[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"passive-fit-of-full-arch-implant-prostheses\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:passive-fit-of-full-arch-implant-prostheses":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":4},"100611014","passive-fit-and-time-efficiency-in-all-on-x-implants-protocols-using-photogrammetry-splinted-scan-bodies-and-conventional-impression-technique-100611014",false,"NCT07235072","Passive Fit and Time Efficiency in All On-X Implants Protocols Using Photogrammetry, Splinted Scan Bodies, and Conventional Impression Technique","Comparative Analysis of Passive Fit and Time Efficiency in Allon-X Implants Protocols Using Photogrammetry, Splinted Scan Bodies, and Conventional Impression Technique","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAdults aged 45-65 years.\n\nFully edentulous or partially edentulous maxilla requiring full-arch rehabilitation.\n\nSufficient maxillary bone volume to support at least four implants according to the All-on-X protocol.\n\nSystemically healthy patients with no contraindications to dental implant surgery (ASA I-II classification).\n\nDemonstrated ability to maintain adequate oral hygiene.\n\nWillingness to participate in the study and comply with follow-up visits and required maintenance protocols.\n\nPatients seeking a fixed, implant-supported prosthesis for the maxilla due to missing teeth and inability to use removable prostheses effectively.\n\nAcceptable radiographic findings with no signs of pathology, infection, or significant anatomical limitations.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nUncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, immunosuppressive disorders)\n\nHistory of radiation therapy to the head and neck region\n\nActive periodontal disease or untreated caries\n\nMaxillary cysts, tumors, or pathologies\n\nPoor oral hygiene or inability to maintain postoperative care\n\nInsufficient bone volume for All-on-X without extensive grafting\n\nMaxillary sinus pathology or oroantral fistula\n\nPsychiatric illness or cognitive impairment affecting compliance\n\nBruxism or parafunctional habits\n\nPregnant or lactating women\n\nHistory of implant failure or titanium allergy\n\nUse of bisphosphonates or antiresorptive medications\n\nHeavy smoking (\\>10 cigarettes\u002Fday)\n\nInability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits\n\nDiagnosed or symptomatic temporomandibular joint disorders (pain, clicking, locking, limited opening)","ALL","45 Years","65 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},14,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","compare the passive fit of three impression techniques: photogrammetry, intraoral digital scanning with splinted scan bodies, and the conventional open-tray impression technique, within the context of the All-on-X treatment concept. This comparison is expected to provide valuable clinical evidence to support clinicians in making informed decisions when considering the adoption of digital alternatives to conventional methods.",[27],"Passive Fit of Full-arch Implant Prostheses","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-11-19",{"date":31,"type":32},"2025-11-24","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":21},"2026-03-01",{"date":36,"type":21},"2026-10-01",{"name":38,"class":39},"October 6 University","OTHER"]