[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"leadership\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:leadership":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,8,0,[8,45,77,108,143,165,194,221],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100591528","prevention-of-psychological-health-problems-via-integrated-operational-support-100591528",false,"NCT06981598","Prevention of Psychological Health Problems Via Integrated Operational Support","Optimizing Psychological Health and Preventing Clinical Problems: Testing the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Toolkit for Integrated Operational Support","IOS Toolkit","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Service members seeing a behavioral health (BH) technician.\n* Currently embedded BH technicians.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Service members who are not currently seeing a BH technician.\n* BH technicians who are not embedded or have taken a clinic role.",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},5586,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Sub-clinical behavioral health services in the military are performed by BH technicians, who receive minimal training. Due to this, embedding more technicians in military units is unlikely to benefit service members. Giving technicians training in, and access to, evidence-based interventions (EBI) could make their work more effective. The proposed study is a training trial examining the efficacy of the full integrated operational support (IOS) toolkit (evidence-based interventions for behavioral health), relative to routine care using standard resources, as a prevention resource for active-duty airmen.",[28,29,30,31],"Depression, Anxiety","Grief","Leadership","Dissatisfaction","RECRUITING","2026-05-12",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-05-15","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":36},"2025-03-10",{"date":40,"type":22},"2028-03-01",{"name":42,"class":43},"New York University","OTHER",1,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":51,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":63,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":44},"100635716","effect-of-an-empowerment-based-psychoeducation-program-on-burnout-and-psychological-outcomes-in-nurse-managers-100635716","NCT07556302","Effect of an Empowerment-Based Psychoeducation Program on Burnout and Psychological Outcomes in Nurse Managers","The Effect of an Empowerment-Based Psychoeducation Program on Burnout, Self-Leadership, Psychological Empowerment, and Psychological Resilience in Nurse Managers: A Randomized Controlled Trial","EMPOWER-NM","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Nurse managers currently working in healthcare institutions\n* Aged 18 years or older\n* Willing to participate in the study\n* Able to attend all psychoeducation sessions\n* Provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participation in a similar psychoeducation or intervention program within the last 6 months\n* Inability to attend scheduled sessions regularly\n* Refusal to provide informed consent",{"count":54,"type":22},60,[25],"This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an empowerment-based psychoeducation program on burnout, self-leadership, mindfulness, and psychological resilience among nurse managers. The study population consists of nurse managers working in healthcare settings.\n\nThe primary objective of this study is to determine whether the psychoeducation program reduces burnout levels and improves self-leadership, mindfulness, and psychological resilience among nurse managers.\n\nThe main research questions are as follows:\n\nDoes the empowerment-based psychoeducation program reduce burnout levels in nurse managers? Does the program improve self-leadership levels in nurse managers? Does the program increase mindfulness levels in nurse managers? Does the program enhance psychological resilience in nurse managers?\n\nIn this randomized controlled design, participants will be assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive a structured empowerment-based psychoeducation program lasting five weeks, while the control group will not receive any intervention.\n\nParticipants will undergo the following procedures:\n\nCompletion of baseline (pre-test) assessments (T1) Participation in the psychoeducation program for the intervention group (5 weeks) No intervention for the control group Completion of post-intervention assessments (T2) Completion of follow-up assessments three months after the intervention (T3)\n\nThe findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of evidence-based interventions aimed at strengthening managerial competencies and psychological well-being among nurse managers.",[58,30,59,60,61,62],"Burnout","Psychological Empowerment Program","Psychological Resilience","Mindfulness","Nurse Led Interventions",[64,65,66,60,58],"nurse led interventions","Psychological Empowerment program","Self-leadership","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-24",{"date":70,"type":36},"2026-04-29",{"date":72,"type":22},"2026-06-05",{"date":74,"type":22},"2026-10-05",{"name":76,"class":43},"Suleyman Demirel University",{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":84,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":86,"briefSummary":87,"conditions":88,"keywords":95,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":101,"startDateStruct":103,"completionDateStruct":105,"leadSponsor":107,"locationsCount":44},"100566612","the-effect-of-a-peer-mentoring-program-on-nursing-students-100566612","NCT06657443","The Effect of a Peer Mentoring Program on Nursing Students","The Effect of a Peer Mentoring Program on Nursing Students' Perceived Empathic Self-Efficacy, Social Self-Efficacy, and Youth Leadership Characteristics: A Pretest-Posttest Quasi-Experimental Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* The term \"volunteers\" is used to designate students enrolled in the 2024-2025 academic year, in their second, third or fourth year of studies, who are actively engaged in the education and training process.