[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"obstetric-delivery\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:obstetric-delivery":31},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":20,"enrollmentInfo":21,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":25,"briefSummary":27,"conditions":28,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":5},"100555025","comparison-between-two-medical-devices-for-labor-induction-after-previous-c-section-100555025",false,"NCT06506721","Comparison Between Two Medical Devices for Labor Induction After Previous C-section","Balloon Catheter vs. Hygroscopic Cervical Dilator for Labour Induction After Previous Caesarean Section: an Open Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","DiBal","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* All women \\>= 18years old with a previous CS and an indication of labour induction, between 24-42 weeks of pregnancy.\n* Modified Bishop-Score \\\u003C 6\n* Informed consent\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* More than 1 CS\n* Premature rupture of membranes\n* Vaginal infection\n* Intrauterine fetal demise\n* Twin pregnancy\n* Contraindication against labour induction or vaginal delivery\n* Vaginal bleeding\n* Simultaneous external administration of prostaglandins planned\n* Placenta praevia, vasa praevia or placenta accreta spectrum\n* Transverse fetal orientation\n* Prolapsed umbilical cord\n* Prior hysterotomy, classic uterine incision, myomectomy or any other full thickness uterine incision (except C-section)\n* Pelvic structural anomaly\n* Active genital herpes infection\n* Invasive cervical cancer\n* Abnormal fetal heart rate pattern\n* Breech presentation\n* Maternal heart disease\n* Polyhydramnios\n* Presentic part above the pelvic inlet\n* Severe maternal hypertension",true,"FEMALE","18 Years","60 Years",{"count":22,"type":23},137,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[26],"NA","The objective of the study ist to compare the Dilapan-S and the Cook Ballon device for the mechanical induction of labour in women with a previous C-section. There is currently lack of data regarding this comparison of the two methods for mechanical labour induction in this patient collective. Any method used for labour induction is therefore off-label. The primary outcome is the time between placement of the device and delivery. Ad secondary outcomes are among others the cesarean delivery rate and patient satisfaction with the induction method.",[29,30,31],"Delivery, Obstetric","Cesarean Section","Obstetric Delivery",[33],"Trial of Labour","RECRUITING","2025-01-10",{"date":37,"type":38},"2025-01-14","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":38},"2023-12-29",{"date":42,"type":23},"2026-12-28",{"name":44,"class":45},"Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern","OTHER"]