[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"patella-fracture\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:patella-fracture":25},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,47,78,106,151],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100612084","high-strength-suture-vs-traditional-tension-band-for-patellar-fractures-100612084",false,"NCT07248982","High-Strength Suture vs. Traditional Tension Band for Patellar Fractures","Prospective Cohort Study of High-Strength Suture Modified Tension Band Technique for the Treatment of Patellar Fractures","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1.Age 18-55 years. 2.Radiographically confirmed patellar fracture (AO\u002FOTA 34-C1 or 34-C2). 3.First-time patellar fracture surgery. 4.Time from injury to surgery ≤ 2 weeks. 5.Able to comply with follow-up and provide written informed consent. 6.Normal pre-injury knee function. 7.Able to tolerate surgery and agree to surgical treatment. 8.Intact cognitive function.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1.Age \\\u003C18 or \\>55 years. 2.Pathological fractures. 3.Prior patellar surgery or severe underlying patellofemoral disease. 4.Time from injury to surgery \\>2 weeks. 5.Concurrent active infection or severe medical conditions. 6.Severe neuropsychiatric disorders affecting follow-up compliance. 7.Postmenopausal women. 8.Inability to tolerate surgery or refusal of surgery. 9.Comorbid patellar dysplasia, rheumatoid arthritis, or other patellofemoral diseases.\n\n  10.Comorbid systemic or local infection at surgical site. 11.Comorbid severe lower limb or systemic injuries. 12.Pre-injury cognitive impairment, mental disorder, or independent walking disability.\n\n  13.Other conditions unsuitable for enrollment.","ALL","18 Years","55 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},50,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of high-strength suture modified tension band fixation in treating patellar fractures and compare it with traditional screw-cable tension band fixation. Adult patients (18-55 years) with AO\u002FOTA 34-C1 or 34-C2 patellar fractures will be enrolled and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes include Lysholm knee function score, knee range of motion (ROM), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include fracture healing time, radiographic alignment quality, complication rates, reoperation rates, implant removal rates, SF-36 health survey scores, and patient satisfaction. No additional biological samples will be collected; data will focus on clinical, radiographic, and follow-up information.",[25],"Patella Fracture",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33],"Patellar Fracture","Tension Band Fixation","High-Strength Suture","Knee Function","Lysholm Score","VAS Pain Score","Prospective Cohort","RECRUITING","2025-11-21",{"date":37,"type":38},"2025-11-25","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":38},"2024-02-01",{"date":42,"type":21},"2026-06-30",{"name":44,"class":45},"Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital","OTHER",1,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":57,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":46},"100593417","phase-4-effects-of-intra-operative-intra-articular-cocktail-injection-in-patella-open-reduction-and-internal-fixation-100593417","NCT07006168","Effects Of Intra-Operative Intra-Articular Cocktail Injection In Patella Open Reduction And Internal Fixation","Effects Of Intra-Operative Intra-Articular Cocktail Injection In Patella Open Reduction And Internal Fixation (ORIF): A Single Centre, Double Blinded, Randomised Control Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* acute patella fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation;\n* able to consent to surgery;\n* pre-morbid able to ambulate\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* open fracture;\n* polytrauma;\n* previous knee arthroplasty;\n* history of chronic pain,\n* insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, or peptic ulcer disease;\n* chronic users of glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, or immune-modulating agents, or of strong opioids (e.g.: morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, oxycodone, or meperidine);\n* hepatitis B or C carrier;\n* renal impairment (creatinine \\[Cr\\], \\>200 mmol\u002FL)",{"count":55,"type":21},56,"INTERVENTIONAL",[58],"PHASE4","The objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of an intra-articular analgesics cocktail