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Students who indicated a preference for not being a first-year student and instead volunteered to serve as peer mentors.",{"count":85,"type":22},32,[25],"This project is designed as a quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effect of the Peer Leadership Program, established in the Nursing Department, on nursing peer mentor students' empathic self-efficacy, social self-efficacy, and youth leadership characteristics.",[89,90,91,92,93,94,30],"Peer Group","Mentoring","Program Evaluation","Nurse","Empathy Skills","Social Skills",[96,97,98,99,100],"Peer mentoring program","Nursing students,","Empathic Self-Efficacy","Social Self-Efficacy","Youth Leadership",{"date":102,"type":36},"2026-04-27",{"date":104,"type":36},"2025-08-29",{"date":106,"type":22},"2026-06-24",{"name":76,"class":43},{"id":109,"slug":110,"hasResults":11,"nctId":111,"briefTitle":112,"officialTitle":113,"acronym":114,"eligibilityCriteria":115,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":116,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":118,"briefSummary":119,"conditions":120,"keywords":127,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":134,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":135,"startDateStruct":137,"completionDateStruct":139,"leadSponsor":141,"locationsCount":44},"100618117","coaching-doctors-and-nurses-to-improve-ethical-decision-making-in-team-100618117","NCT07327450","Coaching Doctors and Nurses to Improve Ethical Decision-making in Team","Coaching Doctors and Nurses to Improve Ethical Decision-making in Team: a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial in 10 Departments of the Ghent University Hospital","CODE II","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients potentially receiving excessive treatment (PET) who are identified by clinicians during their first hospitalization. PET is defined as a patient in whom 2 or more clinicians doubt whether the treatment or treatment limitation code is consistent with their expected survival or quality of life (= \"too much\" or \"excessive treatment\") or whether the treatment limitation code is in line with the patient's or relatives' goals.\n* Family members of PET\n* Junior and senior doctors (including Department Heads) taking care of hospitalized patients\n* Nurses (including head nurses) taking care of hospitalized patients\n* Allied health professionals (psychologists, physical therapists, speech therapists, occupational therapists, social workers, spiritual care providers) taking care of hospitalized patients\n* PET admitted \u002F clinicians working in the 10 participating departments of of the Ghent University Hospital (Cardiology, Gastro-enterology and Hepatology, General Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, Hematology, Medical Oncology, Neurology, Nephrology (including dialysis unit), Pulmonology and the Medical ICU)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* PET with a previous written DNI-DNACPR order\n* Patients and family members of PET who are less than 18 years old and persons who cannot understand Ducth questionnaires",{"count":117,"type":22},360,[25],"Literature and a pilot study performed in 2019 indicate room for enhancing openness to discuss ethical sensitive issues within and between teams, and improving goal-oriented care and decision-making for the benefit of the patient at end-of-life, worldwide and more specifically in Belgium and in the Ghent University Hospital. The CODE study intervention performed in 2021 suggests already an improvement in goal oriented care operationalized via written Do-Not-Intubate and Do-Not-Attempt Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNI-DNACPR orders in the Ghent University Hospital. In this study, the investigators found a nearly doubling of the incidence in written DNI-DNACPR in patient potentially receiving excessive treatment (PET) (from 19.7% to 29.7%, p\\\u003C0.001) and in patients hospitalized for the first time (from 1.9% to 3.4%, p=0.011) without increasing one-year mortality, after coaching doctors during 4 months in self-reflective and empowering leadership, and coping with group dynamics. However, the investigators found no improvement in the perception of the quality of the ethical climate by clinicians, more specifically by nurses. Despite the fact that ethical decision-making is considered a strategic priority in the Ghent University Hospital and an intense communication campaign, clinicians identified also a much smaller number of PET during this interventional study than during the observational pilot study in 2019. Although fading attention for the study over time and visibility of the electronic CODE alert to identify PET was claimed as the main reasons by 75% and 50.7% of the nurses, respectively, 95% expressed the desire to keep on using this alert in the future. This underscores a deeper concern in nurses. More than 40% expressed fear of blaming doctors or skepticism regarding the impact of identifying PET. Nonetheless, 35% acknowledged improvement in interdisciplinary meetings about end-of-life issues since study initiation. These findings highlights the need to additionally coach the entire team in future studies. Indeed, creating a safe climate which enhances inter-professional shared decision-making for the benefit of the patient requires