[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"motor-learning\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:motor-learning":33},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,7,0,[8,60,86,110,144,169,198],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":36,"overallStatus":47,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":48,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":49,"startDateStruct":52,"completionDateStruct":54,"leadSponsor":56,"locationsCount":59},"100574927","the-effect-of-non-invasive-brain-stimulation-rtms-on-hand-muscles-in-chronic-stroke-patients-100574927",false,"NCT06765642","The Effect of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation rTMS on Hand Muscles in Chronic Stroke Patients.","Evaluation of 3 Patterned rTMS Stimulation Dosage on Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Learning in Stroke Patients","REALISE","Inclusion criteria:\n\n1. Age \\>=21 years old of any race or gender\n2. First-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (neuroimaging verified) at least 3 months from stroke onset\n3. Unilateral arm weakness measured by FM-UM scale \\\u003C= 62 out of 66\n4. Inducible rest motor threshold and testing motor threshold recorded from the affected first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle from the study subject\n\nExclusion criteria\n\n1. Bilateral strokes (infarcts and\u002For hematoma)\n2. Other co-existent neuromuscular disorders affecting upper extremity motor impairment.\n3. History of medically uncontrolled depression or other neuropsychiatric disorders despite medications either before or after a stroke that may affect the subject's ability to participate in the study.\n4. Uncontrolled hypertension despite medical treatment(s) at the time of randomization, defined as SBP≥185 mmHg or DBP≥110 mmHg (patient can be treated, reassessed and randomized later).\n5. Presence of any MRI\u002FrTMS risk factors including but not limited to:\n\n   1. an electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated metallic or nonmetallic implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system.\n   2. a non-fixed metallic part in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to the eye.\n   3. history of seizure disorder before stroke or seizure after stroke.\n   4. preexisting scalp lesion or bone defect or hemicraniectomy.\n6. Concurrent enrollment in another interventional stroke recovery study.\n7. Concerns that the subject cannot comply with study procedures and visits.\n8. Pregnant individuals","ALL","21 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},26,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The study is about using a brain stimulation technique called rTMS (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) to help improve hand muscles in people who had a stroke. Researchers want to understand how this device can help stroke patients use their hands better.",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"Stroke","Stroke Patients","Arm Weakness as a Consequence of Stroke","Brain Stimulation","Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive","Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation","Motor Learning","Chronic Stroke Patients","Chronic Stroke Survivors",[37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46],"stroke","arm weakness","arm weakness as a consequence of stroke","stroke patients","transcranial magnetic stimulation","transcranial magnetic stimulation repetitive","motor learning","chronic stroke","chronic stroke patients","chronic stroke survivors","RECRUITING","2026-05-19",{"date":50,"type":51},"2026-05-22","ACTUAL",{"date":53,"type":51},"2025-06-09",{"date":55,"type":21},"2027-04-30",{"name":57,"class":58},"Duke University","OTHER",1,{"id":61,"slug":62,"hasResults":11,"nctId":63,"briefTitle":64,"officialTitle":65,"acronym":66,"eligibilityCriteria":67,"healthyVolunteers":68,"sex":17,"minAge":69,"maxAge":70,"enrollmentInfo":71,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":73,"briefSummary":74,"conditions":75,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":47,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":76,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":77,"startDateStruct":79,"completionDateStruct":81,"leadSponsor":83,"locationsCount":59},"100422745","tms-based-assessment-of-mental-training-effects-on-motor-learning-in-healthy-participants-100422745","NCT04784832","TMS-based Assessment of Mental Training Effects on Motor Learning in Healthy Participants","Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-based Assessment of Mental Training Effects on Motor Learning in Healthy Participants","IMAP-TMS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male or female between 18 and 60 years old\n* Having given written informed consent\n* Affiliated to a social security scheme\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of psychiatric illness (declarative)\n* Person under guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice\n* Neurological problem that could bias the results of the study (declarative)\n* Personal or family history of epilepsy\n* Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision\n* Person hospitalized without consent and not subject to legal protection, and person admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than that of the research\n* Person subject to an exclusion period for another research\n* Pregnant women or women of childbearing age not using known contraception\n* Breastfeeding women\n* Person on medication that could influence neurophysiological measures (neuroleptics, anxiolytics, antidepressants)\n* Person carrying :\n* pacemaker or other device that could interfere with the magnetic field\n* Implants (mechanical or electronic: cochlear implants, neural or cardiac pacemakers, infusion pumps, magnetic aneurysm clips, etc.)