[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"peng-block\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:peng-block":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,51,77,105,129],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":34,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":39,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":40,"startDateStruct":43,"completionDateStruct":45,"leadSponsor":47,"locationsCount":50},"100579224","comparison-of-pain-relief-methods-for-hip-surgery-a-study-on-two-different-nerve-block-techniques-100579224",false,"NCT06821516","Comparison of Pain Relief Methods for Hip Surgery: A Study on Two Different Nerve Block Techniques","Comparison of Analgesic Effectiveness Between Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With Spinal Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Voluntary willingness to participate in the study.\n* Patients who will undergo Total Hip Arthroplasty surgery.\n* Patients aged over 18 years.\n* ASA score I-II-III.\n* Patients who are fully oriented and can cooperate.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA score IV-V.\n* Patients who refuse to participate in the study.\n* Patients under 18 years of age.\n* Presence of active infection in the area to be operated on.\n* Chronic pain and continuous analgesic use.\n* Patients with coagulation disorders.\n* Patients who cannot cooperate with postoperative pain follow-up.\n* Patients with allergies to local anesthetic agents.\n* Presence of neuropathy or myopathy in the operated extremity.",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},52,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This prospective randomized comparative study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESP) groups to relieve postoperative pain in participants over the age of 18 undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\nTo demonstrate whether PENG block or L-ESP block is more effective in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty surgery based on pain scores, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction.\n\nTotal hip arthroplasties cause severe pain with movement in the postoperative period. After surgery, the movements of the participants are severely restricted, which increases the possibility of complications. In this study, the participants' pain status, VAS score, opioid consumption through patient-controlled analgesia, and patient satisfaction will be measured with a questionnaire for 24 hours at predetermined time points and then compared. Both types of blocks have pain-relieving effects. This study will only investigate which one is more effective in reducing pain, and there will be no deficiency in relieving the pain of the participants.",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33],"Opioid Consumption, Postoperative","Pain, Postoperative","Nerve Block","PENG Block","Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block","Hip Replacement, Total","Postoperative Analgesia",[35,31,36,37],"Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block","Total Hip Arthroplasty","Postoperative analgesia","RECRUITING","2026-05-01",{"date":41,"type":42},"2026-05-07","ACTUAL",{"date":44,"type":42},"2025-01-21",{"date":46,"type":21},"2026-06-01",{"name":48,"class":49},"Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":11,"nctId":54,"briefTitle":55,"officialTitle":56,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":57,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":60,"briefSummary":61,"conditions":62,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":74,"locationsCount":50},"100590197","iliopsoas-ipb-and-pericapsular-nerve-group-peng-blocks-comparison-on-analgesia-and-recovery-after-total-hip-arthroplasty-100590197","NCT06964282","Iliopsoas (IPB) and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Blocks Comparison on Analgesia and Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty","Comparison Between Iliopsoas Block (IPB) and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery: a Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAdult patients (age \\>18 years) ASA physical status classification I-III Scheduled for elective posterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPregnancy (confirmed by beta-HCG test if applicable) Known peripheral neuropathy or major neurological disease Chronic pain syndromes or long-term opioid use (\\>20 mg oral morphine equivalents\u002Fday) Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency Allergy to local anesthetics Major coagulopathies Vulnerable patients (e.g., minors, legally protected individuals)",{"count":59,"type":21},118,[24],"Background:\n\nIn recent years, regional anesthesia has become more popular because it can reduce pain and the need for strong pain medications like morphine. For hip surgery, the PENG block is already known to be effective. A newer method, called the iliopsoas plane block (IPB), is very similar and has also shown good results in hip arthroscopy. However, these two techniques have never been directly compared in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery using the posterior approach.