[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"inguinal-hernia\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:inguinal-hernia":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":7,"results":8},null,26,0,25,[9,44,76,101,130,161,189,217,245,270,290,314,340,359,382,409,432,460,483,505,539,558,579,608,633],{"id":10,"slug":11,"hasResults":12,"nctId":13,"briefTitle":14,"officialTitle":15,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100645388","perioperative-rehab-for-inguinal-hernia-repair-100645388",false,"NCT07680777","Perioperative Rehab for Inguinal Hernia Repair","Perioperative Rehabilitation for Individuals Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* scheduled to undergo first time elective inguinal hernia repair\n* willing to participate in a 6-week exercise program before and after surgery\n* internet access: ability to communicate via email and Zoom\n* at least 18 years of age\n* no medical contraindications to exercise\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* recurrent hernia\n* poorly controlled comorbidities that may prevent safe participation in exercise\n* use of opiates and\u002For opioids","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},98,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Despite how common inguinal hernia repair (IHR) surgery is, there is little research on how best to prepare people for this operation. Surgeons' advice to patients about exercise and physical activity are inconsistent and usually based on their clinical opinion. Some surgeons recommend exercise to help prepare for the operation while others say to rest. Research is needed to help know whether exercise is helpful before and after IHR surgery.\n\nThis study will observe the effects of education and exercise before and immediately after IHR surgery. Half of the participants will be randomized to an education and exercise group and the other half to a non-exercise, care as usual group. Participant outcomes will be measured up to 3 months after their surgery. It is expected that participants in the education and exercise group will have: 1) less pain at follow-up, 2) better hernia-related outcomes, 3) quicker return to activity and work, and 4) improved overall experience surrounding IHR surgery. This project will help in developing clear guidelines for pre- and post-operation to better prepare patients for IHR surgery.",[27],"Inguinal Hernia",[29,30],"rehabilitation","prehabilitation","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-25",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-07-02","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":21},"2026-09",{"date":39,"type":21},"2027-12",{"name":41,"class":42},"University of Alberta","OTHER",1,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":12,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":53,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":74,"locationsCount":43},"100613507","image-guided-herniorrhaphy-study-100613507","NCT07267494","Image-Guided Herniorrhaphy Study","Image-guided Herniorrhaphy Safety and Efficacy Pilot","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* English-speaking adult with reducible hernia(s) or diastasis smaller than approximately 8 cm seeking treatment for their hernia but not able or willing to undergo traditional surgery (open, laparoscopic, or robotic)\n* Patient must be willing to undergo a novel 30- to 60-minute image-guided needle-based procedure\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children, prisoners, and pregnant women (possibly requiring a pregnancy test on the day of the procedure)\n* Patients with a known reaction to local anesthetic or sedation medications or the suture material to be used\n* Patients with irreducible hernias\n* Patients with herniation not visible by ultrasound or CT\n* Patients that do not fit the diameter of a CT gantry or the weight limit of the procedural CT table\n* Patients without insurance or not willing to pay out-of-pocket for the study procedure",{"count":52,"type":21},30,[24],"This pilot clinical study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new image-guided, needle-based approach for repairing abdominal or groin hernias in adults who are unable or unwilling to undergo traditional open or laparoscopic surgery. The technique uses ultrasound and, when needed, CT imaging to guide a hollow needle preloaded with barbed suture through the skin to close the hernia defect without large incisions or general anesthesia. Each participant will undergo one image-guided procedure and will be followed for eight months to assess complications and changes in hernia-related quality of life. Approximately thirty participants will be enrolled. The study aims to determine whether this minimally invasive approach is safe, feasible, and capable of improving hernia symptoms enough to justify a larger clinical trial",[56,57,58,27,59,60],"Hernia","Hernia Abdominal Wall","Ventral Hernia","Hiatal Hernia","Diastasis Recti",[62,63,64,65,66],"Image-guided herniorrhaphy","hernia","pilot study","quality of life","safety and feasability","2026-06-12",{"date":69,"type":35},"2026-06-16",{"date":71,"type":21},"2026-12-01",{"date":73,"type":21},"2029-05-01",{"name":75,"class":42},"University of California, Davis",{"id":77,"slug":78,"hasResults":12,"nctId":79,"briefTitle":80,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":83,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":84,"briefSummary":85,"conditions":86,"keywords":88,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":93,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":94,"startDateStruct":96,"completionDateStruct":98,"leadSponsor":99,"locationsCount":43},"100640361","transrectus-sheath-preperitoneal-procedure-trepp-for-inguinal-hernia-repair-100640361","NCT07618884","TransREctus Sheath PrePeritoneal Procedure (TREPP) for Inguinal Hernia Repair","TransREctus Sheath PrePeritoneal Procedure (TREPP) for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Single-center Prospective Study.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults with primary unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Strangulated hernias.\n* Severe comorbidities precluding surgery ((ASA Class IV,V)",{"count":52,"type":21},[24],"Inguinal hernia repair remains one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. Tension-free repair with mesh augmentation is the predominant treatment option, either achieved by preperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty or Lichtenstein procedure (LP). As the recurrence rate is reduced to less than 5 % after mesh repair, nowadays, long-term morbidity associated with open inguinal hernia repair is mainly related to chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP). Despite many hypotheses about the possible causes for CPIP, there is now consensus that involvement of inguinal nerves plays a major role.