[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"open\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:open":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,43],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":42},"100597619","endoscopic-versus-open-lumbar-discectomy-in-diabetic-patients-100597619",false,"NCT07060846","Endoscopic Versus Open Lumbar Discectomy in Diabetic Patients","Endoscopic Versus Open Lumbar Discectomy in Diabetic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age from 18 to 75 years.\n* Both sexes.\n* Patients suffering from prolapsed lumbar disc postero-lateral, single level disc herniation at L4-5 or L5-S1 level with low back pain and unilateral radiculopathy and failure of conservative treatment for 12 weeks\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Extraforaminal disc herniation.\n* Recurrent and\u002For multiple level discs prolapses.\n* Spondylolisthesis.\n* Prior lumbar surgery at the same spinal level.","ALL","18 Years","75 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},50,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This study aims to compare the endoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy in diabetic patients.",[27,28,29,30],"Endoscope","Open","Lumbar Discectomy","Diabetes Mellitus","RECRUITING","2025-07-19",{"date":34,"type":35},"2025-07-22","ACTUAL",{"date":32,"type":35},{"date":38,"type":21},"2025-12-01",{"name":40,"class":41},"Al-Azhar University","OTHER",1,{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":49,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":50,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":53,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":60,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":61,"startDateStruct":63,"completionDateStruct":64,"leadSponsor":65,"locationsCount":42},"100561018","analgesic-efficacy-of-external-oblique-intercostal-block-vs-subcostal-transversus-abdominis-plane-block-in-open-surgical-nephrectomy-100561018","NCT06584695","Analgesic Efficacy of External Oblique Intercostal Block vs Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Open Surgical Nephrectomy","Analgesic Efficacy of External Oblique Intercostal Block Versus Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Open Surgical Nephrectomy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age (18-65) year.\n* Both sexes.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II and III.\n* Cancer patients candidate for open nephrectomy .\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient refusal.\n* Skin lesions or infection at the site of proposed needle insertion.\n* Cognitive disorders.\n* History of psychiatric disorders or drug abuse.\n* Patients allergic to medication used.\n* ASA class IV.\n* Coagulopathy.\n* Body mass index (BMI) more than 35.","65 Years",{"count":52,"type":21},63,[24],"To compare the efficacy of unilateral ultrasound-guided oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block with unilateral ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block in providing intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in cancer patients undergoing open nephrectomy.",[56,57,58,28,59],"Analgesic Efficacy","External Oblique Intercostal Block","Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block","Nephrectomy","2024-09-05",{"date":62,"type":35},"2024-09-19",{"date":60,"type":35},{"date":38,"type":21},{"name":66,"class":41},"Cairo University"]