injection for post-operative patella fracture fixation patients, by comparing post-operative pain relief and functional recovery among study subjects who received the injection and those who did not receive the injection. Secondary objective is to demonstrate the health economic effects of intra-articular analgesics cocktail injection by reducing length of hospital stay and reducing bed-stay related complications.",[25],[62,63,64,65,66,67,68],"Intra-Articular analgesic injection","Pain relief","Open Reduction and Internal Fixation","Functional Recovery","Rehabilitation","Range of motion","Post-operative recovery","2025-05-27",{"date":71,"type":38},"2025-06-05",{"date":73,"type":38},"2024-11-01",{"date":75,"type":21},"2027-07-31",{"name":77,"class":45},"The University of Hong Kong",{"id":79,"slug":80,"hasResults":11,"nctId":81,"briefTitle":82,"officialTitle":83,"acronym":84,"eligibilityCriteria":85,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":86,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":88,"briefSummary":90,"conditions":91,"keywords":92,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":98,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":99,"startDateStruct":101,"completionDateStruct":103,"leadSponsor":105,"locationsCount":46},"100591485","comparison-of-patella-plating-versus-tension-band-wiring-for-the-treatment-of-unstable-patellar-fractures-100591485","NCT06981039","Comparison of Patella Plating Versus Tension Band Wiring for the Treatment of Unstable Patellar Fractures","The WASP Trial (Wiring Versus Anterior Star Plate): Comparison of Patella Plating Versus Tension Band Wiring for the Treatment of Unstable Patellar Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial","WASP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged 18 years or older\n* Diagnosed with an isolated closed injury, displaced, unstable fracture with displacement \\>2mm (AO\u002FOTA Classification 34-B and C with surgical indication)\n* Able to give consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of previous knee surgery\n* Poly trauma,\n* Ongoing malignancy\n* Pre-existing severe knee osteoarthritis (\\>KL stage 4)\n* Stroke\n* Other neurological conditions\u002Finjuries to the lower limb\n* Unfit for surgical anaesthesia\n* Non-ambulatory\n* Unable to consent or follow commands",{"count":87,"type":21},60,[89],"NA","This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of patella anatomical locking plate fixation versus tension band wiring in the treatment of patellar fractures.",[25],[93,94,95,96,97],"trauma","knee injury","Tension Band Wiring","Patella fracture","Anatomical locking plate fixation","2025-05-12",{"date":100,"type":38},"2025-05-20",{"date":102,"type":38},"2024-02-14",{"date":104,"type":21},"2026-07-31",{"name":77,"class":45},{"id":107,"slug":108,"hasResults":11,"nctId":109,"briefTitle":110,"officialTitle":111,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":112,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":113,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":115,"briefSummary":116,"conditions":117,"keywords":139,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":142,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":143,"startDateStruct":145,"completionDateStruct":147,"leadSponsor":149,"locationsCount":46},"100522111","opioid-free-pain-treatment-in-trauma-patients-100522111","NCT06078371","Opioid-Free Pain Treatment in Trauma Patients","Peri-operative Opioid-free Analgesic Protocol for Orthopedic Trauma Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient is over the age of 18 years old\n* Underwent surgical treatment for the injuries of interest (stated elsewhere) by an Orthopedic Traumatology Attending Physician at the University of Kansas Hospital\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients that are unable to provide informed consent due to sustaining a head injury or incoherence from narcotics given to them post-injury\n* Chronic opioid use\n* Under the age of 18 years old\n* Undergoing revision surgery\n* Did not undergo surgical fixation\n* Pregnant\u002Fnursing women\n* Vulnerable populations as defined by the University of Kansas Medical Center IRB\n* Did not experience one of the following fractures listed in D.1. above.