\n\nThe trans rectus sheath extra-peritoneal procedure (TREPP) is a minimally invasive open approach utilizing the rectus sheath to access the preperitoneal space. It has shown promise in providing effective repair with potential advantages in cosmesis, postoperative pain, and recurrence rates. It is a medial approach avoiding the interference with the course of all (three) inguinal nerves through lateral abdominal wall.",[27,87],"Inguinal Hernia Repair",[89,90,91],"Inguinal hernia","Chronic postoperative inguinal pain","Trans rectus sheath extra-peritoneal procedure","RECRUITING","2026-05-28",{"date":95,"type":35},"2026-06-01",{"date":97,"type":35},"2025-04-15",{"date":37,"type":21},{"name":100,"class":42},"Assiut University",{"id":102,"slug":103,"hasResults":12,"nctId":104,"briefTitle":105,"officialTitle":106,"acronym":107,"eligibilityCriteria":108,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":109,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":111,"phases":4,"briefSummary":112,"conditions":113,"keywords":115,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":121,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":122,"startDateStruct":124,"completionDateStruct":126,"leadSponsor":128,"locationsCount":43},"100629354","pneumoperitoneum-duration-and-bicarbonate-changes-in-laparoscopic-hernia-surgery-100629354","NCT07473583","Pneumoperitoneum Duration and Bicarbonate Changes in Laparoscopic Hernia Surgery","Association Between Pneumoperitoneum Duration and Changes in Serum Bicarbonate Levels in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Observational Study","TAPPHCO3","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥18 years\n* Patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the TAPP technique\n* Ability to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnancy\n* Severe cardiovascular disease\n* Renal insufficiency\n* Patients requiring additional intra-abdominal surgical procedures\n* Strangulated inguinal hernia requiring bowel resection",{"count":110,"type":21},100,"OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to learn how the length of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery may affect changes in blood bicarbonate levels. Pneumoperitoneum is the use of carbon dioxide gas to create space inside the abdomen during laparoscopic surgery.\n\nThe main question this study aims to answer is whether a longer pneumoperitoneum time is associated with changes in blood bicarbonate levels after surgery.\n\nParticipants are adults undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair as part of their routine medical care. Researchers will measure blood gas values, including bicarbonate levels, before surgery and again two hours after surgery. The change in bicarbonate levels will be compared with the duration of pneumoperitoneum during the operation.\n\nThe results of this study may help improve the understanding of metabolic changes that occur during laparoscopic surgery.",[114,27],"Hernia, Inguinal",[116,117,118,119,120],"Pneumoperitoneum","Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair","Serum Bicarbonate","Blood Gas Analysis","TAPP Technique","2026-03-12",{"date":123,"type":35},"2026-03-16",{"date":125,"type":21},"2026-03-10",{"date":127,"type":21},"2026-05",{"name":129,"class":42},"Haseki Training and Research Hospital",{"id":131,"slug":132,"hasResults":12,"nctId":133,"briefTitle":134,"officialTitle":134,"acronym":135,"eligibilityCriteria":136,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":137,"targetDuration":139,"studyType":111,"phases":4,"briefSummary":140,"conditions":141,"keywords":145,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":125,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":153,"startDateStruct":154,"completionDateStruct":156,"leadSponsor":158,"locationsCount":43},"100629362","feasibility-study-of-non-contact-imaging-based-physiological-monitoring-in-the-operating-room-100629362","NCT07473687","Feasibility Study of Non-Contact Imaging-Based Physiological Monitoring in the Operating Room","IBPM","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients aged \\>18 years.\n2. Patients scheduled to undergo surgical procedures under general anesthesia.\n3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I, II, or III.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients aged \\\u003C 18 years.\n2. Pregnant patients.\n3. Patients whose facial images cannot be captured or recognized (e.g., due to surgical drapes, severe edema, or major trauma).\n4. Patients who refuse to participate or have not signed the informed consent form.\n5. Other cases deemed unsuitable for the study by the clinical physician or anesthesiologist.",{"count":138,"type":21},315,"1 Day","This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a non-contact, camera-based physiological monitoring technology in a perioperative setting (including anesthesia induction, surgery, and recovery).Conventional vital sign monitoring tools-such as ECG leads, blood pressure cuffs, and pulse oximeters-require direct skin contact, which may pose risks of cross-infection or skin injury in vulnerable populations (e.g., newborns or elderly patients). This research utilizes remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology to estimate vital signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), by analyzing facial video captured via standard camera devices (Logitech C930, iPhone 16 Pro Max, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra).The primary goal is to assess the consistency and stability of this non-contact system compared to clinical gold-standard monitors (Masimo Root, SedLine O3, and Radical-7) during actual surgical procedures. The findings will serve as a foundation for developing non-invasive, supplementary monitoring tools in dynamic clinical environments.",[142,143,144,27],"Cholecystitis","Liver Neoplasms","Cholelithiasis",[146,147,148,149,150,151,152],"General anesthesia","Intraoperative monitoring","Camera-based monitor","Non-contact Physiological Monitoring","Total Extraperitoneal Approach (TEP)","Remote Sensing","Perioperative Care",{"date":123,"type":35},{"date":155,"type":35},"2026-01-08",{"date":157,"type":21},"2030-06-30",{"name":159,"class":160},"Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan","OTHER_GOV",{"id":162,"slug":163,"hasResults":12,"nctId":164,"briefTitle":165,"officialTitle":166,"acronym":167,"eligibilityCriteria":168,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":169,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":171,"briefSummary":172,"conditions":173,"keywords":174,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":180,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":181,"startDateStruct":183,"completionDateStruct":185,"leadSponsor":187,"locationsCount":43},"100625536","pro-rstap-effect-of-tap-and-rs-blocks-on-recovery-after-inguinal-hernia-surgery-pro-rstap-100625536","NCT07423910","PRO-RSTAP: Effect of TAP and RS Blocks on Recovery After Inguinal Hernia Surgery (PRO-RSTAP)","Effect of Medial Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block and Rectus Sheath (RS) Block on Inguinal Hernia Surgery Recovery, a Prospective Randomized Double-blind Study (PRO-RSTAP)","PRO-RSTAP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18 years or older\n* Elective unilateral open inguinal hernia repair\n* Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Emergency surgery\n* Bilateral or recurrent inguinal hernia\n* Contraindication to regional anesthesia or study interventions\n* Known allergy to local anesthetics\n* Inability to comply with study procedures",{"count":170,"type":21},200,[24],"Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure, often performed as day-case surgery. Despite standardized surgical techniques, postoperative pain may delay recovery and occasionally lead to unplanned hospital admission.