both, specific self-reflective and empowering leadership skills in doctors and head nurses (including the management of group dynamics in the interdisciplinary team), and confidence in speaking up in nurses and other health care professionals. This is what the investigators want to develop with this intervention. These skills will also help clinicians during patient and family meetings which will enable clinicians to better take into account the patient's and family's wishes.",[121,30,122,123,124,125,126],"Decision Making ,Shared","End of Life Communication","End of Life Decision Making","End of Life Patients","Ethical Sensitivities","Coaching",[126,128,129,130,131,132,133],"Shared decision-making","Goal-oriented care","Ethical climate","Leaderschip","Communication","End-of-life","2026-04-03",{"date":136,"type":36},"2026-04-09",{"date":138,"type":22},"2026-04-01",{"date":140,"type":22},"2028-06-30",{"name":142,"class":43},"University Hospital, Ghent",{"id":144,"slug":145,"hasResults":11,"nctId":146,"briefTitle":147,"officialTitle":148,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":149,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":150,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":152,"briefSummary":153,"conditions":154,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":156,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":157,"startDateStruct":159,"completionDateStruct":161,"leadSponsor":163,"locationsCount":44},"100533176","leadership-training-affect-physician-career-satisfaction-100533176","NCT06222411","Leadership Training Affect Physician Career Satisfaction","Does Leadership Training Affect Physician Career Satisfaction?","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: ≥18 years\n* Be a current licensed physician practicing at Methodist Health System( MHS )\n* Literate in English\n* Able and willing to provide consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* \\\u003C18 years of age\n* Not a current licensed physician at MHS\n* Illiterate in English\n* Unable or unwilling to provide consent",{"count":151,"type":22},200,[25],"The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of organizational interventions for physician development on wellbeing, and investigate wellbeing and other characteristics of physicians with and without formal leadership roles.",[30,155],"Personality","2026-03-18",{"date":158,"type":36},"2026-03-20",{"date":160,"type":36},"2023-12-01",{"date":162,"type":22},"2028-12",{"name":164,"class":43},"Methodist Health System",{"id":166,"slug":167,"hasResults":11,"nctId":168,"briefTitle":169,"officialTitle":170,"acronym":30,"eligibilityCriteria":171,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":172,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":174,"briefSummary":175,"conditions":176,"keywords":180,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":185,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":186,"startDateStruct":188,"completionDateStruct":190,"leadSponsor":192,"locationsCount":44},"100626447","leadership-thrivecircles-100626447","NCT07435753","Leadership ThriveCircles","Leadership ThriveCircles for Well-Being at University of Colorado School of Medicine (CU SOM)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nLeader\n\n* CU SOM faculty member who is either a physician, advanced practice provider, licensed mental health professional, research scientist or other CU SOM faculty member\n* Works at least half time\n* Has at least 5 employees who directly report to them\n* Not participating in the CU Thrive Circle intervention (like this leadership program but NOT for those in a leadership role)\n* Willingness to participate in the breadth of the leadership program\n* Able to participate in the in-person sessions\n\nEmployee\n\no Direct report of a leader who is in the program\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Does not fit the criteria outlined above",{"count":173,"type":22},125,[25],"This study aims to strengthen leadership competencies among CU SOM faculty who have at least five direct reports by promoting meaningful behavior change in leadership practices and fostering a culture of peer support, to advance employee well-being and help reduce burnout among healthcare professionals. 125 leaders will take part in a six-month leadership development program consisting of 6 self-paced learning focus areas and 6 in-person sessions with peers to discuss. The investigators will evaluate the program's implementation process and its effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes.",[58,177,178,179,30],"Professional Fulfillment","Belonging","Intent to Leave",[30,58,181,182,183,178,184],"Healthcare workforce","Professional fulfillment","Intent to leave","Leadership intervention","2026-03-03",{"date":187,"type":36},"2026-03-05",{"date":189,"type":22},"2026-03-01",{"date":191,"type":22},"2027-03",{"name":193,"class":43},"Colorado School of Public Health",{"id":195,"slug":196,"hasResults":11,"nctId":197,"briefTitle":198,"officialTitle":198,"acronym":199,"eligibilityCriteria":200,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":201,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":203,"briefSummary":204,"conditions":205,"keywords":208,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":212,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":213,"startDateStruct":215,"completionDateStruct":217,"leadSponsor":219,"locationsCount":44},"100622059","implementing-evidence-based-nursing-leadership-and-organizational-change-for-implementation-100622059","NCT07378696","Implementing Evidence-Based Nursing: Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation","LOCI-FIN-P","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Nurse manager\n* Registered nurse\n* Practical nurse\n* Nurse director\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n• Other healtcare professionals",{"count":202,"type":22},300,[25],"This study aims to find out whether a leadership and organizational development program called the LOCI (Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation) strategy can help nurses and their managers use the best available research in everyday care. Using evidence-based practice.