\n\nGoal:\n\nThis study aims to see if the IPB is just as effective as the PENG block for controlling pain and helping patients recover well after hip replacement surgery.\n\nMethod:\n\n118 adult patients scheduled for hip replacement under spinal anesthesia will be randomly assigned to receive either: IPB: 7 ml of Ropivacaine 7.5 mg\u002Fml PENG: 14 ml of Ropivacaine 3.75 mg\u002Fml Both injections are given under ultrasound guidance 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia. Neither the patient, the surgeon, nor the data collector will know which technique was used.\n\nPost-Surgery Care:\n\nAll patients will receive standard pain relief, including:\n\nParacetamol every 6 hours Etoricoxib once a day Morphine via a patient-controlled pump for 48 hours\n\nMain Outcome Measured:\n\nThe primary goal is to compare pain during movement 6 hours after surgery, using a pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). The study will consider the two blocks equivalent if the difference in average pain scores is less than 1 point.\n\nOther Outcomes:\n\nTotal morphine used in 48 hours Pain scores at rest and during movement at various time points Walking ability (2- and 6-minute walk tests, and timed-up-and-go test) Quality of recovery (using the QoR-15 questionnaire) Side effects of morphine Patient satisfaction Length of hospital stay\n\nSafety:\n\nBoth techniques are safe and already used in clinical practice. Ultrasound guidance minimizes risks like nerve injury, bleeding, or infection.\n\nConclusion:\n\nIf the IPB is shown to be as effective as the PENG block, both can be considered reliable options for pain control and early recovery after hip replacement surgery.",[63,64,65,30,66],"Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)","Postoperative Pain Management","Peripheral Nerve Blocks","Iliopsoas Nerve Block","2026-04-29",{"date":69,"type":42},"2026-05-06",{"date":71,"type":42},"2025-10-01",{"date":73,"type":21},"2026-10-10",{"name":75,"class":76},"University of Liege","OTHER",{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":83,"eligibilityCriteria":84,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":85,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":86,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":88,"briefSummary":89,"conditions":90,"keywords":92,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":97,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":98,"startDateStruct":100,"completionDateStruct":102,"leadSponsor":103,"locationsCount":50},"100619855","comparison-of-femoral-nerve-block-and-combined-peng-plus-femoral-nerve-block-in-geriatric-hip-surgery-100619855","NCT07350044","Comparison of Femoral Nerve Block and Combined PENG Plus Femoral Nerve Block in Geriatric Hip Surgery","A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Femoral Nerve Block and Combined Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Plus Femoral Nerve Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery","PENG-FEM","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 65 years and older,\n* Patients scheduled for surgery due to hip fracture,\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III,\n* Body mass index between 18 and 40 kg\u002Fm²,\n* Preoperative fasting duration of approximately 8 hours,\n* Planned spinal anesthesia,\n* Ability to provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age below 65 years,\n* Refusal to participate in the study,\n* Severe cognitive impairment, dementia, or Alzheimer's disease,\n* ASA physical status IV or higher,\n* Body mass index \\> 40 kg\u002Fm²,\n* Failed spinal anesthesia or conversion to general anesthesia,\n* Revision hip surgery,\n* Multiple trauma patients,\n* Old hip fractures (\\>3 weeks),\n* Active malignancy receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy,\n* Active infection requiring antibiotic treatment (except prophylaxis),\n* Contraindications to regional anesthesia techniques,\n* Chronic steroid or immunosuppressive therapy,\n* Use of anti-inflammatory drugs,\n* Non-fasted patients,\n* Allergy or intolerance to local anesthetics, paracetamol, tramadol, or other opioids.","65 Years",{"count":87,"type":21},68,[24],"Hip fracture surgery in geriatric patients is frequently associated with severe perioperative pain, which may complicate positioning for spinal anesthesia and increase perioperative opioid requirements. Regional analgesic techniques are commonly used to improve patient comfort and reduce opioid consumption in this vulnerable population. The femoral nerve block is a well-established method for analgesia in hip surgery, while the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has emerged as a novel technique targeting articular branches of the hip joint with potential advantages in pain control.