\n\nThe PRO-RSTAP study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial evaluating whether ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, rectus sheath (RS) block, or their combination improves postoperative recovery after open inguinal hernia surgery. Adult patients undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair are randomized into four groups receiving either combined TAP and RS blocks, TAP block only, RS block only, or placebo blocks , in addition to standard perioperative care.\n\nThe primary outcome is total perioperative opioid consumption measured as intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, need for rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to discharge, unplanned hospital admission, and chronic postoperative pain during long-term follow-up.\n\nThe aim of this study is to determine the individual and combined effects of TAP and RS blocks on postoperative analgesia and recovery in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair.",[27],[175,176,177,178,179],"Open inguinal hernia repair","Regional anesthesia","Transversus abdominis plane block","Rectus sheath block","Postoperative analgesia","2026-02-13",{"date":182,"type":35},"2026-02-20",{"date":184,"type":35},"2025-07-01",{"date":186,"type":21},"2038-01",{"name":188,"class":42},"Tampere University Hospital",{"id":190,"slug":191,"hasResults":12,"nctId":192,"briefTitle":193,"officialTitle":194,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":195,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":196,"enrollmentInfo":197,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":199,"briefSummary":200,"conditions":201,"keywords":204,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":155,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":209,"startDateStruct":211,"completionDateStruct":213,"leadSponsor":215,"locationsCount":43},"100619601","prevention-of-surgical-site-infection-in-open-paediatric-groin-surgeries-using-intravenous-prophylactic-antibiotics-and-antimicrobial-coated-sutures-100619601","NCT07346742","Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Open Paediatric Groin Surgeries Using Intravenous Prophylactic Antibiotics and Antimicrobial-coated Sutures","Intravenous Prophylactic Antibiotics and Antimicrobial-Coated Sutures in Preventing Surgical Site Infection in Open Paediatric Groin Surgeries: A 3-arm Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* All patients with clinical conditions requiring daycase open groin surgery\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Re-operations\n2. Immunocompromised patients\n3. Malnourished patients\n4. Complicated groin pathologies e,g obstructed inguinal hernia\n5. History of antibiotic usage in the last seven days","15 Years",{"count":198,"type":21},174,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the use of prophylactic antibiotics and antimicrobial-coated sutures can prevent surgical site infection in children undergoing open groin surgeries. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\n• Does the use of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics or antimicrobial-coated sutures significantly reduce the occurrence of surgical site infection in children undergoing open groin surgeries?\n\nResearchers will compare no antibiotic use to the use of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics, or antimicrobial-coated sutures to see if the use of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics and antimicrobial-coated sutures significantly reduces the occurrence of surgical site infection following open groin surgeries in children.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Undergo open groin surgery with either the use of intravenous prophylactic antibiotic or antimicrobial-coated sutures or without antibiotic use\n* Visit the clinic on postoperative days 5, 13 and 30 for review of the surgical wounds for any sign of infection.",[27,202,203],"Hydroceles","Surgical Site Infection",[205,206,207,208],"Paediatric groin surgeries","Intravenous prophylactic antibiotics","Antimicrobial-coated sutures","Double blinded randomized controlled trial",{"date":210,"type":35},"2026-01-16",{"date":212,"type":35},"2025-03-09",{"date":214,"type":21},"2026-02-27",{"name":216,"class":42},"Olawumi Olajide",{"id":218,"slug":219,"hasResults":12,"nctId":220,"briefTitle":221,"officialTitle":221,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":222,"healthyVolunteers":223,"sex":17,"minAge":224,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":227,"briefSummary":228,"conditions":229,"keywords":231,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":235,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":236,"startDateStruct":238,"completionDateStruct":240,"leadSponsor":242,"locationsCount":244},"100416696","a-pilot-study-of-local-anesthesia-for-inguinal-hernia-surgery-in-older-adults-100416696","NCT04706026","A Pilot Study of Local Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Surgery in Older Adults","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age greater than or equal to 60 years\n* Presenting to clinic with a unilateral inguinal hernia that is not incarcerated\n* Considered suitable for either general or local anesthesia\n* Willing to complete all study requirements, including follow-up continuing until six months after surgery\n* English speaking\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* The hernia that the patient is being evaluated for has undergone prior repair\n* Any contraindications to general anesthesia\n* Allergies to local anesthesia\n* Evidence of hernia incarceration or strangulation\n* Active local or systemic infection that would preclude the use of mesh for hernia repair\n* Need for concurrent surgical repair at the time of hernia repair\n* English is not the patient's primary language\n* Enrollment in other research studies\n* Clinical judgement of surgeon or anesthesiology\n* Current pregnancy\n* Unwilling to provide consent\n* Current active illegal drug use\n* Current alcoholism\n* Claustrophobia\n* Unable to tolerate lying in supine position for greater than 30 minutes",true,"60 