[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"internal-medicine\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:internal-medicine":31},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,46,74],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":4},"100603377","online-access-to-clinical-treatment-notes-for-outpatients-100603377",false,"NCT07135726","Online Access to Clinical Treatment Notes for Outpatients","OpenNOTES: Online Access to Clinical Treatment Notes for Outpatients - an Interventional, Prospective, Controlled Mixed-methods Study","OpenNOTES","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients (General, Module A \\& D):\n\n* Aged 18 years or older\n* Outpatient treatment at one of the four study centers\n* For intervention group: access to an internet-enabled device (e.g. smartphone, tablet, computer) and ability to receive text messages\n\nFor Module D:\n\n* Experience with the respective disease or medical field (e.g. via prior treatment experience or basic medical understanding)\n* At least one documented clinical treatment in the internal system of a participating center within the 12 months prior to intervention start\n* Availability of clinically relevant treatment notes (e.g. physician letters, progress notes, discharge summaries, consultation notes) suitable for anonymized analysis\n\nPatients (Control Group - Module A):\n\n•No requirement for access to an internet-enabled device\n\nHealthcare Practitioners (Modules A \\& D):\n\n* Aged 18 years or older\n* Employed at one of the study centers\n* Ability to give informed consent\n* For Module D: experience in relevant clinical field and familiarity with medical terminology and treatment standards\n\nRelatives (Module B):\n\n* Aged 18 years or older\n* Ability to give informed consent\n* Identified as family member, friend, or legal representative of a participating patient\n\nExperts (Module E):\n\n* Demonstrated expertise or professional experience in digital health Relevant experience with telematics infrastructure (TI), HL7 FHIR®, ePA, KIM, TIM, or affiliation with relevant institutions (e.g. gematik GmbH, HL7 Deutschland e.V., mio42 GmbH)\n* Participation in or co-design of health IT interoperability projects\n\nPatients and Physicians (Module E):\n\n* Good proficiency in German (workshops conducted in German)\n* Basic digital literacy and experience with digital technologies in healthcare\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nGeneral:\n\n* Insufficient German language skills\n* Severe organic brain disorders with cognitive impairment\n* Intellectual disability\n* Acute self-endangerment or danger to others at time of inclusion\n* Lack of capacity to provide informed consent\n* Lack of access to an internet-enabled device and inability to receive text messages (except in control group of Module A)\n\nModule D:\n\n* Clinical notes that cannot be anonymized due to legal, ethical, or technical restrictions\n* Presence of rare diagnoses or unique treatment histories that hinder effective anonymization","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},1092,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This study investigates the feasibility and impact of patient access to clinical notes written by their healthcare providers-a concept known as Open Notes. While international research has already demonstrated positive effects of Open Notes on patient empowerment and treatment outcomes, there is a lack of corresponding evidence for the German healthcare context. The quasi-experimental study therefore combines quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate the effects of Open Notes on patient-reported outcomes as well as clinical practice.\n\nThe study is structured into five modules, each addressing specific research questions:\n\nModule A - Summative Outcome Evaluation in Patients: Does the use of Open Notes lead to a significant increase in patient-reported outcomes such as empowerment and self-efficacy? Module B - Formative Process Evaluation with Stakeholders: What experiences do patients, relatives and clinicians have with Open Notes and what challenges and barriers arise in their use? Module C - Changes in Clinical Documentation: How do language style and content of clinical notes change when they are shared with patients as Open Notes? Module D - Optimization through Artificial Intelligence: Can clinical notes be processed using artificial intelligence in a way that makes them easier for patients to understand compared to conventional medical documentation? Module E - Integration into National Data Infrastructure: What technical, organizational and legal requirements must be met to successfully integrate Open Notes into the national telematics infrastructure and the electronic health record or routine care? The overall goal is to identify both patient-related outcomes and structural conditions for the sustainable implementation of Open Notes in the German healthcare system. The use of artificial intelligence is intended to further enhance patient-centeredness while reducing the burden on clinical staff.",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33],"Mental Disorders","Chronic Disease","Primary Health Care","Outpatients","Internal Medicine","Aged","Comorbidity","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-08-20",{"date":37,"type":38},"2025-08-22","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":21},"2025-09-01",{"date":42,"type":21},"2028-02-29",{"name":44,"class":45},"Julian