[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"maternal-outcomes\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:maternal-outcomes":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":39,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":40,"startDateStruct":43,"completionDateStruct":45,"leadSponsor":47,"locationsCount":5},"100567595","effectiveness-of-upright-vs-lithotomy-birthing-position-on-maternal-and-newborn-outcomes-100567595",false,"NCT06670235","Effectiveness of Upright vs. Lithotomy Birthing Position on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes","Effectiveness of Using Upright Versus Lithotomy Birthing Position on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes: A Quasi Experimental Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant women with singleton pregnancies;\n* Gestational age ranges from (≥37 to 41+6 weeks);\n* Spontaneous labor with no contraindications to upright positions;\n* Active phase of first stage labor;\n* Age 18-35 years old;\n* Normal size fetus with occipito-anterior position;\n* Communicate normally and participate voluntary.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Abnormal fetal position (malpresentation) (e,g., persistent occipital-transverse and occipital-posterior position, etc.);\n* Risky pregnancy or childbirth complications, such as (preeclampsia, eclampsia, heart disease, cephalic presentation dystocia, antepartum hemorrhage, fetal distress, intra-uterine growth restriction, intra-amniotic infection); and free from any chronic diseases (heart disease, epilepsy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and renal disease)\n* Multiple gestation;\n* Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD);\n* Precipitate labor;\n* Antenatally diagnosed fetal anomalies;\n* Current history of a leg injury, fracture, and deep vein thrombosis.",true,"FEMALE","18 Years","35 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},124,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This study investigates the effectiveness of upright versus lithotomy birthing positions on maternal and newborn outcomes. Conducted at the Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil City, it employs a quasi-experimental design with 62 women in each group (Intervention and control), comparing outcomes for those encouraged to use upright positions with those in standard lithotomy. Maternal and newborn outcomes will be assessed to provide evidence on how birthing positions impact labor progression, comfort, and delivery results. The findings aim to inform clinical practice and policy, enhancing midwifery care and supporting patient-centered approaches to childbirth. Does the upright birthing position effect on maternal and newborn outcomes? Does the lithotomy birthing position effect on maternal and newborn outcomes? The expected outcomes will decrease the rate of perineal tear , episiotomy , post partum hemorrhage and decreasing the rate of admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in newborn.",[28,29],"Maternal Outcomes","Newborn Complication",[31,32,33,34,35,36,37],"Upright birthing position","Lithotomy position","Maternal outcomes in childbirth","Newborn outcomes in labor","Birth position comparison","Labor positions and delivery","Effectiveness of birth positions","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2024-10-30",{"date":41,"type":42},"2024-11-01","ACTUAL",{"date":44,"type":22},"2024-11-10",{"date":46,"type":22},"2026-09-01",{"name":48,"class":49},"Hawler Medical University","OTHER"]