Years",{"count":226,"type":21},80,[24],"The purpose of this study is to collect data about local versus general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in Veterans aged 60 years for planning a larger, multisite randomized clinical trial. Approximately 80 participants will be enrolled and can expect to be on study for 6 months.",[27,230],"Anesthesia, Local",[232,233,89,234],"Elderly","Outcome","Local anesthesia","2026-01-05",{"date":237,"type":35},"2026-01-07",{"date":239,"type":35},"2024-10-23",{"date":241,"type":21},"2027-03-01",{"name":243,"class":42},"University of Wisconsin, Madison",3,{"id":246,"slug":247,"hasResults":12,"nctId":248,"briefTitle":249,"officialTitle":250,"acronym":251,"eligibilityCriteria":252,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":253,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":254,"briefSummary":255,"conditions":256,"keywords":259,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":261,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":262,"startDateStruct":264,"completionDateStruct":266,"leadSponsor":268,"locationsCount":43},"100617525","tens-for-pain-and-sleep-after-hernia-surgery-100617525","NCT07319754","TENS for Pain and Sleep After Hernia Surgery","The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Postoperative Pain and Sleep After Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","TENS-HERNIA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults (≥18 years) undergoing elective inguinal hernia surgery\n\nAbility to provide informed consent\n\nWillingness to comply with study procedures\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of epilepsy, cardiac pacemaker, or other contraindications to TENS\n\nSevere psychiatric or neurological disorders affecting pain or sleep assessment\n\nAllergy or intolerance to electrode materials\n\nPatients requiring emergency surgery\n\nInability to complete questionnaires (VAS, PSQI)",{"count":226,"type":21},[24],"This study evaluates whether Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) improves postoperative pain and sleep quality in adults undergoing inguinal hernia surgery. After surgery, participants will receive physician-supervised TENS or usual care. Pain intensity and sleep quality will be measured and compared between groups to assess the effectiveness and safety of TENS as a supportive recovery method.",[27,257,258],"Postoperative Pain","Sleep Disturbance",[89,257,258,260],"Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)","2025-12-21",{"date":263,"type":35},"2026-01-06",{"date":265,"type":21},"2026-01-10",{"date":267,"type":21},"2026-10-10",{"name":269,"class":42},"Nigde Omer Halisdemir University",{"id":271,"slug":272,"hasResults":12,"nctId":273,"briefTitle":274,"officialTitle":274,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":275,"healthyVolunteers":223,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":276,"enrollmentInfo":277,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":111,"phases":4,"briefSummary":279,"conditions":280,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":282,"startDateStruct":284,"completionDateStruct":286,"leadSponsor":288,"locationsCount":4},"100609120","comparative-study-on-the-post-operative-pain-and-other-outcomes-of-mesh-fixation-with-prolene-vs-vicryl-vs-skin-staples-in-lichtenstein-inguinal-hernia-repair-100609120","NCT07210424","Comparative Study on the Post-operative Pain and Other Outcomes of Mesh Fixation With Prolene vs Vicryl vs Skin Staples in Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair\n* 18-65 years\n* Both genders\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* COPD\n* Immunocompromised\n* Obstructive Uropathy\n* Chronic constipation","65 Years",{"count":278,"type":21},132,"We are going to see the outcome measures for patient and compare them across two groups, those who are undergoing mesh fixation for inguinal hernia by sutures, and those who are fixated by skin staples.",[27],"2025-12-09",{"date":283,"type":35},"2025-12-17",{"date":285,"type":21},"2025-12-29",{"date":287,"type":21},"2026-02-28",{"name":289,"class":42},"King Edward Medical University",{"id":291,"slug":292,"hasResults":12,"nctId":293,"briefTitle":294,"officialTitle":295,"acronym":296,"eligibilityCriteria":297,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":298,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":299,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":301,"briefSummary":302,"conditions":303,"keywords":304,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":306,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":307,"startDateStruct":309,"completionDateStruct":311,"leadSponsor":313,"locationsCount":4},"100591084","a-comparison-between-two-laparoscopic-techniques-in-management-of-inguinal-hernias-in-pediatrics-100591084","NCT06975826","A Comparison Between Two Laparoscopic Techniques in Management of Inguinal Hernias in Pediatrics","A Comparison Between the Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) Technique and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Purse String Suture Sac Closure Technique in Pediatrics","Pediatrics","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Age 1month to 18 years. 2. Denovo Inguinal Hernias. 3. Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernias.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Complicated Inguinal Hernia 2. Age more than 18 Years 3. cases inwhich laparoscopic surgery is contraindicated 4. cases with collagen disease. 5. Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.","1 Month",{"count":300,"type":21},50,[24],"To compare between the use of the percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique and the Laparoscopic intraperitoneal purse-string suture sac closure technique. in pediatrics \\& evaluate the safety, efficacy feasibility ,operative time ,postoperative pain ,recurrence rate of both approaches.",[27,296],[305],"Laparscopic inguinal herniotomy","2025-05-08",{"date":308,"type":35},"2025-05-16",{"date":310,"type":21},"2025-05-26",{"date":312,"type":21},"2026-10-20",{"name":100,"class":42},{"id":315,"slug":316,"hasResults":12,"nctId":317,"briefTitle":318,"officialTitle":319,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":320,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":321,"enrollmentInfo":322,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":324,"briefSummary":325,"conditions":326,"keywords":329,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":331,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":332,"startDateStruct":334,"completionDateStruct":336,"leadSponsor":338,"locationsCount":4},"100590251","effects-of-virtual-glasses-stress-ball-and-music-intervention-on-pain-anxiety-and-comfort-in-patients-undergoing-inguinal-hernia-surgery-100590251","NCT06964984","Effects of Virtual Glasses, Stress Ball and Music Intervention on Pain, Anxiety and Comfort in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgery","Effects of Virtual Glasses, Stress