\n\nThis prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of femoral nerve block alone versus a combined pericapsular nerve group (PENG) plus femoral nerve block in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcomes include perioperative pain intensity, opioid consumption within the first 24 hours postoperatively, and the need for additional analgesia during positioning for spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcomes include spinal anesthesia procedure duration, time to sensory block onset, time to first postoperative opioid requirement, and perioperative hemodynamic parameters.\n\nThe results of this study are expected to clarify whether the addition of the PENG block to femoral nerve block provides superior perioperative analgesia and improved patient comfort compared with femoral nerve block alone in geriatric hip fracture surgery.",[30,91],"Hip Fracture Surgeries",[93,94,91,95,96],"PENG block","Femoral block","Pain","Opioid","2026-03-23",{"date":99,"type":42},"2026-03-25",{"date":101,"type":42},"2026-01-15",{"date":46,"type":21},{"name":104,"class":76},"Ankara City Hospital Bilkent",{"id":106,"slug":107,"hasResults":11,"nctId":108,"briefTitle":109,"officialTitle":110,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":111,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":112,"enrollmentInfo":113,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":115,"briefSummary":117,"conditions":118,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":119,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":120,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":121,"startDateStruct":123,"completionDateStruct":125,"leadSponsor":127,"locationsCount":4},"100572678","phase-2-efficacy-of-dexmedetomidine-as-an-adjuvant-to-bupivacaine-in-pericapsular-nerve-group-block-in-hip-replacement-surgeries-100572678","NCT06736392","Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Hip Replacement Surgeries","Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Postoperative Analgesia During Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Replacement Surgeries, a Randomized Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged from 18 years to 90 years\n* Gender : both males and females\n* BMI less than 35 kg\u002Fm2\n* Patients with American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) classification class I , II or III\n* Patients scheduled for total or partial hip replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient declining to give written informed consent\n* Patient with infection at the site of injection\n* Patient with coagulopathy\n* Patients with known allergy to used medications.\n* Psychiatric disorder","90 Years",{"count":114,"type":21},60,[116],"PHASE2","Our aim will be to investigate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for postoperative analgesia in hip replacement surgeries.\n\n* Our primary outcome of the study: total amount of postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24h postoperative.\n* Our secondary outcome of the study: postoperative analgesia assessed by pain score (by Visual Analog Scale)",[30],"NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2024-12-13",{"date":122,"type":42},"2024-12-16",{"date":124,"type":21},"2025-03-01",{"date":126,"type":21},"2027-03",{"name":128,"class":76},"Assiut University",{"id":130,"slug":131,"hasResults":11,"nctId":132,"briefTitle":133,"officialTitle":134,"acronym":30,"eligibilityCriteria":135,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":85,"maxAge":136,"enrollmentInfo":137,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":139,"briefSummary":140,"conditions":141,"keywords":144,"overallStatus":119,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":146,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":147,"startDateStruct":149,"completionDateStruct":151,"leadSponsor":153,"locationsCount":50},"100560862","assessing-the-effectiveness-and-safety-of-pericapsular-nerve-group-peng-block-in-hip-fracture-patients-on-antithrombotic-therapy-100560862","NCT06582667","Assessing the Effectiveness and Safety of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Hip Fracture Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy","Assessing the Effectiveness and Safety of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Hip Fracture Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 65 years or older\n* diagnosis of hip fracture\n* scheduled for surgical intervention within 48 hours\n* Informed consent obtained.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Allergy to local anesthetics,\n* Contraindications to the PENG block\n* inability to provide informed consent.","85 Years",{"count":138,"type":21},100,[24],"PENG block will be done on patients with hip fracture either receiving antithrombotic therapy or not under ultrasound guidance",[142,143,30],"Hip Fracture","Antithrombotic Therapy",[145,93],"antithrombotic therapy","2024-08-30",{"date":148,"type":42},"2024-09-03",{"date":150,"type":21},"2024-09-17",{"date":152,"type":21},"2025-04-17",{"name":154,"class":76},"Alexandria University"]