Schwarz","OTHER",{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":51,"acronym":52,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":56,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":67,"completionDateStruct":69,"leadSponsor":71,"locationsCount":73},"100589316","evaluation-of-a-diva-score-effectiveness-at-admission-for-preserving-venous-capital-in-patients-with-difficult-access-100589316","NCT06952829","Evaluation of A-DIVA Score Effectiveness at Admission for Preserving Venous Capital in Patients With Difficult Access","Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of a Venipuncture Strategy Adapted According to A-DIVA Score Results Compared to Standard Care in Reducing the Number of Punctures","ERV-ADIVA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male and Female Adult Patients Aged 18 Years and Older\n* written informed consent given by patient\n* Affiliation to a social security system or equivalence system\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients in Intensive Care Units\n* Patients with Psychiatric Disorders or Under Psychiatric Care\n* Minor Patients Under 18 Years of Age\n* Pregnant or Breastfeeding Women\n* Vulnerable and Protected Individuals as Defined by the Public Health Code (Articles L.1121-5 to L.1121-8 and L.1122-1-2)\n* Patients Participating in Another Interventional Study\n* Dying patients\n* Patients Receiving Infusions of:\n\n  * Chemotherapy Drugs with a pH \\\u003C5 or \\>8\n  * Solutions with an Osmolarity \\>900 mOsm\u002FL\n* Patients refusing to participate in the study",{"count":55,"type":21},600,[24],"In certain cases (e.g.: patient who are difficult to perfuse, thin veins, etc.), an increase in venipunctures performed by study nurses in healthcare services can lead to a loss of venous capital, repeated pain during punctures, discontinuous treatment follow-up and numerous requests for assistance from colleagues, including nurse anesthetists, but often too late.\n\nThe main objective of project is to reduce the number of punctures to access the venous system after evaluation of adult patients upon entering the hospitalization department using the A-DIVA tool. the A-DIVA score predicts the difficulty in infusing an adult patient",[31,59,60],"Surgery","Neurology",[62,63],"Adult-Difficult IntraVenous Access (A-DIVA)","capital venous preservation","2025-04-28",{"date":66,"type":38},"2025-05-01",{"date":68,"type":21},"2025-04-21",{"date":70,"type":21},"2028-09",{"name":72,"class":45},"Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Robert Ballanger",1,{"id":75,"slug":76,"hasResults":11,"nctId":77,"briefTitle":78,"officialTitle":78,"acronym":79,"eligibilityCriteria":80,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":81,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":83,"phases":4,"briefSummary":84,"conditions":85,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":89,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":90,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":91,"startDateStruct":93,"completionDateStruct":95,"leadSponsor":97,"locationsCount":73},"100561988","trends-of-patient-reported-outcome-measures-proms-in-multimorbid-medical-patients-hospitalized-for-an-acute-illness-100561988","NCT06597318","Trends of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Multimorbid Medical Patients Hospitalized for an Acute Illness","TRADUCE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* eligible for the LUCID registry (CER-VD AO\\_2023-00029) \\[Age ≥ 18 years, hospitalized in one of the five participating university hospitals (Geneva, Lausanne, Bern, Zürich, Basel), after 01.01.2014, and admitted to general internal medicine wards\n* Multimorbid patients (2 or more chronic diseases, defined as chronic conditions defined by international classification of diseases, 10th revision, codes with an estimated expected duration of at least 6 months or based on a clinical decision.\n* Acute illness\n* Signature of study specific informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Not able to speak French, German or English\n* Foreseen length of stay of less than 4 days (estimated by study collaborators)\n* Prior inclusion in the TRADUCE study\n* Incapacity of discernment, i.e. cognitive impairment which could interfere with the ability to fill in PROMs tools",{"count":82,"type":21},1000,"OBSERVATIONAL","currently, PROMs and PREMs are not routinely collected and compared among medical inpatients of Swiss university hospitals, nor is a standard set of PROMs and PREMs available for use in Swiss hospitals. The project aims to examine trends in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), including symptoms, quality of life, and distress, in multimorbid hospitalized patients from admission to 30 days post-discharge. It will also investigate whether PROMs at discharge are linked to the risk of readmission or emergency visits and explore how these outcomes differ in patients who receive low-value care. Additionally, the project will assess the relationship between patient-reported experiences (PREMs) and the provision of low-value care during the hospital stay.",[86,87,88,31],"PROM","PREM","Quality of Care","RECRUITING","2024-09-12",{"date":92,"type":38},"2024-09-19",{"date":94,"type":38},"2023-07-01",{"date":96,"type":21},"2025-10-01",{"name":98,"class":45},"University of Lausanne Hospitals"]