Ball and Music Intervention on Pain, Anxiety and Comfort in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Between the ages of 18-70 Inguinal surgery will be performed,\n\n  * No communication problems, can speak Turkish,\n  * No psychiatric illness or mental perception problems,\n  * No vision, hearing and perception problems,\n  * No physical problems in squeezing a stress ball,\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Any postoperative complications,\n\n  * Patients who do not agree to participate in the study,\n  * Patients using anxiolytic drugs","70 Years",{"count":323,"type":21},120,[24],"Although it changes with age, due to its high incidence and prevalence, inguinal hernia is one of the most commonly performed surgeries by general surgeons. Pain, anxiety and changes in comfort levels in patients after inguinal hernia repair surgery negatively affect the patient's recovery after surgery. One of the goals of nursing care practices in the perioperative period, especially in patients undergoing surgery, is to provide and maintain patient comfort. Today, the concept of comfort is a part of quality nursing care, allowing patients to be comfortable, carefree, recover more quickly and cope better with disease stress. Using non-pharmacological methods in pain management reduces the use of pharmacological methods, increases the patient's comfort level, reduces stress and anxiety, increases the individual's sense of control over their own health and increases physical function and daily life activities. Virtual reality, music therapy, stress ball are used in various areas of clinical medical care as a way to distract attention and relieve pain.",[327,328,27],"Pain","Anxiety",[330],"inguinal hernia,virtual reality,stress ball,music therapy","2025-05-01",{"date":333,"type":35},"2025-05-11",{"date":335,"type":21},"2025-06-05",{"date":337,"type":21},"2025-08-01",{"name":339,"class":42},"Cagla Toprak",{"id":341,"slug":342,"hasResults":12,"nctId":343,"briefTitle":344,"officialTitle":344,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":345,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":346,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":347,"briefSummary":348,"conditions":349,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":350,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":351,"startDateStruct":353,"completionDateStruct":355,"leadSponsor":357,"locationsCount":43},"100355203","conventional-versus-robot-assisted-laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-100355203","NCT03904888","Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* adult patients presenting with a bilateral inguinal hernia planned for a minimal invasive laparoscopic repair\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age below 18 years\n* unilateral groin hernia repair\n* incarcerated hernias\n* open hernia repair\n* no informed consent\n* pregnant women\n* ASA score 4 or more\n* patient included in another study.",{"count":170,"type":21},[24],"Evaluate the early postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with either a conventional or a robot assisted approach and with or without the injection of the trocar wounds with a local anesthetic.",[27],"2025-04-10",{"date":352,"type":35},"2025-04-11",{"date":354,"type":35},"2019-09-23",{"date":356,"type":21},"2029-12",{"name":358,"class":42},"Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares",{"id":360,"slug":361,"hasResults":12,"nctId":362,"briefTitle":363,"officialTitle":364,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":365,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":366,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":367,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":369,"briefSummary":370,"conditions":371,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":374,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":375,"startDateStruct":377,"completionDateStruct":379,"leadSponsor":380,"locationsCount":43},"100584165","uterine-round-ligament-preservation-vs-resection-in-laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-in-womena-multicenterstratified-randomized-controlled-trial-100584165","NCT06885788","Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women：A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial","Comparative Study on the Effect of Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women： a Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ►Age : Female patients over 18 years of age without a childbearing requirement\n\n  * Diagnosis and basis : Female patients diagnosed with Unilateral inguinal hernia.\n  * agreed to participate in this study and signed the informed consent form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ►Combined with severe heart, liver, kidney and other diseases.\n\n  * pregnant or lactating women.\n  * those with surgical contraindications.","FEMALE",{"count":368,"type":21},466,[24],"This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.",[27,372,373],"Laparoscopic Surgery","Randomized Controlled Trial","2025-03-20",{"date":376,"type":35},"2025-03-25",{"date":378,"type":35},"2024-09-20",{"date":241,"type":21},{"name":381,"class":160},"Nanchong Central Hospital",{"id":383,"slug":384,"hasResults":12,"nctId":385,"briefTitle":386,"officialTitle":387,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":388,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":389,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":390,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":392,"briefSummary":393,"conditions":394,"keywords":395,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":400,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":401,"startDateStruct":403,"completionDateStruct":405,"leadSponsor":407,"locationsCount":43},"100561858","modified-guarnieri-desarda-technique-versus-lichtenstein-technique-in-inguinal-hernia-repair-100561858","NCT06595628","Modified Guarnieri-Desarda Technique Versus Lichtenstein Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair","Comparative Study of Modified Guarnieri-Desarda Technique Versus Lichtenstein Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult male patients aged 18 years or older.\n* Patients diagnosed with non-complicated inguinal hernia (both direct and indirect).\n* Patients able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 18 years old.\n* Patients with complicated hernias (e.g., inflamed, obstructed, or strangulated hernias).\n* Patients with a recurrent inguinal hernia.\n* Patients with weak or thin external oblique aponeurosis (intraoperative findings).\n* Patients with a history of prior surgery in the inguinal region.