[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"obstetric\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:obstetric":31},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,51,92],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":39,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":40,"startDateStruct":43,"completionDateStruct":45,"leadSponsor":47,"locationsCount":50},"100643966","platelet-rich-plasma-versus-standard-care-for-episiotomy-wound-healing-in-postpartum-women-100643966",false,"NCT07669285","Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Standard Care for Episiotomy Wound Healing in Postpartum Women","Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma in Enhancing Episiotomy Wound Healing and Reducing Postpartum Perineal Pain: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (PRP-EpiHeal)","PRP-EpiHeal","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Singular pregnancy, at term (≥ 37 weeks of gestation)\n* Vaginal delivery with episiotomy (midline or mediolateral)\n* Signed informed consent to participate in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known coagulation disorders or thrombocytopenia (\\\u003C 100,000\u002Fmm³)\n* Severe anemia (hemoglobin \\\u003C 7 g\u002FdL) at the time of delivery\n* Active systemic or local perineal infection at the time of delivery\n* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or other significant comorbidities affecting wound healing (e.g., autoimmune disease under immunosuppressive treatment) Third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (extending to the anal sphincter or rectal mucosa) Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent",true,"FEMALE","18 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},200,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This study looks at whether a treatment made from a patient's own blood, called platelet-rich plasma (PRP), can help heal the cut made during childbirth (episiotomy) better than standard care alone.\n\nPRP is prepared by drawing a small blood sample from the patient and spinning it in a centrifuge to concentrate the platelets, which contain natural healing factors. In this study, women who have an episiotomy during vaginal delivery will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive a single injection of their own PRP at the wound site right after delivery, and the other group will receive the usual standard wound care. Neither group's care will otherwise differ.\n\nResearchers will follow each woman for 6 weeks after delivery, checking how well the wound is healing using a standard scoring tool (REEDA score), along with pain levels, any complications like infection or wound reopening, and how satisfied participants are with their recovery.\n\nThe goal is to find out whether this simple, low-risk treatment using a woman's own blood can speed up healing and reduce discomfort after childbirth.",[28,29,30,31],"Episiotomy","Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)","Wound Healing","Obstetric",[33,34,35,36,37],"episiotomy","platelet rich plasma","wound healing","obstetric","postpartum period","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-25",{"date":41,"type":42},"2026-06-30","ACTUAL",{"date":44,"type":22},"2026-06-21",{"date":46,"type":22},"2028-12-30",{"name":48,"class":49},"Saint Andrew Hospital Constanta","OTHER",1,{"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":11,"nctId":54,"briefTitle":55,"officialTitle":56,"acronym":57,"eligibilityCriteria":58,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":59,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":61,"briefSummary":62,"conditions":63,"keywords":72,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":83,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":84,"startDateStruct":86,"completionDateStruct":88,"leadSponsor":90,"locationsCount":50},"100644265","hyperangulated-vs-macintosh-style-blades-for-intubation-in-obstetric-patients-100644265","NCT07667010","Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Style Blades for Intubation in Obstetric Patients","HyperANGulated Versus Macintosh styLE blaDes for INtubation in OBstetric Patients: a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Study","ANGLED","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1\\. Pregnant patients undergoing emergency or urgent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. No tracheal intubation performed and (ii) patient refusal of consent.\n2. Patients not receiving general anesthesia.\n3. Patients that previously participated in the study.",{"count":60,"type":22},100,[25],"Cesarean section under general anesthesia requires intubation (insertion of a tube through the mouth into the breathing pipe to support breathing during the surgery). A device called a video laryngoscope is used, which has a smooth, curved, or less curved component called 'a blade' that helps the doctor gently see the voice box and guide the breathing tube safely into place during anesthesia; it is not a sharp tool blade.\n\nThere are two types of video laryngoscopes blades: a Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees) and a hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve).\n\nAlthough video laryngoscopes are safe and both types have been used for around 20 years, it is not known whether one type works better that the other in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. Because general anesthesia is used in only a small proportion (about 5%) of all cesarean deliveries, research in this area is limited.\n\nThe main purpose of the study is to assess if a study comparing these two types of blades in the obstetric population is feasible. This is also known as a feasibility study, which aims to test the study plan and determine whether enough participants will join a larger study and accept the study procedures. The results will be used as a guide for a larger study.",[31,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71],"Cesarean Birth","Airway Anesthesia","Intubation","General Anesthesia; Tracheal Intubation","Video Laryngoscopy","Obstetric Anesthesia","Obstetric Anesthesia Problems","General Anesthesia",[36,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82],"obstetric anesthesia","intubation","airway safety in OB patients","video laryngoscopy","cesarean delivery","general anesthesia in cesarean delivery","macintosh blade","hyperangulated blade","intubation in OB patients","general anesthesia","2026-06-19",{"date":85,"type":42},"2026-06-24",{"date":87,"type":22},"2026-06-15",{"date":89,"type":22},"2028-06-30",{"name":91,"class":49},"Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital",{"id":93,"slug":94,"hasResults":11,"nctId":95,"briefTitle":96,"officialTitle":97,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":98,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":99,"maxAge":100,"enrollmentInfo":101,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":103,"briefSummary":104,"conditions":105,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":107,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":108,"startDateStruct":110,"completionDateStruct":112,"leadSponsor":114,"locationsCount":50},"100612055","emergency-obstetric-care-protocol-100612055","NCT07248605","Emergency Obstetric Care Protocol","Effect of Applying Emergency Obstetric Care Protocol on Maternity Nurses' Practices","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* of maternity nurses who are works in Obstetric departments , Emergency obstetric operating room and delivery unit\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* nurses who are on long vocations at the time of data collection or have administrative work.","20 Years","35 Years",{"count":102,"type":22},60,[25],"This study aims to investigate the effect of applying emergency obstetric care protocol on maternity nurses' practices.",[106,31],"Emergency Care","2026-02-28",{"date":109,"type":42},"2026-03-03",{"date":111,"type":22},"2026-03-01",{"date":113,"type":22},"2027-01-01",{"name":115,"class":49},"Mansoura University"]