\n* Metallic foreign bodies in the eye or nervous system\n* Metallic objects (tattoos, piercings, etc.)",true,"18 Years","60 Years",{"count":72,"type":21},556,[24],"The general purpose of this research project is to analyze the specific role of motor imagery on motor learning, assessed through corticospinal excitability measurements and behavioral data collection. This project is based on four sequences. For Sequence 1, the main objective is to examine the effect of mental training on movement speed and accuracy in a manual motor sequence task, as well as the influence of sensory feedback in immediate post-test (i.e., execution of a similar, but not identical, manual motor sequence, other manual tasks) on performance in delayed post-test. The secondary objective will be to examine corticospinal changes (i.e., amplitude of motor evoked potentials) induced by mental training, by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials before and after mental training. For Sequence 2, the main objective is to examine the impact of a motor disturbance induced by a robotic arm at different intervals during the motor imagery process. The secondary objective will be to examine the corticospinal changes (i.e. amplitude of evoked motor potentials) induced by mental training as a function of the applied perturbations, before and after perturbation. For Sequence 3, the main objective will be to examine the influence of neuroplasticity on the quality of mental training. More specifically, the investigators will study the links between brain plasticity and motor learning through mental training. The secondary objective will be to examine the corticospinal changes (i.e. amplitude of evoked motor potentials) induced by mental training at different levels of the neuromuscular system (cortical, cervicomedullar, peripheral) after a training period. For Sequence 4, the main objective will be to examine the effect of short-term arm-immobilization of on the retention of motor learning induced by mental training. The secondary objective will be to examine the corticospinal changes (i.e., amplitude of motor evoked potentials) induced by of short-term arm-immobilization, or by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on motor learning. The results of this fundamental research project will allow a better understanding of neurophysiological and behavioral mechanisms that underlie motor learning through motor imagery. The results will allow to efficiently consider inter-individual specificities and will thus open up to clinical research perspectives, towards the establishment of adapted motor rehabilitation protocols.",[33],"2026-04-15",{"date":78,"type":51},"2026-04-20",{"date":80,"type":51},"2024-04-08",{"date":82,"type":21},"2029-04",{"name":84,"class":85},"Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France","OTHER_GOV",{"id":87,"slug":88,"hasResults":11,"nctId":89,"briefTitle":90,"officialTitle":91,"acronym":92,"eligibilityCriteria":93,"healthyVolunteers":68,"sex":17,"minAge":69,"maxAge":94,"enrollmentInfo":95,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":97,"briefSummary":98,"conditions":99,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":47,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":101,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":102,"startDateStruct":104,"completionDateStruct":106,"leadSponsor":108,"locationsCount":59},"100627963","cortical-excitability-during-de-novo-motor-learning-100627963","NCT07455461","Cortical Excitability During de Novo Motor Learning","Cortical Excitability During de Novo Motor Learning in Healthy Subjects : an Exploratory Longitudinal Study","StimNovoLearn","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* right-handed\n* healthy\n* having signed an informed consent form\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* counter-indication to transcranial magnetic stimulation\n* pregnancy","35 Years",{"count":96,"type":21},40,[24],"De novo motor learning is a specific learning paradigm that allows investigation of how a new motor skill is learned from scratch. Motor task learning can induce increased corticospinal excitability and reorganization of connectivity observed within the motor cortex (M1). Several studies have investigated the plasticity mechanisms underlying motor learning using simple paradigms. The results obtained have been variable, with a major trend toward increased corticospinal excitability, while other results show no increase. We expect to observe a significant increase in excitability and enhanced intracortical reorganization mechanisms within M1 in our subjects during our de novo motor learning sessions.\n\nThe primary objective of this study is to measure changes in corticospinal excitability of the motor system across 3 de novo motor learning sessions separated by different time intervals.