\n* Patients who refuse to participate in the study.","MALE",{"count":391,"type":21},40,[24],"The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcome of both Lichnichtien tension free mesh hernioplasty of inguinal hernia and the combined modified Guarnieri Desarda technique in terms of postoperative pain, post operative complications (seroma, hematoma, wound infection), chronic inguinodenia, early recurrence and assessment of testicular vascularity and size by application of a testicular duplex and ultrasound.",[27],[27,396,397,398,399],"Hernia Repair","Guarnieri Technique","Desarda Technique","Lichtenstein Hernioplasty","2025-03-12",{"date":402,"type":35},"2025-03-14",{"date":404,"type":35},"2024-10-10",{"date":406,"type":21},"2025-10-01",{"name":408,"class":42},"Cairo University",{"id":410,"slug":411,"hasResults":12,"nctId":412,"briefTitle":413,"officialTitle":414,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":415,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":416,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":417,"briefSummary":418,"conditions":419,"keywords":421,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":425,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":426,"startDateStruct":427,"completionDateStruct":429,"leadSponsor":430,"locationsCount":43},"100583075","transversalis-fascia-plane-vs-ilioinguinal-and-iliohypogastric-nerve-block-for-the-treatment-of-cpip-100583075","NCT06871605","Transversalis Fascia Plane vs Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block for the Treatment of CPIP","Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Transversalis Fascia Plane Block With Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in the Treatment of Chronic Post-herniorrhaphy Inguinal Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Complaints of inguinal pain \\>12 weeks post-herniorrhaphy surgery\n* \\>18 years of age\n* Failure of conservative pain management\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Other causes of inguinal pain (haematoma, infection, tubo-ovarian disease, abscess, etc., gynaecological, urological and organic pathologies after inguinal hernia, etc.)\n* Pregnancy\n* Coagulopathy, antiaggregant\u002Fanticoagulant\u002Fantiplatelet use\n* Unstable psychiatric illness",{"count":226,"type":21},[24],"The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided transversalis fascia plane block (TFP) and ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) nerve block in the treatment of chronic post-herniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) refractory to conservative treatments. For this evaluation, a numerical rating scale (NRS) will be used before and after both interventions.",[27,420],"Groin Hernia",[422,423,424],"Ultrasonography","Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve","Transversalis Fascia Plane Block","2025-03-11",{"date":400,"type":35},{"date":428,"type":35},"2025-02-11",{"date":406,"type":21},{"name":431,"class":42},"Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital",{"id":433,"slug":434,"hasResults":12,"nctId":435,"briefTitle":436,"officialTitle":437,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":438,"healthyVolunteers":223,"sex":17,"minAge":439,"maxAge":440,"enrollmentInfo":441,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":111,"phases":4,"briefSummary":443,"conditions":444,"keywords":449,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":451,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":452,"startDateStruct":454,"completionDateStruct":456,"leadSponsor":458,"locationsCount":43},"100523978","chronic-pelvic-pain-in-females-and-males-100523978","NCT06102733","Chronic Pelvic Pain in Females and Males","Chronic Pelvic Pain Management in Female and Male Adult Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with chronic pelvic pain\n* Patients with sacroiliac pain\n* Patients with inguinal pain\n* Patients with coccygeal pain\n* Patients with piriformis pain\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with spinal pain\n* Patients who had spine surgery","20 Years","99 Years",{"count":442,"type":21},1000,"Pelvic pain is under-reported in healthy adults. Many patients with pelvic pain under-estimate the problem. Chronic pelvic pain can be managed properly, if diagnosed promptly.\n\nThis is a quantitative analysis of prospective clinical data. It evaluates the management of pelvic pain in a cohort population, and analyzes the treatment outcome.",[445,446,447,448,27],"Pelvic Pain Syndrome","Sacroiliac Disorder","Piriformis Syndrome","Sacrococcygeal Disorder",[450],"Pelvic pain","2025-01-23",{"date":453,"type":35},"2025-01-27",{"date":455,"type":35},"2018-01-02",{"date":457,"type":21},"2025-12-31",{"name":459,"class":42},"Salem Anaesthesia Pain Clinic",{"id":461,"slug":462,"hasResults":12,"nctId":463,"briefTitle":464,"officialTitle":465,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":466,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":366,"minAge":18,"maxAge":321,"enrollmentInfo":467,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":469,"briefSummary":470,"conditions":471,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":474,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":475,"startDateStruct":477,"completionDateStruct":479,"leadSponsor":481,"locationsCount":43},"100576546","the-importance-of-preserving-the-round-ligament-in-the-repair-of-inguinal-hernias-in-women-100576546","NCT06786702","The Importance of Preserving the Round Ligament in the Repair of Inguinal Hernias in Women","A Prospective Analysis of the Effects of Round Ligament Preservation and Division in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* For patients applying to the General Surgery Clinic of Basaksehir Cam Sakura City Hospital:\n* Age Range: Female patients aged between 18 and 70 years.\n* Type of Hernia: Patients with inguinal, direct or indirect, femoral, and obturator hernias.\n* Surgical Indication: Patients indicated for TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) surgery.\n* Consent: Patients who consent to participate in the study.\n* General Anesthesia: Patients who are suitable for general anesthesia.\n* Follow-up: Patients who attend follow-up appointments regularly.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: Female patients under 18 years old or over 70 years old.\n* Surgical Technique: Patients who are operated on with techniques other than TAPP (e.g., TEP, conventional surgery).\n* Hernia Type: Patients with strangulated or incarcerated hernias.\n* Hernia Location: Patients with hernias outside the groin region.\n* Surgical Site: Surgeries performed in different clinics.