[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"orthopedic-operations\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:orthopedic-operations":36},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,69,103],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":41,"overallStatus":56,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":57,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":58,"startDateStruct":61,"completionDateStruct":63,"leadSponsor":65,"locationsCount":68},"100634199","time-to-healing-in-displaced-pediatric-diaphyseal-forearm-fractures-treated-with-bioabsorbable-compared-to-titanium-intramedullary-nails-100634199",false,"NCT07536581","Time to Healing in Displaced Pediatric Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures Treated With Bioabsorbable Compared to Titanium Intramedullary Nails","Time to Healing in Displaced Pediatric Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures Treated With Bioabsorbable Compared to Titanium Intramedullary Nails: A Single-Center, Multi-Blinded, Randomized Parallel-Group, Non-Inferiority Study","FOREST","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosis of a traumatic diaphyseal forearm fracture of the radius, ulna, or both\n* Operative fixation required\n* Fractures must be complete (not unicortical or greenstick) AND displaced \\>50% of bone width (after attempted closed reduction) AND\u002FOR angulated \\>10° in any plane (after attempted closed reduction)\n* Informed consent obtained\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Conditions where internal fixation is contraindicated (e.g. active or potential infection)\n* Grossly open fractures (Gustilo Anderson grade \\> 2)\n* Fracture occurred more than 2 weeks prior\n* Fractures that are well managed conservatively (undisplaced or minimally displaced)\n* Previous ipsilateral forearm fracture (risk of closed medullary canal)\n* Fractures unsuited for intramedullary nailing (e.g. multifragmentary, metaphyseal or epiphyseal)\n* Concurrent ipsilateral wrist or elbow involvement (e.g. Monteggia or Galeazzi variants)\n* Unable to participate in follow-up\n* Existing bone pathology (e.g. tumor, osteogenesis imperfecta, degenerative disease)\n* Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence in opinion of the PI the results of the present study\n\nIntraoperative exclusion criteria:\n\n* Fractures suitable for closed reduction and casting (see 6.3.9)\n* Indication for treatment 1 (BIN) only\n* Indication for treatment 2 (ESIN) only\n* Intraoperative decision to use implants other than the devices under investigation","ALL","3 Years","13 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},60,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This study looks at children with forearm fractures that need surgery. The standard treatment uses titanium nails, which usually need to be removed in a second operation later. This study compares titanium nails with bioabsorbable nails, which gradually dissolve in the body and may help some children avoid another operation.\n\nThe study will compare how quickly the fractures heal on X-ray, and also look at complications, recovery, function, and the family's experience. Children who need surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatments so the comparison is fair.\n\nHypothesis: The researchers expect that fractures treated with bioabsorbable nails will heal almost as quickly as fractures treated with titanium nails, while reducing the need for later implant removal surgery.",[28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40],"Forearm Injuries","Radius Fractures","Ulna Fractures","Fractures, Bone","Child","Adolescent","Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary","Internal Fixation","Orthopedic Operations","Polymers","Fracture Healing","Radiography","Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)",[40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55],"pediatric forearm fracture","forearm shaft fracture in children","elastic stable intramedullary nailingelastic stable intramedullary nailing","ESIN","titanium elastic nail","bioabsorbable intramedullary nail","TEN","BIN","radiographic healing","radiographic union","modified Radiographic Union Score","mRUS","non-inferiority trial","randomized trial","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-17",{"date":59,"type":60},"2026-04-22","ACTUAL",{"date":62,"type":22},"2026-04",{"date":64,"type":22},"2031-12",{"name":66,"class":67},"Children's Fractures Interest Group, Denmark","OTHER",1,{"id":70,"slug":71,"hasResults":11,"nctId":72,"briefTitle":73,"officialTitle":74,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":75,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":76,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":77,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":79,"phases":4,"briefSummary":80,"conditions":81,"keywords":90,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":93,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":94,"startDateStruct":96,"completionDateStruct":98,"leadSponsor":100,"locationsCount":68},"100613051","adherence-to-home-based-exercises-in-musculoskeletal-disorders-100613051","NCT07261553","Adherence to Home-Based Exercises in Musculoskeletal Disorders","Adherence to Home-Based Exercise Programs Among Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders and Its Influencing Factors","Inclusion criteria:\n\n* Be 18 years of age or older\n* To have a musculoskeletal disease (degenerative, neurological or orthopedic)\n* To be given a home exercise program\n* To have cognitive and language functions to communicate, to be a volunteer\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* Those