[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"laryngeal-mask-airways\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:laryngeal-mask-airways":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,6,0,[8,51,90,122,148,181],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":23,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":39,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":40,"startDateStruct":43,"completionDateStruct":45,"leadSponsor":47,"locationsCount":50},"100633151","comparison-of-two-airway-devices-i-gel-and-air-q-in-children-aged-1-10-years-during-general-anesthesia-100633151",false,"NCT07522957","Comparison of Two Airway Devices (I-Gel and Air-Q) in Children Aged 1-10 Years During General Anesthesia","Effect of I-gel and Air-Q SP LMAs on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Gastric Insufflation in Children: An Ultrasonography-Guided Randomized Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children aged 1-10 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II\n* Scheduled for elective (non-emergency) surgery under general anesthesia\n* Planned use of a supraglottic airway device for airway management\n* Written informed consent obtained from a parent or legal guardian\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of conditions associated with increased risk of aspiration (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux)\n* Known or predicted difficult airway (e.g., Mallampati score ≥ 3)\n* Congenital or acquired abnormalities of the face, neck, or upper airway\n* Active upper respiratory tract infection\n* Presence of significant pulmonary disease (e.g., asthma, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic fibrosis)\n* Body mass index above the 95th percentile for age (morbid obesity)\n* Emergency surgery\n* Previous complications related to supraglottic airway device use\n* Failure of device placement or need to switch to an alternative airway management technique\n* Refusal of participation by parent or legal guardian",true,"ALL","1 Year","10 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},60,"ESTIMATED","1 Day","OBSERVATIONAL","This study aims to compare two commonly used airway devices (I-gel and Air-Q) in children aged 1-10 years undergoing general anesthesia for surgery. These devices help doctors keep the airway open and support breathing during the operation. The study will evaluate how well each device works, how easy they are to place, and whether they cause air to enter the stomach. Ultrasound will be used to safely check the position of the device and detect any air in the stomach. The results of this study may help improve the safety and effectiveness of airway management in children during anesthesia.",[27,28,29,30,31],"Anesthesia General","Ultrasonography","Laryngeal Mask Airways","Airway Management","Child",[33,34,35,28,36,37],"Airway management","Laryngeal mask airway","Pediatric patients","Gastric insufflation","Supraglottic airway devices","RECRUITING","2026-04-21",{"date":41,"type":42},"2026-04-23","ACTUAL",{"date":44,"type":22},"2026-04",{"date":46,"type":22},"2026-05",{"name":48,"class":49},"Ankara Etlik City Hospital","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":11,"nctId":54,"briefTitle":55,"officialTitle":56,"acronym":57,"eligibilityCriteria":58,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":59,"maxAge":23,"enrollmentInfo":60,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":62,"phases":63,"briefSummary":65,"conditions":66,"keywords":74,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":80,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":81,"startDateStruct":83,"completionDateStruct":85,"leadSponsor":87,"locationsCount":50},"100625192","supraglottic-airway-for-resuscitation-in-preemies-100625192","NCT07419438","Supraglottic Airway for Resuscitation in Preemies","Supraglottic Airway Interface for Positive Pressure Ventilation During Delivery Room Resuscitation of Premature Infants: A Pilot Feasibility Trial","SUPREEMIE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Gestational age 29 0\u002F7 to 33 6\u002F7 weeks at birth\n* Estimated fetal weight \\>\u002F= 1000 grams at birth\n* Clinical decision to initiate PPV\n* Parental informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Major anomalies or aneuploidy\n* Palliative care planned or considered\n* Not resuscitated in the infant resuscitation room","0 Days",{"count":61,"type":22},20,"INTERVENTIONAL",[64],"NA","The goal of this single-arm intervention trial is to learn whether using a supraglottic airway (SA) as the primary interface for positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is feasible during delivery room resuscitation of premature infants. This study will be conducted in premature infants born between 29 0\u002F7 and 33 6\u002F7 weeks' gestation who require PPV at birth.