\n* Gender: Male patients.",{"count":468,"type":21},106,[24],"The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of preserving or not preserving the round ligament during laparoscopic Trans Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) hernia repair on postoperative outcomes in female patients. Specifically, the study will compare outcomes such as postoperative pain, seroma, hematoma, prolapsus of uterina , recurrence rates, and quality of life between patients whose round ligament was preserved versus those whose ligament was cut.",[27,472,473],"Femoral Hernia","Obturator Hernia","2025-01-19",{"date":476,"type":35},"2025-01-22",{"date":478,"type":35},"2024-04-20",{"date":480,"type":21},"2026-04-20",{"name":482,"class":160},"Muhammet Mustafa Vural",{"id":484,"slug":485,"hasResults":12,"nctId":486,"briefTitle":487,"officialTitle":488,"acronym":489,"eligibilityCriteria":490,"healthyVolunteers":223,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":491,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":492,"briefSummary":493,"conditions":494,"keywords":495,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":497,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":498,"startDateStruct":500,"completionDateStruct":502,"leadSponsor":503,"locationsCount":504},"100562157","setup-study-for-hugotm-ras-inguinal-hernia-repair-100562157","NCT06599515","SetUp Study for HugoTM RAS Inguinal Hernia Repair","A Multicenter Comparative Prospective Observational Cohort Study About Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Two Different Robotic Systems","SUSHI","Inclusion Criteria: All patients planned for a minimal invasive (robotic assisted laparoscopic) inguinal hernia repair during the study period will be invited to take part in the study. Both unilateral and bilateral hernias will be included.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Recurrent hernias after previous preperitoneal mesh placement.\n* Inguinal hernias after abdominal prostatectomy.\n* Pregnancy.\n* Emergency surgery.\n* Age below 18 years.\n* Absence of informed consent.",{"count":110,"type":21},[24],"The goal of this observational cohort study is to evaluate the evolution of the operative time in performing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) during the learning curve of the first 50 patients using the HugoTM Ras (Medtronic) robotic system using the setup guide.\n\nResearchers will compare to the operative time for rTAPP of 50 patients by the same surgeon in another hospital using the daVinci Xi (Intuitive Surgical) robotic system.",[27],[496],"robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair","2024-09-13",{"date":499,"type":35},"2024-09-19",{"date":501,"type":35},"2023-09-15",{"date":457,"type":21},{"name":358,"class":42},2,{"id":506,"slug":507,"hasResults":12,"nctId":508,"briefTitle":509,"officialTitle":510,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":511,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":512,"enrollmentInfo":513,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":111,"phases":4,"briefSummary":515,"conditions":516,"keywords":521,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":531,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":532,"startDateStruct":534,"completionDateStruct":536,"leadSponsor":537,"locationsCount":43},"100509958","factors-influencing-the-results-of-treatment-in-patients-with-hernias-of-various-localizations-100509958","NCT05920200","Factors Influencing the Results of Treatment in Patients With Hernias of Various Localizations","Factors Affecting the Results of Treatment of Patients With Hernias of Various Localization: Evaluation of Treatment Results Using an Automated Hernia Register","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* All mesh and non-mesh repairs that have been registered in the KHR from January 9, 2020, until December 31, 2023.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients not having a 11-digit state-assigned Personal insurance policy number.\n* Parastomal hernia;\n* infected hernias;","90 Years",{"count":514,"type":21},4000,"The study attempts to quantify the relative risks for acute postoperative pain, complications rate, chronic postoperative pain (CPIP) and recurrence rate after different methods of repair of groin, umbilical and incisional hernia depending on surgical technique, mesh type and fixation suture material.\n\nFor this purpose the investigators will analyze data from the Kalinigrad Hernia Registry (KHR).",[27,472,517,58,518,519,520],"Umbilical Hernia","Chronic Pain","Acute Post Operative Pain","Recrrence Rate",[63,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530],"register","inguinal hernia","femoral hernia","umbilical hernia","ventral hernia","CPIP","postoperative complications","chronic post-operative pain","recurrence rate","2024-07-22",{"date":533,"type":35},"2024-07-23",{"date":535,"type":35},"2020-01-09",{"date":457,"type":21},{"name":538,"class":42},"Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University",{"id":540,"slug":541,"hasResults":12,"nctId":542,"briefTitle":543,"officialTitle":544,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":545,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":546,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":547,"briefSummary":548,"conditions":549,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":550,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":551,"startDateStruct":552,"completionDateStruct":554,"leadSponsor":556,"locationsCount":43},"100555651","repair-of-inguinal-hernia-100555651","NCT06514859","Repair of Inguinal Hernia","Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Inguinal Hernia","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nMale patient \\> 18 years of age\n\n• Primary groin hernias requiring surgical intervention that are eligible for both open and laparoscopic repair.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Emergency procedures .\n\n  * ASA score \\> 2.\n  * Irreducible inguinoscrotal hernia .\n  * Local or systemic infection .\n  * Other abdominal hernias being operated at the same time or planned operated during Follow up.\n\nPrevious surgery which has impaired the sensation in the groin area .\n\n* BMI \\> 40 kg\u002Fm2.\n* Known disease which Impairs central or peripheral nerve function .\n* Concurrent malignant Disease .\n* Chronic pain which requires daily medication . • Mental disorder which requires daily medication .",{"count":300,"type":21},[24],"The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approaches for inguinal hernia surgery and provide evidence-based guidance to the selection of the most appropriate operative technique.",[27],"2024-07-17",{"date":533,"type":35},{"date":553,"type":35},"2024-06-10",{"date":555,"type":21},"2024-12-30",{"name":557,"class":42},"Sohag University",{"id":559,"slug":560,"hasResults":12,"nctId":561,"briefTitle":562,"officialTitle":562,"acronym":563,"eligibilityCriteria":564,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":565,"targetDuration":567,"studyType":111,"phases":4,"briefSummary":568,"conditions":569,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":570,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":571,"startDateStruct":573,"completionDateStruct":575,"leadSponsor":577,"locationsCount":504},"100410367","flemish-inguinal-and-femoral-hernia-prospective-registry-100410367","NCT04623580","Flemish Inguinal and Femoral Hernia Prospective Registry","FLIPR","Inclusion criteria\n\n* Consecutively all patients with a groin hernia (inguinal and\u002For femoral hernia) operated starting 01.01.2018.