\n\nPrevious work in the region showed that nurses and their managers want to use evidence-based practices but face challenges, such as unclear processes, limited support, and differences in skills. The LOCI strategy has helped leaders in other countries improve how new practices are introduced and supported. This study will test a version of LOCI adapted for Finnish healthcare settings.\n\nNurse managers and staff from selected hospital and elder care units will:\n\nTake part in leadership and training sessions. Receive individual and group mentoring. Work with their teams on plans that support introducing new, research-based ways of working.\n\nTwo evidence-based practices will be introduced:\n\nIn psychiatric units: A safety planning method to help prevent suicide among people receiving mental health care.\n\nIn elder care units: Better ways to identify and treat malnutrition among older adults.\n\nThe study involves:\n\nNurse managers Nursing staff Senior nurse leaders Specialist nurses who support the training\n\nThe study will run for one year. The LOCI program lasts nine months, followed by a three-month follow-up period.\n\nAssessment:\n\nHow well the adapted LOCI strategy works in practice (for example, whether participants find it useful).\n\nWhether leadership skills and workplace support for evidence-based practices improve.\n\nWhether the new care practices (suicide safety planning and malnutrition prevention) are used more often and more effectively.\n\nParticipants will complete questionnaires, take part in interviews or group discussions, and researchers will review documentation and care records to understand how the changes progress.\n\nThe study may help improve leadership skills, strengthen support for evidence-based practice, and improve care for patients in both mental health and elder care settings. The results may also help other healthcare organizations adopt similar approaches.\n\nThe study follows strict ethical and data protection rules. Survey participation is voluntary, and all personal information will be handled securely and confidentially. The care practices being introduced are already recommended in Finland and are part of normal care.",[30,206,207],"Self-Harm","Malnutrition Elderly",[209,210,211,30],"Implementation","Evidence-based practice","Nursing","2026-02-02",{"date":214,"type":36},"2026-02-05",{"date":216,"type":36},"2026-01-15",{"date":218,"type":22},"2027-01",{"name":220,"class":43},"Jaakko Varpula",{"id":222,"slug":223,"hasResults":11,"nctId":224,"briefTitle":225,"officialTitle":226,"acronym":227,"eligibilityCriteria":228,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":229,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":230,"briefSummary":231,"conditions":232,"keywords":234,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":238,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":239,"startDateStruct":241,"completionDateStruct":243,"leadSponsor":245,"locationsCount":44},"100584226","online-training-course-to-improve-evidence-based-leadership-100584226","NCT06886581","Online Training Course to Improve Evidence-based Leadership","Effectiveness of Online Training Course to Improve Evidence-based Leadership Practices: a Cluster Randomised Two-arm Controlled Trial","EVILEAD","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* have shown their willingness to join the study,\n* unit leaders have an official managerial position at the study organisation,\n* unit have a leaders with a professional licence to work in health or social care sector,\n* unit leaders represent any gender,\n* are able to speak, read and write in Finnish, and\n* have given informed consent to join the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Those staff members who are off duty during the recruitment period (family leave, long-term sick leave, study leave, or any other reason).",{"count":202,"type":22},[25],"The goal of this cluster clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of online training course, targeted to unit leaders to improve staff's evidence-based skills (individual outcomes), EBP implementation (team-based outcomes), and the quality of care (organisational outcomes). Feasibility and fidelity of the intervention will be assessed as well. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1. Does online training course improve staff's evidence-based practice?\n2. Does online training course improve staff's self-esteem and self-efficacy?\n3. Does online training course improve leadership for EBP implementation on organisational level?\n4. Does online training course improve the quality of patient care?\n5. Does online training course reduce staff's absence (sick leaves, intention to leave the ward or hospital)?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Participants will join in a seven-months online training course in small group or practice as usual.\n* Seven course modules, read course material, prepare assignments, join in peer discussions.\n* Self-assessment, self-reflection and give course feedback.",[233,30],"Evidence-Based Practice",[235,236,237],"cluster randomised trial","evidence-based","leadership","2025-06-10",{"date":240,"type":36},"2025-06-13",{"date":242,"type":36},"2025-06-05",{"date":244,"type":22},"2026-12-31",{"name":246,"class":43},"University of Turku"]