[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"pelvic-fractures\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:pelvic-fractures":24},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,43],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":14,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":23,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":31,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":32,"startDateStruct":35,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":42},"100619938","assessment-of-treatment-variability-for-pelvic-ring-fragility-fractures-100619938",false,"NCT07351123","Assessment of Treatment Variability for Pelvic Ring Fragility Fractures","Pelvis ATV","The inclusion criteria are:\n\n1. Patient 60 years of age or older.\n2. Low energy injury mechanism.\n3. LC1 pelvis fracture (AO\u002FOTA 61B1.1,61B2.1, or 61B3.2) confirmed with antero-posterior, inlet, and outlet pelvis radiographs, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging.\n4. Fracture displacement of \\\u003C10 mm of the posterior pelvic ring on computed tomography of the pelvis.\n5. Injury occurred within 21 days of screening.\n\nThe exclusion criteria are:\n\n1. Patient did not ambulate prior to injury.\n2. Severely frail patients (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥7).\n3. Patient has another condition, injury, or fracture that prevents post-operative weightbearing on any extremity.\n4. Retained implants around the pelvis that precludes or limits either study treatment.\n5. Infection around the hip (soft tissue or bone).\n6. Pathologic fracture with a lytic lesion in the pelvis or sacrum that precludes internal fixation.\n7. Patient is too ill, in the judgement of the attending surgeon, for internal fixation.\n8. Patient is too ill, in the judgement of the attending surgeon, for nonoperative care.\n9. Problems, in the judgment of study personnel, with maintaining follow-up with the patient.\n10. Expected injury survival of less than 12 months.\n11. Terminal illness with expected survival of less than 12 months.\n12. Currently enrolled in a study that does not permit co-enrollment.\n13. Prior enrollment in the study.\n14. Unable to obtain informed consent due to language barriers.\n15. Unable to obtain informed consent because a legally authorized representative (LAR) was unavailable.\n16. Did not provide informed consent (declined participation).\n17. Patient or LAR not approached to participate in the trial (missed patient).\n18. Other reason to exclude the patient, as approved by the Principal Investigator.","ALL","60 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},120,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Fragility fractures of the pelvic ring are a common injury associated with poor patient outcomes and high healthcare costs. Management of these injuries is evolving with increasing frequency of operative stabilization of the pelvic ring, despite a lack of evidence supporting operative versus nonoperative treatment. This multicenter prospective cohort study will evaluate 120 patients to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing operative and nonoperative treatment, by evaluating patient willingness to enroll in a trial, surgeon willingness to randomize their patients' treatment, and the completeness of data collection.",[24,25],"Pelvic Fractures","Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP)",[27,28,29],"Pelvic fracture","Fragility fracture of the pelvis","Pelvic ring injury","RECRUITING","2026-06-04",{"date":33,"type":34},"2026-06-08","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":34},"2026-05-25",{"date":38,"type":20},"2027-09-30",{"name":40,"class":41},"University of Maryland, Baltimore","OTHER",1,{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":49,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":50,"maxAge":51,"enrollmentInfo":52,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":54,"phases":55,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":60,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":67,"completionDateStruct":69,"leadSponsor":71,"locationsCount":42},"100634364","early-partial-weight-bearing-may-improve-functional-recovery-without-increasing-complications-despite-this-potential-limited-randomized-studies-have-evaluated-early-weight-bearing-after-pelvic-fixation-surgeries-100634364","NCT07538726","Early Partial Weight-bearing May Improve Functional Recovery Without Increasing Complications Despite This Potential, Limited Randomized Studies Have Evaluated Early Weight-bearing After Pelvic Fixation Surgeries","Immediate Versus Delayed Weight Bearing After Fixation of Pelvic Ring Injuries: Randomized Control Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 to 55 years\n* Traumatic fractures indicated for pelvic fixation.\n* All Types B after stable anterior and \u002F or posterior fixation.\n* Type C, Stable fixation:\n\nPosterior fixation by triangular osteosynthesis. oTrans-iliac trans-sacral screw fixation or Trans iliac plate or posterior infex combined with anterior fixation.\n\n• Excellent to good quality of fracture reduction by Matta and Tornetta radiological assessment.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Associated lower extremity fractures that independently restrict or contraindicate weight-bearing activities.\n* Bilateral unstable after fixation pelvic ring disruption.\n* Patients with associated spinal cord injury, as neurological deficits may alter gait, functional recovery, and weight-bearing capacity, thereby affecting the validity and generalizability of the outcome measures.\n* Current history of acute systemic infection, active Bone inflammatory disease, (e.g., osteomyelitis, chronic non-bacterial osteitis), or malignancy, which may compromise the healing process, confound clinical outcomes, or pose additional medical risks during rehabilitation.\n* Uncontrolled Diabetes\n* Cancer\n* Active infection\n* Morbid obesity (BMI \\> 40)\n* Alcohol use disorder (AUD). Alcohol abuse as defined by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: \"Drinking at Low Risk for Developing Alcohol Use Disorder: For women, low-risk drinking is defined as no more than 3 drinks on any single day and no more than 7 drinks per week. For men, it is defined as no more than 4 drinks on any single day and no more than 14 drinks per week. NIAAA research shows that only about 2 in 100 people who drink within these limits have AUD\".\n* Claustrophobia\n* Pregnant woman\n* Inability to follow study protocol (e.g., lack of ability to attend visits or comprehend instructions)\n* Any psychiatric illness that would prevent comprehension of the details and nature of the study and interfere with follow-up clinical visits\n* Any clinical finding that would place the patient at health risk, impact the study, or affect the completion of the study","18 Years","55 Years",{"count":53,"type":20},50,"INTERVENTIONAL",[56],"NA","The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare between the effect of immediate weight bearing (WB) versus delayed weight bearing in improving function, pain, gait, quality of reduction radiologically, muscle strength, and quality of life outcomes in individuals who underwent specific pelvic fixation surgeries.",[24,59],"Weight Bearing",[61,62,63],"Immediate weight bearimg","pelvic fracture rehabilitation","unstalbe pelvic fractures","2026-04-13",{"date":66,"type":34},"2026-04-20",{"date":68,"type":34},"2025-08-31",{"date":70,"type":20},"2026-06",{"name":72,"class":41},"Assiut University"]