\n* Male and female\n* 18 years or older\n* Operated of supervised by a participating surgeon (participating in this study is not necessarily by a whole surgical department of a hospital, but by specific surgeons)\n* Elective and emergency surgery\n* Primary and recurrent hernia\n* Metachronous and synchronous hernia\n* Signed informed consent form\n\nExclusion criteria\n\n* Younger than 18 years\n* Not operated or supervised by participating surgeon\n* Pregnant at inclusion in the registry\n* No signed informed consent form",{"count":566,"type":21},560,"5 Years","Prospective registry. The purpose of this clinical trial will be to measure surgical outcome parameters (e.g. recurrence, chronic pain and other quality indicators) after inguinal hernia repair using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the short- and long-term.",[27],"2024-06-28",{"date":572,"type":35},"2024-07-01",{"date":574,"type":35},"2018-01-01",{"date":576,"type":21},"2028-12-31",{"name":578,"class":42},"Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven",{"id":580,"slug":581,"hasResults":12,"nctId":582,"briefTitle":583,"officialTitle":584,"acronym":585,"eligibilityCriteria":586,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":587,"maxAge":588,"enrollmentInfo":589,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":591,"briefSummary":592,"conditions":593,"keywords":594,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":598,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":599,"startDateStruct":601,"completionDateStruct":603,"leadSponsor":605,"locationsCount":607},"100550773","the-cost--effectiveness-of-paediatric-laparoscopic-hernia-repair-compared-to-open-hernia-repair-100550773","NCT06451432","The (Cost-) Effectiveness of Paediatric Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Compared to Open Hernia Repair","'Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN Repair In chIldren Analysis\": A Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the (Cost-) Effectiveness of Paediatric Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Compared to Open Hernia Repair","HERNIIA-2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1\\. Infants aged 0 months to 16 years of age with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia undergoing hernia repair\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. incarcerated inguinal hernia, which have to be operated immediately,\n2. recurrent hernia\n3. ventricular-peritoneal drain\n4. non-descended testis\n5. parents who are not able to understand the nature or consequences of the study.","0 Years","16 Years",{"count":590,"type":21},464,[24],"This study assess the (cost-)effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years.",[27],[595,596,597],"pediatric","PIRS","open inguinal hernia repair","2024-06-09",{"date":600,"type":35},"2024-06-11",{"date":602,"type":35},"2024-02-01",{"date":604,"type":21},"2028-09-30",{"name":606,"class":42},"Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)",9,{"id":609,"slug":610,"hasResults":12,"nctId":611,"briefTitle":612,"officialTitle":613,"acronym":614,"eligibilityCriteria":615,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":224,"enrollmentInfo":616,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":618,"briefSummary":619,"conditions":620,"keywords":621,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":624,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":625,"startDateStruct":627,"completionDateStruct":629,"leadSponsor":631,"locationsCount":4},"100528773","task-sharing-in-inguinal-hernia-repair-between-surgeons-and-non-surgeon-physicians-100528773","NCT06165133","Task Sharing in InGuinal hErnia Repair Between Surgeons and Non-surgeon Physicians","Task Shifting in InGuinal hErnia Repair Between Surgeons and Non-surgeon Physicians. A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.","TIGER","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* Patients older than \\\u003C18 years\\> (male or female) and less or equal to 60 years\n* Primary inguinal hernia (unilateral) eligible for elective inguinal hernia repair\n* Primary bilateral, but only one side being repaired\n* Written informed consent of patient (signature or a fingerprint)\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\n* Complex inguinal hernias: recurrent, obstructive, or femoral hernias\n* Bilateral inguinal hernias undergoing simultaneous repair\n* Inguinal hernias needing emergent surgical repair (e.g., incarcerated)\n* Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up",{"count":617,"type":21},1782,[24],"TIGER is a multicentre, 2-arm, parallel group, assessor blinded, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot to assess if non-surgeon physicians (NSPs) can effectively perform mesh inguinal hernia repair compared to fully trained surgeons in adult patients with non-complicated inguinal hernia.",[27],[622,623,523],"surgery","global surgery","2024-05-29",{"date":626,"type":35},"2024-05-30",{"date":628,"type":21},"2024-06-01",{"date":630,"type":21},"2026-06-30",{"name":632,"class":42},"University of Birmingham",{"id":634,"slug":635,"hasResults":12,"nctId":636,"briefTitle":637,"officialTitle":637,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":638,"healthyVolunteers":223,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":639,"enrollmentInfo":640,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":641,"briefSummary":642,"conditions":643,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":646,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":647,"startDateStruct":649,"completionDateStruct":651,"leadSponsor":653,"locationsCount":4},"100535937","mesh-fixation-versus-non-fixation-in-laparoscopic-inguinal-hernioplasty-100535937","NCT06258317","Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any male or female above 18 years old that has uncomplicated inguinal hernia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with contraindications to use laparoscopy as cardiac or immunocompromised patients.\n* Patients who are difficult to follow up.","80 Years",{"count":52,"type":21},[24],"Inguinal hernia is one of the most common types of abdominal hernias. Laparoscopic hernioplasty of inguinal hernia is a good alternative to traditional open repairs even in simple unilateral primary inguinal hernia in terms of decrease post operative pain and complications with comparable recurrence rates.Two techniques are described in laparoscopic hernioplasty and have been extensively studied in randomised trials. The totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is more widely used than the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach.\n\nIn this study we will compare between the results of mesh fixation and non fixation as regard operative and postoperative data.",[644,27,645],"Laparoscopic","Hernioplasty","2024-02-12",{"date":648,"type":35},"2024-02-14",{"date":650,"type":21},"2024-02",{"date":652,"type":21},"2027-03",{"name":100,"class":42}]