[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"pain-intensity-assessment\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:pain-intensity-assessment":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,58,87],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":17,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":21,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":39,"overallStatus":45,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":46,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":47,"startDateStruct":50,"completionDateStruct":52,"leadSponsor":54,"locationsCount":57},"100577203","efficacy-of-physical-therapy-treatment-in-endometriosis-and-its-relationship-to-adherence-rates-100577203",false,"NCT06795243","Efficacy of Physical Therapy Treatment in Endometriosis and Its Relationship to Adherence Rates.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult women (over 18 years of age) diagnosed with endometriosis.\n* Women with the capacity to carry out a therapeutic program based on muscular exercise.\n* Women with the capacity to understand the requirements of the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Women undergoing fertility and\u002For assisted reproduction treatment.\n* Pregnant women.","FEMALE","18 Years",{"count":18,"type":19},32,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[22],"NA","The main objective of this study is to know if the application of both therapies, neuroscience pain education plus therapeutic exercise will modify pain, catastrophizing and quality of life in endometriosis.",[25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"Endometriosis","Endometriosis Related Pain","Endometriosis, Pain","Endometriosis-related Pain","Pain","Pain Intensity Assessment","Pain Management","Pain, Chronic Disease","Pain Score","Therapeutic Exercise","Exercise Adherence","Adherence, Treatment","Treatment Adherence and Compliance","Quality of Life",[25,26,27,29,30,31,40,41,42,43,36,37,44],"Pain, chronic disease","pain score","therapeutic exercise","exercise adherence","Quality of life","RECRUITING","2026-03-30",{"date":48,"type":49},"2026-04-06","ACTUAL",{"date":51,"type":49},"2025-05-01",{"date":53,"type":19},"2026-07-01",{"name":55,"class":56},"University of Seville","OTHER",1,{"id":59,"slug":60,"hasResults":11,"nctId":61,"briefTitle":62,"officialTitle":62,"acronym":63,"eligibilityCriteria":64,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":65,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":66,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":68,"phases":4,"briefSummary":69,"conditions":70,"keywords":73,"overallStatus":45,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":77,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":78,"startDateStruct":80,"completionDateStruct":82,"leadSponsor":84,"locationsCount":86},"100606999","prevalence-of-pain-in-mechanically-ventilated-patients-in-intensive-care-units-100606999","NCT07182851","Prevalence of Pain in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Units","PainICU","Inclusion Criteria\n\nParticipants of both sexes, aged 18 or over;\n\nParticipants who are using invasive mechanical ventilation,\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nParticipants undergoing treatment with neuromuscular blockers,;\n\nParticipants with any condition associated with altered pain perception (e.g., Guillain-Barré Syndrome, SCI, etc.);\n\nParticipants with any condition that would likely interfere with behavioral assessments of pain (e.g., decortication or decerebration posture)\n\nAs the assessments will be carried out before and after the tracheal aspiration procedure, if the patient does not have objective criteria for tracheal aspiration, he\u002Fshe will be excluded from the study, irrefutably preventing the procedure from being carried out without express need.","ALL",{"count":67,"type":19},370,"OBSERVATIONAL","Introduction: Pain is a subjective symptom, a physiological response that is difficult to assess, which affects the body physically and\u002For emotionally. It is a common phenomenon among clinical and surgical patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU). And its effects are the combined results of physiological and behavioral aggressions caused by clinical conditions, immobility and the execution of common procedures in ICU's. The presence of pain appears to be independently associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher infection rates, patient-ventilator asynchronies, delirium, prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay and higher healthcare costs. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of pain and its associated factors in mechanically ventilated surgical patients in ICU's. Methods: This is a cohort, prospective, multicenter study designed to estimate the prevalence of pain, its intensity, its associated factors, correlating them to outcomes such as patient-ventilator asynchrony rate, time to weaning, and 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. All research participants who meet the inclusion criteria and who are not using neuromuscular blockers, or have any other condition associated with altered pain perception, will be evaluated using the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) on the 2nd day of mechanical ventilation and on the first day of awakening, when the RASS scale is between 4 and -2. At the same time, data will be collected on the ongoing sedoanalegesia strategy, and the asynchrony index will be calculated \\[(Nº of asynchronous ventilatory cycles\u002FNº of ventilatory cycles studied) \\*100\\]. The end point of the research will be 28 days, where the time until weaning, time until discharge or death will be established using the Kaplan-Meier estimators. Expected results: The prevalence of pain and its intensity is associated with the presence of patient-ventilator asynchronies and thus with harsh outcomes related to the length of stay in the ICU, time until weaning and thirty-day mortality in the ICU. It is estimated that there is agreement between the BPS and CPOT scales in mechanically ventilated patients.",[71,30,72],"Sedation and Analgesia","Mechanical Ventilation Complication",[74,75,76],"mechanical ventilation","intensive care unit","Pain Assessment","2025-09-17",{"date":79,"type":49},"2025-09-19",{"date":81,"type":49},"2025-06-01",{"date":83,"type":19},"2026-03-31",{"name":85,"class":56},"Centro Universitário Augusto Motta",4,{"id":88,"slug":89,"hasResults":11,"nctId":90,"briefTitle":91,"officialTitle":91,"acronym":92,"eligibilityCriteria":93,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":94,"minAge":16,"maxAge":95,"enrollmentInfo":96,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":20,"phases":98,"briefSummary":100,"conditions":101,"keywords":105,"overallStatus":45,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":109,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":110,"startDateStruct":112,"completionDateStruct":114,"leadSponsor":116,"locationsCount":118},"100576414","phase-4-impact-of-using-the-airseal-system-with-ultra-low-pneumoperitoneum-in-patients-undergoing-robot-assisted-radical-prostatectomy-a-prospective-comparative-randomized-clinical-study-100576414","NCT06784986","Impact of Using the Airseal System With Ultra-low Pneumoperitoneum in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Clinical Study.","ARCO2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with prostate cancer who will undergo robotic prostatectomy;\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients over 65 and under 18 years of age;\n* Patients allergic to NSAIDs and\u002For Morphine and\u002For Tramadol;\n* Patients with chronic renal failure;\n* Patients with recurrence, metastasis and other existing neoplasms.","MALE","65 Years",{"count":97,"type":19},200,[99],"PHASE4","The AirSeal platform has been evaluated in urological surgeries, mainly in cases of malignant diseases 5,6. However, there is still a lack of data demonstrating the possible benefits of its use, which justifies the conduct of this research in order to aggregate such knowledge. Therefore, the objective of this prospective pilot study is to compare and evaluate the role of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with the AirSeal system in patients with prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy with those undergoing the procedure with the conventional insufflation system. We seek to provide more data on the use of AirSeal, which is associated with shorter operative times, shorter hospital stays and a lower probability of complications. In addition, we aim to ratify the effectiveness and cost-benefit of using the AirSeal system.",[102,103,30,104],"Prostate Carcinoma","Prostate Neoplasm","Quality of Life (QOL)",[106,107,108],"pneumoperitoneum","airseal","pneumoperitoneum in prostate neoplasm","2025-01-15",{"date":111,"type":49},"2025-01-20",{"date":113,"type":19},"2025-02",{"date":115,"type":19},"2026-02-15",{"name":117,"class":56},"Brazilian Institute of Robotic Surgery",2]