\n\nThe secondary objectives will be: 1) to measure learning across the three practice sessions, 2) to measure changes in inhibition and facilitation across the 3 learning sessions, and 3) to measure correlations between subjects' motor performance and corticospinal and intracortical changes.",[33,100],"Corticospinal Excitability","2026-03-02",{"date":103,"type":51},"2026-03-06",{"date":105,"type":21},"2026-02-25",{"date":107,"type":21},"2027-06",{"name":109,"class":58},"Universite du Littoral Cote d'Opale",{"id":111,"slug":112,"hasResults":11,"nctId":113,"briefTitle":114,"officialTitle":115,"acronym":116,"eligibilityCriteria":117,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":69,"maxAge":118,"enrollmentInfo":119,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":121,"briefSummary":122,"conditions":123,"keywords":128,"overallStatus":47,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":134,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":135,"startDateStruct":137,"completionDateStruct":139,"leadSponsor":141,"locationsCount":143},"100616343","effects-of-exercise-and-sleep-on-motor-learning-and-functional-abilities-in-multiple-sclerosis-100616343","NCT07304375","Effects of Exercise and Sleep on Motor Learning and Functional Abilities in Multiple Sclerosis","Effects of Aerobic Exercise and Daytime Sleep on Neurorehabilitation and Functional Abilities in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence of Training the Brain in Neurorehabilitation","ExSiMS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Competent individuals (aged 18-70) diagnosed with early relapsing-remitting MS\n* Expanded Disability Status Score, 1 \\\u003C EDSS \\\u003C 4.5\n* MRC muscle strength ≥ 4+ in the dominant hand\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Implanted devices, such as pacemakers or stimulators\n* Epilepsy or neuromuscular diseases","70 Years",{"count":120,"type":21},20,[24],"The ExSiMS study is a randomized, controlled crossover study including 20 individuals (18-70 years) diagnosed with relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis (MS) This project investigates, through behavioral and neurophysiological measurements, how aerobic exercise on an ergometer bike and sleep in the form of a nap and overnight sleep may enhance cortical motor skill learning evaluated by a complex hand motor skill test and thereby improve functional capacity in individuals with MS. Beyond the effect on motor skill learning, the project investigate the effect on electroencephalography (EEG) - electromyography (EMG) coherence.\n\nThe study hypothesizes that individuals with neurological conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), may experience beneficial effects on specific motor rehabilitation through systematically planned cardiovascular exercise and sleep scheduling, due to positive impacts on memory consolidation.\n\nAims:\n\n* Investigate the brain's neurophysiological responses and memory effects following a training intervention and, separately, sleep, in the form of a power nap, in individuals with MS.\n* Examine whether these effects persist beyond the few days previously observed in healthy individuals by implementing a longer-term intervention.\n* Explore whether the training effect is influenced by disease activity in the brain, such as during relapses and during immunosuppressive treatment.\n* Assess whether the presence of abnormally reduced cognitive endurance (fatigue) affects the impact of the intervention involving exercise and sleep.\n\nThe study is based on documented positive effects of physical activity and sleep in both young and older adults, as well as in individuals recovering from stroke. The research thus offers promising perspectives for broader applications within neurorehabilitation, and particularly for MS, as the disease is associated with functional impairments. At the same time, both physical exercise and sleep represent meaningful interventions that should be thoughtfully integrated into rehabilitation strategies.",[124,125,33,126,127],"Exercise","Sleep","Memory","Multiple Sclerosis",[129,130,125,131,33,126,132,133],"Aerobic Exercise","Daytime Sleep","Learning Ability","Cognitive Function","Neurorehabilitation","2026-01-05",{"date":136,"type":51},"2026-01-08",{"date":138,"type":51},"2025-12-01",{"date":140,"type":21},"2028-11-30",{"name":142,"class":58},"Zealand University Hospital",2,{"id":145,"slug":146,"hasResults":11,"nctId":147,"briefTitle":148,"officialTitle":148,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":149,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":150,"maxAge":151,"enrollmentInfo":152,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":154,"briefSummary":155,"conditions":156,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":47,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":160,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":161,"startDateStruct":163,"completionDateStruct":165,"leadSponsor":167,"locationsCount":59},"100597157","pain-and-split-belt-motor-learning-in-older-adults-100597157","NCT07054840","Pain and Split-belt Motor Learning in Older Adults","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 55-90 years old\n* Self-identifying as generally medically healthy\n* Able to read, write and speak English\n* Able to provide informed consent and attend all testing sessions\n* Willing to undergo the experimental pain paradigm, if selected\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Resting heart rate \\\u003C 50 or \\> 100 bpm\n* Resting blood pressure \\\u003C 90\u002F60 or \\> 165\u002F95\n* Any history or current mental health condition, learning\u002Fdevelopmental disability or cognitive impairment, including severe untreated ADD\u002FADHD, severe untreated anxiety, severe untreated depression, autism spectrum disorder, insomnia, mild cognitive impairment, etc. (Mild to moderate treated ADD\u002FADHD, anxiety, and\u002For depression are allowed.)