[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"periapical-lesions\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:periapical-lesions":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,48],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100594427","success-of-endodontic-treatment-with-different-obturation-techniques-and-sealer-cements-100594427",false,"NCT07019298","Success of Endodontic Treatment With Different Obturation Techniques and Sealer Cements","Evaluation of the Success Rate of Endodontic Treatment Using Different Obturation Techniques and Root Canal Sealer Cements: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients aged 18 years and older. Teeth with a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis or irreversible pulpitis. Informed consent provided for data usage.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with systemic conditions that may impair healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression).\n* Teeth with root fractures, resorption, or open apices.\n* Incomplete clinical or radiographic records.\n* Cases with poor-quality radiographs or lack of standardization for evaluation","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},270,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","The present study aims to compare the radiographic success of endodontic treatment using Orstavik's criteria between two sealers: AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and Neosealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Bradenton, Florida, USA), as well as between two obturation techniques: continuous wave and single cone. The study includes 270 patients, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Clinical and radiographic variables will be assessed, including quality of obturation, lesion healing, and restoration. The study seeks to determine if the use of bioceramic sealer is effective regardless of the obturation technique used, highlighting the importance of clinical follow-up to evaluate endodontic treatment success.",[26,27,28,29],"Pulpitis","Periapical Lesions","Periapical Periodontitis","Periapical Pathology",[31,32,33,34],"Endodontics","Endodontic Sealer","Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer","Ah Plus","RECRUITING","2025-06-04",{"date":38,"type":39},"2025-06-13","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":39},"2025-06-01",{"date":43,"type":20},"2029-06-01",{"name":45,"class":46},"University of Siena","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":58,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":62,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":74,"locationsCount":47},"100561199","outcome-of-bone-window-approach-in-endodontic-microsurgery-using-novel-piezoelectric-device-100561199","NCT06587048","Outcome of Bone Window Approach in Endodontic Microsurgery Using Novel Piezoelectric Device","Outcome of Bone Window Approach in Endodontic Microsurgery Using Novel Piezoelectric Device Versus Conventional Rotary Burs in the Treatment of Periapical Lesions - a Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Consenting adults (age range: 18-60 years)\n\n  * Non-contributory medical history (ASA Class I or Class 2)\n  * Participants with symptomatic\u002Fpersistent apical periodontitis showing clinical signs and symptoms and evidence of periapical lesion of strictly endodontic origin with minimum lesion diameter of 5mm on periapical radiography (PR).\n  * Radiographic evidence of an intact buccal cortical plate on cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging with minimum thickness of 1mm.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, hepatic\u002Frenal disease, or systemic bleeding disorders), pregnancy, smoking\n* Patients on anticoagulant\u002F antiplatelet drugs\n* Teeth that were unrestorable, fractured\u002Fperforated teeth,\n* Teeth with endodontic-periodontal communication and\n* Teeth with deep pockets (probing depth \\>4 mm)","60 Years",{"count":57,"type":20},40,[23],"The Bone window technique provides excellent access to the surgical site while preserving cortical bone in cases of tooth with large periapical lesion and an intact cortical plate. Traditionally, rotary burs and a bone chisel were used to create a bone window. Piezoelectric bone surgery, on the other hand, is an innovative technique that uses thin osteotomy instrument to selectively cut hard tissue while preserving soft tissues. To the best of our knowledge, no study comparing the results of a bone lid using a piezoelectric device and a conventional bur is currently available.",[27,61],"Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin",[63,64,65,66],"endondontic microsurgery","piezoelectric device","piezoendodontic surgery","bone window","2024-09-04",{"date":69,"type":39},"2024-09-19",{"date":71,"type":39},"2023-09-01",{"date":73,"type":20},"2025-05-01",{"name":75,"class":46},"Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak"]