\n\nThe main question it aims to answer is: Is it feasible to use a supraglottic airway as the primary interface to provide effective PPV during delivery room resuscitation in 29 0\u002F7 to 33 6\u002F7 weeks' gestation premature infants?\n\nParticipants will (1)Be screened prenatally and have informed consent obtained from the birth parent prior to delivery; (2)Be rescreened for eligibility on the day of delivery before receiving the study intervention; (3)Receive PPV using a supraglottic airway as the primary ventilation interface if resuscitation is required at birth; and (4)Have clinical and procedural data collected during delivery room resuscitation and for up to 24 hours after birth.",[67,68,69,70,71,72,73,29],"Respiratory Failure","Premature Neonates","Delivery Room Resuscitation","Positive Pressure Ventilation","Neonatal Resuscitation","Supraglottic Airway","Laryngeal Mask",[75,76,69,77,78,72,79,29],"Respiratory failure","Premature neonates","Positive pressure ventilation","Neonatal resuscitation","laryngeal mask","2026-04-16",{"date":82,"type":42},"2026-04-17",{"date":84,"type":42},"2026-03-13",{"date":86,"type":22},"2026-10",{"name":88,"class":89},"University of Pennsylvania","OTHER",{"id":91,"slug":92,"hasResults":11,"nctId":93,"briefTitle":94,"officialTitle":94,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":95,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":96,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":97,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":62,"phases":99,"briefSummary":100,"conditions":101,"keywords":108,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":113,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":114,"startDateStruct":116,"completionDateStruct":118,"leadSponsor":120,"locationsCount":50},"100628425","effects-of-continuous-monitoring-and-progressive-regulation-of-inflatable-laryngeal-mask-airway-cuff-pressure-on-postoperative-pharyngolaryngeal-complications-in-elderly-patients-100628425","NCT07461467","Effects of Continuous Monitoring and Progressive Regulation of Inflatable Laryngeal Mask Airway Cuff Pressure on Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Complications in Elderly Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged ≥ 60years;\n* Non-cardiac, non-thoracic, and non-head and neck surgery;\n* Non-laparoscopic surgery;\n* Elective surgery;\n* Surgical position: supine position ;\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification Ⅰ-Ⅲ;\n* New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function classification Ⅰ-Ⅱ;\n* Expected surgical duration ≥30 minutes and ≤ 2 hours;\n* Body mass index (BMI) 18.5-30.0 kg\u002Fm2.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Preoperative predictable difficult airways, such as trismus, limited neck mobility, and other related conditions;\n* Preoperative pharyngeal and laryngeal complications including sore throat, hoarseness, blood-tinged sputum, and dysphagia;\n* Preexisting conditions such as loose teeth, laryngeal obstruction, laryngeal edema, acute airway inflammation, and gastrointestinal bleeding;\n* Comorbidities of respiratory diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma;\n* Allergies to ILMA materials (e.g., silicone, polyvinylchloride \\[PVC\\]);\n* Inability to cooperate with the study for any reason;\n* Participation in other clinical trials within 3 months prior to enrollment in this study;\n* Any other circumstances deemed inappropriate for inclusion by the investigators.","60 Years",{"count":98,"type":22},146,[64],"Currently, research on laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has been continuously deepened both domestically and internationally, which has greatly promoted the optimization process of clinical application and related management strategies. Numerous domestic and foreign research findings have consistently emphasized the key role of LMA cuff pressure monitoring in reducing postoperative complications, especially in alleviating sore throat and dysphagia. Foreign studies have extensively covered the research and development innovation of LMA devices, as well as comprehensive comparative analyses with other airway management methods such as endotracheal intubation, providing rich perspectives for expanding the application of LMA and improving its application effects. In contrast, domestic studies have distinct pertinence, focusing on application exploration in specific populations and clinical practice scenarios, and have provided important evidence for the safe and effective use of LMA in specific groups through in-depth research. However, it is undeniable that there are obvious deficiencies in both domestic and foreign research regarding the application of continuous monitoring and progressive regulation of LMA cuff pressure in elderly patients-a crucial field. Due to the natural decline of physiological functions, elderly patients face an increased risk of complications such as pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications, as well as pharyngolaryngeal complications, when using LMA during the perioperative period. Therefore, it is particularly urgent to carry out continuous pressure monitoring and progressive regulation of LMA cuff pressure, and to further explore the optimal range of LMA cuff pressure. This study will not only fill the current research gap but also provide solid support for the safe and efficient airway management of elderly patients during the perioperative period.",[102,103,104,29,105,106,107],"Elderly (People Aged 65 or More)","LMA","Randomized Controlled Trial","Pharyngolaryngeal Postoperative Pain","Cuff Pressure","Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure",[109,110,111,112,104],"Elderly people","Laryngeal mask airways","pharyngolaryngeal complications","cuff pressure","2026-03-06",{"date":115,"type":42},"2026-03-10",{"date":117,"type":42},"2025-11-02",{"date":119,"type":22},"2027-03-01",{"name":121,"class":89},"First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University",{"id":123,"slug":124,"hasResults":11,"nctId":125,"briefTitle":126,"officialTitle":127,"acronym":128,"eligibilityCriteria":129,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":59,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":130,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":62,"phases":132,"briefSummary":133,"conditions":134,"keywords":137,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":138,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":139,"startDateStruct":141,"completionDateStruct":143,"leadSponsor":145,"locationsCount":147},"100604546","supraglottic-airway-for-resuscitation-trial-100604546","NCT07150923","Supraglottic Airway for Resuscitation Trial","Comparing Two Multicomponent Strategies To Promote Supraglottic Airway Implementation During Neonatal Resuscitation","SUGAR","Population 1: Hospital Staff\n\nPopulation 1a: Clinical providers and administrators who complete study questionnaires\n\nClinical provider 1a inclusion criteria:\n\n* Employed full-time by the hospital, affiliated practice, or affiliated university in a role that involves newborn resuscitation\n* Fluent in English\n\nAdministrator 1a inclusion criteria\n\n* Oversee the care of newborns on a local level (e.g. nurse manager) or a hospital level (e.g. Chief Quality and Safety Officer)\n* Fluent in English\n\nClinical provider and administrator exclusion 1a criteria: No exclusion criteria\n\nPopulation 1b: Clinical providers who participate in qualitative interviews\n\nClinical provider 1b inclusion criteria:\n\n* Employed full-time by the hospital, affiliated practice, or affiliated university in a role that involves newborn resuscitation\n* Fluent in English\n\nClinical provider 1b exclusion criteria: No exclusion criteria\n\nPopulation 2: Patients who receive neonatal resuscitation at birth\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inborn (not transferred to the hospital after birth)\n* ≥34 weeks' gestation at birth, based on best obstetrical estimate\n* Received PPV during neonatal resuscitation (as per provider's clinical assessment)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Congenital diaphragmatic hernia\n* Airway anomalies",{"count":131,"type":22},36503,[64],"This is a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation parallel cluster randomized superiority trial designed to compare two strategies to promote early supraglottic airway (SA) rescue during neonatal resuscitation, with a focus on implementation outcomes.",[71,69,70,135,72,29,136],"Infant, Newborn","Implementation Research",[71,69,77,72,29,136,135],"2026-02-26",{"date":140,"type":42},"2026-02-27",{"date":142,"type":42},"2026-01-01",{"date":144,"type":22},"2029-09",{"name":146,"class":89},"Children's Hospital of Philadelphia",30,{"id":149,"slug":150,"hasResults":11,"nctId":151,"briefTitle":152,"officialTitle":153,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":154,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":155,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":156,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":62,"phases":158,"briefSummary":159,"conditions":160,"keywords":164,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":172,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":173,"startDateStruct":175,"completionDateStruct":177,"leadSponsor":179,"locationsCount":50},"100595041","the-insertion-of-i-gel-and-classic-lma-in-different-head-positions-in-elderly-patients-100595041","NCT07027293","The Insertion of I-gel and Classic LMA in Different Head Positions in Elderly Patients","Evaluation of the Insertion of I-gel and Classic LMA in Different Head Positions in Elderly Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA classification I-III\n* Age over 75 years\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known or anticipated difficult airway\n* Contraindications