\n* Score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) \\\u003C23\n* Score on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale ≥ 10\n* Score on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 ≥ 2 and score on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ≥ 10\n* Any current (within last 3 month) or chronic medical conditions, including any musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, psychiatric or neurological diagnosis that affects activities of daily living or would confound testing or place the subject at risk by participating, such as a significant cardiovascular condition or event (e.g., heart attack \\\u003C 3 months ago, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation, uncontrolled angina, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, or peripheral vascular disease)\n* Any impaired sensation or weakness in either lower extremity\n* History of serious concussion or head injury, defined as a loss of consciousness for \\> 5 minutes and\u002For requiring medical treatment, or \\> 2 concussions over the lifespan\n* Any history of acute or chronic problems with balance, any dizziness, or \\> 1 fall in the last 12 months\n* Currently or regularly using any analgesic medications, over-the-counter remedies, or any other treatment for the purposes of pain relief (i.e., baby aspirin for heart health is allowed)\n* Any current or chronic pain condition during the last year, located anywhere in the body with an intensity of \\> 2\u002F10\n* Allergy to capsaicin or hot peppers\n* Any skin lesion, breakage or irritation in the area targeted for the painful stimulus\n* Significant skin sensitivity to soaps\u002Fcreams\u002Fperfumes or to heat\n* Poor circulation in the area targeted for the painful stimulus\n* Prior participation in a split-belt locomotor learning study in the Neuromotor Behavior Lab in the past 2 years","55 Years","90 Years",{"count":153,"type":21},34,[24],"The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of acute pain, induced using an experimental pain paradigm of capsaicin paired with heat, on implicit locomotor learning and its retention in older adults.",[157,158,159,33],"Aging","Older Adults","Pain","2025-12-03",{"date":162,"type":51},"2025-12-04",{"date":164,"type":51},"2025-08-26",{"date":166,"type":21},"2026-05-31",{"name":168,"class":58},"University of Delaware",{"id":170,"slug":171,"hasResults":11,"nctId":172,"briefTitle":173,"officialTitle":173,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":174,"healthyVolunteers":68,"sex":17,"minAge":175,"maxAge":69,"enrollmentInfo":176,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":178,"phases":4,"briefSummary":179,"conditions":180,"keywords":183,"overallStatus":188,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":189,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":190,"startDateStruct":192,"completionDateStruct":193,"leadSponsor":195,"locationsCount":197},"100593140","predictors-of-motor-magery-performance-in-cerebral-palsy-100593140","NCT07002567","Predictors of Motor İmagery Performance in Cerebral Palsy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 6-18 year olds diagnosed with spastic type unilateral and bilateral diplegia CP,\n* Those with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I - II,\n* Hand Skill Classification System (EBSS) level I-II,\n* Children with a Mini-Mental Test score of at least 24 points,\n* Those with IQ \\\u003C70, Those who can understand the guidelines of the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Those with advanced vision, hearing and attention problems,\n* Those with advanced cardiovascular or cognitive problems,\n* Upper extremity botulinum toxin administration and surgery in the last 6 months,\n* Those who have received MI training in the last 6 months","6 Years",{"count":177,"type":21},54,"OBSERVATIONAL","There are very few studies in the literature examining the effect of age on motor imagery ability in children with cerebral palsy. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the impact of other related factors. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of age, sex, body mass index, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.\n\nH1-1: Age has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.\n\nH1-2: Sex has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.\n\nH1-3: Clinical type has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.\n\nH1-4: Body mass index has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.\n\nH1-5: GMFCS level has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.