[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"neck-dissection\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:neck-dissection":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,42],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":30,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":31,"startDateStruct":34,"completionDateStruct":36,"leadSponsor":38,"locationsCount":41},"100598661","assessing-spinal-accessory-nerve-recovery-after-post-operative-electrical-stimulation-100598661",false,"NCT07074392","Assessing Spinal Accessory Nerve Recovery After Post-operative Electrical Stimulation","Assessing the Feasibility and Effect of Post-operative Electrical Stimulation on Spinal Accessory Nerve Recovery After Neck Dissection for Head and Neck Cancer","SpARES","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Undergoing neck dissection\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous neck dissection, previous implantable stimulator (i.e. pacemaker), previous spinal accessory nerve injury, pre-existing shoulder injury or weakness","ALL",{"count":19,"type":20},38,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","Shoulder weakness and pain are common after neck dissection surgery for head and neck cancer. This is often caused by injury to the spinal accessory nerve, which controls important shoulder muscles. Recovery can be slow and incomplete, affecting patients' ability to return to daily activities. This project will test whether a brief, low-dose electrical stimulation treatment can help the nerve heal faster and improve shoulder function. The treatment is applied during surgery and is safe, non-invasive, and quick to deliver. If successful, this approach could lead to better rehabilitation, less disability, and improved quality of life for patients undergoing cancer surgery. The project also supports the development of new medical technology and offers a pathway to expand the use of electrical stimulation in other nerve injuries.",[26,27,28],"Head and Neck Cancer","Nerve Injury","Neck Dissection","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-08-14",{"date":32,"type":33},"2025-08-19","ACTUAL",{"date":35,"type":20},"2026-01-01",{"date":37,"type":20},"2027-03-01",{"name":39,"class":40},"McMaster University","OTHER",1,{"id":43,"slug":44,"hasResults":11,"nctId":45,"briefTitle":46,"officialTitle":46,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":47,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":48,"maxAge":49,"enrollmentInfo":50,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":52,"briefSummary":53,"conditions":54,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":56,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":57,"startDateStruct":59,"completionDateStruct":61,"leadSponsor":63,"locationsCount":4},"100501193","elective-vs-therapeutic-neck-dissection-in-treatment-of-patients-with-clinical-t12n1m0-oral-squamous-cell-carcinoma-100501193","NCT05806073","Elective vs Therapeutic Neck Dissection in Treatment of Patients With Clinical T1\u002F2N1M0 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Histologically proven T1 or T2 N1 M0( AJCC 8th) squamous call carcinoma of tongue(except base of the tongue ), buccal mucosa, upper and lower gums, hard palate and floor of mouth;\n2. No history of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or targeted therapy,for any reason before\n3. No history of a prior malignancy in head and neck region\n4. No history of a prior malignancy outside head and neck region in the preceding 5 years\n5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance score (ECOG PS) is 0 or 1;\n6. Participants will be reliable for follow-up\n7. Understanding the protocol and is able to give informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. failed to obtain the signed written informed consent;\n2. definite distant metastasis or other malignant tumor;\n3. Previous surgical operations for primary tumors or lymph nodes in the head and neck (except biopsy);\n4. previously received radiotherapy for primary tumors or lymph nodes;\n5. previously received anti-tumor biological targeted therapy;\n6. Chemotherapy or immunotherapy has been applied to the primary tumor in the past;\n7. Patients with any malignant tumor in the past 5 years (except the cured basal cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ)；\n8. Any unstable systemic disease (including active infection, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina pectoris, angina pectoris that started in the last 3 months, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction that occurred in the first 12 months, serious arrhythmia requiring medical treatment, liver, kidney or metabolic diseases);\n9. known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection;\n10. chronic diseases requiring immune preparations or hormone treatment;\n11. pregnant or lactating women;\n12. drug\u002Falcohol abuse, or suffering from psychological or mental diseases that may interfere with research compliance;\n13. Epilepsy patients who need medical treatment (such as steroids or antiepileptic drugs);\n14. participated in other clinical trials in the past 30 days;\n15. cases that the researcher thinks are not suitable for joining the group.","18 Years","75 Years",{"count":51,"type":20},188,[23],"Cervical lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Therapeutic neck dissection (I-V region) has always been regarded as the standard scheme of neck surgery for patients with cN+ OSCC and however, it has brought obvious side effects, which seriously affects the postoperative quality of life of patients. In addition, excessive neck lymph node dissection will also affect the local immune function of patients to some extent and reduce the body's response to immunotherapy. Lymph node metastasis of primary oral squamous cell carcinoma follows certain rules. Most of the metastatic areas are I-II, and low-level metastasis is very rare. Therefore, more than 90% of patients with cN+ oral squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone Therapeutic neck dissection may have suffered from \"excessive dissection of area of IV and V\".\n\nBoth the long-term clinical experience of surgeons and a large number of recent retrospective studies show that elective neck dissection (I-III region) is safe enough for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma of cN1 and part of cN2.There is clearly a need therefore for a large randomized trial that will resolve the issue either way once and for all.",[55,28],"Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma","2023-04-10",{"date":58,"type":33},"2023-04-12",{"date":60,"type":20},"2023-04",{"date":62,"type":20},"2026-12",{"name":64,"class":40},"Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University"]