for the use of a supraglottic airway device\n* Patients scheduled for endotracheal intubation","75 Years",{"count":157,"type":22},120,[64],"This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study aims to evaluate the insertion success of two supraglottic airway devices, the classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and the I-gel, in different head and neck positions in elderly patients undergoing elective urological surgery under general anesthesia. A total of 120 patients aged over 75 years with ASA physical status I-III will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: standard position with I-gel, right lateral rotation with I-gel, standard position with classic LMA, and right lateral rotation with classic LMA. The study will compare insertion time, ease and success of placement, number of attempts, hemodynamic responses, oropharyngeal leak pressures, fiberoptic scores, and airway-related complications. The findings aim to provide clinical guidance on the optimal use of supraglottic airway devices in geriatric patients in various head positions.",[161,162,163,29],"Airway Management Assessment","Supraglottic Airways","Supraglottic Airways for General Anesthesia",[165,166,167,168,33,169,170,171],"Supraglottic airway device","i-gel","Classic laryngeal mask airway","Elderly patients","Head position","General anesthesia","Insertion success","2025-09-10",{"date":174,"type":42},"2025-09-17",{"date":176,"type":42},"2025-06-20",{"date":178,"type":22},"2025-09-15",{"name":180,"class":89},"Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey",{"id":182,"slug":183,"hasResults":11,"nctId":184,"briefTitle":185,"officialTitle":185,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":186,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":187,"enrollmentInfo":188,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":190,"conditions":191,"keywords":195,"overallStatus":200,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":201,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":202,"startDateStruct":204,"completionDateStruct":206,"leadSponsor":208,"locationsCount":4},"100592519","comparison-of-the-effects-of-endotracheal-intubation-and-laryngeal-mask-applications-on-optic-nerve-diameter-in-pediatric-patients-100592519","NCT06994481","Comparison of the Effects of Endotracheal Intubation and Laryngeal Mask Applications on Optic Nerve Diameter in Pediatric Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II,\n2. Aged between 1 and 11 years,\n3. Scheduled to receive general anesthesia,\n4. Planned to be ventilated via endotracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway (LMA).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Families who do not provide informed consent,\n2. Patients with a tracheostomy,\n3. History of previous intracranial surgery (e.g., tumor resection or shunt placement),\n4. History of preoperative seizures,\n5. Presence of craniofacial deformities that may prevent accurate optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement,\n6. Infection, wound, or any other condition in the measurement area that may interfere with ONSD assessment,\n7. Presence of conditions that may increase intracranial pressure and affect ONSD measurement (e.g., tumor, encephalitis, meningitis, or intracranial infection),\n8. Patients who require a change in the endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway (LMA) size during the operation, or who undergo a second intubation or insertion attempt,\n9. Patients who withdraw from the study.","11 Years",{"count":189,"type":22},200,"This clinical study aims to investigate the effects of breathing tubes, which we use to connect children aged 1-11 to a respiratory device under general anesthesia in the operating room, on intracranial pressure after they are inserted. No changes will be made to routine anesthesia practices for this purpose, and eye examinations will be performed with an USG device. This study has no undesirable effects or risks. This study does not include any invasive procedures. You have the right to refuse to participate in the study. You have the right to withdraw from the study at any time. If you decide not to participate in the study for any reason, there will be no disruption to your treatment. You will not be liable for any financial loss if you participate in the study, and you will not be paid. Your identity will be kept confidential if you participate in the study.",[192,193,194,29],"Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter","Pediatric Anesthesia","Intubation",[196,197,198,199],"optic nerve sheath diameter","pediatric patients","intubation","laryngeal mask airway","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-05-20",{"date":203,"type":42},"2025-05-29",{"date":205,"type":22},"2025-06-01",{"date":207,"type":22},"2026-06-01",{"name":209,"class":89},"Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital"]