[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"occlusal-caries\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:occlusal-caries":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,46,74],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100606106","evaluation-of-cytokines-level-as-an-indicator-of-pulp-inflammation-and-its-relation-to-the-success-rates-of-pulpotomy-in-primary-molars-affected-with-proximal-versus-occlusal-decay-100606106",false,"NCT07171229","Evaluation of Cytokines Level as an Indicator of Pulp Inflammation and Its Relation to the Success Rates of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Affected With Proximal Versus Occlusal Decay","Evaluation of Cytokines Level as an Indicator of Pulp Inflammation and Its Relation to the Success Rates of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Affected With Proximal Versus Occlusal Decay: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with provoked pain.\n* Caries in proximal surface to the dentine full thickness.\n* Caries in occlusal surface to the dentine full thickness.\n* Radicular pulp health is verified by achieving hemostasis within eight minutes of compression using a cotton pellet with 5% sodium hypochlorite.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unrestorable primary molars.\n* Primary molars with spontaneous pain.\n* Medically compromised patients who have systemic disease.\n* Uncooperative children who refuse treatment.\n* Children whose parents are unwilling to place stainless steel crowns.\n* Children whose parents or caregivers refuse to participate in the study or are unable to attend follow-up visits.","ALL","4 Years","9 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},58,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","pulpotomy will be done I primary molars with occlusal or proximal decay and level of cytokines will be measured as an indicator for pulp inflammation levels",[27,28,29],"Pulpitis - Reversible","Occlusal Caries","Proximal Caries",[31,32],"pulpotomy","cytokines","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-09-10",{"date":36,"type":37},"2025-09-12","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":21},"2025-09-01",{"date":41,"type":21},"2026-10-01",{"name":43,"class":44},"Cairo University","OTHER",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":51,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":53,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":56,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":66,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":67,"startDateStruct":69,"completionDateStruct":71,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":4},"100589610","18-month-clinical-evaluation-of-self-adhesive-flowable-giomer-compared-to-conventional-flowable-giomer-in-conservative-occlusal-restorations-100589610","NCT06956651","18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations","18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Posterior vital tooth with Class I caries.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Teeth with clinical symptoms of pulpitis, such as spontaneous pain.\n* Pain or sensitivity to pressure.\n* Non-vital teeth.\n* Fractured or cracked teeth.\n* Endodontically treated teeth.\n* Periodontally affected teeth.","18 Years",{"count":55,"type":21},40,[24],"The study compares two restorative materials to restore occlusal decay, offering the patients high-strength, high-durability restorations with antibacterial properties.",[28],[60,61,62,63,64,65],"self adhesive giomer","class I","clinical performance","Beautifil Flow","FIT SA","USPHS Criteria","2025-05-14",{"date":68,"type":37},"2025-05-18",{"date":70,"type":21},"2025-09",{"date":72,"type":21},"2027-04",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":75,"slug":76,"hasResults":11,"nctId":77,"briefTitle":78,"officialTitle":79,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":80,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":81,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":83,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":85,"briefSummary":86,"conditions":87,"keywords":95,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":97,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":98,"startDateStruct":100,"completionDateStruct":102,"leadSponsor":104,"locationsCount":4},"100587104","the-clinical-performance-of-two-dentine-replacement-materials-in-deep-occlusal-cavities-randomized-100587104","NCT06924047","The Clinical Performance of Two Dentine Replacement Materials in Deep Occlusal Cavities (Randomized)","The Clinical Performance of Two Dentine Replacement Materials in Deep Occlusal Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Adult patients aged (20-50)\n2. Medically free\n3. Good oral hygiene (Plaque index ≤2 (Moderate accumulation with plaque in the sulcus))\n4. Patients accepting to participate in the study.\n5. Teeth of normal appearance and morphology\n6. Maxillary and mandibular molar teeth with deep class Ⅰ carious lesions extending into the inner third of dentin.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients \\\u003C20 and \\>50.\n2. Teeth with proximal lesions.\n3. Patients with bad oral hygiene (Plaque index \\>2).\n4. Systematic disease that may interfere with the study.\n5. Patients with xerostomia.\n6. Presence of any abnormal occlusal habits (bruxism, nail biting, clenching).\n7. Patients undergoing or will start orthodontic treatment.\n8. Pregnancy.\n9. Teeth with signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.\n10. Non-vital, fractured or cracked teeth.\n11. Teeth with secondary caries.\n12. Periodontally compromised teeth.","20 Years","50 Years",{"count":84,"type":21},50,[24],"Higher mechanical properties are needed to restore structurally compromised posterior teeth, short fiber reinforced resin composite and injectable bioactive resin composites provide superior properties to flowable composites that were traditionally used to improve adaptation in deep cavities below the packable resin composite restorations. Thus, this study was designed to assess the clinical outcome of high strength dentine substitute materials.",[88,89,90,28,91,92,93,94],"Class I Cavities in High Caries Risk","Class I Composite Restorations","Randomized Clinical Trial","Fiber Reinforced Composite","Injectable Composite","Composite Restoration","Composite Resins",[96],"occlusal caries","2025-04-05",{"date":99,"type":37},"2025-04-11",{"date":101,"type":21},"2025-04",{"date":103,"type":21},"2026-04",{"name":105,"class":44},"Dalia Sameh Fawzi"]