\n\nH1-6: MACS level has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.",[181,182,33],"Cerebral Palsy (CP)","Spasticity",[184,185,186,187],"MOTOR İMAGERY","CEREBRAL PALSY","UPPER EXTREMİTY","PHYSIOTHERAPY","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-07-03",{"date":191,"type":51},"2025-07-04",{"date":191,"type":21},{"date":194,"type":21},"2025-11-01",{"name":196,"class":58},"Abant Izzet Baysal University",3,{"id":199,"slug":200,"hasResults":11,"nctId":201,"briefTitle":202,"officialTitle":203,"acronym":204,"eligibilityCriteria":205,"healthyVolunteers":68,"sex":17,"minAge":206,"maxAge":207,"enrollmentInfo":208,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":210,"briefSummary":211,"conditions":212,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":47,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":218,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":219,"startDateStruct":221,"completionDateStruct":223,"leadSponsor":225,"locationsCount":59},"100558816","investigating-the-effects-of-transcranial-direct-current-stimulation-to-different-brain-regions-on-ankle-tracking-motor-learning-motor-adaptation-and-brain-connectivity-in-healthy-middle-aged-and-older-adults-and-patients-with-subcortical-stroke-100558816","NCT06556043","Investigating the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Different Brain Regions on Ankle Tracking Motor Learning, Motor Adaptation, and Brain Connectivity in Healthy Middle-aged and Older Adults and Patients With Subcortical Stroke","Investigating the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to Different Brain Regions on Ankle Tracking Motor Learning, Motor Adaptation, and Brain Connectivity in Healthy Middle-aged and Older Adults and Patients With Subcortical Stroke","tDCS","Inclusion Criteria: Part 1: healthy middle-aged and older adults\n\n1. age between 40 and 80 years old\n2. intact cognitive function (MMSE ≧ 27)\n3. normal ankle dorsiflexor and plantarflexor strength (manual muscle strength testing= 5) and passive range of motion (ankle dorsiflexion ≧10 degrees; ankle plantarflexion ≧ 45 degrees)\n4. corrected far vision ≥ 0.8 (Landolt C test) and uncorrected near vision ≥ 0.04 (Comprehensive Color Blindness Checklist)\n\nExclusion Criteria: Part 1: healthy middle-aged and older adults\n\n1. having any contraindications for MRI or tDCS;\n2. serious or uncontrolled systematic diseases;\n3. symptoms or history of neurological diseases, including transient ischemic attack, stroke, epilepsy, history of abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG), meningitis, encephalitis, brain tumors, brain surgery, and sensory disorders, etc.;\n4. severe musculoskeletal problems that would affect lower limb functions;\n5. visual spatial perception disorders and hearing loss;\n6. color blindness;\n7. depression and psychiatric disorders;\n8. use of any medication that could affect the central nervous system function;\n9. drug, substance, or alcohol addiction;\n10. those participating in research involving invasive or non-invasive brain stimulation;\n11. those deemed unsuitable for MRI or tDCS after evaluation by the attending physician;\n12. those affiliated with any research-conducting institution.\n\nInclusion Criteria: Part 2: patients with chronic subcortical stroke\n\n1. aged between 40 and 80 years old;\n2. intact cognitive function (MMSE ≥ 27);\n3. first-ever onset of subcortical stroke occurring at least 3 months prior to enrollment, with brain lesions involving unilateral subcortical regions only;\n4. hemiplegic or hemiparetic;\n5. no spatial neglect;\n6. able to actively perform at least 5 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion and 10 degrees of ankle plantarflexion with the affected ankle;\n7. no excessive spasticity;\n8. no severe contracture (passive range of motion ≥ 10 degrees for ankle dorsiflexion and ≥ 20 degrees for ankle plantarflexion) in the affected leg;\n9. mild-to moderate disability;\n10. can walk independently or under supervision without assistance;\n11. corrected far vision ≥ 0.8 (Landolt C test) and uncorrected near vision ≥ 0.04 (Comprehensive Color Blindness Checklist.)\n\nExclusion Criteria: Part 2: patients with chronic subcortical stroke The exclusion criteria will be the same as those listed for healthy participants described in Part 1 except for items (3) and (4). Item (3) will be changed to \"(3a) symptoms or history of other neurological diseases, including epilepsy, history of abnormal EEG, meningitis, encephalitis, brain tumors, brain surgery, and sensory disorders, etc.\" and item (4) will be changed to \"(4a) severe musculoskeletal problems of the non-hemiparetic limbs that would affect mobility functions\".","40 Years","80 Years",{"count":209,"type":21},120,[24],"Ankle control is essential to safe over-ground navigation for humans. Middle- aged and older adults and patients with stroke whose ankle control is poor often lose their balance or fall. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging non-invasive brain stimulation technology that has great potential to be applied to neurorehabilitation; however, the optimization of its applications still needs further studies. The aims of this project are to compare the effects of anodal tDCS (AtDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the moving leg (cM1), posterior parietal cortex (PPC) contralateral to the moving leg (cPPC), and cerebellar cortex (CBM) ipsilateral to the moving leg (iCBM) on motor learning, motor adaptation, and brain connectivity in healthy middle-aged and older adults and hemiparetic patients with chronic subcortical stroke.",[213,214,33,215,216,217,27],"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation","Ankle","Adaptation","Brain Structure","Brain Connectivity","2024-08-15",{"date":220,"type":51},"2024-08-19",{"date":222,"type":51},"2024-07-09",{"date":224,"type":21},"2026-07-31",{"name":226,"class":58},"National Taiwan University Hospital"]