with major psychiatric illness\n* Those with cognitive dysfunction\n* Those with communication disorders, reluctant\u002Freluctant to participate\n* Those with any condition other than a primary degenerative, orthopedic, or neurological disease that could significantly affect exercise adherence, including musculoskeletal or systemic disorders (e.g., severe anemia, heart failure, respiratory failure, uncontrolled diabetes, inflammatory rheumatic disease, recent fractures, or active infections).","18 Years",{"count":78,"type":22},252,"OBSERVATIONAL","Home exercise program is recommended by physicians to patients and their relatives to do at home and It is a treatment option in which the physician describes how to do it. Home workout program to be completed at home to complement and reinforce their program in the clinic It is a personalized set of therapeutic exercises that are taught. There are factors that can change exercise compliance; There are some reasons why some patients adhere to the prescribed home exercise program and others do not.\n\nAdherence to home exercises is a major issue in rehabilitation and the reasons for this are multifactorial; It includes both psychological and specific conditions factors that vary between each individual and these conditions should be taken into account by clinicians in designing personalized exercise programs.\n\nHome exercise programs constitute a fundamental component of rehabilitation and are widely prescribed by physicians support therapeutic gains beyond the clinical environment. These individualized programs aim to maintain functional improvements, reduce symptoms, and promote self-management among individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. Although adherence to home-based exercises is recognized as a key determinant of rehabilitation outcomes, non-adherence remains a persistent challenge. Despite growing emphasis on the importance of exercise compliance, the existing literature provides relatively limited and insufficient evidence regarding the factors that influence adherence across different musculoskeletal conditions, including degenerative, orthopedic, and neurological disorders.\n\nAddressing this gap, the present prospective longitudinal cohort study aims to evaluate adherence to individualized home-based exercise programs among patients with diverse musculoskeletal conditions and to determine whether adherence behaviors differ across diagnostic groups. In addition, the study seeks to identify demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and functional factors associated with exercise compliance. By integrating structured clinical evaluations with validated outcome measures, this study aims not only to clarify the determinants of exercise adherence but also to contribute to the development of more effective, condition-specific strategies to enhance sustained engagement in home-based rehabilitation.",[82,83,84,85,86,87,88,36,89],"Exercise Training","Adherence, Treatment","Musculoskeletal Disease","Rehabilitation Exercise","Adherence, Patient","Home Exercise Program","Stroke","Degeneration of Spine and Osteoarticular",[87,91,85,84,86],"adherence","RECRUITING","2026-03-21",{"date":95,"type":60},"2026-03-25",{"date":97,"type":60},"2024-12-30",{"date":99,"type":22},"2026-05-15",{"name":101,"class":102},"Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital","OTHER_GOV",{"id":104,"slug":105,"hasResults":11,"nctId":106,"briefTitle":107,"officialTitle":108,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":109,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":110,"maxAge":111,"enrollmentInfo":112,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":113,"briefSummary":114,"conditions":115,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":121,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":122,"startDateStruct":124,"completionDateStruct":126,"leadSponsor":128,"locationsCount":68},"100581703","gastric-insufflation-volume-using-i-gel-versus-ambu-auragain-in-pediatric-patients-undergoing-elective-orthopedic-operations-under-general-anesthesia-100581703","NCT06853756","Gastric Insufflation Volume Using I-gel Versus Ambu AuraGain in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Orthopedic Operations Under General Anesthesia","Gastric Insufflation Volume Using I-gel Versus Ambu AuraGain in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Orthopedic Operations Under General Anesthesia: a Prospective Randomized Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged from 2 to 12 years.\n* Both sexes.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II.\n* Scheduled for elective orthopedic operations in a supine position under general anesthesia.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a known history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disorders.\n* Full Stomach.\n* Anticipated difficult mask ventilation or intubation.\n* Body mass index \"BMI\" exceeding 20% of the ideal.\n* A history of chest problems.\n* History of the gastrointestinal tract or thoracic surgeries.","2 Years","12 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},[25],"Our study aimed to compare the gastric insufflation volume between Ambu AuraGain and i-gel and its relationship with the oropharyngeal sealing pressure and the incidence of postoperative complications in generally anesthetized controlled-ventilated pediatric patients undergoing elective orthopedic operations.",[116,117,118,119,36,120],"Gastric Insufflation","I-gel","Ambu AuraGain","Pediatric","General Anesthesia","2025-02-25",{"date":123,"type":60},"2025-03-03",{"date":125,"type":60},"2023-08-01",{"date":127,"type":22},"2025-03-27",{"name":129,"class":67},"Tanta University"]