgery; • Pain according to NRS (numerica rating scale) at 8, 24 and 48 hours after surgery; • Extent of sensory block of the three branches of the lumbar plexus (femoral, obturator, lateral femorocutaneuous nerves) at 8, 24 and 48 hours after surgery; • Timing of hospital discharge; • Incidence of chronic or persistent postoperative pain (at 30 and 90 days after surgery); • Any postoperative complication",[272,273,274,62,275,28,276,277],"Hip Replacement Surgery","Hip Replacement, Total","Hip Pain","Hip Replacement Postoperative","Pain,Postoperative","Mobility and Independence","2025-06-27",{"date":280,"type":41},"2025-06-29",{"date":282,"type":41},"2025-06-23",{"date":284,"type":22},"2026-09-23",{"name":286,"class":48},"A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza",{"id":288,"slug":289,"hasResults":11,"nctId":290,"briefTitle":291,"officialTitle":292,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":293,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":294,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":295,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":297,"conditions":298,"keywords":302,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":306,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":307,"startDateStruct":309,"completionDateStruct":311,"leadSponsor":313,"locationsCount":4},"100590941","low--vs-normal-flow-anesthesia-and-delirium-after-hip-fracture-in-the-elderly-100590941","NCT06973967","Low- vs. Normal-Flow Anesthesia and Delirium After Hip Fracture in the Elderly","Evaluation of the Association Between Low-Flow and Normal-Flow Anesthesia and Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients aged 65 years and older who are scheduled to undergo surgical treatment for hip fracture, classified as ASA physical status I-IV, and who have signed the informed consent form will be included in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients with complex fractures (multiple fractures, extremity, abdominal, pelvic or sacral trauma, head trauma, etc.), those with relative contraindications to general anesthesia (e.g., known difficult airway, malignant hyperthermia), patients requiring postoperative intubated intensive care follow-up, those with a history of dementia, sleep disorders, or psychosis, individuals with serious neurological diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease, stroke sequelae), those with a history of opioid, alcohol, or substance use, patients with cerebrovascular disease, those who underwent surgery within the past 6 months, patients with hearing or vision impairment, bleeding disorders or those taking medications affecting coagulation, patients with hypoalbuminemia (\\\u003C3 g\u002FdL), preoperative anemia with hematocrit \\\u003C30%, known allergy to anesthetic drugs, severe cardiopulmonary failure, immobility, malnutrition, or those who are unable to comply with the study protocol will be excluded from the study.","65 Years",{"count":296,"type":22},128,"The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between low-flow and normal-flow anesthesia techniques and the development of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture.",[299,300,301,28],"Delirium - Postoperative","Low Flow Anesthesia","Elderly Patients (>65 Years)",[303,95,304,305],"delirium","elderly patients","low-flow anesthesia","2025-05-14",{"date":308,"type":41},"2025-05-15",{"date":310,"type":22},"2025-05-08",{"date":312,"type":22},"2025-08-07",{"name":314,"class":315},"Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital","OTHER_GOV",{"id":317,"slug":318,"hasResults":11,"nctId":319,"briefTitle":320,"officialTitle":321,"acronym":322,"eligibilityCriteria":323,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":324,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":326,"conditions":327,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":254,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":328,"startDateStruct":330,"completionDateStruct":332,"leadSponsor":334,"locationsCount":4},"100518677","long-term-follow-up-of-the-titanium-modular-revision-hip-system-up-tint-10-levels-100518677","NCT06033651","Long Term Follow up of the Titanium Modular Revision Hip System up (TinT 10) Levels","Long Term Follow up of the Titanium Modular Revision Hip System up (TinT 10)","TinT10","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAll adult patients who had Lima Corporate modular titanium acetabular component implants implanted between 2011 and 2015.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nDeceased patients Patients who have undergone a subsequent acetabular revision Patients that lack capacity Prisoners in the custody of HM Prison service or who are offenders supervised by the probation service in England or Wales.",{"count":325,"type":22},100,"Patients are to be approached to attend clinic who have been identified as being implanted with either a Lima Corporate Delta Revision TT, Delta One TT or the Delta Multihole Systems hip systems between 2011 and 2015, a minimum of 10 years since hip surgery. They will be x-rayed (AP pelvis and a lateral view) and have a clinical review in clinic.",[28],{"date":329,"type":41},"2025-04-09",{"date":331,"type":22},"2025-04-10",{"date":333,"type":22},"2026-05-14",{"name":335,"class":315},"Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust",{"id":337,"slug":338,"hasResults":11,"nctId":339,"briefTitle":340,"officialTitle":341,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":342,"healthyVolunteers":343,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":294,"enrollmentInfo":344,"targetDuration":345,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":346,"conditions":347,"keywords":348,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":352,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":353,"startDateStruct":355,"completionDateStruct":357,"leadSponsor":359,"locationsCount":4},"100567753","comparison-of-the-analgesic-effectiveness-of-pericapsular-nerve-block-and-suprainguinal-fascia-iliac-block-application-100567753","NCT06672289","Comparison of the Analgesic Effectiveness of Pericapsular Nerve Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliac Block Application","Comparison of the Analgesic Effectiveness of Pericapsular Nerve Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliac Block Application in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients over the age of 18 and under the age of 65 who will undergo hip arthroscopy\n* ASA I-II group patients\n* Patients without allergies\n\n  * Patients without psychiatric disorders\n* Patients without opioid addiction\n* Patients who have the ability to use the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and perform VAS scoring\n* Patients with no contraindications for peripheral blocks\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who do not want to participate in the study\n* Patients with uncontrolled hypertension\n* Patients with chronic pain or receiving pain treatment,\n* Significant Cardiac Disorder (Coronary Artery Disease, Arrhythmia, Electrocardiography Anomaly, Heart Failure, etc.)\n* Patients with Diabetes Mellitus",true,{"count":215,"type":22},"1 Day","Suprainguinal Fascia iliac compartment outlet and Pericapsular nerve reduction, which is a routinely successful method for postoperative analgesia in anesthesia practice; the aim is to investigate information regarding postoperative pain level, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction and discharge time after arm arthroscopy.",[28],[349,350,351],"hip arthroscopy","PENG block","Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block","2024-11-01",{"date":354,"type":41},"2024-11-04",{"date":356,"type":22},"2024-11-15",{"date":358,"type":22},"2026-11-15",{"name":360,"class":48},"TC Erciyes University"]