\n* Patients with CKD and\u002For cirrhosis will be excluded from the opioid-free pain block (block 2) and will only qualify for the standard of care opioid group (Block 1)",{"count":114,"type":21},250,[89],"Analgesic drug study that will compare pain outcomes of opioid analgesia and opioid-free analgesia in post-operative orthopedic patients.",[118,119,120,121,25,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138],"Femoral Neck Fractures","Intertrochanteric Fractures","Femoral Shaft Fracture","Distal Femur Fracture","Tibial Shaft Fracture with or Without Associated Fibula Fracture","Ankle Fracture (bimalleolar Equivalent, Bimalleolar, or Trimalleolar)","Tibial Pilon Fracture","Talar Head, Neck, Body, or Process Fractures","Calcaneus Fractures","Lisfranc Injuries","Isolated or Multiple Metatarsal Fractures","Phalanx Fractures of the Foot, Single or Multiple","Clavicle Fractures","Proximal Humerus Fractures","Humeral Shaft Fractures","Distal Humerus Fractures (intra or Extra-articular)","Olecranon Fractures","Radial Head or Neck Fractures","Elbow Fractures Involving a Combination of Fractures of the Radius and Uln","Forearm Fractures (both Bone Forearm Fractures, Isolated Ulnar Shaft, Isolated Radial Shaft)","Distal Radius Fractures",[140,141],"Surgical Intervention","Trauma","2024-10-22",{"date":144,"type":38},"2024-10-26",{"date":146,"type":38},"2023-11-01",{"date":148,"type":21},"2026-10",{"name":150,"class":45},"University of Kansas Medical Center",{"id":152,"slug":153,"hasResults":11,"nctId":154,"briefTitle":155,"officialTitle":156,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":157,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":158,"enrollmentInfo":159,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":161,"briefSummary":162,"conditions":163,"keywords":168,"overallStatus":177,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":178,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":179,"startDateStruct":181,"completionDateStruct":183,"leadSponsor":185,"locationsCount":46},"100502624","depuy-synthes-variable-angle-lcp-patella-plating-system-study-100502624","NCT05824676","DePuy Synthes Variable Angle LCP Patella Plating System Study","Utility of the Variable Angle LCP Patella Plating System for Traumatic Patellar Fractures: A Randomized Control Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Males and females\n* Age between 18 and 74 years old (inclusive)\n* Patellar fracture\n* Treated at Hartford HealthCare The Bone and Joint Institute or Hartford Hospital\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age greater than or equal to 75 or less than 18\n* Patients that are non-ambulatory\u002Flimited ambulation prior to their injury\n* Previous patellar fracture\n* Pre-existing osteoarthritis of the knee\n* Ipsilateral femoral or tibia fractures","74 Years",{"count":160,"type":21},36,[89],"The Depuy Synthes Locking Compression Plate (LCP) Variable Angle Patella Plating System is an FDA approved device. The purpose of this study is to see how well the Depuy Synthes LCP Variable Plating System work in fixing a broken kneecap (patella). Depuy says that the device will improve healing when compared to traditional ways of repairing a broken patella.\n\nThe goal of this randomized control trial is to learn how well the LCP Variable Plating System works to fix a broken patella (kneecap) compared to traditional fixation methods, in male and females, age 18 to 74, with a patellar fracture, and being treated at Hartford HealthCare The Bone and Joint Institute or Hartford Hospital. The main question it aims to answer are:\n\n* To understand if the Depuy Synthes LCP Variable Angle Plating System will provide a better way to help patients recover from a broken patella.\n\nParticipants will evaluated at specific time points: post-op day 1, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 month post-surgery. Participants will be asked to:\n\n* Complete surveys at all evaluation timepoints.\n* Have x-rays(radiographs) taken at the 6 week, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 1 year timepoints.\n* Participants will have a passive range of motion tests done at 6 week, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 1 year timepoints.\n* Participants would have strength and balance tests done at the 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 1 year timepoints.",[141,25,164,165,166,167],"Knee Cap","Knee Cap Injury","Knee Discomfort","Knee Deformity",[169,170,93,171,172,173,94,174,175,176],"Patella","Plating","kneecap","injury","knee injuries","fracture","break","randomized","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2023-04-10",{"date":180,"type":38},"2023-04-21",{"date":182,"type":21},"2023-05",{"date":184,"type":21},"2027-12",{"name":186,"class":45},"Hartford Hospital"]